## Issue Addressed
#3068
## Proposed Changes
Adds support for remote key API.
## Additional Info
Needed to add `is_local_keystore` argument to `delete_definition_and_keystore` to know if we want to delete local or remote key. Previously this wasn't necessary because remotekeys(web3signers) could be deleted.
## Issue Addressed
Resolves#3102
## Proposed Changes
- https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3102#issuecomment-1114835063
- This is not an ideal solution, since the commit hash is missing from version number, but I think it is sufficient.
## Additional Info
I've tested ... :
- `fallback` is updated via `change_version.sh`.
```shell
$ cd scripts/
$ ./change_version.sh 2.2.1 2.2.2
$ git diff ../common/lighthouse_version/src/lib.rs
```
```diff
@ common/lighthouse_version/src/lib.rs:20 @ pub const VERSION: &str = git_version!(
// NOTE: using --match instead of --exclude for compatibility with old Git
"--match=thiswillnevermatchlol"
],
- prefix = "Lighthouse/v2.2.1-",
- fallback = "Lighthouse/v2.2.1"
+ prefix = "Lighthouse/v2.2.2-",
+ fallback = "Lighthouse/v2.2.2"
);
```
- a package built without git info prints expected version number (v2.2.1).
```shell
$ git archive HEAD --output=/tmp/lighthouse.zip
$ cd /tmp
$ unzip lighthouse.zip
$ cd lighthouse
$ cargo build --release
$ target/release/lighthouse --version
Lighthouse v2.2.1
BLS library: blst
SHA256 hardware acceleration: false
Specs: mainnet (true), minimal (false), gnosis (false)
```
## Issue Addressed
Fix a panic due to misuse of the Tokio executor when processing a forkchoiceUpdated response. We were previously calling `process_invalid_execution_payload` from the async function `update_execution_engine_forkchoice_async`, which resulted in a panic because `process_invalid_execution_payload` contains a call to fork choice, which ultimately calls `block_on`.
An example backtrace can be found here: https://gist.github.com/michaelsproul/ac5da03e203d6ffac672423eaf52fb20
## Proposed Changes
Wrap the call to `process_invalid_execution_payload` in a `spawn_blocking` so that `block_on` is no longer called from an async context.
## Additional Info
- I've been thinking about how to catch bugs like this with static analysis (a new Clippy lint).
- The payload validation tests have been re-worked to support distinct responses from the mock EE for newPayload and forkchoiceUpdated. Three new tests have been added covering the `Invalid`, `InvalidBlockHash` and `InvalidTerminalBlock` cases.
- I think we need a bunch more tests of different legal and illegal variations
## Proposed Changes
Recently, changes to Nethermind's Kiln branch have broken our integration tests.
This PR updates the chainspec to Kiln to ensure proper compatibility.
## Issue Addressed
N/A
## Proposed Changes
Previously, we were using `Sleep::is_elapsed()` to check if the shutdown timeout had triggered without polling the sleep. This PR polls the sleep timer.
## Issue Addressed
We still ping peers that are considered in a disconnecting state
## Proposed Changes
Do not ping peers once we decide they are disconnecting
Upgrade logs about ignored rpc messages
## Additional Info
--
## Issue Addressed
NA
## Proposed Changes
Disallow the production of attestations and retrieval of unaggregated attestations when they reference an optimistic head. Add tests to this end.
I also moved `BeaconChain::produce_unaggregated_attestation_for_block` to the `BeaconChainHarness`. It was only being used during tests, so it's nice to stop pretending it's production code. I also needed something that could produce attestations to optimistic blocks in order to simulate scenarios where the justified checkpoint is determined invalid (if no one would attest to an optimistic block, we could never justify it and then flip it to invalid).
## Additional Info
- ~~Blocked on #3126~~
## Issue Addressed
In very rare occasions we've seen most if not all our peers in a chain with which we don't agree. Purging these peers can take a very long time: number of retries of the chain. Meanwhile sync is caught in a loop trying the chain again and again. This makes it so that we fast track purging peers via registering the failed chain to prevent retrying for some time (30 seconds). Longer times could be dangerous since a chain can fail if a batch fails to download for example. In this case, I think it's still acceptable to fast track purging peers since they are nor providing the required info anyway
Co-authored-by: Divma <26765164+divagant-martian@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue Addressed
Addresses sync stalls on v2.2.0 (i.e. https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3147).
## Additional Info
I've avoided doing a full `cargo update` because I noticed there's a new patch version of libp2p and thought it could do with some more testing.
Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
## Issue Addressed
NA
## Proposed Changes
Fixes an issue introduced in #3088 which was causing unnecessary `crit` logs on networks without Bellatrix enabled.
## Additional Info
NA
## Issue Addressed
N/A
## Proposed Changes
https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3133 changed the rpc type limits to be fork aware i.e. if our current fork based on wall clock slot is Altair, then we apply only altair rpc type limits. This is a bug because phase0 blocks can still be sent over rpc and phase 0 block minimum size is smaller than altair block minimum size. So a phase0 block with `size < SIGNED_BEACON_BLOCK_ALTAIR_MIN` will return an `InvalidData` error as it doesn't pass the rpc types bound check.
This error can be seen when we try syncing pre-altair blocks with size smaller than `SIGNED_BEACON_BLOCK_ALTAIR_MIN`.
This PR fixes the issue by also accounting for forks earlier than current_fork in the rpc limits calculation in the `rpc_block_limits_by_fork` function. I decided to hardcode the limits in the function because that seemed simpler than calculating previous forks based on current fork and doing a min across forks. Adding a new fork variant is simple and can the limits can be easily checked in a review.
Adds unit tests and modifies the syncing simulator to check the syncing from across fork boundaries.
The syncing simulator's block 1 would always be of phase 0 minimum size (404 bytes) which is smaller than altair min block size (since block 1 contains no attestations).
## Issue Addressed
NA
## Proposed Changes
Ensures that a `VALID` response from a `forkchoiceUpdate` call will update that block in `ProtoArray`.
I also had to modify the mock execution engine so it wouldn't return valid when all payloads were supposed to be some other static value.
## Additional Info
NA
## Issue Addressed
NA
## Proposed Changes
- Adds more checks to prevent importing blocks atop parent with invalid execution payloads.
- Adds a test for these conditions.
## Additional Info
NA
## Proposed Changes
Cut release v2.2.0 including proposer boost.
## Additional Info
I also updated the clippy lints for the imminent release of Rust 1.60, although LH v2.2.0 will continue to compile using Rust 1.58 (our MSRV).
## Proposed Changes
I did some gardening 🌳 in our dependency tree:
- Remove duplicate versions of `warp` (git vs patch)
- Remove duplicate versions of lots of small deps: `cpufeatures`, `ethabi`, `ethereum-types`, `bitvec`, `nix`, `libsecp256k1`.
- Update MDBX (should resolve#3028). I tested and Lighthouse compiles on Windows 11 now.
- Restore `psutil` back to upstream
- Make some progress updating everything to rand 0.8. There are a few crates stuck on 0.7.
Hopefully this puts us on a better footing for future `cargo audit` issues, and improves compile times slightly.
## Additional Info
Some crates are held back by issues with `zeroize`. libp2p-noise depends on [`chacha20poly1305`](https://crates.io/crates/chacha20poly1305) which depends on zeroize < v1.5, and we can only have one version of zeroize because it's post 1.0 (see https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/6584). The latest version of `zeroize` is v1.5.4, which is used by the new versions of many other crates (e.g. `num-bigint-dig`). Once a new version of chacha20poly1305 is released we can update libp2p-noise and upgrade everything to the latest `zeroize` version.
I've also opened a PR to `blst` related to zeroize: https://github.com/supranational/blst/pull/111
## Issue Addressed
N/A
## Proposed Changes
Fix the upper bound for blocks by root responses to be equal to the max merge block size instead of altair.
Further make the rpc response limits fork aware.
## Proposed Changes
Increase the default `--slots-per-restore-point` to 8192 for a 4x reduction in freezer DB disk usage.
Existing nodes that use the previous default of 2048 will be left unchanged. Newly synced nodes (with or without checkpoint sync) will use the new 8192 default.
Long-term we could do away with the freezer DB entirely for validator-only nodes, but this change is much simpler and grants us some extra space in the short term. We can also roll it out gradually across our nodes by purging databases one by one, while keeping the Ansible config the same.
## Additional Info
We ignore a change from 2048 to 8192 if the user hasn't set the 8192 explicitly. We fire a debug log in the case where we do ignore:
```
DEBG Ignoring slots-per-restore-point config in favour of on-disk value, on_disk: 2048, config: 8192
```
## Proposed Changes
Mitigate the fork choice attacks described in [_Three Attacks on Proof-of-Stake Ethereum_](https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.10086) by enabling proposer boost @ 70% on mainnet.
Proposer boost has been running with stability on Prater for a few months now, and is safe to roll out gradually on mainnet. I'll argue that the financial impact of rolling out gradually is also minimal.
Consider how a proposer-boosted validator handles two types of re-orgs:
## Ex ante re-org (from the paper)
In the mitigated attack, a malicious proposer releases their block at slot `n + 1` late so that it re-orgs the block at the slot _after_ them (at slot `n + 2`). Non-boosting validators will follow this re-org and vote for block `n + 1` in slot `n + 2`. Boosted validators will vote for `n + 2`. If the boosting validators are outnumbered, there'll be a re-org to the malicious block from `n + 1` and validators applying the boost will have their slot `n + 2` attestations miss head (and target on an epoch boundary). Note that all the attesters from slot `n + 1` are doomed to lose their head vote rewards, but this is the same regardless of boosting.
Therefore, Lighthouse nodes stand to miss slightly more head votes than other nodes if they are in the minority while applying the proposer boost. Once the proposer boost nodes gain a majority, this trend reverses.
## Ex post re-org (using the boost)
The other type of re-org is an ex post re-org using the strategy described here: https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/2860. With this strategy, boosted nodes will follow the attempted re-org and again lose a head vote if the re-org is unsuccessful. Once boosting is widely adopted, the re-orgs will succeed and the non-boosting validators will lose out.
I don't think there are (m)any validators applying this strategy, because it is irrational to attempt it before boosting is widely adopted. Therefore I think we can safely ignore this possibility.
## Risk Assessment
From observing re-orgs on mainnet I don't think ex ante re-orgs are very common. I've observed around 1 per day for the last month on my node (see: https://gist.github.com/michaelsproul/3b2142fa8fe0ff767c16553f96959e8c), compared to 2.5 ex post re-orgs per day.
Given one extra slot per day where attesting will cause a missed head vote, each individual validator has a 1/32 chance of being assigned to that slot. So we have an increase of 1/32 missed head votes per validator per day in expectation. Given that we currently see ~7 head vote misses per validator per day due to late/missing blocks (and re-orgs), this represents only a (1/32)/7 = 0.45% increase in missed head votes in expectation. I believe this is so small that we shouldn't worry about it. Particularly as getting proposer boost deployed is good for network health and may enable us to drive down the number of late blocks over time (which will decrease head vote misses).
## TL;DR
Enable proposer boost now and release ASAP, as financial downside is a 0.45% increase in missed head votes until widespread adoption.
## Proposed Changes
Add a `lighthouse db` command with three initial subcommands:
- `lighthouse db version`: print the database schema version.
- `lighthouse db migrate --to N`: manually upgrade (or downgrade!) the database to a different version.
- `lighthouse db inspect --column C`: log the key and size in bytes of every value in a given `DBColumn`.
This PR lays the groundwork for other changes, namely:
- Mark's fast-deposit sync (https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/2915), for which I think we should implement a database downgrade (from v9 to v8).
- My `tree-states` work, which already implements a downgrade (v10 to v8).
- Standalone purge commands like `lighthouse db purge-dht` per https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/2824.
## Additional Info
I updated the `strum` crate to 0.24.0, which necessitated some changes in the network code to remove calls to deprecated methods.
Thanks to @winksaville for the motivation, and implementation work that I used as a source of inspiration (https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/2685).
## Issue Addressed
MEV boost compatibility
## Proposed Changes
See #2987
## Additional Info
This is blocked on the stabilization of a couple specs, [here](https://github.com/ethereum/beacon-APIs/pull/194) and [here](https://github.com/flashbots/mev-boost/pull/20).
Additional TODO's and outstanding questions
- [ ] MEV boost JWT Auth
- [ ] Will `builder_proposeBlindedBlock` return the revealed payload for the BN to propogate
- [ ] Should we remove `private-tx-proposals` flag and communicate BN <> VC with blinded blocks by default once these endpoints enter the beacon-API's repo? This simplifies merge transition logic.
Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: realbigsean <sean@sigmaprime.io>
## Issue Addressed
N/A
## Proposed Changes
- Update the JSON-RPC id field for both our request and response objects to be a `serde_json::Value` rather than a `u32`. This field could be a string or a number according to the JSON-RPC 2.0 spec. We only ever set it to a number, but if, for example, we get a response that wraps this number in quotes, we would fail to deserialize it. I think because we're not doing any validation around this id otherwise, we should be less strict with it in this regard.
## Additional Info
Co-authored-by: realbigsean <sean@sigmaprime.io>
## Issue Addressed
NA
## Proposed Changes
In the first Goerli shadow-fork, Lighthouse was getting timeouts from Geth which prevented the LH+Geth pair from progressing.
There's not a whole lot of information I can use to set these timeouts. The most interesting pieces of information I have are quotes from Marius from Geth:
- *"Fcu also needs to construct the block which can take 2sec"* ([Discord](https://discord.com/channels/595666850260713488/910910348922589184/958006487052066836))
- *"2 sec should be ok for new payload, weird that it times out"* ([Discord](https://discord.com/channels/595666850260713488/910910348922589184/958006487052066836))
I don't think we should be so worried about getting these timeouts correct now. No one really knows how long the various EEs are going to take, it's a bit too early in development. With these changes I'm giving some headroom so that we don't fail just because EEs are quite optimized enough. I've set the value to 6s (half a mainnet slot), since I think anything beyond 6s is an interesting problem that we want to know about sooner rather than later.
## Additional Info
NA
## Issue Addressed
N/A
## Proposed Changes
Set the engine state to `EngineState::Offline` if the engine api call fails during broadcast. This caused issues while pausing sync when the execution engine is offline because `EngineState` always returned `Synced`.
## Issue Addressed
N/A
## Proposed Changes
The slashing db import log showed the latest proposed block in the db as `latest block` which might be potentially confusing.
## Proposed Changes
Allow Lighthouse to speculatively create blocks via the `/eth/v1/validators/blocks` endpoint by optionally skipping the RANDAO verification that we introduced in #2740. When `verify_randao=false` is passed as a query parameter the `randao_reveal` is not required to be present, and if present will only be lightly checked (must be a valid BLS sig). If `verify_randao` is omitted it defaults to true and Lighthouse behaves exactly as it did previously, hence this PR is backwards-compatible.
I'd like to get this change into `unstable` pretty soon as I've got 3 projects building on top of it:
- [`blockdreamer`](https://github.com/michaelsproul/blockdreamer), which mocks block production every slot in order to fingerprint clients
- analysis of Lighthouse's block packing _optimality_, which uses `blockdreamer` to extract interesting instances of the attestation packing problem
- analysis of Lighthouse's block packing _performance_ (as in speed) on the `tree-states` branch
## Additional Info
Having tested `blockdreamer` with Prysm, Nimbus and Teku I noticed that none of them verify the randao signature on `/eth/v1/validator/blocks`. I plan to open a PR to the `beacon-APIs` repo anyway so that this parameter can be standardised in case the other clients add RANDAO verification by default in future.
## Issue Addressed
No issue, just updating merge ASCII art.
## Proposed Changes
Updating ASCII art for merge.
## Additional Info
Please provide any additional information. For example, future considerations
or information useful for reviewers.
## Issue Addressed
#3103
## Proposed Changes
Parse `http-address` and `metrics-address` as `IpAddr` for both the beacon node and validator client to support IPv6 addresses.
Also adjusts parsing of CORS origins to allow for IPv6 addresses.
## Usage
You can now set `http-address` and/or `metrics-address` flags to IPv6 addresses.
For example, the following:
`lighthouse bn --http --http-address :: --metrics --metrics-address ::1`
will expose the beacon node HTTP server on `[::]` (equivalent of `0.0.0.0` in IPv4) and the metrics HTTP server on `localhost` (the equivalent of `127.0.0.1` in IPv4)
The beacon node API can then be accessed by:
`curl "http://[server-ipv6-address]:5052/eth/v1/some_endpoint"`
And the metrics server api can be accessed by:
`curl "http://localhost:5054/metrics"` or by `curl "http://[::1]:5054/metrics"`
## Additional Info
On most Linux distributions the `v6only` flag is set to `false` by default (see the section for the `IPV6_V6ONLY` flag in https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/ipv6.7.html) which means IPv4 connections will continue to function on a IPv6 address (providing it is appropriately mapped). This means that even if the Lighthouse API is running on `::` it is also possible to accept IPv4 connections.
However on Windows, this is not the case. The `v6only` flag is set to `true` so binding to `::` will only allow IPv6 connections.
## Issue Addressed
Removes the await points in sync waiting for a processor response for rpc block processing. Built on top of #3029
This also handles a couple of bugs in the previous code and adds a relatively comprehensive test suite.
## Issue Addressed
Attempt to fix CI
## Proposed Changes
- ~~install `node-gyp-build` which should look for prebuilt binaries for `@truffle-suite/bigint_buffer`. This should make it so we don't have to build it directly. See: https://github.com/trufflesuite/ganache/pull/1414~~ this didn't work
- This also uses the `setup-node` action because it includes caching. Sort of a shot in the dark, but the ganache github repo uses it and the failures seem to be for missing files in a node cache
Co-authored-by: realbigsean <sean@sigmaprime.io>
## Issue Addressed
Hopefully makes windows ganache installation more reliable.
## Proposed Changes
- use `chocolatey` to install windows build tools. This seems to often be the prescribed solution for `node gyp` issues. `chocolatey` is used here because `npm install --global --production windows-build-tools` hangs in github actions
## Additional Info
I still haven't found why the prior installation technique would sometimes work, the `windows-2019` environments seem to be identical across successes and failures. I think this should be re-run a few times to see if it can consistently pass
Co-authored-by: realbigsean <sean@sigmaprime.io>
## Issue Addressed
No issue
## Proposed Changes
Correct typos in book
## Additional Info
Nothing to add
Co-authored-by: Emilia Hane <58548332+emhane@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue Addressed
Fix the `cargo-audit` failure for the recent openssl bug involving parsing of untrusted certificates (CVE-2022-0778).
## Additional Info
Lighthouse loads remote certificates in the following cases:
* When connecting to an eth1 node (`--eth1-endpoints`).
* When connecting to a beacon node from the VC (`--beacon-nodes`).
* When connecting to a beacon node for checkpoint sync (`--checkpoint-sync-url`).
In all of these cases we are already placing a lot of trust in the server at the other end, however due to the scope for MITM attacks we are still potentially vulnerable. E.g. an ISP could inject an invalid certificate for the remote host which would cause Lighthouse to hang indefinitely.
## Proposed Changes
Set a minimum supported Rust version (MSRV) in the `Cargo.toml` for the Lighthouse binary so that attempts to compile it with an outdated compiler fail immediately with a clear error.
To ensure that the codebase builds with the MSRV I've also added a Github actions job that runs `cargo check` using the MSRV extracted from `Cargo.toml`. This will force us to keep it up to date.
I opted to use `cargo check` rather than Clippy because Clippy frequently introduces new lints that we adopt, so our MSRV for Clippy is usually the most recent Rust version, while the MSRV for building Lighthouse is older.
## Issue Addressed
NA
## Proposed Changes
Address a CI failure in the release suite.
Example: https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/actions/runs/1984266187
## Additional Info
I believe we should merge this into `unstable` and `stable`. Then, move the `v2.1.4` commit to target the commit with the updated CI. It's sad that v2.1.4 has two commits, but they're functionally equivalent for users.
## Issue Addressed
NA
## Proposed Changes
- Bump version to `v2.1.4`
- Run `cargo update`
## Additional Info
I think this release should be published around the 15th of March.
Presently `blocked` for testing on our infrastructure.
