047c7544e3
## Issue Addressed Cleans up all the remnants of 4844 in capella. This makes sure when 4844 is reviewed there is nothing we are missing because it got included here ## Proposed Changes drop a bomb on every 4844 thing ## Additional Info Merge process I did (locally) is as follows: - squash merge to produce one commit - in new branch off unstable with the squashed commit create a `git revert HEAD` commit - merge that new branch onto 4844 with `--strategy ours` - compare local 4844 to remote 4844 and make sure the diff is empty - enjoy Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
566 lines
21 KiB
Rust
566 lines
21 KiB
Rust
use crate::consensus_context::ConsensusContext;
|
|
use errors::{BlockOperationError, BlockProcessingError, HeaderInvalid};
|
|
use rayon::prelude::*;
|
|
use safe_arith::{ArithError, SafeArith};
|
|
use signature_sets::{block_proposal_signature_set, get_pubkey_from_state, randao_signature_set};
|
|
use std::borrow::Cow;
|
|
use tree_hash::TreeHash;
|
|
use types::*;
|
|
|
|
pub use self::verify_attester_slashing::{
|
|
get_slashable_indices, get_slashable_indices_modular, verify_attester_slashing,
|
|
};
|
|
pub use self::verify_proposer_slashing::verify_proposer_slashing;
|
|
pub use altair::sync_committee::process_sync_aggregate;
|
|
pub use block_signature_verifier::{BlockSignatureVerifier, ParallelSignatureSets};
|
|
pub use is_valid_indexed_attestation::is_valid_indexed_attestation;
|
|
pub use process_operations::process_operations;
|
|
pub use verify_attestation::{
|
|
verify_attestation_for_block_inclusion, verify_attestation_for_state,
|
|
};
|
|
pub use verify_bls_to_execution_change::verify_bls_to_execution_change;
|
|
pub use verify_deposit::{
|
|
get_existing_validator_index, verify_deposit_merkle_proof, verify_deposit_signature,
|
|
};
|
|
pub use verify_exit::verify_exit;
|
|
|
|
pub mod altair;
|
|
pub mod block_signature_verifier;
|
|
pub mod errors;
|
|
mod is_valid_indexed_attestation;
|
|
pub mod process_operations;
|
|
pub mod signature_sets;
|
|
pub mod tests;
|
|
mod verify_attestation;
|
|
mod verify_attester_slashing;
|
|
mod verify_bls_to_execution_change;
|
|
mod verify_deposit;
|
|
mod verify_exit;
|
|
mod verify_proposer_slashing;
|
|
|
|
use crate::common::decrease_balance;
|
|
|
|
#[cfg(feature = "arbitrary-fuzz")]
|
|
use arbitrary::Arbitrary;
|
|
|
|
/// The strategy to be used when validating the block's signatures.
|
|
#[cfg_attr(feature = "arbitrary-fuzz", derive(Arbitrary))]
|
|
#[derive(PartialEq, Clone, Copy, Debug)]
|
|
pub enum BlockSignatureStrategy {
|
|
/// Do not validate any signature. Use with caution.
|
|
NoVerification,
|
|
/// Validate each signature individually, as its object is being processed.
|
|
VerifyIndividual,
|
|
/// Validate only the randao reveal signature.
|
|
VerifyRandao,
|
|
/// Verify all signatures in bulk at the beginning of block processing.
|
|
VerifyBulk,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// The strategy to be used when validating the block's signatures.
|
|
#[cfg_attr(feature = "arbitrary-fuzz", derive(Arbitrary))]
|
|
#[derive(PartialEq, Clone, Copy)]
|
|
pub enum VerifySignatures {
|
|
/// Validate all signatures encountered.
|
|
True,
|
|
/// Do not validate any signature. Use with caution.
|
|
False,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl VerifySignatures {
|
|
pub fn is_true(self) -> bool {
|
|
self == VerifySignatures::True
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Control verification of the latest block header.
|
|
#[cfg_attr(feature = "arbitrary-fuzz", derive(Arbitrary))]
|
|
#[derive(PartialEq, Clone, Copy)]
|
|
pub enum VerifyBlockRoot {
|
|
True,
|
|
False,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Updates the state for a new block, whilst validating that the block is valid, optionally
|
|
/// checking the block proposer signature.
|
|
///
|
|
/// Returns `Ok(())` if the block is valid and the state was successfully updated. Otherwise
|
|
/// returns an error describing why the block was invalid or how the function failed to execute.
|
|
///
|
|
/// If `block_root` is `Some`, this root is used for verification of the proposer's signature. If it
|
|
/// is `None` the signing root is computed from scratch. This parameter only exists to avoid
|
|
/// re-calculating the root when it is already known. Note `block_root` should be equal to the
|
|
/// tree hash root of the block, NOT the signing root of the block. This function takes
|
|
/// care of mixing in the domain.
|
|
pub fn per_block_processing<T: EthSpec, Payload: AbstractExecPayload<T>>(
|
|
state: &mut BeaconState<T>,
|
|
signed_block: &SignedBeaconBlock<T, Payload>,
|
|
block_signature_strategy: BlockSignatureStrategy,
|
|
verify_block_root: VerifyBlockRoot,
|
|
ctxt: &mut ConsensusContext<T>,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), BlockProcessingError> {
|
|
let block = signed_block.message();
|
|
|
|
// Verify that the `SignedBeaconBlock` instantiation matches the fork at `signed_block.slot()`.
|
|
signed_block
|
|
.fork_name(spec)
|
|
.map_err(BlockProcessingError::InconsistentBlockFork)?;
|
|
|
|
// Verify that the `BeaconState` instantiation matches the fork at `state.slot()`.
|
|
state
|
|
.fork_name(spec)
|
|
.map_err(BlockProcessingError::InconsistentStateFork)?;
|
|
|
|
let verify_signatures = match block_signature_strategy {
|
|
BlockSignatureStrategy::VerifyBulk => {
|
|
// Verify all signatures in the block at once.
|
|
block_verify!(
|
|
BlockSignatureVerifier::verify_entire_block(
|
|
state,
|
|
|i| get_pubkey_from_state(state, i),
|
|
|pk_bytes| pk_bytes.decompress().ok().map(Cow::Owned),
|
|
signed_block,
|
|
ctxt,
|
|
spec
|
|
)
|
|
.is_ok(),
|
|
BlockProcessingError::BulkSignatureVerificationFailed
|
|
);
|
|
VerifySignatures::False
|
|
}
|
|
BlockSignatureStrategy::VerifyIndividual => VerifySignatures::True,
|
|
BlockSignatureStrategy::NoVerification => VerifySignatures::False,
|
|
BlockSignatureStrategy::VerifyRandao => VerifySignatures::False,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
let proposer_index = process_block_header(
|
|
state,
|
|
block.temporary_block_header(),
|
|
verify_block_root,
|
|
ctxt,
|
|
spec,
|
|
)?;
|
|
|
|
if verify_signatures.is_true() {
|
|
verify_block_signature(state, signed_block, ctxt, spec)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let verify_randao = if let BlockSignatureStrategy::VerifyRandao = block_signature_strategy {
|
|
VerifySignatures::True
|
|
} else {
|
|
verify_signatures
|
|
};
|
|
// Ensure the current and previous epoch caches are built.
|
|
state.build_committee_cache(RelativeEpoch::Previous, spec)?;
|
|
state.build_committee_cache(RelativeEpoch::Current, spec)?;
|
|
|
|
// The call to the `process_execution_payload` must happen before the call to the
|
|
// `process_randao` as the former depends on the `randao_mix` computed with the reveal of the
|
|
// previous block.
|
|
if is_execution_enabled(state, block.body()) {
|
|
let payload = block.body().execution_payload()?;
|
|
process_withdrawals::<T, Payload>(state, payload, spec)?;
|
|
process_execution_payload::<T, Payload>(state, payload, spec)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
process_randao(state, block, verify_randao, ctxt, spec)?;
|
|
process_eth1_data(state, block.body().eth1_data())?;
|
|
process_operations(state, block.body(), verify_signatures, ctxt, spec)?;
|
|
|
|
if let Ok(sync_aggregate) = block.body().sync_aggregate() {
|
|
process_sync_aggregate(
|
|
state,
|
|
sync_aggregate,
|
|
proposer_index,
|
|
verify_signatures,
|
|
spec,
|
|
)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Processes the block header, returning the proposer index.
|
|
pub fn process_block_header<T: EthSpec>(
|
|
state: &mut BeaconState<T>,
|
|
block_header: BeaconBlockHeader,
|
|
verify_block_root: VerifyBlockRoot,
|
|
ctxt: &mut ConsensusContext<T>,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<u64, BlockOperationError<HeaderInvalid>> {
|
|
// Verify that the slots match
|
|
verify!(
|
|
block_header.slot == state.slot(),
|
|
HeaderInvalid::StateSlotMismatch
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Verify that the block is newer than the latest block header
|
|
verify!(
|
|
block_header.slot > state.latest_block_header().slot,
|
|
HeaderInvalid::OlderThanLatestBlockHeader {
|
|
block_slot: block_header.slot,
|
|
latest_block_header_slot: state.latest_block_header().slot,
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Verify that proposer index is the correct index
|
|
let proposer_index = block_header.proposer_index;
|
|
let state_proposer_index = ctxt.get_proposer_index(state, spec)?;
|
|
verify!(
|
|
proposer_index == state_proposer_index,
|
|
HeaderInvalid::ProposerIndexMismatch {
|
|
block_proposer_index: proposer_index,
|
|
state_proposer_index,
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
if verify_block_root == VerifyBlockRoot::True {
|
|
let expected_previous_block_root = state.latest_block_header().tree_hash_root();
|
|
verify!(
|
|
block_header.parent_root == expected_previous_block_root,
|
|
HeaderInvalid::ParentBlockRootMismatch {
|
|
state: expected_previous_block_root,
|
|
block: block_header.parent_root,
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
*state.latest_block_header_mut() = block_header;
|
|
|
|
// Verify proposer is not slashed
|
|
verify!(
|
|
!state.get_validator(proposer_index as usize)?.slashed,
|
|
HeaderInvalid::ProposerSlashed(proposer_index)
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
Ok(proposer_index)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Verifies the signature of a block.
|
|
///
|
|
/// Spec v0.12.1
|
|
pub fn verify_block_signature<T: EthSpec, Payload: AbstractExecPayload<T>>(
|
|
state: &BeaconState<T>,
|
|
block: &SignedBeaconBlock<T, Payload>,
|
|
ctxt: &mut ConsensusContext<T>,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), BlockOperationError<HeaderInvalid>> {
|
|
let block_root = Some(ctxt.get_current_block_root(block)?);
|
|
let proposer_index = Some(ctxt.get_proposer_index(state, spec)?);
|
|
verify!(
|
|
block_proposal_signature_set(
|
|
state,
|
|
|i| get_pubkey_from_state(state, i),
|
|
block,
|
|
block_root,
|
|
proposer_index,
|
|
spec
|
|
)?
|
|
.verify(),
|
|
HeaderInvalid::ProposalSignatureInvalid
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Verifies the `randao_reveal` against the block's proposer pubkey and updates
|
|
/// `state.latest_randao_mixes`.
|
|
pub fn process_randao<T: EthSpec, Payload: AbstractExecPayload<T>>(
|
|
state: &mut BeaconState<T>,
|
|
block: BeaconBlockRef<'_, T, Payload>,
|
|
verify_signatures: VerifySignatures,
|
|
ctxt: &mut ConsensusContext<T>,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), BlockProcessingError> {
|
|
if verify_signatures.is_true() {
|
|
// Verify RANDAO reveal signature.
|
|
let proposer_index = ctxt.get_proposer_index(state, spec)?;
|
|
block_verify!(
|
|
randao_signature_set(
|
|
state,
|
|
|i| get_pubkey_from_state(state, i),
|
|
block,
|
|
Some(proposer_index),
|
|
spec
|
|
)?
|
|
.verify(),
|
|
BlockProcessingError::RandaoSignatureInvalid
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Update the current epoch RANDAO mix.
|
|
state.update_randao_mix(state.current_epoch(), block.body().randao_reveal())?;
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Update the `state.eth1_data_votes` based upon the `eth1_data` provided.
|
|
pub fn process_eth1_data<T: EthSpec>(
|
|
state: &mut BeaconState<T>,
|
|
eth1_data: &Eth1Data,
|
|
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
|
if let Some(new_eth1_data) = get_new_eth1_data(state, eth1_data)? {
|
|
*state.eth1_data_mut() = new_eth1_data;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
state.eth1_data_votes_mut().push(eth1_data.clone())?;
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Returns `Ok(Some(eth1_data))` if adding the given `eth1_data` to `state.eth1_data_votes` would
|
|
/// result in a change to `state.eth1_data`.
|
|
pub fn get_new_eth1_data<T: EthSpec>(
|
|
state: &BeaconState<T>,
|
|
eth1_data: &Eth1Data,
|
|
) -> Result<Option<Eth1Data>, ArithError> {
|
|
let num_votes = state
|
|
.eth1_data_votes()
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.filter(|vote| *vote == eth1_data)
|
|
.count();
|
|
|
|
// The +1 is to account for the `eth1_data` supplied to the function.
|
|
if num_votes.safe_add(1)?.safe_mul(2)? > T::SlotsPerEth1VotingPeriod::to_usize() {
|
|
Ok(Some(eth1_data.clone()))
|
|
} else {
|
|
Ok(None)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Performs *partial* verification of the `payload`.
|
|
///
|
|
/// The verification is partial, since the execution payload is not verified against an execution
|
|
/// engine. That is expected to be performed by an upstream function.
|
|
///
|
|
/// ## Specification
|
|
///
|
|
/// Contains a partial set of checks from the `process_execution_payload` function:
|
|
///
|
|
/// https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/v1.1.5/specs/merge/beacon-chain.md#process_execution_payload
|
|
pub fn partially_verify_execution_payload<T: EthSpec, Payload: AbstractExecPayload<T>>(
|
|
state: &BeaconState<T>,
|
|
block_slot: Slot,
|
|
payload: Payload::Ref<'_>,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), BlockProcessingError> {
|
|
if is_merge_transition_complete(state) {
|
|
block_verify!(
|
|
payload.parent_hash() == state.latest_execution_payload_header()?.block_hash(),
|
|
BlockProcessingError::ExecutionHashChainIncontiguous {
|
|
expected: state.latest_execution_payload_header()?.block_hash(),
|
|
found: payload.parent_hash(),
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
block_verify!(
|
|
payload.prev_randao() == *state.get_randao_mix(state.current_epoch())?,
|
|
BlockProcessingError::ExecutionRandaoMismatch {
|
|
expected: *state.get_randao_mix(state.current_epoch())?,
|
|
found: payload.prev_randao(),
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let timestamp = compute_timestamp_at_slot(state, block_slot, spec)?;
|
|
block_verify!(
|
|
payload.timestamp() == timestamp,
|
|
BlockProcessingError::ExecutionInvalidTimestamp {
|
|
expected: timestamp,
|
|
found: payload.timestamp(),
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Calls `partially_verify_execution_payload` and then updates the payload header in the `state`.
|
|
///
|
|
/// ## Specification
|
|
///
|
|
/// Partially equivalent to the `process_execution_payload` function:
|
|
///
|
|
/// https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/v1.1.5/specs/merge/beacon-chain.md#process_execution_payload
|
|
pub fn process_execution_payload<T: EthSpec, Payload: AbstractExecPayload<T>>(
|
|
state: &mut BeaconState<T>,
|
|
payload: Payload::Ref<'_>,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), BlockProcessingError> {
|
|
partially_verify_execution_payload::<T, Payload>(state, state.slot(), payload, spec)?;
|
|
|
|
match state.latest_execution_payload_header_mut()? {
|
|
ExecutionPayloadHeaderRefMut::Merge(header_mut) => {
|
|
match payload.to_execution_payload_header() {
|
|
ExecutionPayloadHeader::Merge(header) => *header_mut = header,
|
|
_ => return Err(BlockProcessingError::IncorrectStateType),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
ExecutionPayloadHeaderRefMut::Capella(header_mut) => {
|
|
match payload.to_execution_payload_header() {
|
|
ExecutionPayloadHeader::Capella(header) => *header_mut = header,
|
|
_ => return Err(BlockProcessingError::IncorrectStateType),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// These functions will definitely be called before the merge. Their entire purpose is to check if
|
|
/// the merge has happened or if we're on the transition block. Thus we don't want to propagate
|
|
/// errors from the `BeaconState` being an earlier variant than `BeaconStateMerge` as we'd have to
|
|
/// repeaetedly write code to treat these errors as false.
|
|
/// https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/dev/specs/bellatrix/beacon-chain.md#is_merge_transition_complete
|
|
pub fn is_merge_transition_complete<T: EthSpec>(state: &BeaconState<T>) -> bool {
|
|
// We must check defaultness against the payload header with 0x0 roots, as that's what's meant
|
|
// by `ExecutionPayloadHeader()` in the spec.
|
|
state
|
|
.latest_execution_payload_header()
|
|
.map(|header| !header.is_default_with_zero_roots())
|
|
.unwrap_or(false)
|
|
}
|
|
/// https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/dev/specs/bellatrix/beacon-chain.md#is_merge_transition_block
|
|
pub fn is_merge_transition_block<T: EthSpec, Payload: AbstractExecPayload<T>>(
|
|
state: &BeaconState<T>,
|
|
body: BeaconBlockBodyRef<T, Payload>,
|
|
) -> bool {
|
|
// For execution payloads in blocks (which may be headers) we must check defaultness against
|
|
// the payload with `transactions_root` equal to the tree hash of the empty list.
|
|
body.execution_payload()
|
|
.map(|payload| {
|
|
!is_merge_transition_complete(state) && !payload.is_default_with_empty_roots()
|
|
})
|
|
.unwrap_or(false)
|
|
}
|
|
/// https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/dev/specs/bellatrix/beacon-chain.md#is_execution_enabled
|
|
pub fn is_execution_enabled<T: EthSpec, Payload: AbstractExecPayload<T>>(
|
|
state: &BeaconState<T>,
|
|
body: BeaconBlockBodyRef<T, Payload>,
|
|
) -> bool {
|
|
is_merge_transition_block(state, body) || is_merge_transition_complete(state)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/dev/specs/bellatrix/beacon-chain.md#compute_timestamp_at_slot
|
|
pub fn compute_timestamp_at_slot<T: EthSpec>(
|
|
state: &BeaconState<T>,
|
|
block_slot: Slot,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<u64, ArithError> {
|
|
let slots_since_genesis = block_slot.as_u64().safe_sub(spec.genesis_slot.as_u64())?;
|
|
slots_since_genesis
|
|
.safe_mul(spec.seconds_per_slot)
|
|
.and_then(|since_genesis| state.genesis_time().safe_add(since_genesis))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Compute the next batch of withdrawals which should be included in a block.
|
|
///
|
|
/// https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/dev/specs/capella/beacon-chain.md#new-get_expected_withdrawals
|
|
pub fn get_expected_withdrawals<T: EthSpec>(
|
|
state: &BeaconState<T>,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<Withdrawals<T>, BlockProcessingError> {
|
|
let epoch = state.current_epoch();
|
|
let mut withdrawal_index = state.next_withdrawal_index()?;
|
|
let mut validator_index = state.next_withdrawal_validator_index()?;
|
|
let mut withdrawals = vec![];
|
|
|
|
let bound = std::cmp::min(
|
|
state.validators().len() as u64,
|
|
spec.max_validators_per_withdrawals_sweep,
|
|
);
|
|
for _ in 0..bound {
|
|
let validator = state.get_validator(validator_index as usize)?;
|
|
let balance = *state.balances().get(validator_index as usize).ok_or(
|
|
BeaconStateError::BalancesOutOfBounds(validator_index as usize),
|
|
)?;
|
|
if validator.is_fully_withdrawable_at(balance, epoch, spec) {
|
|
withdrawals.push(Withdrawal {
|
|
index: withdrawal_index,
|
|
validator_index,
|
|
address: validator
|
|
.get_eth1_withdrawal_address(spec)
|
|
.ok_or(BlockProcessingError::WithdrawalCredentialsInvalid)?,
|
|
amount: balance,
|
|
});
|
|
withdrawal_index.safe_add_assign(1)?;
|
|
} else if validator.is_partially_withdrawable_validator(balance, spec) {
|
|
withdrawals.push(Withdrawal {
|
|
index: withdrawal_index,
|
|
validator_index,
|
|
address: validator
|
|
.get_eth1_withdrawal_address(spec)
|
|
.ok_or(BlockProcessingError::WithdrawalCredentialsInvalid)?,
|
|
amount: balance.safe_sub(spec.max_effective_balance)?,
|
|
});
|
|
withdrawal_index.safe_add_assign(1)?;
|
|
}
|
|
if withdrawals.len() == T::max_withdrawals_per_payload() {
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
validator_index = validator_index
|
|
.safe_add(1)?
|
|
.safe_rem(state.validators().len() as u64)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Ok(withdrawals.into())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Apply withdrawals to the state.
|
|
pub fn process_withdrawals<T: EthSpec, Payload: AbstractExecPayload<T>>(
|
|
state: &mut BeaconState<T>,
|
|
payload: Payload::Ref<'_>,
|
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
) -> Result<(), BlockProcessingError> {
|
|
match state {
|
|
BeaconState::Merge(_) => Ok(()),
|
|
BeaconState::Capella(_) => {
|
|
let expected_withdrawals = get_expected_withdrawals(state, spec)?;
|
|
let expected_root = expected_withdrawals.tree_hash_root();
|
|
let withdrawals_root = payload.withdrawals_root()?;
|
|
|
|
if expected_root != withdrawals_root {
|
|
return Err(BlockProcessingError::WithdrawalsRootMismatch {
|
|
expected: expected_root,
|
|
found: withdrawals_root,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for withdrawal in expected_withdrawals.iter() {
|
|
decrease_balance(
|
|
state,
|
|
withdrawal.validator_index as usize,
|
|
withdrawal.amount,
|
|
)?;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Update the next withdrawal index if this block contained withdrawals
|
|
if let Some(latest_withdrawal) = expected_withdrawals.last() {
|
|
*state.next_withdrawal_index_mut()? = latest_withdrawal.index.safe_add(1)?;
|
|
|
|
// Update the next validator index to start the next withdrawal sweep
|
|
if expected_withdrawals.len() == T::max_withdrawals_per_payload() {
|
|
// Next sweep starts after the latest withdrawal's validator index
|
|
let next_validator_index = latest_withdrawal
|
|
.validator_index
|
|
.safe_add(1)?
|
|
.safe_rem(state.validators().len() as u64)?;
|
|
*state.next_withdrawal_validator_index_mut()? = next_validator_index;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Advance sweep by the max length of the sweep if there was not a full set of withdrawals
|
|
if expected_withdrawals.len() != T::max_withdrawals_per_payload() {
|
|
let next_validator_index = state
|
|
.next_withdrawal_validator_index()?
|
|
.safe_add(spec.max_validators_per_withdrawals_sweep)?
|
|
.safe_rem(state.validators().len() as u64)?;
|
|
*state.next_withdrawal_validator_index_mut()? = next_validator_index;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
// these shouldn't even be encountered but they're here for completeness
|
|
BeaconState::Base(_) | BeaconState::Altair(_) => Ok(()),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|