cerc-io/lighthouse
11
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
5,952 Commits 2 Branches 0 Tags 125 MiB
e181741d38
Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jimmy Chen
fc7f1ba6b9 Phase 0 attestation rewards via Beacon API (#4474) 
## Issue Addressed

Addresses #4026.

Beacon-API spec [here](https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Beacon/getAttestationsRewards).

Endpoint: `POST /eth/v1/beacon/rewards/attestations/{epoch}`

This endpoint already supports post-Altair epochs. This PR adds support for phase 0 rewards calculation.

## Proposed Changes

- [x] Attestation rewards API to support phase 0 rewards calculation, re-using logic from `state_processing`. Refactored `get_attestation_deltas` slightly to support computing deltas for a subset of validators.
- [x] Add `inclusion_delay` to `ideal_rewards` (`beacon-API` spec update to follow)
- [x] Add `inactivity` penalties to both `ideal_rewards` and `total_rewards` (`beacon-API` spec update to follow)
- [x] Add tests to compute attestation rewards and compare results with beacon states 

## Additional Notes

- The extra penalty for missing attestations or being slashed during an inactivity leak is currently not included in the API response (for both phase 0 and Altair) in the spec. 
- I went with adding `inactivity` as a separate component rather than combining them with the 4 rewards, because this is how it was grouped in [the phase 0 spec](https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/dev/specs/phase0/beacon-chain.md#get_attestation_deltas). During inactivity leak, all rewards include the optimal reward, and inactivity penalties are calculated separately (see below code snippet from the spec), so it would be quite confusing if we merge them. This would also work better with Altair, because there's no "cancelling" of rewards and inactivity penalties are more separate.
- Altair calculation logic (to include inactivity penalties) to be updated in a follow-up PR.

```python
def get_attestation_deltas(state: BeaconState) -> Tuple[Sequence[Gwei], Sequence[Gwei]]:
    """
    Return attestation reward/penalty deltas for each validator.
    """
    source_rewards, source_penalties = get_source_deltas(state)
    target_rewards, target_penalties = get_target_deltas(state)
    head_rewards, head_penalties = get_head_deltas(state)
    inclusion_delay_rewards, _ = get_inclusion_delay_deltas(state)
    _, inactivity_penalties = get_inactivity_penalty_deltas(state)

    rewards = [
        source_rewards[i] + target_rewards[i] + head_rewards[i] + inclusion_delay_rewards[i]
        for i in range(len(state.validators))
    ]

    penalties = [
        source_penalties[i] + target_penalties[i] + head_penalties[i] + inactivity_penalties[i]
        for i in range(len(state.validators))
    ]

    return rewards, penalties
```

## Example API Response

<details>
  <summary>Click me</summary>
  
```json
{
  "ideal_rewards": [
    {
      "effective_balance": "1000000000",
      "head": "6638",
      "target": "6638",
      "source": "6638",
      "inclusion_delay": "9783",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "2000000000",
      "head": "13276",
      "target": "13276",
      "source": "13276",
      "inclusion_delay": "19565",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "3000000000",
      "head": "19914",
      "target": "19914",
      "source": "19914",
      "inclusion_delay": "29349",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "4000000000",
      "head": "26553",
      "target": "26553",
      "source": "26553",
      "inclusion_delay": "39131",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "5000000000",
      "head": "33191",
      "target": "33191",
      "source": "33191",
      "inclusion_delay": "48914",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "6000000000",
      "head": "39829",
      "target": "39829",
      "source": "39829",
      "inclusion_delay": "58697",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "7000000000",
      "head": "46468",
      "target": "46468",
      "source": "46468",
      "inclusion_delay": "68480",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "8000000000",
      "head": "53106",
      "target": "53106",
      "source": "53106",
      "inclusion_delay": "78262",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "9000000000",
      "head": "59744",
      "target": "59744",
      "source": "59744",
      "inclusion_delay": "88046",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "10000000000",
      "head": "66383",
      "target": "66383",
      "source": "66383",
      "inclusion_delay": "97828",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "11000000000",
      "head": "73021",
      "target": "73021",
      "source": "73021",
      "inclusion_delay": "107611",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "12000000000",
      "head": "79659",
      "target": "79659",
      "source": "79659",
      "inclusion_delay": "117394",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "13000000000",
      "head": "86298",
      "target": "86298",
      "source": "86298",
      "inclusion_delay": "127176",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "14000000000",
      "head": "92936",
      "target": "92936",
      "source": "92936",
      "inclusion_delay": "136959",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "15000000000",
      "head": "99574",
      "target": "99574",
      "source": "99574",
      "inclusion_delay": "146742",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "16000000000",
      "head": "106212",
      "target": "106212",
      "source": "106212",
      "inclusion_delay": "156525",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "17000000000",
      "head": "112851",
      "target": "112851",
      "source": "112851",
      "inclusion_delay": "166307",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "18000000000",
      "head": "119489",
      "target": "119489",
      "source": "119489",
      "inclusion_delay": "176091",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "19000000000",
      "head": "126127",
      "target": "126127",
      "source": "126127",
      "inclusion_delay": "185873",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "20000000000",
      "head": "132766",
      "target": "132766",
      "source": "132766",
      "inclusion_delay": "195656",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "21000000000",
      "head": "139404",
      "target": "139404",
      "source": "139404",
      "inclusion_delay": "205439",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "22000000000",
      "head": "146042",
      "target": "146042",
      "source": "146042",
      "inclusion_delay": "215222",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "23000000000",
      "head": "152681",
      "target": "152681",
      "source": "152681",
      "inclusion_delay": "225004",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "24000000000",
      "head": "159319",
      "target": "159319",
      "source": "159319",
      "inclusion_delay": "234787",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "25000000000",
      "head": "165957",
      "target": "165957",
      "source": "165957",
      "inclusion_delay": "244570",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "26000000000",
      "head": "172596",
      "target": "172596",
      "source": "172596",
      "inclusion_delay": "254352",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "27000000000",
      "head": "179234",
      "target": "179234",
      "source": "179234",
      "inclusion_delay": "264136",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "28000000000",
      "head": "185872",
      "target": "185872",
      "source": "185872",
      "inclusion_delay": "273918",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "29000000000",
      "head": "192510",
      "target": "192510",
      "source": "192510",
      "inclusion_delay": "283701",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "30000000000",
      "head": "199149",
      "target": "199149",
      "source": "199149",
      "inclusion_delay": "293484",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "31000000000",
      "head": "205787",
      "target": "205787",
      "source": "205787",
      "inclusion_delay": "303267",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "32000000000",
      "head": "212426",
      "target": "212426",
      "source": "212426",
      "inclusion_delay": "313050",
      "inactivity": "0"
    }
  ],
  "total_rewards": [
    {
      "validator_index": "0",
      "head": "212426",
      "target": "212426",
      "source": "212426",
      "inclusion_delay": "313050",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "validator_index": "32",
      "head": "212426",
      "target": "212426",
      "source": "212426",
      "inclusion_delay": "313050",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "validator_index": "63",
      "head": "-357771",
      "target": "-357771",
      "source": "-357771",
      "inclusion_delay": "0",
      "inactivity": "0"
    }
  ]
}
```
</details>
 2023-07-18 01:48:40 +00:00
Jimmy Chen
46be05f728 Cache target attester balances for unrealized FFG progression calculation (#4362) 
## Issue Addressed

#4118 

## Proposed Changes

This PR introduces a "progressive balances" cache on the `BeaconState`, which keeps track of the accumulated target attestation balance for the current & previous epochs. The cached values are utilised by fork choice to calculate unrealized justification and finalization (instead of converting epoch participation arrays to balances for each block we receive).

This optimization will be rolled out gradually to allow for more testing. A new `--progressive-balances disabled|checked|strict|fast` flag is introduced to support this:
- `checked`: enabled with checks against participation cache, and falls back to the existing epoch processing calculation if there is a total target attester balance mismatch. There is no performance gain from this as the participation cache still needs to be computed. **This is the default mode for now.**
- `strict`: enabled with checks against participation cache, returns error if there is a mismatch. **Used for testing only**.
- `fast`: enabled with no comparative checks and without computing the participation cache. This mode gives us the performance gains from the optimization. This is still experimental and not currently recommended for production usage, but will become the default mode in a future release.
- `disabled`: disable the usage of progressive cache, and use the existing method for FFG progression calculation. This mode may be useful if we find a bug and want to stop the frequent error logs.

### Tasks

- [x] Initial cache implementation in `BeaconState`
- [x] Perform checks in fork choice to compare the progressive balances cache against results from `ParticipationCache`
- [x] Add CLI flag, and disable the optimization by default
- [x] Testing on Goerli & Benchmarking
- [x]  Move caching logic from state processing to the `ProgressiveBalancesCache` (see [this comment](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/4362#discussion_r1230877001))
- [x] Add attesting balance metrics



Co-authored-by: Jimmy Chen <jimmy@sigmaprime.io>
 2023-06-30 01:13:06 +00:00
realbigsean
20ebf1f3c1 Realized unrealized experimentation (#3322) 
## Issue Addressed

Add a flag that optionally enables unrealized vote tracking.  Would like to test out on testnets and benchmark differences in methods of vote tracking. This PR includes a DB schema upgrade to enable to new vote tracking style.


Co-authored-by: realbigsean <sean@sigmaprime.io>
Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
Co-authored-by: sean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mac L <mjladson@pm.me>
 2022-07-25 23:53:26 +00:00
realbigsean
de49c7ddaa
1.1.5 merge spec tests (#2781) 
* Fix arbitrary check kintsugi

* Add merge chain spec fields, and a function to determine which constant to use based on the state variant

* increment spec test version

* Remove `Transaction` enum wrapper

* Remove Transaction new-type

* Remove gas validations

* Add `--terminal-block-hash-epoch-override` flag

* Increment spec tests version to 1.1.5

* Remove extraneous gossip verification https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2687

* - Remove unused Error variants
- Require both "terminal-block-hash-epoch-override" and "terminal-block-hash-override" when either flag is used

* - Remove a couple more unused Error variants

Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
 2021-12-02 14:26:55 +11:00
Michael Sproul
9c785a9b33 Optimize process_attestation with active balance cache (#2560) 
## Proposed Changes

Cache the total active balance for the current epoch in the `BeaconState`. Computing this value takes around 1ms, and this was negatively impacting block processing times on Prater, particularly when reconstructing states.

With a large number of attestations in each block, I saw the `process_attestations` function taking 150ms, which means that reconstructing hot states can take up to 4.65s (31 * 150ms), and reconstructing freezer states can take up to 307s (2047 * 150ms).

I opted to add the cache to the beacon state rather than computing the total active balance at the start of state processing and threading it through. Although this would be simpler in a way, it would waste time, particularly during block replay, as the total active balance doesn't change for the duration of an epoch. So we save ~32ms for hot states, and up to 8.1s for freezer states (using `--slots-per-restore-point 8192`).
 2021-09-03 07:50:43 +00:00
Pawan Dhananjay
5a3bcd2904 Validator monitor support for sync committees (#2476) 
## Issue Addressed

N/A

## Proposed Changes

Add functionality in the validator monitor to provide sync committee related metrics for monitored validators.


Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
 2021-08-31 23:31:36 +00:00
realbigsean
303deb9969 Rust 1.54.0 lints (#2483) 
## Issue Addressed

N/A

## Proposed Changes

- Removing a bunch of unnecessary references
- Updated `Error::VariantError` to `Error::Variant`
- There were additional enum variant lints that I ignored, because I thought our variant names were fine
- removed `MonitoredValidator`'s `pubkey` field, because I couldn't find it used anywhere. It looks like we just use the string version of the pubkey (the `id` field) if there is no index

## Additional Info



Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
 2021-07-30 01:11:47 +00:00
Paul Hauner
6e3ca48cb9 Cache participating indices for Altair epoch processing (#2416) 
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

This PR addresses two things:

1. Allows the `ValidatorMonitor` to work with Altair states.
1. Optimizes `altair::process_epoch` (see [code](https://github.com/paulhauner/lighthouse/blob/participation-cache/consensus/state_processing/src/per_epoch_processing/altair/participation_cache.rs) for description)

## Breaking Changes

The breaking changes in this PR revolve around one premise:

*After the Altair fork, it's not longer possible (given only a `BeaconState`) to identify if a validator had *any* attestation included during some epoch. The best we can do is see if that validator made the "timely" source/target/head flags.*

Whilst this seems annoying, it's not actually too bad. Finalization is based upon "timely target" attestations, so that's really the most important thing. Although there's *some* value in knowing if a validator had *any* attestation included, it's far more important to know about "timely target" participation, since this is what affects finality and justification.

For simplicity and consistency, I've also removed the ability to determine if *any* attestation was included from metrics and API endpoints. Now, all Altair and non-Altair states will simply report on the head/target attestations.

The following section details where we've removed fields and provides replacement values.

### Breaking Changes: Prometheus Metrics

Some participation metrics have been removed and replaced. Some were removed since they are no longer relevant to Altair (e.g., total attesting balance) and others replaced with gwei values instead of pre-computed values. This provides more flexibility at display-time (e.g., Grafana).

The following metrics were added as replacements:

- `beacon_participation_prev_epoch_head_attesting_gwei_total`
- `beacon_participation_prev_epoch_target_attesting_gwei_total`
- `beacon_participation_prev_epoch_source_attesting_gwei_total`
- `beacon_participation_prev_epoch_active_gwei_total`

The following metrics were removed:

- `beacon_participation_prev_epoch_attester`
   - instead use `beacon_participation_prev_epoch_source_attesting_gwei_total / beacon_participation_prev_epoch_active_gwei_total`.
- `beacon_participation_prev_epoch_target_attester`
   - instead use `beacon_participation_prev_epoch_target_attesting_gwei_total / beacon_participation_prev_epoch_active_gwei_total`.
- `beacon_participation_prev_epoch_head_attester`
   - instead use `beacon_participation_prev_epoch_head_attesting_gwei_total / beacon_participation_prev_epoch_active_gwei_total`.

The `beacon_participation_prev_epoch_attester` endpoint has been removed. Users should instead use the pre-existing `beacon_participation_prev_epoch_target_attester`. 

### Breaking Changes: HTTP API

The `/lighthouse/validator_inclusion/{epoch}/{validator_id}` endpoint loses the following fields:

- `current_epoch_attesting_gwei` (use `current_epoch_target_attesting_gwei` instead)
- `previous_epoch_attesting_gwei` (use `previous_epoch_target_attesting_gwei` instead)

The `/lighthouse/validator_inclusion/{epoch}/{validator_id}` endpoint lose the following fields:

- `is_current_epoch_attester` (use `is_current_epoch_target_attester` instead)
- `is_previous_epoch_attester` (use `is_previous_epoch_target_attester` instead)
- `is_active_in_current_epoch` becomes `is_active_unslashed_in_current_epoch`.
- `is_active_in_previous_epoch` becomes `is_active_unslashed_in_previous_epoch`.

## Additional Info

NA

## TODO

- [x] Deal with total balances
- [x] Update validator_inclusion API
- [ ] Ensure `beacon_participation_prev_epoch_target_attester` and `beacon_participation_prev_epoch_head_attester` work before Altair

Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
 2021-07-27 07:01:01 +00:00
Michael Sproul
b4689e20c6 Altair consensus changes and refactors (#2279) 
## Proposed Changes

Implement the consensus changes necessary for the upcoming Altair hard fork.

## Additional Info

This is quite a heavy refactor, with pivotal types like the `BeaconState` and `BeaconBlock` changing from structs to enums. This ripples through the whole codebase with field accesses changing to methods, e.g. `state.slot` => `state.slot()`.


Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
 2021-07-09 06:15:32 +00:00