cae40731a2
## Issue Addressed Add a flag that can increase count unrealized strictness, defaults to false ## Proposed Changes Please list or describe the changes introduced by this PR. ## Additional Info Please provide any additional information. For example, future considerations or information useful for reviewers. Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: sean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
1289 lines
44 KiB
Rust
1289 lines
44 KiB
Rust
use crate::error::Error;
|
|
use crate::proto_array::CountUnrealizedFull;
|
|
use crate::proto_array::{
|
|
calculate_proposer_boost, InvalidationOperation, Iter, ProposerBoost, ProtoArray, ProtoNode,
|
|
};
|
|
use crate::ssz_container::SszContainer;
|
|
use serde_derive::{Deserialize, Serialize};
|
|
use ssz::{Decode, Encode};
|
|
use ssz_derive::{Decode, Encode};
|
|
use std::collections::{BTreeSet, HashMap};
|
|
use types::{
|
|
AttestationShufflingId, ChainSpec, Checkpoint, Epoch, EthSpec, ExecutionBlockHash, Hash256,
|
|
Slot,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
pub const DEFAULT_PRUNE_THRESHOLD: usize = 256;
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Default, PartialEq, Clone, Encode, Decode)]
|
|
pub struct VoteTracker {
|
|
current_root: Hash256,
|
|
next_root: Hash256,
|
|
next_epoch: Epoch,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Represents the verification status of an execution payload.
|
|
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, PartialEq, Encode, Decode, Serialize, Deserialize)]
|
|
#[ssz(enum_behaviour = "union")]
|
|
pub enum ExecutionStatus {
|
|
/// An EL has determined that the payload is valid.
|
|
Valid(ExecutionBlockHash),
|
|
/// An EL has determined that the payload is invalid.
|
|
Invalid(ExecutionBlockHash),
|
|
/// An EL has not yet verified the execution payload.
|
|
Optimistic(ExecutionBlockHash),
|
|
/// The block is either prior to the merge fork, or after the merge fork but before the terminal
|
|
/// PoW block has been found.
|
|
///
|
|
/// # Note:
|
|
///
|
|
/// This `bool` only exists to satisfy our SSZ implementation which requires all variants
|
|
/// to have a value. It can be set to anything.
|
|
Irrelevant(bool),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl ExecutionStatus {
|
|
pub fn is_execution_enabled(&self) -> bool {
|
|
!matches!(self, ExecutionStatus::Irrelevant(_))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn irrelevant() -> Self {
|
|
ExecutionStatus::Irrelevant(false)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn block_hash(&self) -> Option<ExecutionBlockHash> {
|
|
match self {
|
|
ExecutionStatus::Valid(hash)
|
|
| ExecutionStatus::Invalid(hash)
|
|
| ExecutionStatus::Optimistic(hash) => Some(*hash),
|
|
ExecutionStatus::Irrelevant(_) => None,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Returns `true` if the block:
|
|
///
|
|
/// - Has a valid payload, OR
|
|
/// - Does not have execution enabled.
|
|
///
|
|
/// Whenever this function returns `true`, the block is *fully valid*.
|
|
pub fn is_valid_or_irrelevant(&self) -> bool {
|
|
matches!(
|
|
self,
|
|
ExecutionStatus::Valid(_) | ExecutionStatus::Irrelevant(_)
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Returns `true` if the block:
|
|
///
|
|
/// - Has execution enabled, AND
|
|
/// - Has a valid payload
|
|
///
|
|
/// This function will return `false` for any block from a slot prior to the Bellatrix fork.
|
|
/// This means that some blocks that are perfectly valid will still receive a `false` response.
|
|
/// See `Self::is_valid_or_irrelevant` for a function that will always return `true` given any
|
|
/// perfectly valid block.
|
|
pub fn is_valid_and_post_bellatrix(&self) -> bool {
|
|
matches!(self, ExecutionStatus::Valid(_))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Returns `true` if the block:
|
|
///
|
|
/// - Has execution enabled, AND
|
|
/// - Has a payload that has not yet been verified by an EL.
|
|
pub fn is_strictly_optimistic(&self) -> bool {
|
|
matches!(self, ExecutionStatus::Optimistic(_))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Returns `true` if the block:
|
|
///
|
|
/// - Has execution enabled, AND
|
|
/// - Has a payload that has not yet been verified by an EL, OR.
|
|
/// - Has a payload that has been deemed invalid by an EL.
|
|
pub fn is_optimistic_or_invalid(&self) -> bool {
|
|
matches!(
|
|
self,
|
|
ExecutionStatus::Optimistic(_) | ExecutionStatus::Invalid(_)
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Returns `true` if the block:
|
|
///
|
|
/// - Has execution enabled, AND
|
|
/// - Has an invalid payload.
|
|
pub fn is_invalid(&self) -> bool {
|
|
matches!(self, ExecutionStatus::Invalid(_))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Returns `true` if the block:
|
|
///
|
|
/// - Does not have execution enabled (before or after Bellatrix fork)
|
|
pub fn is_irrelevant(&self) -> bool {
|
|
matches!(self, ExecutionStatus::Irrelevant(_))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// A block that is to be applied to the fork choice.
|
|
///
|
|
/// A simplified version of `types::BeaconBlock`.
|
|
#[derive(Clone, Debug, PartialEq)]
|
|
pub struct Block {
|
|
pub slot: Slot,
|
|
pub root: Hash256,
|
|
pub parent_root: Option<Hash256>,
|
|
pub state_root: Hash256,
|
|
pub target_root: Hash256,
|
|
pub current_epoch_shuffling_id: AttestationShufflingId,
|
|
pub next_epoch_shuffling_id: AttestationShufflingId,
|
|
pub justified_checkpoint: Checkpoint,
|
|
pub finalized_checkpoint: Checkpoint,
|
|
/// Indicates if an execution node has marked this block as valid. Also contains the execution
|
|
/// block hash.
|
|
pub execution_status: ExecutionStatus,
|
|
pub unrealized_justified_checkpoint: Option<Checkpoint>,
|
|
pub unrealized_finalized_checkpoint: Option<Checkpoint>,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// A Vec-wrapper which will grow to match any request.
|
|
///
|
|
/// E.g., a `get` or `insert` to an out-of-bounds element will cause the Vec to grow (using
|
|
/// Default) to the smallest size required to fulfill the request.
|
|
#[derive(Default, Clone, Debug, PartialEq)]
|
|
pub struct ElasticList<T>(pub Vec<T>);
|
|
|
|
impl<T> ElasticList<T>
|
|
where
|
|
T: Default,
|
|
{
|
|
fn ensure(&mut self, i: usize) {
|
|
if self.0.len() <= i {
|
|
self.0.resize_with(i + 1, Default::default);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn get_mut(&mut self, i: usize) -> &mut T {
|
|
self.ensure(i);
|
|
&mut self.0[i]
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn iter_mut(&mut self) -> impl Iterator<Item = &mut T> {
|
|
self.0.iter_mut()
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[derive(PartialEq)]
|
|
pub struct ProtoArrayForkChoice {
|
|
pub(crate) proto_array: ProtoArray,
|
|
pub(crate) votes: ElasticList<VoteTracker>,
|
|
pub(crate) balances: Vec<u64>,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl ProtoArrayForkChoice {
|
|
#[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
|
|
pub fn new<E: EthSpec>(
|
|
finalized_block_slot: Slot,
|
|
finalized_block_state_root: Hash256,
|
|
justified_checkpoint: Checkpoint,
|
|
finalized_checkpoint: Checkpoint,
|
|
current_epoch_shuffling_id: AttestationShufflingId,
|
|
next_epoch_shuffling_id: AttestationShufflingId,
|
|
execution_status: ExecutionStatus,
|
|
count_unrealized_full: CountUnrealizedFull,
|
|
) -> Result<Self, String> {
|
|
let mut proto_array = ProtoArray {
|
|
prune_threshold: DEFAULT_PRUNE_THRESHOLD,
|
|
justified_checkpoint,
|
|
finalized_checkpoint,
|
|
nodes: Vec::with_capacity(1),
|
|
indices: HashMap::with_capacity(1),
|
|
previous_proposer_boost: ProposerBoost::default(),
|
|
count_unrealized_full,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
let block = Block {
|
|
slot: finalized_block_slot,
|
|
root: finalized_checkpoint.root,
|
|
parent_root: None,
|
|
state_root: finalized_block_state_root,
|
|
// We are using the finalized_root as the target_root, since it always lies on an
|
|
// epoch boundary.
|
|
target_root: finalized_checkpoint.root,
|
|
current_epoch_shuffling_id,
|
|
next_epoch_shuffling_id,
|
|
justified_checkpoint,
|
|
finalized_checkpoint,
|
|
execution_status,
|
|
unrealized_justified_checkpoint: Some(justified_checkpoint),
|
|
unrealized_finalized_checkpoint: Some(finalized_checkpoint),
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
proto_array
|
|
.on_block::<E>(block, finalized_block_slot)
|
|
.map_err(|e| format!("Failed to add finalized block to proto_array: {:?}", e))?;
|
|
|
|
Ok(Self {
|
|
proto_array,
|
|
votes: ElasticList::default(),
|
|
balances: vec![],
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// See `ProtoArray::propagate_execution_payload_validation` for documentation.
|
|
pub fn process_execution_payload_validation(
|
|
&mut self,
|
|
block_root: Hash256,
|
|
) -> Result<(), String> {
|
|
self.proto_array
|
|
.propagate_execution_payload_validation(block_root)
|
|
.map_err(|e| format!("Failed to process valid payload: {:?}", e))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// See `ProtoArray::propagate_execution_payload_invalidation` for documentation.
|
|
pub fn process_execution_payload_invalidation(
|
|
&mut self,
|
|
op: &InvalidationOperation,
|
|
) -> Result<(), String> {
|
|
self.proto_array
|
|
.propagate_execution_payload_invalidation(op)
|
|
.map_err(|e| format!("Failed to process invalid payload: {:?}", e))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn process_attestation(
|
|
&mut self,
|
|
validator_index: usize,
|
|
block_root: Hash256,
|
|
target_epoch: Epoch,
|
|
) -> Result<(), String> {
|
|
let vote = self.votes.get_mut(validator_index);
|
|
|
|
if target_epoch > vote.next_epoch || *vote == VoteTracker::default() {
|
|
vote.next_root = block_root;
|
|
vote.next_epoch = target_epoch;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn process_block<E: EthSpec>(
|
|
&mut self,
|
|
block: Block,
|
|
current_slot: Slot,
|
|
) -> Result<(), String> {
|
|
if block.parent_root.is_none() {
|
|
return Err("Missing parent root".to_string());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
self.proto_array
|
|
.on_block::<E>(block, current_slot)
|
|
.map_err(|e| format!("process_block_error: {:?}", e))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
|
|
pub fn find_head<E: EthSpec>(
|
|
&mut self,
|
|
justified_checkpoint: Checkpoint,
|
|
finalized_checkpoint: Checkpoint,
|
|
justified_state_balances: &[u64],
|
|
proposer_boost_root: Hash256,
|
|
equivocating_indices: &BTreeSet<u64>,
|
|
current_slot: Slot,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<Hash256, String> {
|
|
let old_balances = &mut self.balances;
|
|
|
|
let new_balances = justified_state_balances;
|
|
|
|
let deltas = compute_deltas(
|
|
&self.proto_array.indices,
|
|
&mut self.votes,
|
|
old_balances,
|
|
new_balances,
|
|
equivocating_indices,
|
|
)
|
|
.map_err(|e| format!("find_head compute_deltas failed: {:?}", e))?;
|
|
|
|
self.proto_array
|
|
.apply_score_changes::<E>(
|
|
deltas,
|
|
justified_checkpoint,
|
|
finalized_checkpoint,
|
|
new_balances,
|
|
proposer_boost_root,
|
|
current_slot,
|
|
spec,
|
|
)
|
|
.map_err(|e| format!("find_head apply_score_changes failed: {:?}", e))?;
|
|
|
|
*old_balances = new_balances.to_vec();
|
|
|
|
self.proto_array
|
|
.find_head::<E>(&justified_checkpoint.root, current_slot)
|
|
.map_err(|e| format!("find_head failed: {:?}", e))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Returns `true` if there are any blocks in `self` with an `INVALID` execution payload status.
|
|
///
|
|
/// This will operate on *all* blocks, even those that do not descend from the finalized
|
|
/// ancestor.
|
|
pub fn contains_invalid_payloads(&mut self) -> bool {
|
|
self.proto_array
|
|
.nodes
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.any(|node| node.execution_status.is_invalid())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// For all nodes, regardless of their relationship to the finalized block, set their execution
|
|
/// status to be optimistic.
|
|
///
|
|
/// In practice this means forgetting any `VALID` or `INVALID` statuses.
|
|
pub fn set_all_blocks_to_optimistic<E: EthSpec>(
|
|
&mut self,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), String> {
|
|
// Iterate backwards through all nodes in the `proto_array`. Whilst it's not strictly
|
|
// required to do this process in reverse, it seems natural when we consider how LMD votes
|
|
// are counted.
|
|
//
|
|
// This function will touch all blocks, even those that do not descend from the finalized
|
|
// block. Since this function is expected to run at start-up during very rare
|
|
// circumstances we prefer simplicity over efficiency.
|
|
for node_index in (0..self.proto_array.nodes.len()).rev() {
|
|
let node = self
|
|
.proto_array
|
|
.nodes
|
|
.get_mut(node_index)
|
|
.ok_or("unreachable index out of bounds in proto_array nodes")?;
|
|
|
|
match node.execution_status {
|
|
ExecutionStatus::Invalid(block_hash) => {
|
|
node.execution_status = ExecutionStatus::Optimistic(block_hash);
|
|
|
|
// Restore the weight of the node, it would have been set to `0` in
|
|
// `apply_score_changes` when it was invalidated.
|
|
let mut restored_weight: u64 = self
|
|
.votes
|
|
.0
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.enumerate()
|
|
.filter_map(|(validator_index, vote)| {
|
|
if vote.current_root == node.root {
|
|
// Any voting validator that does not have a balance should be
|
|
// ignored. This is consistent with `compute_deltas`.
|
|
self.balances.get(validator_index)
|
|
} else {
|
|
None
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
.sum();
|
|
|
|
// If the invalid root was boosted, apply the weight to it and
|
|
// ancestors.
|
|
if let Some(proposer_score_boost) = spec.proposer_score_boost {
|
|
if self.proto_array.previous_proposer_boost.root == node.root {
|
|
// Compute the score based upon the current balances. We can't rely on
|
|
// the `previous_proposr_boost.score` since it is set to zero with an
|
|
// invalid node.
|
|
let proposer_score =
|
|
calculate_proposer_boost::<E>(&self.balances, proposer_score_boost)
|
|
.ok_or("Failed to compute proposer boost")?;
|
|
// Store the score we've applied here so it can be removed in
|
|
// a later call to `apply_score_changes`.
|
|
self.proto_array.previous_proposer_boost.score = proposer_score;
|
|
// Apply this boost to this node.
|
|
restored_weight = restored_weight
|
|
.checked_add(proposer_score)
|
|
.ok_or("Overflow when adding boost to weight")?;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Add the restored weight to the node and all ancestors.
|
|
if restored_weight > 0 {
|
|
let mut node_or_ancestor = node;
|
|
loop {
|
|
node_or_ancestor.weight = node_or_ancestor
|
|
.weight
|
|
.checked_add(restored_weight)
|
|
.ok_or("Overflow when adding weight to ancestor")?;
|
|
|
|
if let Some(parent_index) = node_or_ancestor.parent {
|
|
node_or_ancestor = self
|
|
.proto_array
|
|
.nodes
|
|
.get_mut(parent_index)
|
|
.ok_or(format!("Missing parent index: {}", parent_index))?;
|
|
} else {
|
|
// This is either the finalized block or a block that does not
|
|
// descend from the finalized block.
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
// There are no balance changes required if the node was either valid or
|
|
// optimistic.
|
|
ExecutionStatus::Valid(block_hash) | ExecutionStatus::Optimistic(block_hash) => {
|
|
node.execution_status = ExecutionStatus::Optimistic(block_hash)
|
|
}
|
|
// An irrelevant node cannot become optimistic, this is a no-op.
|
|
ExecutionStatus::Irrelevant(_) => (),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn maybe_prune(&mut self, finalized_root: Hash256) -> Result<(), String> {
|
|
self.proto_array
|
|
.maybe_prune(finalized_root)
|
|
.map_err(|e| format!("find_head maybe_prune failed: {:?}", e))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn set_prune_threshold(&mut self, prune_threshold: usize) {
|
|
self.proto_array.prune_threshold = prune_threshold;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn len(&self) -> usize {
|
|
self.proto_array.nodes.len()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn is_empty(&self) -> bool {
|
|
self.proto_array.nodes.is_empty()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn contains_block(&self, block_root: &Hash256) -> bool {
|
|
self.proto_array.indices.contains_key(block_root)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn get_proto_node(&self, block_root: &Hash256) -> Option<&ProtoNode> {
|
|
let block_index = self.proto_array.indices.get(block_root)?;
|
|
self.proto_array.nodes.get(*block_index)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn get_block(&self, block_root: &Hash256) -> Option<Block> {
|
|
let block = self.get_proto_node(block_root)?;
|
|
let parent_root = block
|
|
.parent
|
|
.and_then(|i| self.proto_array.nodes.get(i))
|
|
.map(|parent| parent.root);
|
|
|
|
// If a node does not have a `finalized_checkpoint` or `justified_checkpoint` populated,
|
|
// it means it is not a descendant of the finalized checkpoint, so it is valid to return
|
|
// `None` here.
|
|
if let (Some(justified_checkpoint), Some(finalized_checkpoint)) =
|
|
(block.justified_checkpoint, block.finalized_checkpoint)
|
|
{
|
|
Some(Block {
|
|
slot: block.slot,
|
|
root: block.root,
|
|
parent_root,
|
|
state_root: block.state_root,
|
|
target_root: block.target_root,
|
|
current_epoch_shuffling_id: block.current_epoch_shuffling_id.clone(),
|
|
next_epoch_shuffling_id: block.next_epoch_shuffling_id.clone(),
|
|
justified_checkpoint,
|
|
finalized_checkpoint,
|
|
execution_status: block.execution_status,
|
|
unrealized_justified_checkpoint: block.unrealized_justified_checkpoint,
|
|
unrealized_finalized_checkpoint: block.unrealized_finalized_checkpoint,
|
|
})
|
|
} else {
|
|
None
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Returns the `block.execution_status` field, if the block is present.
|
|
pub fn get_block_execution_status(&self, block_root: &Hash256) -> Option<ExecutionStatus> {
|
|
let block = self.get_proto_node(block_root)?;
|
|
Some(block.execution_status)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Returns the weight of a given block.
|
|
pub fn get_weight(&self, block_root: &Hash256) -> Option<u64> {
|
|
let block_index = self.proto_array.indices.get(block_root)?;
|
|
self.proto_array
|
|
.nodes
|
|
.get(*block_index)
|
|
.map(|node| node.weight)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// See `ProtoArray` documentation.
|
|
pub fn is_descendant(&self, ancestor_root: Hash256, descendant_root: Hash256) -> bool {
|
|
self.proto_array
|
|
.is_descendant(ancestor_root, descendant_root)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn latest_message(&self, validator_index: usize) -> Option<(Hash256, Epoch)> {
|
|
if validator_index < self.votes.0.len() {
|
|
let vote = &self.votes.0[validator_index];
|
|
|
|
if *vote == VoteTracker::default() {
|
|
None
|
|
} else {
|
|
Some((vote.next_root, vote.next_epoch))
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
None
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// See `ProtoArray::iter_nodes`
|
|
pub fn iter_nodes<'a>(&'a self, block_root: &Hash256) -> Iter<'a> {
|
|
self.proto_array.iter_nodes(block_root)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn as_bytes(&self) -> Vec<u8> {
|
|
SszContainer::from(self).as_ssz_bytes()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn from_bytes(
|
|
bytes: &[u8],
|
|
count_unrealized_full: CountUnrealizedFull,
|
|
) -> Result<Self, String> {
|
|
SszContainer::from_ssz_bytes(bytes)
|
|
.map(|container| (container, count_unrealized_full))
|
|
.map(Into::into)
|
|
.map_err(|e| format!("Failed to decode ProtoArrayForkChoice: {:?}", e))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Returns a read-lock to core `ProtoArray` struct.
|
|
///
|
|
/// Should only be used when encoding/decoding during troubleshooting.
|
|
pub fn core_proto_array(&self) -> &ProtoArray {
|
|
&self.proto_array
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Returns a mutable reference to the core `ProtoArray` struct.
|
|
///
|
|
/// Should only be used during database schema migrations.
|
|
pub fn core_proto_array_mut(&mut self) -> &mut ProtoArray {
|
|
&mut self.proto_array
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Returns a list of `deltas`, where there is one delta for each of the indices in
|
|
/// `0..indices.len()`.
|
|
///
|
|
/// The deltas are formed by a change between `old_balances` and `new_balances`, and/or a change of vote in `votes`.
|
|
///
|
|
/// ## Errors
|
|
///
|
|
/// - If a value in `indices` is greater to or equal to `indices.len()`.
|
|
/// - If some `Hash256` in `votes` is not a key in `indices` (except for `Hash256::zero()`, this is
|
|
/// always valid).
|
|
fn compute_deltas(
|
|
indices: &HashMap<Hash256, usize>,
|
|
votes: &mut ElasticList<VoteTracker>,
|
|
old_balances: &[u64],
|
|
new_balances: &[u64],
|
|
equivocating_indices: &BTreeSet<u64>,
|
|
) -> Result<Vec<i64>, Error> {
|
|
let mut deltas = vec![0_i64; indices.len()];
|
|
|
|
for (val_index, vote) in votes.iter_mut().enumerate() {
|
|
// There is no need to create a score change if the validator has never voted or both their
|
|
// votes are for the zero hash (alias to the genesis block).
|
|
if vote.current_root == Hash256::zero() && vote.next_root == Hash256::zero() {
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Handle newly slashed validators by deducting their weight from their current vote. We
|
|
// determine if they are newly slashed by checking whether their `vote.current_root` is
|
|
// non-zero. After applying the deduction a single time we set their `current_root` to zero
|
|
// and never update it again (thus preventing repeat deductions).
|
|
//
|
|
// Even if they make new attestations which are processed by `process_attestation` these
|
|
// will only update their `vote.next_root`.
|
|
if equivocating_indices.contains(&(val_index as u64)) {
|
|
// First time we've processed this slashing in fork choice:
|
|
//
|
|
// 1. Add a negative delta for their `current_root`.
|
|
// 2. Set their `current_root` (permanently) to zero.
|
|
if !vote.current_root.is_zero() {
|
|
let old_balance = old_balances.get(val_index).copied().unwrap_or(0);
|
|
|
|
if let Some(current_delta_index) = indices.get(&vote.current_root).copied() {
|
|
let delta = deltas
|
|
.get(current_delta_index)
|
|
.ok_or(Error::InvalidNodeDelta(current_delta_index))?
|
|
.checked_sub(old_balance as i64)
|
|
.ok_or(Error::DeltaOverflow(current_delta_index))?;
|
|
|
|
// Array access safe due to check on previous line.
|
|
deltas[current_delta_index] = delta;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
vote.current_root = Hash256::zero();
|
|
}
|
|
// We've handled this slashed validator, continue without applying an ordinary delta.
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If the validator was not included in the _old_ balances (i.e., it did not exist yet)
|
|
// then say its balance was zero.
|
|
let old_balance = old_balances.get(val_index).copied().unwrap_or(0);
|
|
|
|
// If the validators vote is not known in the _new_ balances, then use a balance of zero.
|
|
//
|
|
// It is possible that there is a vote for an unknown validator if we change our justified
|
|
// state to a new state with a higher epoch that is on a different fork because that fork may have
|
|
// on-boarded less validators than the prior fork.
|
|
let new_balance = new_balances.get(val_index).copied().unwrap_or(0);
|
|
|
|
if vote.current_root != vote.next_root || old_balance != new_balance {
|
|
// We ignore the vote if it is not known in `indices`. We assume that it is outside
|
|
// of our tree (i.e., pre-finalization) and therefore not interesting.
|
|
if let Some(current_delta_index) = indices.get(&vote.current_root).copied() {
|
|
let delta = deltas
|
|
.get(current_delta_index)
|
|
.ok_or(Error::InvalidNodeDelta(current_delta_index))?
|
|
.checked_sub(old_balance as i64)
|
|
.ok_or(Error::DeltaOverflow(current_delta_index))?;
|
|
|
|
// Array access safe due to check on previous line.
|
|
deltas[current_delta_index] = delta;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We ignore the vote if it is not known in `indices`. We assume that it is outside
|
|
// of our tree (i.e., pre-finalization) and therefore not interesting.
|
|
if let Some(next_delta_index) = indices.get(&vote.next_root).copied() {
|
|
let delta = deltas
|
|
.get(next_delta_index)
|
|
.ok_or(Error::InvalidNodeDelta(next_delta_index))?
|
|
.checked_add(new_balance as i64)
|
|
.ok_or(Error::DeltaOverflow(next_delta_index))?;
|
|
|
|
// Array access safe due to check on previous line.
|
|
deltas[next_delta_index] = delta;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
vote.current_root = vote.next_root;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Ok(deltas)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[cfg(test)]
|
|
mod test_compute_deltas {
|
|
use super::*;
|
|
use types::MainnetEthSpec;
|
|
|
|
/// Gives a hash that is not the zero hash (unless i is `usize::max_value)`.
|
|
fn hash_from_index(i: usize) -> Hash256 {
|
|
Hash256::from_low_u64_be(i as u64 + 1)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn finalized_descendant() {
|
|
let genesis_slot = Slot::new(0);
|
|
let genesis_epoch = Epoch::new(0);
|
|
|
|
let state_root = Hash256::from_low_u64_be(0);
|
|
let finalized_root = Hash256::from_low_u64_be(1);
|
|
let finalized_desc = Hash256::from_low_u64_be(2);
|
|
let not_finalized_desc = Hash256::from_low_u64_be(3);
|
|
let unknown = Hash256::from_low_u64_be(4);
|
|
let junk_shuffling_id =
|
|
AttestationShufflingId::from_components(Epoch::new(0), Hash256::zero());
|
|
let execution_status = ExecutionStatus::irrelevant();
|
|
|
|
let genesis_checkpoint = Checkpoint {
|
|
epoch: genesis_epoch,
|
|
root: finalized_root,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
let mut fc = ProtoArrayForkChoice::new::<MainnetEthSpec>(
|
|
genesis_slot,
|
|
state_root,
|
|
genesis_checkpoint,
|
|
genesis_checkpoint,
|
|
junk_shuffling_id.clone(),
|
|
junk_shuffling_id.clone(),
|
|
execution_status,
|
|
CountUnrealizedFull::default(),
|
|
)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// Add block that is a finalized descendant.
|
|
fc.proto_array
|
|
.on_block::<MainnetEthSpec>(
|
|
Block {
|
|
slot: genesis_slot + 1,
|
|
root: finalized_desc,
|
|
parent_root: Some(finalized_root),
|
|
state_root,
|
|
target_root: finalized_root,
|
|
current_epoch_shuffling_id: junk_shuffling_id.clone(),
|
|
next_epoch_shuffling_id: junk_shuffling_id.clone(),
|
|
justified_checkpoint: genesis_checkpoint,
|
|
finalized_checkpoint: genesis_checkpoint,
|
|
execution_status,
|
|
unrealized_justified_checkpoint: Some(genesis_checkpoint),
|
|
unrealized_finalized_checkpoint: Some(genesis_checkpoint),
|
|
},
|
|
genesis_slot + 1,
|
|
)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// Add block that is *not* a finalized descendant.
|
|
fc.proto_array
|
|
.on_block::<MainnetEthSpec>(
|
|
Block {
|
|
slot: genesis_slot + 1,
|
|
root: not_finalized_desc,
|
|
parent_root: None,
|
|
state_root,
|
|
target_root: finalized_root,
|
|
current_epoch_shuffling_id: junk_shuffling_id.clone(),
|
|
next_epoch_shuffling_id: junk_shuffling_id,
|
|
justified_checkpoint: genesis_checkpoint,
|
|
finalized_checkpoint: genesis_checkpoint,
|
|
execution_status,
|
|
unrealized_justified_checkpoint: None,
|
|
unrealized_finalized_checkpoint: None,
|
|
},
|
|
genesis_slot + 1,
|
|
)
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert!(!fc.is_descendant(unknown, unknown));
|
|
assert!(!fc.is_descendant(unknown, finalized_root));
|
|
assert!(!fc.is_descendant(unknown, finalized_desc));
|
|
assert!(!fc.is_descendant(unknown, not_finalized_desc));
|
|
|
|
assert!(fc.is_descendant(finalized_root, finalized_root));
|
|
assert!(fc.is_descendant(finalized_root, finalized_desc));
|
|
assert!(!fc.is_descendant(finalized_root, not_finalized_desc));
|
|
assert!(!fc.is_descendant(finalized_root, unknown));
|
|
|
|
assert!(!fc.is_descendant(finalized_desc, not_finalized_desc));
|
|
assert!(fc.is_descendant(finalized_desc, finalized_desc));
|
|
assert!(!fc.is_descendant(finalized_desc, finalized_root));
|
|
assert!(!fc.is_descendant(finalized_desc, unknown));
|
|
|
|
assert!(fc.is_descendant(not_finalized_desc, not_finalized_desc));
|
|
assert!(!fc.is_descendant(not_finalized_desc, finalized_desc));
|
|
assert!(!fc.is_descendant(not_finalized_desc, finalized_root));
|
|
assert!(!fc.is_descendant(not_finalized_desc, unknown));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn zero_hash() {
|
|
let validator_count: usize = 16;
|
|
|
|
let mut indices = HashMap::new();
|
|
let mut votes = ElasticList::default();
|
|
let mut old_balances = vec![];
|
|
let mut new_balances = vec![];
|
|
let equivocating_indices = BTreeSet::new();
|
|
|
|
for i in 0..validator_count {
|
|
indices.insert(hash_from_index(i), i);
|
|
votes.0.push(VoteTracker {
|
|
current_root: Hash256::zero(),
|
|
next_root: Hash256::zero(),
|
|
next_epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
|
});
|
|
old_balances.push(0);
|
|
new_balances.push(0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let deltas = compute_deltas(
|
|
&indices,
|
|
&mut votes,
|
|
&old_balances,
|
|
&new_balances,
|
|
&equivocating_indices,
|
|
)
|
|
.expect("should compute deltas");
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
deltas.len(),
|
|
validator_count,
|
|
"deltas should have expected length"
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
deltas,
|
|
vec![0; validator_count],
|
|
"deltas should all be zero"
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
for vote in votes.0 {
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
vote.current_root, vote.next_root,
|
|
"the vote shoulds should have been updated"
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn all_voted_the_same() {
|
|
const BALANCE: u64 = 42;
|
|
|
|
let validator_count: usize = 16;
|
|
|
|
let mut indices = HashMap::new();
|
|
let mut votes = ElasticList::default();
|
|
let mut old_balances = vec![];
|
|
let mut new_balances = vec![];
|
|
let equivocating_indices = BTreeSet::new();
|
|
|
|
for i in 0..validator_count {
|
|
indices.insert(hash_from_index(i), i);
|
|
votes.0.push(VoteTracker {
|
|
current_root: Hash256::zero(),
|
|
next_root: hash_from_index(0),
|
|
next_epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
|
});
|
|
old_balances.push(BALANCE);
|
|
new_balances.push(BALANCE);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let deltas = compute_deltas(
|
|
&indices,
|
|
&mut votes,
|
|
&old_balances,
|
|
&new_balances,
|
|
&equivocating_indices,
|
|
)
|
|
.expect("should compute deltas");
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
deltas.len(),
|
|
validator_count,
|
|
"deltas should have expected length"
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
for (i, delta) in deltas.into_iter().enumerate() {
|
|
if i == 0 {
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
delta,
|
|
BALANCE as i64 * validator_count as i64,
|
|
"zero'th root should have a delta"
|
|
);
|
|
} else {
|
|
assert_eq!(delta, 0, "all other deltas should be zero");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for vote in votes.0 {
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
vote.current_root, vote.next_root,
|
|
"the vote shoulds should have been updated"
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn different_votes() {
|
|
const BALANCE: u64 = 42;
|
|
|
|
let validator_count: usize = 16;
|
|
|
|
let mut indices = HashMap::new();
|
|
let mut votes = ElasticList::default();
|
|
let mut old_balances = vec![];
|
|
let mut new_balances = vec![];
|
|
let equivocating_indices = BTreeSet::new();
|
|
|
|
for i in 0..validator_count {
|
|
indices.insert(hash_from_index(i), i);
|
|
votes.0.push(VoteTracker {
|
|
current_root: Hash256::zero(),
|
|
next_root: hash_from_index(i),
|
|
next_epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
|
});
|
|
old_balances.push(BALANCE);
|
|
new_balances.push(BALANCE);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let deltas = compute_deltas(
|
|
&indices,
|
|
&mut votes,
|
|
&old_balances,
|
|
&new_balances,
|
|
&equivocating_indices,
|
|
)
|
|
.expect("should compute deltas");
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
deltas.len(),
|
|
validator_count,
|
|
"deltas should have expected length"
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
for delta in deltas.into_iter() {
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
delta, BALANCE as i64,
|
|
"each root should have the same delta"
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for vote in votes.0 {
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
vote.current_root, vote.next_root,
|
|
"the vote shoulds should have been updated"
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn moving_votes() {
|
|
const BALANCE: u64 = 42;
|
|
|
|
let validator_count: usize = 16;
|
|
|
|
let mut indices = HashMap::new();
|
|
let mut votes = ElasticList::default();
|
|
let mut old_balances = vec![];
|
|
let mut new_balances = vec![];
|
|
let equivocating_indices = BTreeSet::new();
|
|
|
|
for i in 0..validator_count {
|
|
indices.insert(hash_from_index(i), i);
|
|
votes.0.push(VoteTracker {
|
|
current_root: hash_from_index(0),
|
|
next_root: hash_from_index(1),
|
|
next_epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
|
});
|
|
old_balances.push(BALANCE);
|
|
new_balances.push(BALANCE);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let deltas = compute_deltas(
|
|
&indices,
|
|
&mut votes,
|
|
&old_balances,
|
|
&new_balances,
|
|
&equivocating_indices,
|
|
)
|
|
.expect("should compute deltas");
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
deltas.len(),
|
|
validator_count,
|
|
"deltas should have expected length"
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let total_delta = BALANCE as i64 * validator_count as i64;
|
|
|
|
for (i, delta) in deltas.into_iter().enumerate() {
|
|
if i == 0 {
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
delta,
|
|
0 - total_delta,
|
|
"zero'th root should have a negative delta"
|
|
);
|
|
} else if i == 1 {
|
|
assert_eq!(delta, total_delta, "first root should have positive delta");
|
|
} else {
|
|
assert_eq!(delta, 0, "all other deltas should be zero");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for vote in votes.0 {
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
vote.current_root, vote.next_root,
|
|
"the vote shoulds should have been updated"
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn move_out_of_tree() {
|
|
const BALANCE: u64 = 42;
|
|
|
|
let mut indices = HashMap::new();
|
|
let mut votes = ElasticList::default();
|
|
let equivocating_indices = BTreeSet::new();
|
|
|
|
// There is only one block.
|
|
indices.insert(hash_from_index(1), 0);
|
|
|
|
// There are two validators.
|
|
let old_balances = vec![BALANCE; 2];
|
|
let new_balances = vec![BALANCE; 2];
|
|
|
|
// One validator moves their vote from the block to the zero hash.
|
|
votes.0.push(VoteTracker {
|
|
current_root: hash_from_index(1),
|
|
next_root: Hash256::zero(),
|
|
next_epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// One validator moves their vote from the block to something outside the tree.
|
|
votes.0.push(VoteTracker {
|
|
current_root: hash_from_index(1),
|
|
next_root: Hash256::from_low_u64_be(1337),
|
|
next_epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
let deltas = compute_deltas(
|
|
&indices,
|
|
&mut votes,
|
|
&old_balances,
|
|
&new_balances,
|
|
&equivocating_indices,
|
|
)
|
|
.expect("should compute deltas");
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(deltas.len(), 1, "deltas should have expected length");
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
deltas[0],
|
|
0 - BALANCE as i64 * 2,
|
|
"the block should have lost both balances"
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
for vote in votes.0 {
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
vote.current_root, vote.next_root,
|
|
"the vote shoulds should have been updated"
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn changing_balances() {
|
|
const OLD_BALANCE: u64 = 42;
|
|
const NEW_BALANCE: u64 = OLD_BALANCE * 2;
|
|
|
|
let validator_count: usize = 16;
|
|
|
|
let mut indices = HashMap::new();
|
|
let mut votes = ElasticList::default();
|
|
let mut old_balances = vec![];
|
|
let mut new_balances = vec![];
|
|
let equivocating_indices = BTreeSet::new();
|
|
|
|
for i in 0..validator_count {
|
|
indices.insert(hash_from_index(i), i);
|
|
votes.0.push(VoteTracker {
|
|
current_root: hash_from_index(0),
|
|
next_root: hash_from_index(1),
|
|
next_epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
|
});
|
|
old_balances.push(OLD_BALANCE);
|
|
new_balances.push(NEW_BALANCE);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let deltas = compute_deltas(
|
|
&indices,
|
|
&mut votes,
|
|
&old_balances,
|
|
&new_balances,
|
|
&equivocating_indices,
|
|
)
|
|
.expect("should compute deltas");
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
deltas.len(),
|
|
validator_count,
|
|
"deltas should have expected length"
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
for (i, delta) in deltas.into_iter().enumerate() {
|
|
if i == 0 {
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
delta,
|
|
0 - OLD_BALANCE as i64 * validator_count as i64,
|
|
"zero'th root should have a negative delta"
|
|
);
|
|
} else if i == 1 {
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
delta,
|
|
NEW_BALANCE as i64 * validator_count as i64,
|
|
"first root should have positive delta"
|
|
);
|
|
} else {
|
|
assert_eq!(delta, 0, "all other deltas should be zero");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for vote in votes.0 {
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
vote.current_root, vote.next_root,
|
|
"the vote shoulds should have been updated"
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn validator_appears() {
|
|
const BALANCE: u64 = 42;
|
|
|
|
let mut indices = HashMap::new();
|
|
let mut votes = ElasticList::default();
|
|
let equivocating_indices = BTreeSet::new();
|
|
|
|
// There are two blocks.
|
|
indices.insert(hash_from_index(1), 0);
|
|
indices.insert(hash_from_index(2), 1);
|
|
|
|
// There is only one validator in the old balances.
|
|
let old_balances = vec![BALANCE; 1];
|
|
// There are two validators in the new balances.
|
|
let new_balances = vec![BALANCE; 2];
|
|
|
|
// Both validator move votes from block 1 to block 2.
|
|
for _ in 0..2 {
|
|
votes.0.push(VoteTracker {
|
|
current_root: hash_from_index(1),
|
|
next_root: hash_from_index(2),
|
|
next_epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let deltas = compute_deltas(
|
|
&indices,
|
|
&mut votes,
|
|
&old_balances,
|
|
&new_balances,
|
|
&equivocating_indices,
|
|
)
|
|
.expect("should compute deltas");
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(deltas.len(), 2, "deltas should have expected length");
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
deltas[0],
|
|
0 - BALANCE as i64,
|
|
"block 1 should have only lost one balance"
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
deltas[1],
|
|
2 * BALANCE as i64,
|
|
"block 2 should have gained two balances"
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
for vote in votes.0 {
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
vote.current_root, vote.next_root,
|
|
"the vote shoulds should have been updated"
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn validator_disappears() {
|
|
const BALANCE: u64 = 42;
|
|
|
|
let mut indices = HashMap::new();
|
|
let mut votes = ElasticList::default();
|
|
let equivocating_indices = BTreeSet::new();
|
|
|
|
// There are two blocks.
|
|
indices.insert(hash_from_index(1), 0);
|
|
indices.insert(hash_from_index(2), 1);
|
|
|
|
// There are two validators in the old balances.
|
|
let old_balances = vec![BALANCE; 2];
|
|
// There is only one validator in the new balances.
|
|
let new_balances = vec![BALANCE; 1];
|
|
|
|
// Both validator move votes from block 1 to block 2.
|
|
for _ in 0..2 {
|
|
votes.0.push(VoteTracker {
|
|
current_root: hash_from_index(1),
|
|
next_root: hash_from_index(2),
|
|
next_epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let deltas = compute_deltas(
|
|
&indices,
|
|
&mut votes,
|
|
&old_balances,
|
|
&new_balances,
|
|
&equivocating_indices,
|
|
)
|
|
.expect("should compute deltas");
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(deltas.len(), 2, "deltas should have expected length");
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
deltas[0],
|
|
0 - BALANCE as i64 * 2,
|
|
"block 1 should have lost both balances"
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
deltas[1], BALANCE as i64,
|
|
"block 2 should have only gained one balance"
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
for vote in votes.0 {
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
vote.current_root, vote.next_root,
|
|
"the vote should have been updated"
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn validator_equivocates() {
|
|
const OLD_BALANCE: u64 = 42;
|
|
const NEW_BALANCE: u64 = 43;
|
|
|
|
let mut indices = HashMap::new();
|
|
let mut votes = ElasticList::default();
|
|
|
|
// There are two blocks.
|
|
indices.insert(hash_from_index(1), 0);
|
|
indices.insert(hash_from_index(2), 1);
|
|
|
|
// There are two validators.
|
|
let old_balances = vec![OLD_BALANCE; 2];
|
|
let new_balances = vec![NEW_BALANCE; 2];
|
|
|
|
// Both validator move votes from block 1 to block 2.
|
|
for _ in 0..2 {
|
|
votes.0.push(VoteTracker {
|
|
current_root: hash_from_index(1),
|
|
next_root: hash_from_index(2),
|
|
next_epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Validator 0 is slashed.
|
|
let equivocating_indices = BTreeSet::from_iter([0]);
|
|
|
|
let deltas = compute_deltas(
|
|
&indices,
|
|
&mut votes,
|
|
&old_balances,
|
|
&new_balances,
|
|
&equivocating_indices,
|
|
)
|
|
.expect("should compute deltas");
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(deltas.len(), 2, "deltas should have expected length");
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
deltas[0],
|
|
-2 * OLD_BALANCE as i64,
|
|
"block 1 should have lost two old balances"
|
|
);
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
deltas[1], NEW_BALANCE as i64,
|
|
"block 2 should have gained one balance"
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Validator 0's current root should have been reset.
|
|
assert_eq!(votes.0[0].current_root, Hash256::zero());
|
|
assert_eq!(votes.0[0].next_root, hash_from_index(2));
|
|
|
|
// Validator 1's current root should have been updated.
|
|
assert_eq!(votes.0[1].current_root, hash_from_index(2));
|
|
|
|
// Re-computing the deltas should be a no-op (no repeat deduction for the slashed validator).
|
|
let deltas = compute_deltas(
|
|
&indices,
|
|
&mut votes,
|
|
&new_balances,
|
|
&new_balances,
|
|
&equivocating_indices,
|
|
)
|
|
.expect("should compute deltas");
|
|
assert_eq!(deltas, vec![0, 0]);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|