616bee6757
## Issue Addressed #4150 ## Proposed Changes Maintain trusted peers in the pruning logic. ~~In principle the changes here are not necessary as a trusted peer has a max score (100) and all other peers can have at most 0 (because we don't implement positive scores). This means that we should never prune trusted peers unless we have more trusted peers than the target peer count.~~ This change shifts this logic to explicitly never prune trusted peers which I expect is the intuitive behaviour. ~~I suspect the issue in #4150 arises when a trusted peer disconnects from us for one reason or another and then we remove that peer from our peerdb as it becomes stale. When it re-connects at some large time later, it is no longer a trusted peer.~~ Currently we do disconnect trusted peers, and this PR corrects this to maintain trusted peers in the pruning logic. As suggested in #4150 we maintain trusted peers in the db and thus we remember them even if they disconnect from us. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| beacon_chain | ||
| builder_client | ||
| client | ||
| eth1 | ||
| execution_layer | ||
| genesis | ||
| http_api | ||
| http_metrics | ||
| lighthouse_network | ||
| network | ||
| operation_pool | ||
| src | ||
| store | ||
| tests | ||
| timer | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||