lighthouse/beacon_node/network/src/sync/peer_sync_info.rs
Paul Hauner be4e261e74 Use async code when interacting with EL (#3244)
## Overview

This rather extensive PR achieves two primary goals:

1. Uses the finalized/justified checkpoints of fork choice (FC), rather than that of the head state.
2. Refactors fork choice, block production and block processing to `async` functions.

Additionally, it achieves:

- Concurrent forkchoice updates to the EL and cache pruning after a new head is selected.
- Concurrent "block packing" (attestations, etc) and execution payload retrieval during block production.
- Concurrent per-block-processing and execution payload verification during block processing.
- The `Arc`-ification of `SignedBeaconBlock` during block processing (it's never mutated, so why not?):
    - I had to do this to deal with sending blocks into spawned tasks.
    - Previously we were cloning the beacon block at least 2 times during each block processing, these clones are either removed or turned into cheaper `Arc` clones.
    - We were also `Box`-ing and un-`Box`-ing beacon blocks as they moved throughout the networking crate. This is not a big deal, but it's nice to avoid shifting things between the stack and heap.
    - Avoids cloning *all the blocks* in *every chain segment* during sync.
    - It also has the potential to clean up our code where we need to pass an *owned* block around so we can send it back in the case of an error (I didn't do much of this, my PR is already big enough 😅)
- The `BeaconChain::HeadSafetyStatus` struct was removed. It was an old relic from prior merge specs.

For motivation for this change, see https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3244#issuecomment-1160963273

## Changes to `canonical_head` and `fork_choice`

Previously, the `BeaconChain` had two separate fields:

```
canonical_head: RwLock<Snapshot>,
fork_choice: RwLock<BeaconForkChoice>
```

Now, we have grouped these values under a single struct:

```
canonical_head: CanonicalHead {
  cached_head: RwLock<Arc<Snapshot>>,
  fork_choice: RwLock<BeaconForkChoice>
} 
```

Apart from ergonomics, the only *actual* change here is wrapping the canonical head snapshot in an `Arc`. This means that we no longer need to hold the `cached_head` (`canonical_head`, in old terms) lock when we want to pull some values from it. This was done to avoid deadlock risks by preventing functions from acquiring (and holding) the `cached_head` and `fork_choice` locks simultaneously.

## Breaking Changes

### The `state` (root) field in the `finalized_checkpoint` SSE event

Consider the scenario where epoch `n` is just finalized, but `start_slot(n)` is skipped. There are two state roots we might in the `finalized_checkpoint` SSE event:

1. The state root of the finalized block, which is `get_block(finalized_checkpoint.root).state_root`.
4. The state root at slot of `start_slot(n)`, which would be the state from (1), but "skipped forward" through any skip slots.

Previously, Lighthouse would choose (2). However, we can see that when [Teku generates that event](de2b2801c8/data/beaconrestapi/src/main/java/tech/pegasys/teku/beaconrestapi/handlers/v1/events/EventSubscriptionManager.java (L171-L182)) it uses [`getStateRootFromBlockRoot`](de2b2801c8/data/provider/src/main/java/tech/pegasys/teku/api/ChainDataProvider.java (L336-L341)) which uses (1).

I have switched Lighthouse from (2) to (1). I think it's a somewhat arbitrary choice between the two, where (1) is easier to compute and is consistent with Teku.

## Notes for Reviewers

I've renamed `BeaconChain::fork_choice` to `BeaconChain::recompute_head`. Doing this helped ensure I broke all previous uses of fork choice and I also find it more descriptive. It describes an action and can't be confused with trying to get a reference to the `ForkChoice` struct.

I've changed the ordering of SSE events when a block is received. It used to be `[block, finalized, head]` and now it's `[block, head, finalized]`. It was easier this way and I don't think we were making any promises about SSE event ordering so it's not "breaking".

I've made it so fork choice will run when it's first constructed. I did this because I wanted to have a cached version of the last call to `get_head`. Ensuring `get_head` has been run *at least once* means that the cached values doesn't need to wrapped in an `Option`. This was fairly simple, it just involved passing a `slot` to the constructor so it knows *when* it's being run. When loading a fork choice from the store and a slot clock isn't handy I've just used the `slot` that was saved in the `fork_choice_store`. That seems like it would be a faithful representation of the slot when we saved it.

I added the `genesis_time: u64` to the `BeaconChain`. It's small, constant and nice to have around.

Since we're using FC for the fin/just checkpoints, we no longer get the `0x00..00` roots at genesis. You can see I had to remove a work-around in `ef-tests` here: b56be3bc2. I can't find any reason why this would be an issue, if anything I think it'll be better since the genesis-alias has caught us out a few times (0x00..00 isn't actually a real root). Edit: I did find a case where the `network` expected the 0x00..00 alias and patched it here: 3f26ac3e2.

You'll notice a lot of changes in tests. Generally, tests should be functionally equivalent. Here are the things creating the most diff-noise in tests:
- Changing tests to be `tokio::async` tests.
- Adding `.await` to fork choice, block processing and block production functions.
- Refactor of the `canonical_head` "API" provided by the `BeaconChain`. E.g., `chain.canonical_head.cached_head()` instead of `chain.canonical_head.read()`.
- Wrapping `SignedBeaconBlock` in an `Arc`.
- In the `beacon_chain/tests/block_verification`, we can't use the `lazy_static` `CHAIN_SEGMENT` variable anymore since it's generated with an async function. We just generate it in each test, not so efficient but hopefully insignificant.

I had to disable `rayon` concurrent tests in the `fork_choice` tests. This is because the use of `rayon` and `block_on` was causing a panic.

Co-authored-by: Mac L <mjladson@pm.me>
2022-07-03 05:36:50 +00:00

88 lines
3.7 KiB
Rust

use super::manager::SLOT_IMPORT_TOLERANCE;
use beacon_chain::{BeaconChain, BeaconChainTypes};
use lighthouse_network::{SyncInfo, SyncStatus as PeerSyncStatus};
use std::cmp::Ordering;
/// The type of peer relative to our current state.
pub enum PeerSyncType {
/// The peer is on our chain and is fully synced with respect to our chain.
FullySynced,
/// The peer has a greater knowledge of the chain than us that warrants a full sync.
Advanced,
/// A peer is behind in the sync and not useful to us for downloading blocks.
Behind,
}
impl PeerSyncType {
pub fn as_sync_status(&self, info: &SyncInfo) -> PeerSyncStatus {
match self {
PeerSyncType::FullySynced => PeerSyncStatus::Synced { info: info.clone() },
PeerSyncType::Behind => PeerSyncStatus::Behind { info: info.clone() },
PeerSyncType::Advanced => PeerSyncStatus::Advanced { info: info.clone() },
}
}
}
pub fn remote_sync_type<T: BeaconChainTypes>(
local: &SyncInfo,
remote: &SyncInfo,
chain: &BeaconChain<T>,
) -> PeerSyncType {
// auxiliary variables for clarity: Inclusive boundaries of the range in which we consider a peer's
// head "near" ours.
let near_range_start = local.head_slot - SLOT_IMPORT_TOLERANCE as u64;
let near_range_end = local.head_slot + SLOT_IMPORT_TOLERANCE as u64;
match remote.finalized_epoch.cmp(&local.finalized_epoch) {
Ordering::Less => {
// The node has a lower finalized epoch, their chain is not useful to us. There are two
// cases where a node can have a lower finalized epoch:
//
// ## The node is on the same chain
//
// If a node is on the same chain but has a lower finalized epoch, their head must be
// lower than ours. Therefore, we have nothing to request from them.
//
// ## The node is on a fork
//
// If a node is on a fork that has a lower finalized epoch, switching to that fork would
// cause us to revert a finalized block. This is not permitted, therefore we have no
// interest in their blocks.
//
// We keep these peers to allow them to sync from us.
PeerSyncType::Behind
}
Ordering::Equal => {
// NOTE: if a peer has our same `finalized_epoch` with a different `finalized_root`
// they are not considered relevant and won't be propagated to sync.
// Check if the peer is the peer is inside the tolerance range to be considered synced.
if remote.head_slot < near_range_start {
PeerSyncType::Behind
} else if remote.head_slot > near_range_end
&& !chain.block_is_known_to_fork_choice(&remote.head_root)
{
// This peer has a head ahead enough of ours and we have no knowledge of their best
// block.
PeerSyncType::Advanced
} else {
// This peer is either in the tolerance range, or ahead us with an already rejected
// block.
PeerSyncType::FullySynced
}
}
Ordering::Greater => {
if (local.finalized_epoch + 1 == remote.finalized_epoch
&& near_range_start <= remote.head_slot
&& remote.head_slot <= near_range_end)
|| chain.block_is_known_to_fork_choice(&remote.head_root)
{
// This peer is near enough to us to be considered synced, or
// we have already synced up to this peer's head
PeerSyncType::FullySynced
} else {
PeerSyncType::Advanced
}
}
}
}