Commit Graph

156 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Pawan Dhananjay
b276af98b7
Rework block processing (#4092)
* introduce availability pending block

* add intoavailableblock trait

* small fixes

* add 'gossip blob cache' and start to clean up processing and transition types

* shard memory blob cache

* Initial commit

* Fix after rebase

* Add gossip verification conditions

* cache cleanup

* general chaos

* extended chaos

* cargo fmt

* more progress

* more progress

* tons of changes, just tryna compile

* everything, everywhere, all at once

* Reprocess an ExecutedBlock on unavailable blobs

* Add sus gossip verification for blobs

* Merge stuff

* Remove reprocessing cache stuff

* lint

* Add a wrapper to allow construction of only valid `AvailableBlock`s

* rename blob arc list to blob list

* merge cleanuo

* Revert "merge cleanuo"

This reverts commit 5e98326878c77528d0c4668c5a4db4a4b0fbaeaa.

* Revert "Revert "merge cleanuo""

This reverts commit 3a4009443a5812b3028abe855079307436dc5419.

* fix rpc methods

* move beacon block and blob to eth2/types

* rename gossip blob cache to data availability checker

* lots of changes

* fix some compilation issues

* fix compilation issues

* fix compilation issues

* fix compilation issues

* fix compilation issues

* fix compilation issues

* cargo fmt

* use a common data structure for block import types

* fix availability check on proposal import

* refactor the blob cache and split the block wrapper into two types

* add type conversion for signed block and block wrapper

* fix beacon chain tests and do some renaming, add some comments

* Partial processing (#4)

* move beacon block and blob to eth2/types

* rename gossip blob cache to data availability checker

* lots of changes

* fix some compilation issues

* fix compilation issues

* fix compilation issues

* fix compilation issues

* fix compilation issues

* fix compilation issues

* cargo fmt

* use a common data structure for block import types

* fix availability check on proposal import

* refactor the blob cache and split the block wrapper into two types

* add type conversion for signed block and block wrapper

* fix beacon chain tests and do some renaming, add some comments

* cargo update (#6)

---------

Co-authored-by: realbigsean <sean@sigmaprime.io>
Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
2023-03-24 17:30:41 -04:00
Diva M
1b9cfcc11b
Merge branch 'unstable' into eip4844 2023-03-24 13:32:50 -05:00
Diva M
7fad926b65
Merge commit '65a5eb829264cb279ed66814c961991ae3a0a04b' into eip4844 2023-03-24 13:24:21 -05:00
Paul Hauner
1f8c17b530 Fork choice modifications and cleanup (#3962)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

- Implements https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/3290/
- Bumps `ef-tests` to [v1.3.0-rc.4](https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-spec-tests/releases/tag/v1.3.0-rc.4).

The `CountRealizedFull` concept has been removed and the `--count-unrealized-full` and `--count-unrealized` BN flags now do nothing but log a `WARN` when used.

## Database Migration Debt

This PR removes the `best_justified_checkpoint` from fork choice. This field is persisted on-disk and the correct way to go about this would be to make a DB migration to remove the field. However, in this PR I've simply stubbed out the value with a junk value. I've taken this approach because if we're going to do a DB migration I'd love to remove the `Option`s around the justified and finalized checkpoints on `ProtoNode` whilst we're at it. Those options were added in #2822 which was included in Lighthouse v2.1.0. The options were only put there to handle the migration and they've been set to `Some` ever since v2.1.0. There's no reason to keep them as options anymore.

I started adding the DB migration to this branch but I started to feel like I was bloating this rather critical PR with nice-to-haves. I've kept the partially-complete migration [over in my repo](https://github.com/paulhauner/lighthouse/tree/fc-pr-18-migration) so we can pick it up after this PR is merged.
2023-03-21 07:34:41 +00:00
Age Manning
785a9171e6 Customisable shuffling cache size (#4081)
This PR enables the user to adjust the shuffling cache size.

This is useful for some HTTP API requests which require re-computing old shufflings. This PR currently optimizes the
beacon/states/{state_id}/committees HTTP API by first checking the cache before re-building shuffling.

If the shuffling is set to a non-default value, then the HTTP API request will also fill the cache when as it constructs new shufflings.

If the CLI flag is not present or the value is set to the default of 16 the default behaviour is observed.


Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
2023-03-21 05:14:59 +00:00
ethDreamer
65a5eb8292 Reconstruct Payloads using Payload Bodies Methods (#4028)
## Issue Addressed

* #3895 

Co-authored-by: ethDreamer <37123614+ethDreamer@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
2023-03-19 23:15:59 +00:00
Diva M
7f2e9b80bb
Merge branch 'unstable' into eip4844 2023-03-14 12:00:32 -05:00
Michael Sproul
90cef1db86 Appease Clippy 1.68 and refactor http_api (#4068)
## Proposed Changes

Two tiny updates to satisfy Clippy 1.68

Plus refactoring of the `http_api` into less complex types so the compiler can chew and digest them more easily.

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
2023-03-13 01:40:03 +00:00
Divma
047c7544e3 Clean capella (#4019)
## Issue Addressed

Cleans up all the remnants of 4844 in capella. This makes sure when 4844 is reviewed there is nothing we are missing because it got included here 

## Proposed Changes

drop a bomb on every 4844 thing 

## Additional Info

Merge process I did (locally) is as follows:
- squash merge to produce one commit
- in new branch off unstable with the squashed commit create a `git revert HEAD` commit
- merge that new branch onto 4844 with `--strategy ours`
- compare local 4844 to remote 4844 and make sure the diff is empty
- enjoy

Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
2023-03-01 03:19:02 +00:00
realbigsean
b805fa6279
merge with upstream 2023-02-15 14:20:12 -05:00
Michael Sproul
18c8cab4da
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/unstable' into capella-merge 2023-02-14 12:07:27 +11:00
realbigsean
26a296246d
Merge branch 'capella' of https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse into eip4844
# Conflicts:
#	beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/beacon_chain.rs
#	beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/block_verification.rs
#	beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/test_utils.rs
#	beacon_node/execution_layer/src/engine_api.rs
#	beacon_node/execution_layer/src/engine_api/http.rs
#	beacon_node/execution_layer/src/lib.rs
#	beacon_node/execution_layer/src/test_utils/handle_rpc.rs
#	beacon_node/http_api/src/lib.rs
#	beacon_node/http_api/tests/fork_tests.rs
#	beacon_node/network/src/beacon_processor/mod.rs
#	beacon_node/network/src/beacon_processor/work_reprocessing_queue.rs
#	beacon_node/network/src/beacon_processor/worker/sync_methods.rs
#	beacon_node/operation_pool/src/bls_to_execution_changes.rs
#	beacon_node/operation_pool/src/lib.rs
#	beacon_node/operation_pool/src/persistence.rs
#	consensus/serde_utils/src/u256_hex_be_opt.rs
#	testing/antithesis/Dockerfile.libvoidstar
2023-02-07 12:12:56 -05:00
naviechan
9547ac069c Implement block_rewards API (per-validator reward) (#3907)
## Issue Addressed

[#3661](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3661)

## Proposed Changes

`/eth/v1/beacon/rewards/blocks/{block_id}`

```
{
  "execution_optimistic": false,
  "finalized": false,
  "data": {
    "proposer_index": "123",
    "total": "123",
    "attestations": "123",
    "sync_aggregate": "123",
    "proposer_slashings": "123",
    "attester_slashings": "123"
  }
}
```

The issue contains the implementation of three per-validator reward APIs:
* `sync_committee_rewards`
* [`attestation_rewards`](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3822)
* `block_rewards`

This PR only implements the `block_rewards`.

The endpoints can be viewed in the Ethereum Beacon nodes API browser: [https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards](https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards)

## Additional Info

The implementation of [consensus client reward APIs](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three/blob/master/projects/project-ideas.md#consensus-client-reward-apis) is part of the [EPF](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three).

Co-authored-by: kevinbogner <kevbogner@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: navie <naviechan@gmail.com>
2023-02-07 08:33:23 +00:00
kevinbogner
4d07e40501 Implement attestation_rewards API (per-validator reward) (#3822)
## Issue Addressed

#3661 

## Proposed Changes
`/eth/v1/beacon/rewards/attestations/{epoch}`

```json
{
  "execution_optimistic": false,
  "finalized": false,
  "data": [
    {
      "ideal_rewards": [
        {
          "effective_balance": "1000000000",
          "head": "2500",
          "target": "5000",
          "source": "5000"
        }
      ],
      "total_rewards": [
        {
          "validator_index": "0",
          "head": "2000",
          "target": "2000",
          "source": "4000",
          "inclusion_delay": "2000"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}
```

The issue contains the implementation of three per-validator reward APIs:
- [`sync_committee_rewards`](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3790)
- `attestation_rewards`
- `block_rewards`.

This PR *only* implements the `attestation_rewards`.

The endpoints can be viewed in the Ethereum Beacon nodes API browser: https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards

## Additional Info
The implementation of [consensus client reward APIs](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three/blob/master/projects/project-ideas.md#consensus-client-reward-apis) is part of the [EPF](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three).

---
- [x] `get_state`
- [x] Calculate *ideal rewards* with some logic from  `get_flag_index_deltas`
- [x] Calculate *actual rewards*  with some logic from `get_flag_index_deltas`
- [x] Code cleanup
- [x] Testing
2023-02-07 00:00:19 +00:00
ethDreamer
7b7595347d
exchangeCapabilities & Capella Readiness Logging (#3918)
* Undo Passing Spec to Engine API

* Utilize engine_exchangeCapabilities

* Add Logging to Indicate Capella Readiness

* Add exchangeCapabilities to mock_execution_layer

* Send Nested Array for engine_exchangeCapabilities

* Use Mutex Instead of RwLock for EngineCapabilities

* Improve Locking to Avoid Deadlock

* Prettier logic for get_engine_capabilities

* Improve Comments

* Update beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/capella_readiness.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/capella_readiness.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/capella_readiness.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/capella_readiness.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/capella_readiness.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/client/src/notifier.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/execution_layer/src/engine_api/http.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Addressed Michael's Comments

---------

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
2023-01-31 18:26:23 +01:00
naviechan
9b5c2eefd5 Implement sync_committee_rewards API (per-validator reward) (#3903)
[#3661](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3661)

`/eth/v1/beacon/rewards/sync_committee/{block_id}`

```
{
  "execution_optimistic": false,
  "finalized": false,
  "data": [
    {
      "validator_index": "0",
      "reward": "2000"
    }
  ]
}
```

The issue contains the implementation of three per-validator reward APIs:
* `sync_committee_rewards`
* [`attestation_rewards`](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3822)
* `block_rewards`

This PR only implements the `sync_committe_rewards `.

The endpoints can be viewed in the Ethereum Beacon nodes API browser: [https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards](https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards)

The implementation of [consensus client reward APIs](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three/blob/master/projects/project-ideas.md#consensus-client-reward-apis) is part of the [EPF](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three).

Co-authored-by: navie <naviechan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kevinbogner <kevbogner@gmail.com>
2023-01-25 14:22:15 +01:00
Michael Sproul
c76a1971cc
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/unstable' into capella 2023-01-25 14:20:16 +11:00
naviechan
2802bc9a9c Implement sync_committee_rewards API (per-validator reward) (#3903)
## Issue Addressed

[#3661](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3661)

## Proposed Changes

`/eth/v1/beacon/rewards/sync_committee/{block_id}`

```
{
  "execution_optimistic": false,
  "finalized": false,
  "data": [
    {
      "validator_index": "0",
      "reward": "2000"
    }
  ]
}
```

The issue contains the implementation of three per-validator reward APIs:
* `sync_committee_rewards`
* [`attestation_rewards`](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3822)
* `block_rewards`

This PR only implements the `sync_committe_rewards `.

The endpoints can be viewed in the Ethereum Beacon nodes API browser: [https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards](https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards)

## Additional Info

The implementation of [consensus client reward APIs](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three/blob/master/projects/project-ideas.md#consensus-client-reward-apis) is part of the [EPF](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three).

Co-authored-by: navie <naviechan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kevinbogner <kevbogner@gmail.com>
2023-01-24 02:06:42 +00:00
Pawan Dhananjay
ba410c3012
Embed trusted setup in network config (#3851)
* Load trusted setup in network config

* Fix trusted setup serialize and deserialize

* Load trusted setup from hardcoded preset instead of a file

* Truncate after deserialising trusted setup

* Fix beacon node script

* Remove hardcoded setup file

* Add length checks
2023-01-09 12:34:16 +05:30
realbigsean
1644978cdb
fix compilation 2022-12-15 10:26:10 -05:00
realbigsean
d893706e0e
merge with capella 2022-12-15 09:33:18 -05:00
Michael Sproul
991e4094f8
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/unstable' into capella-update 2022-12-14 13:00:41 +11:00
Michael Sproul
775d222299 Enable proposer boost re-orging (#2860)
## Proposed Changes

With proposer boosting implemented (#2822) we have an opportunity to re-org out late blocks.

This PR adds three flags to the BN to control this behaviour:

* `--disable-proposer-reorgs`: turn aggressive re-orging off (it's on by default).
* `--proposer-reorg-threshold N`: attempt to orphan blocks with less than N% of the committee vote. If this parameter isn't set then N defaults to 20% when the feature is enabled.
* `--proposer-reorg-epochs-since-finalization N`: only attempt to re-org late blocks when the number of epochs since finalization is less than or equal to N. The default is 2 epochs, meaning re-orgs will only be attempted when the chain is finalizing optimally.

For safety Lighthouse will only attempt a re-org under very specific conditions:

1. The block being proposed is 1 slot after the canonical head, and the canonical head is 1 slot after its parent. i.e. at slot `n + 1` rather than building on the block from slot `n` we build on the block from slot `n - 1`.
2. The current canonical head received less than N% of the committee vote. N should be set depending on the proposer boost fraction itself, the fraction of the network that is believed to be applying it, and the size of the largest entity that could be hoarding votes.
3. The current canonical head arrived after the attestation deadline from our perspective. This condition was only added to support suppression of forkchoiceUpdated messages, but makes intuitive sense.
4. The block is being proposed in the first 2 seconds of the slot. This gives it time to propagate and receive the proposer boost.


## Additional Info

For the initial idea and background, see: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2353#issuecomment-950238004

There is also a specification for this feature here: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/3034

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: pawan <pawandhananjay@gmail.com>
2022-12-13 09:57:26 +00:00
GeemoCandama
1b28ef8a8d Adding light_client gossip topics (#3693)
## Issue Addressed
Implementing the light_client_gossip topics but I'm not there yet.

Which issue # does this PR address?
Partially #3651

## Proposed Changes
Add light client gossip topics.
Please list or describe the changes introduced by this PR.
I'm going to Implement light_client_finality_update and light_client_optimistic_update gossip topics. Currently I've attempted the former and I'm seeking feedback.

## Additional Info
I've only implemented the light_client_finality_update topic because I wanted to make sure I was on the correct path. Also checking that the gossiped LightClientFinalityUpdate is the same as the locally constructed one is not implemented because caching the updates will make this much easier. Could someone give me some feedback on this please? 

Please provide any additional information. For example, future considerations
or information useful for reviewers.

Co-authored-by: GeemoCandama <104614073+GeemoCandama@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-12-13 06:24:51 +00:00
Mac L
8cb9b5e126 Expose certain validator_monitor metrics to the HTTP API (#3760)
## Issue Addressed

#3724 

## Proposed Changes

Exposes certain `validator_monitor` as an endpoint on the HTTP API. Will only return metrics for validators which are actively being monitored.

### Usage

```bash
curl -X GET "http://localhost:5052/lighthouse/ui/validator_metrics" -H "accept: application/json" | jq
```

```json
{
  "data": {
    "validators": {
      "12345": {
        "attestation_hits": 10,
        "attestation_misses": 0,
        "attestation_hit_percentage": 100,
        "attestation_head_hits": 10,
        "attestation_head_misses": 0,
        "attestation_head_hit_percentage": 100,
        "attestation_target_hits": 5,
        "attestation_target_misses": 5,
        "attestation_target_hit_percentage": 50 
      }
    }
  }
}
```

## Additional Info

Based on #3756 which should be merged first.
2022-12-09 06:39:19 +00:00
realbigsean
8102a01085
merge with upstream 2022-12-01 11:13:07 -05:00
Mark Mackey
8a04c3428e Merged with unstable 2022-11-30 17:29:10 -06:00
GeemoCandama
3534c85e30 Optimize finalized chain sync by skipping newPayload messages (#3738)
## Issue Addressed

#3704 

## Proposed Changes
Adds is_syncing_finalized: bool parameter for block verification functions. Sets the payload_verification_status to Optimistic if is_syncing_finalized is true. Uses SyncState in NetworkGlobals in BeaconProcessor to retrieve the syncing status.

## Additional Info
I could implement FinalizedSignatureVerifiedBlock if you think it would be nicer.
2022-11-29 08:19:27 +00:00
Pawan Dhananjay
902055f295
ugly utils 2022-11-22 20:10:32 -05:00
realbigsean
e7ee79185b
add blobs cache and fix some block production 2022-11-21 14:09:06 -05:00
realbigsean
8656d23327
merge with unstable 2022-11-01 13:18:00 -04:00
ethDreamer
e8604757a2 Deposit Cache Finalization & Fast WS Sync (#2915)
## Summary

The deposit cache now has the ability to finalize deposits. This will cause it to drop unneeded deposit logs and hashes in the deposit Merkle tree that are no longer required to construct deposit proofs. The cache is finalized whenever the latest finalized checkpoint has a new `Eth1Data` with all deposits imported.

This has three benefits:

1. Improves the speed of constructing Merkle proofs for deposits as we can just replay deposits since the last finalized checkpoint instead of all historical deposits when re-constructing the Merkle tree.
2. Significantly faster weak subjectivity sync as the deposit cache can be transferred to the newly syncing node in compressed form. The Merkle tree that stores `N` finalized deposits requires a maximum of `log2(N)` hashes. The newly syncing node then only needs to download deposits since the last finalized checkpoint to have a full tree.
3. Future proofing in preparation for [EIP-4444](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4444) as execution nodes will no longer be required to store logs permanently so we won't always have all historical logs available to us.

## More Details

Image to illustrate how the deposit contract merkle tree evolves and finalizes along with the resulting `DepositTreeSnapshot`
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/37123614/151465302-5fc56284-8a69-4998-b20e-45db3934ac70.png)

## Other Considerations

I've changed the structure of the `SszDepositCache` so once you load & save your database from this version of lighthouse, you will no longer be able to load it from older versions.

Co-authored-by: ethDreamer <37123614+ethDreamer@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-10-30 04:04:24 +00:00
Pawan Dhananjay
12fe514550
Add more gossip verification functions for blobs 2022-10-04 19:17:53 -05:00
realbigsean
acaa340b41
add new beacon state variant for shanghai 2022-09-29 12:37:14 -04:00
Paul Hauner
fa6ad1a11a Deduplicate block root computation (#3590)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

This PR removes duplicated block root computation.

Computing the `SignedBeaconBlock::canonical_root` has become more expensive since the merge as we need to compute the merke root of each transaction inside an `ExecutionPayload`.

Computing the root for [a mainnet block](https://beaconcha.in/slot/4704236) is taking ~10ms on my i7-8700K CPU @ 3.70GHz (no sha extensions). Given that our median seen-to-imported time for blocks is presently 300-400ms, removing a few duplicated block roots (~30ms) could represent an easy 10% improvement. When we consider that the seen-to-imported times include operations *after* the block has been placed in the early attester cache, we could expect the 30ms to be more significant WRT our seen-to-attestable times.

## Additional Info

NA
2022-09-23 03:52:42 +00:00
realbigsean
cae40731a2 Strict count unrealized (#3522)
## Issue Addressed

Add a flag that can increase count unrealized strictness, defaults to false

## Proposed Changes

Please list or describe the changes introduced by this PR.

## Additional Info

Please provide any additional information. For example, future considerations
or information useful for reviewers.


Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: sean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
2022-09-05 04:50:47 +00:00
Divma
8c69d57c2c Pause sync when EE is offline (#3428)
## Issue Addressed

#3032

## Proposed Changes

Pause sync when ee is offline. Changes include three main parts:
- Online/offline notification system
- Pause sync
- Resume sync

#### Online/offline notification system
- The engine state is now guarded behind a new struct `State` that ensures every change is correctly notified. Notifications are only sent if the state changes. The new `State` is behind a `RwLock` (as before) as the synchronization mechanism.
- The actual notification channel is a [tokio::sync::watch](https://docs.rs/tokio/latest/tokio/sync/watch/index.html) which ensures only the last value is in the receiver channel. This way we don't need to worry about message order etc.
- Sync waits for state changes concurrently with normal messages.

#### Pause Sync
Sync has four components, pausing is done differently in each:
- **Block lookups**: Disabled while in this state. We drop current requests and don't search for new blocks. Block lookups are infrequent and I don't think it's worth the extra logic of keeping these and delaying processing. If we later see that this is required, we can add it.
- **Parent lookups**: Disabled while in this state. We drop current requests and don't search for new parents. Parent lookups are even less frequent and I don't think it's worth the extra logic of keeping these and delaying processing. If we later see that this is required, we can add it.
- **Range**: Chains don't send batches for processing to the beacon processor. This is easily done by guarding the channel to the beacon processor and giving it access only if the ee is responsive. I find this the simplest and most powerful approach since we don't need to deal with new sync states and chain segments that are added while the ee is offline will follow the same logic without needing to synchronize a shared state among those. Another advantage of passive pause vs active pause is that we can still keep track of active advertised chain segments so that on resume we don't need to re-evaluate all our peers.
- **Backfill**: Not affected by ee states, we don't pause.

#### Resume Sync
- **Block lookups**: Enabled again.
- **Parent lookups**: Enabled again.
- **Range**: Active resume. Since the only real pause range does is not sending batches for processing, resume makes all chains that are holding read-for-processing batches send them.
- **Backfill**: Not affected by ee states, no need to resume.

## Additional Info

**QUESTION**: Originally I made this to notify and change on synced state, but @pawanjay176 on talks with @paulhauner concluded we only need to check online/offline states. The upcheck function mentions extra checks to have a very up to date sync status to aid the networking stack. However, the only need the networking stack would have is this one. I added a TODO to review if the extra check can be removed

Next gen of #3094

Will work best with #3439 

Co-authored-by: Pawan Dhananjay <pawandhananjay@gmail.com>
2022-08-24 23:34:56 +00:00
Paul Hauner
a688621919 Add support for beaconAPI in lcli functions (#3252)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

Modifies `lcli skip-slots` and `lcli transition-blocks` allow them to source blocks/states from a beaconAPI and also gives them some more features to assist with benchmarking.

## Additional Info

Breaks the current `lcli skip-slots` and `lcli transition-blocks` APIs by changing some flag names. It should be simple enough to figure out the changes via `--help`.

Currently blocked on #3263.
2022-08-09 06:05:13 +00:00
ethDreamer
034260bd99 Initial Commit of Retrospective OTB Verification (#3372)
## Issue Addressed

* #2983 

## Proposed Changes

Basically followed the [instructions laid out here](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/2983#issuecomment-1062494947)


Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
Co-authored-by: ethDreamer <37123614+ethDreamer@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-07-30 00:22:38 +00:00
realbigsean
6c2d8b2262 Builder Specs v0.2.0 (#3134)
## Issue Addressed

https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3091

Extends https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3062, adding pre-bellatrix block support on blinded endpoints and allowing the normal proposal flow (local payload construction) on blinded endpoints. This resulted in better fallback logic because the VC will not have to switch endpoints on failure in the BN <> Builder API, the BN can just fallback immediately and without repeating block processing that it shouldn't need to. We can also keep VC fallback from the VC<>BN API's blinded endpoint to full endpoint.

## Proposed Changes

- Pre-bellatrix blocks on blinded endpoints
- Add a new `PayloadCache` to the execution layer
- Better fallback-from-builder logic

## Todos

- [x] Remove VC transition logic
- [x] Add logic to only enable builder flow after Merge transition finalization
- [x] Tests
- [x] Fix metrics
- [x] Rustdocs


Co-authored-by: Mac L <mjladson@pm.me>
Co-authored-by: realbigsean <sean@sigmaprime.io>
2022-07-30 00:22:37 +00:00
realbigsean
20ebf1f3c1 Realized unrealized experimentation (#3322)
## Issue Addressed

Add a flag that optionally enables unrealized vote tracking.  Would like to test out on testnets and benchmark differences in methods of vote tracking. This PR includes a DB schema upgrade to enable to new vote tracking style.


Co-authored-by: realbigsean <sean@sigmaprime.io>
Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
Co-authored-by: sean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mac L <mjladson@pm.me>
2022-07-25 23:53:26 +00:00
Michael Sproul
e32868458f Set safe block hash to justified (#3347)
## Issue Addressed

Closes https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3189.

## Proposed Changes

- Always supply the justified block hash as the `safe_block_hash` when calling `forkchoiceUpdated` on the execution engine.
- Refactor the `get_payload` routine to use the new `ForkchoiceUpdateParameters` struct rather than just the `finalized_block_hash`. I think this is a nice simplification and that the old way of computing the `finalized_block_hash` was unnecessary, but if anyone sees reason to keep that approach LMK.
2022-07-21 05:45:37 +00:00
Pawan Dhananjay
5b5cf9cfaa Log ttd (#3339)
## Issue Addressed

Resolves #3249 

## Proposed Changes

Log merge related parameters and EE status in the beacon notifier before the merge.


Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
2022-07-20 23:16:54 +00:00
Paul Hauner
be4e261e74 Use async code when interacting with EL (#3244)
## Overview

This rather extensive PR achieves two primary goals:

1. Uses the finalized/justified checkpoints of fork choice (FC), rather than that of the head state.
2. Refactors fork choice, block production and block processing to `async` functions.

Additionally, it achieves:

- Concurrent forkchoice updates to the EL and cache pruning after a new head is selected.
- Concurrent "block packing" (attestations, etc) and execution payload retrieval during block production.
- Concurrent per-block-processing and execution payload verification during block processing.
- The `Arc`-ification of `SignedBeaconBlock` during block processing (it's never mutated, so why not?):
    - I had to do this to deal with sending blocks into spawned tasks.
    - Previously we were cloning the beacon block at least 2 times during each block processing, these clones are either removed or turned into cheaper `Arc` clones.
    - We were also `Box`-ing and un-`Box`-ing beacon blocks as they moved throughout the networking crate. This is not a big deal, but it's nice to avoid shifting things between the stack and heap.
    - Avoids cloning *all the blocks* in *every chain segment* during sync.
    - It also has the potential to clean up our code where we need to pass an *owned* block around so we can send it back in the case of an error (I didn't do much of this, my PR is already big enough 😅)
- The `BeaconChain::HeadSafetyStatus` struct was removed. It was an old relic from prior merge specs.

For motivation for this change, see https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3244#issuecomment-1160963273

## Changes to `canonical_head` and `fork_choice`

Previously, the `BeaconChain` had two separate fields:

```
canonical_head: RwLock<Snapshot>,
fork_choice: RwLock<BeaconForkChoice>
```

Now, we have grouped these values under a single struct:

```
canonical_head: CanonicalHead {
  cached_head: RwLock<Arc<Snapshot>>,
  fork_choice: RwLock<BeaconForkChoice>
} 
```

Apart from ergonomics, the only *actual* change here is wrapping the canonical head snapshot in an `Arc`. This means that we no longer need to hold the `cached_head` (`canonical_head`, in old terms) lock when we want to pull some values from it. This was done to avoid deadlock risks by preventing functions from acquiring (and holding) the `cached_head` and `fork_choice` locks simultaneously.

## Breaking Changes

### The `state` (root) field in the `finalized_checkpoint` SSE event

Consider the scenario where epoch `n` is just finalized, but `start_slot(n)` is skipped. There are two state roots we might in the `finalized_checkpoint` SSE event:

1. The state root of the finalized block, which is `get_block(finalized_checkpoint.root).state_root`.
4. The state root at slot of `start_slot(n)`, which would be the state from (1), but "skipped forward" through any skip slots.

Previously, Lighthouse would choose (2). However, we can see that when [Teku generates that event](de2b2801c8/data/beaconrestapi/src/main/java/tech/pegasys/teku/beaconrestapi/handlers/v1/events/EventSubscriptionManager.java (L171-L182)) it uses [`getStateRootFromBlockRoot`](de2b2801c8/data/provider/src/main/java/tech/pegasys/teku/api/ChainDataProvider.java (L336-L341)) which uses (1).

I have switched Lighthouse from (2) to (1). I think it's a somewhat arbitrary choice between the two, where (1) is easier to compute and is consistent with Teku.

## Notes for Reviewers

I've renamed `BeaconChain::fork_choice` to `BeaconChain::recompute_head`. Doing this helped ensure I broke all previous uses of fork choice and I also find it more descriptive. It describes an action and can't be confused with trying to get a reference to the `ForkChoice` struct.

I've changed the ordering of SSE events when a block is received. It used to be `[block, finalized, head]` and now it's `[block, head, finalized]`. It was easier this way and I don't think we were making any promises about SSE event ordering so it's not "breaking".

I've made it so fork choice will run when it's first constructed. I did this because I wanted to have a cached version of the last call to `get_head`. Ensuring `get_head` has been run *at least once* means that the cached values doesn't need to wrapped in an `Option`. This was fairly simple, it just involved passing a `slot` to the constructor so it knows *when* it's being run. When loading a fork choice from the store and a slot clock isn't handy I've just used the `slot` that was saved in the `fork_choice_store`. That seems like it would be a faithful representation of the slot when we saved it.

I added the `genesis_time: u64` to the `BeaconChain`. It's small, constant and nice to have around.

Since we're using FC for the fin/just checkpoints, we no longer get the `0x00..00` roots at genesis. You can see I had to remove a work-around in `ef-tests` here: b56be3bc2. I can't find any reason why this would be an issue, if anything I think it'll be better since the genesis-alias has caught us out a few times (0x00..00 isn't actually a real root). Edit: I did find a case where the `network` expected the 0x00..00 alias and patched it here: 3f26ac3e2.

You'll notice a lot of changes in tests. Generally, tests should be functionally equivalent. Here are the things creating the most diff-noise in tests:
- Changing tests to be `tokio::async` tests.
- Adding `.await` to fork choice, block processing and block production functions.
- Refactor of the `canonical_head` "API" provided by the `BeaconChain`. E.g., `chain.canonical_head.cached_head()` instead of `chain.canonical_head.read()`.
- Wrapping `SignedBeaconBlock` in an `Arc`.
- In the `beacon_chain/tests/block_verification`, we can't use the `lazy_static` `CHAIN_SEGMENT` variable anymore since it's generated with an async function. We just generate it in each test, not so efficient but hopefully insignificant.

I had to disable `rayon` concurrent tests in the `fork_choice` tests. This is because the use of `rayon` and `block_on` was causing a panic.

Co-authored-by: Mac L <mjladson@pm.me>
2022-07-03 05:36:50 +00:00
Michael Sproul
8fa032c8ae Run fork choice before block proposal (#3168)
## Issue Addressed

Upcoming spec change https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2878

## Proposed Changes

1. Run fork choice at the start of every slot, and wait for this run to complete before proposing a block.
2. As an optimisation, also run fork choice 3/4 of the way through the slot (at 9s), _dequeueing attestations for the next slot_.
3. Remove the fork choice run from the state advance timer that occurred before advancing the state.

## Additional Info

### Block Proposal Accuracy

This change makes us more likely to propose on top of the correct head in the presence of re-orgs with proposer boost in play. The main scenario that this change is designed to address is described in the linked spec issue.

### Attestation Accuracy

This change _also_ makes us more likely to attest to the correct head. Currently in the case of a skipped slot at `slot` we only run fork choice 9s into `slot - 1`. This means the attestations from `slot - 1` aren't taken into consideration, and any boost applied to the block from `slot - 1` is not removed (it should be). In the language of the linked spec issue, this means we are liable to attest to C, even when the majority voting weight has already caused a re-org to B.

### Why remove the call before the state advance?

If we've run fork choice at the start of the slot then it has already dequeued all the attestations from the previous slot, which are the only ones eligible to influence the head in the current slot. Running fork choice again is unnecessary (unless we run it for the next slot and try to pre-empt a re-org, but I don't currently think this is a great idea).

### Performance

Based on Prater testing this adds about 5-25ms of runtime to block proposal times, which are 500-1000ms on average (and spike to 5s+ sometimes due to state handling issues 😢 ). I believe this is a small enough penalty to enable it by default, with the option to disable it via the new flag `--fork-choice-before-proposal-timeout 0`. Upcoming work on block packing and state representation will also reduce block production times in general, while removing the spikes.

### Implementation

Fork choice gets invoked at the start of the slot via the `per_slot_task` function called from the slot timer. It then uses a condition variable to signal to block production that fork choice has been updated. This is a bit funky, but it seems to work. One downside of the timer-based approach is that it doesn't happen automatically in most of the tests. The test added by this PR has to trigger the run manually.
2022-05-20 05:02:11 +00:00
Michael Sproul
6efd95496b Optionally skip RANDAO verification during block production (#3116)
## Proposed Changes

Allow Lighthouse to speculatively create blocks via the `/eth/v1/validators/blocks` endpoint by optionally skipping the RANDAO verification that we introduced in #2740. When `verify_randao=false` is passed as a query parameter the `randao_reveal` is not required to be present, and if present will only be lightly checked (must be a valid BLS sig). If `verify_randao` is omitted it defaults to true and Lighthouse behaves exactly as it did previously, hence this PR is backwards-compatible.

I'd like to get this change into `unstable` pretty soon as I've got 3 projects building on top of it:

- [`blockdreamer`](https://github.com/michaelsproul/blockdreamer), which mocks block production every slot in order to fingerprint clients
- analysis of Lighthouse's block packing _optimality_, which uses `blockdreamer` to extract interesting instances of the attestation packing problem
- analysis of Lighthouse's block packing _performance_ (as in speed) on the `tree-states` branch

## Additional Info

Having tested `blockdreamer` with Prysm, Nimbus and Teku I noticed that none of them verify the randao signature on `/eth/v1/validator/blocks`. I plan to open a PR to the `beacon-APIs` repo anyway so that this parameter can be standardised in case the other clients add RANDAO verification by default in future.
2022-03-28 07:14:13 +00:00
Paul Hauner
267d8babc8 Prepare proposer (#3043)
## Issue Addressed

Resolves #2936

## Proposed Changes

Adds functionality for calling [`validator/prepare_beacon_proposer`](https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Validator/prepareBeaconProposer) in advance.

There is a `BeaconChain::prepare_beacon_proposer` method which, which called, computes the proposer for the next slot. If that proposer has been registered via the `validator/prepare_beacon_proposer` API method, then the `beacon_chain.execution_layer` will be provided the `PayloadAttributes` for us in all future forkchoiceUpdated calls. An artificial forkchoiceUpdated call will be created 4s before each slot, when the head updates and when a validator updates their information.

Additionally, I added strict ordering for calls from the `BeaconChain` to the `ExecutionLayer`. I'm not certain the `ExecutionLayer` will always maintain this ordering, but it's a good start to have consistency from the `BeaconChain`. There are some deadlock opportunities introduced, they are documented in the code.

## Additional Info

- ~~Blocked on #2837~~

Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@GMAIL.com>
2022-03-09 00:42:05 +00:00
Paul Hauner
27e83b888c Retrospective invalidation of exec. payloads for opt. sync (#2837)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

Adds the functionality to allow blocks to be validated/invalidated after their import as per the [optimistic sync spec](https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/dev/sync/optimistic.md#how-to-optimistically-import-blocks). This means:

- Updating `ProtoArray` to allow flipping the `execution_status` of ancestors/descendants based on payload validity updates.
- Creating separation between `execution_layer` and the `beacon_chain` by creating a `PayloadStatus` struct.
- Refactoring how the `execution_layer` selects a `PayloadStatus` from the multiple statuses returned from multiple EEs.
- Adding testing framework for optimistic imports.
- Add `ExecutionBlockHash(Hash256)` new-type struct to avoid confusion between *beacon block roots* and *execution payload hashes*.
- Add `merge` to [`FORKS`](c3a793fd73/Makefile (L17)) in the `Makefile` to ensure we test the beacon chain with merge settings.
    - Fix some tests here that were failing due to a missing execution layer.

## TODO

- [ ] Balance tests

Co-authored-by: Mark Mackey <mark@sigmaprime.io>
2022-02-28 22:07:48 +00:00
Michael Sproul
99d2c33387 Avoid looking up pre-finalization blocks (#2909)
## Issue Addressed

This PR fixes the unnecessary `WARN Single block lookup failed` messages described here:

https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/2866#issuecomment-1008442640

## Proposed Changes

Add a new cache to the `BeaconChain` that tracks the block roots of blocks from before finalization. These could be blocks from the canonical chain (which might need to be read from disk), or old pre-finalization blocks that have been forked out.

The cache also stores a set of block roots for in-progress single block lookups, which duplicates some of the information from sync's `single_block_lookups` hashmap:

a836e180f9/beacon_node/network/src/sync/manager.rs (L192-L196)

On a live node you can confirm that the cache is working by grepping logs for the message: `Rejected attestation to finalized block`.
2022-01-27 22:58:32 +00:00
Michael Sproul
e70daaa3b6 Implement API for block rewards (#2628)
## Proposed Changes

Add an API endpoint for retrieving detailed information about block rewards.

For information on usage see [the docs](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/blob/block-rewards-api/book/src/api-lighthouse.md#lighthouseblock_rewards), and the source.
2022-01-27 01:06:02 +00:00