lighthouse/eth2/state_processing/src/per_epoch_processing/winning_root.rs
2019-04-17 12:00:23 +10:00

165 lines
4.9 KiB
Rust

use super::get_attestation_participants::get_attestation_participants;
use std::collections::HashSet;
use std::iter::FromIterator;
use types::*;
#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct WinningRoot {
pub crosslink_data_root: Hash256,
pub attesting_validator_indices: Vec<usize>,
pub total_attesting_balance: u64,
}
impl WinningRoot {
/// Returns `true` if `self` is a "better" candidate than `other`.
///
/// A winning root is "better" than another if it has a higher `total_attesting_balance`. Ties
/// are broken by favouring the higher `crosslink_data_root` value.
///
/// Spec v0.5.1
pub fn is_better_than(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
if self.total_attesting_balance > other.total_attesting_balance {
true
} else if self.total_attesting_balance == other.total_attesting_balance {
self.crosslink_data_root > other.crosslink_data_root
} else {
false
}
}
}
/// Returns the `crosslink_data_root` with the highest total attesting balance for the given shard.
/// Breaks ties by favouring the smaller `crosslink_data_root` hash.
///
/// The `WinningRoot` object also contains additional fields that are useful in later stages of
/// per-epoch processing.
///
/// Spec v0.5.1
pub fn winning_root(
state: &BeaconState,
shard: u64,
spec: &ChainSpec,
) -> Result<Option<WinningRoot>, BeaconStateError> {
let mut winning_root: Option<WinningRoot> = None;
let crosslink_data_roots: HashSet<Hash256> = HashSet::from_iter(
state
.previous_epoch_attestations
.iter()
.chain(state.current_epoch_attestations.iter())
.filter_map(|a| {
if is_eligible_for_winning_root(state, a, shard) {
Some(a.data.crosslink_data_root)
} else {
None
}
}),
);
for crosslink_data_root in crosslink_data_roots {
let attesting_validator_indices =
get_attesting_validator_indices(state, shard, &crosslink_data_root, spec)?;
let total_attesting_balance: u64 =
attesting_validator_indices
.iter()
.try_fold(0_u64, |acc, i| {
state
.get_effective_balance(*i, spec)
.and_then(|bal| Ok(acc + bal))
})?;
let candidate = WinningRoot {
crosslink_data_root,
attesting_validator_indices,
total_attesting_balance,
};
if let Some(ref winner) = winning_root {
if candidate.is_better_than(&winner) {
winning_root = Some(candidate);
}
} else {
winning_root = Some(candidate);
}
}
Ok(winning_root)
}
/// Returns `true` if pending attestation `a` is eligible to become a winning root.
///
/// Spec v0.5.1
fn is_eligible_for_winning_root(state: &BeaconState, a: &PendingAttestation, shard: Shard) -> bool {
if shard >= state.latest_crosslinks.len() as u64 {
return false;
}
a.data.previous_crosslink == state.latest_crosslinks[shard as usize]
}
/// Returns all indices which voted for a given crosslink. Does not contain duplicates.
///
/// Spec v0.5.1
fn get_attesting_validator_indices(
state: &BeaconState,
shard: u64,
crosslink_data_root: &Hash256,
spec: &ChainSpec,
) -> Result<Vec<usize>, BeaconStateError> {
let mut indices = vec![];
for a in state
.current_epoch_attestations
.iter()
.chain(state.previous_epoch_attestations.iter())
{
if (a.data.shard == shard) && (a.data.crosslink_data_root == *crosslink_data_root) {
indices.append(&mut get_attestation_participants(
state,
&a.data,
&a.aggregation_bitfield,
spec,
)?);
}
}
// Sort the list (required for dedup). "Unstable" means the sort may re-order equal elements,
// this causes no issue here.
//
// These sort + dedup ops are potentially good CPU time optimisation targets.
indices.sort_unstable();
// Remove all duplicate indices (requires a sorted list).
indices.dedup();
Ok(indices)
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn is_better_than() {
let worse = WinningRoot {
crosslink_data_root: Hash256::from_slice(&[1; 32]),
attesting_validator_indices: vec![],
total_attesting_balance: 42,
};
let better = WinningRoot {
crosslink_data_root: Hash256::from_slice(&[2; 32]),
..worse.clone()
};
assert!(better.is_better_than(&worse));
let better = WinningRoot {
total_attesting_balance: worse.total_attesting_balance + 1,
..worse.clone()
};
assert!(better.is_better_than(&worse));
}
}