Commit Graph

73 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Divma
56d596ee42 Unban peers at the swarm level when purged (#2855)
## Issue Addressed
#2840
2021-12-20 23:45:21 +00:00
Divma
eee0260a68 do not count dialing peers in the connection limit (#2856)
## Issue Addressed
#2841 

## Proposed Changes
Not counting dialing peers while deciding if we have reached the target peers in case of outbound peers.

## Additional Info
Checked this running in nodes and bandwidth looks normal, peer count looks normal too
2021-12-15 05:48:45 +00:00
realbigsean
b22ac95d7f v1.1.6 Fork Choice changes (#2822)
## Issue Addressed

Resolves: https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/2741
Includes: https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/2853 so that we can get ssz static tests passing here on v1.1.6. If we want to merge that first, we can make this diff slightly smaller

## Proposed Changes

- Changes the `justified_epoch` and `finalized_epoch` in the `ProtoArrayNode` each to an `Option<Checkpoint>`. The `Option` is necessary only for the migration, so not ideal. But does allow us to add a default logic to `None` on these fields during the database migration.
- Adds a database migration from a legacy fork choice struct to the new one, search for all necessary block roots in fork choice by iterating through blocks in the db.
- updates related to https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2727
  -  We will have to update the persisted forkchoice to make sure the justified checkpoint stored is correct according to the updated fork choice logic. This boils down to setting the forkchoice store's justified checkpoint to the justified checkpoint of the block that advanced the finalized checkpoint to the current one. 
  - AFAICT there's no migration steps necessary for the update to allow applying attestations from prior blocks, but would appreciate confirmation on that
- I updated the consensus spec tests to v1.1.6 here, but they will fail until we also implement the proposer score boost updates. I confirmed that the previously failing scenario `new_finalized_slot_is_justified_checkpoint_ancestor` will now pass after the boost updates, but haven't confirmed _all_ tests will pass because I just quickly stubbed out the proposer boost test scenario formatting.
- This PR now also includes proposer boosting https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2730

## Additional Info
I realized checking justified and finalized roots in fork choice makes it more likely that we trigger this bug: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2727

It's possible the combination of justified checkpoint and finalized checkpoint in the forkchoice store is different from in any block in fork choice. So when trying to startup our store's justified checkpoint seems invalid to the rest of fork choice (but it should be valid). When this happens we get an `InvalidBestNode` error and fail to start up. So I'm including that bugfix in this branch.

Todo:

- [x] Fix fork choice tests
- [x] Self review
- [x] Add fix for https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2727
- [x] Rebase onto Kintusgi 
- [x] Fix `num_active_validators` calculation as @michaelsproul pointed out
- [x] Clean up db migrations

Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
2021-12-13 20:43:22 +00:00
Lion - dapplion
2984f4b474 Remove wrong duplicated comment (#2751)
## Issue Addressed

Remove wrong duplicated comment. Comment was copied from ban_peer() but doesn't apply to unban_peer()
2021-12-06 05:34:15 +00:00
Pawan Dhananjay
f3c237cfa0
Restrict network limits based on merge fork epoch (#2839) 2021-12-02 14:32:31 +11:00
Paul Hauner
ab86b42874
Kintsugi Diva comments (#2836)
* Remove TODOs

* Fix typo
2021-12-02 14:29:59 +11:00
Paul Hauner
82a81524e3
Bump crate versions (#2829) 2021-12-02 14:29:57 +11:00
pawan
44a7b37ce3
Increase network limits (#2796)
Fix max packet sizes

Fix max_payload_size function

Add merge block test

Fix max size calculation; fix up test

Clear comments

Add a payload_size_function

Use safe arith for payload calculation

Return an error if block too big in block production

Separate test to check if block is over limit
2021-12-02 14:29:20 +11:00
Mark Mackey
5687c56d51
Initial merge changes
Added Execution Payload from Rayonism Fork

Updated new Containers to match Merge Spec

Updated BeaconBlockBody for Merge Spec

Completed updating BeaconState and BeaconBlockBody

Modified ExecutionPayload<T> to use Transaction<T>

Mostly Finished Changes for beacon-chain.md

Added some things for fork-choice.md

Update to match new fork-choice.md/fork.md changes

ran cargo fmt

Added Missing Pieces in eth2_libp2p for Merge

fix ef test

Various Changes to Conform Closer to Merge Spec
2021-12-02 14:26:50 +11:00
Age Manning
6625aa4afe Status'd Peer Not Found (#2761)
## Issue Addressed

Users are experiencing `Status'd peer not found` errors

## Proposed Changes

Although I cannot reproduce this error, this is only one connection state change that is not addressed in the peer manager (that I could see). The error occurs because the number of disconnected peers in the peerdb becomes out of sync with the actual number of disconnected peers. From what I can tell almost all possible connection state changes are handled, except for the case when a disconnected peer changes to be disconnecting. This can potentially happen at the peer connection limit, where a previously connected peer switches to disconnecting. 

This PR decrements the disconnected counter when this event occurs and from what I can tell, covers all possible disconnection state changes in the peer manager.
2021-11-28 22:46:17 +00:00
Pawan Dhananjay
9eedb6b888 Allow additional subnet peers (#2823)
## Issue Addressed

N/A

## Proposed Changes

1. Don't disconnect peer from dht on connection limit errors
2. Bump up `PRIORITY_PEER_EXCESS` to allow for dialing upto 60 peers by default.



Co-authored-by: Diva M <divma@protonmail.com>
2021-11-25 21:27:08 +00:00
Michael Sproul
2c07a72980 Revert peer DB changes from #2724 (#2828)
## Proposed Changes

This reverts commit 53562010ec from PR #2724

Hopefully this will restore the reliability of the sync simulator.
2021-11-25 03:45:52 +00:00
Age Manning
0b319d4926 Inform dialing via the behaviour (#2814)
I had this change but it seems to have been lost in chaos of network upgrades.

The swarm dialing event seems to miss some cases where we dial via the behaviour. This causes an error to be logged as the peer manager doesn't know about some dialing events. 

This shifts the logic to the behaviour to inform the peer manager.
2021-11-19 04:42:33 +00:00
Divma
53562010ec Move peer db writes to eth2 libp2p (#2724)
## Issue Addressed
Part of a bigger effort to make the network globals read only. This moves all writes to the `PeerDB` to the `eth2_libp2p` crate. Limiting writes to the peer manager is a slightly more complicated issue for a next PR, to keep things reviewable.

## Proposed Changes
- Make the peers field in the globals a private field.
- Allow mutable access to the peers field to `eth2_libp2p` for now.
- Add a new network message to update the sync state.

Co-authored-by: Age Manning <Age@AgeManning.com>
2021-11-19 04:42:31 +00:00
Age Manning
e519af9012 Update Lighthouse Dependencies (#2818)
## Issue Addressed

Updates lighthouse dependencies to resolve audit issues in out-dated deps.
2021-11-18 05:08:42 +00:00
Pawan Dhananjay
e32c09bfda Fix decoding max length (#2816)
## Issue Addressed

N/A

## Proposed Changes

Fix encoder max length to the correct value (`MAX_RPC_SIZE`).
2021-11-16 22:23:39 +00:00
Age Manning
a43a2448b7 Investigate and correct RPC Response Timeouts (#2804)
RPC Responses are for some reason not removing their timeout when they are completing. 

As an example:

```
Nov 09 01:18:20.256 DEBG Received BlocksByRange Request          step: 1, start_slot: 728465, count: 64, peer_id: 16Uiu2HAmEmBURejquBUMgKAqxViNoPnSptTWLA2CfgSPnnKENBNw
Nov 09 01:18:20.263 DEBG Received BlocksByRange Request          step: 1, start_slot: 728593, count: 64, peer_id: 16Uiu2HAmEmBURejquBUMgKAqxViNoPnSptTWLA2CfgSPnnKENBNw
Nov 09 01:18:20.483 DEBG BlocksByRange Response sent             returned: 63, requested: 64, current_slot: 2466389, start_slot: 728465, msg: Failed to return all requested blocks, peer: 16Uiu2HAmEmBURejquBUMgKAqxViNoPnSptTWLA2CfgSPnnKENBNw
Nov 09 01:18:20.500 DEBG BlocksByRange Response sent             returned: 64, requested: 64, current_slot: 2466389, start_slot: 728593, peer: 16Uiu2HAmEmBURejquBUMgKAqxViNoPnSptTWLA2CfgSPnnKENBNw
Nov 09 01:18:21.068 DEBG Received BlocksByRange Request          step: 1, start_slot: 728529, count: 64, peer_id: 16Uiu2HAmEmBURejquBUMgKAqxViNoPnSptTWLA2CfgSPnnKENBNw
Nov 09 01:18:21.272 DEBG BlocksByRange Response sent             returned: 63, requested: 64, current_slot: 2466389, start_slot: 728529, msg: Failed to return all requested blocks, peer: 16Uiu2HAmEmBURejquBUMgKAqxViNoPnSptTWLA2CfgSPnnKENBNw
Nov 09 01:18:23.434 DEBG Received BlocksByRange Request          step: 1, start_slot: 728657, count: 64, peer_id: 16Uiu2HAmEmBURejquBUMgKAqxViNoPnSptTWLA2CfgSPnnKENBNw
Nov 09 01:18:23.665 DEBG BlocksByRange Response sent             returned: 64, requested: 64, current_slot: 2466390, start_slot: 728657, peer: 16Uiu2HAmEmBURejquBUMgKAqxViNoPnSptTWLA2CfgSPnnKENBNw
Nov 09 01:18:25.851 DEBG Received BlocksByRange Request          step: 1, start_slot: 728337, count: 64, peer_id: 16Uiu2HAmEmBURejquBUMgKAqxViNoPnSptTWLA2CfgSPnnKENBNw
Nov 09 01:18:25.851 DEBG Received BlocksByRange Request          step: 1, start_slot: 728401, count: 64, peer_id: 16Uiu2HAmEmBURejquBUMgKAqxViNoPnSptTWLA2CfgSPnnKENBNw
Nov 09 01:18:26.094 DEBG BlocksByRange Response sent             returned: 62, requested: 64, current_slot: 2466390, start_slot: 728401, msg: Failed to return all requested blocks, peer: 16Uiu2HAmEmBURejquBUMgKAqxViNoPnSptTWLA2CfgSPnnKENBNw
Nov 09 01:18:26.100 DEBG BlocksByRange Response sent             returned: 63, requested: 64, current_slot: 2466390, start_slot: 728337, msg: Failed to return all requested blocks, peer: 16Uiu2HAmEmBURejquBUMgKAqxViNoPnSptTWLA2CfgSPnnKENBNw
Nov 09 01:18:31.070 DEBG RPC Error                               direction: Incoming, score: 0, peer_id: 16Uiu2HAmEmBURejquBUMgKAqxViNoPnSptTWLA2CfgSPnnKENBNw, client: Prysm: version: a80b1c252a9b4773493b41999769bf3134ac373f, os_version: unknown, err: Stream Timeout, protocol: beacon_blocks_by_range, service: libp2p
Nov 09 01:18:31.070 WARN Timed out to a peer's request. Likely insufficient resources, reduce peer count, service: libp2p
Nov 09 01:18:31.085 DEBG RPC Error                               direction: Incoming, score: 0, peer_id: 16Uiu2HAmEmBURejquBUMgKAqxViNoPnSptTWLA2CfgSPnnKENBNw, client: Prysm: version: a80b1c252a9b4773493b41999769bf3134ac373f, os_version: unknown, err: Stream Timeout, protocol: beacon_blocks_by_range, service: libp2p
Nov 09 01:18:31.085 WARN Timed out to a peer's request. Likely insufficient resources, reduce peer count, service: libp2p
Nov 09 01:18:31.459 DEBG RPC Error                               direction: Incoming, score: 0, peer_id: 16Uiu2HAmEmBURejquBUMgKAqxViNoPnSptTWLA2CfgSPnnKENBNw, client: Prysm: version: a80b1c252a9b4773493b41999769bf3134ac373f, os_version: unknown, err: Stream Timeout, protocol: beacon_blocks_by_range, service: libp2p
Nov 09 01:18:31.459 WARN Timed out to a peer's request. Likely insufficient resources, reduce peer count, service: libp2p
Nov 09 01:18:34.129 DEBG RPC Error                               direction: Incoming, score: 0, peer_id: 16Uiu2HAmEmBURejquBUMgKAqxViNoPnSptTWLA2CfgSPnnKENBNw, client: Prysm: version: a80b1c252a9b4773493b41999769bf3134ac373f, os_version: unknown, err: Stream Timeout, protocol: beacon_blocks_by_range, service: libp2p
Nov 09 01:18:34.130 WARN Timed out to a peer's request. Likely insufficient resources, reduce peer count, service: libp2p
Nov 09 01:18:35.686 DEBG Peer Manager disconnecting peer         reason: Too many peers, peer_id: 16Uiu2HAmEmBURejquBUMgKAqxViNoPnSptTWLA2CfgSPnnKENBNw, service: libp2p
```

This PR is to investigate and correct the issue. 

~~My current thoughts are that for some reason we are not closing the streams correctly, or fast enough, or the executor is not registering the closes and waking up.~~ - Pretty sure this is not the case, see message below for a more accurate reason.

~~I've currently added a timeout to stream closures in an attempt to force streams to close and the future to always complete.~~ I removed this
2021-11-16 03:42:25 +00:00
Divma
fbafe416d1 Move the peer manager to be a behaviour (#2773)
This simply moves some functions that were "swarm notifications" to a network behaviour implementation.

Notes
------
- We could disconnect from the peer manager but we would lose the rpc shutdown message
- We still notify from the swarm since this is the most reliable way to get some events. Ugly but best for now
- Events need to be pushed with "add event" to wake the waker

Co-authored-by: Divma <26765164+divagant-martian@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-11-08 00:01:10 +00:00
Divma
a683e0296a Peer manager cfg (#2766)
## Issue Addressed
I've done this change in a couple of WIPs already so I might as well submit it on its own. This changes no functionality but reduces coupling in a 0.0001%. It also helps new people who need to work in the peer manager to better understand what it actually needs from the outside

## Proposed Changes

Add a config to the peer manager
2021-11-03 23:44:44 +00:00
Divma
7502970a7d Do not compute metrics in the network service if the cli flag is not set (#2765)
## Issue Addressed

The computation of metrics in the network service can be expensive. This disables the computation unless the cli flag `metrics` is set.

## Additional Info
Metrics in other parts of the network are still updated, since most are simple metrics and checking if metrics are enabled each time each metric is updated doesn't seem like a gain.
2021-11-03 00:06:03 +00:00
Age Manning
1790010260 Upgrade to latest libp2p (#2605)
This is a pre-cursor to the next libp2p upgrade. 

It is currently being used for staging a number of PR upgrades which are contingent on the latest libp2p.
2021-10-29 01:59:29 +00:00
Divma
d4819bfd42 Add a waker to the RPC handler (#2721)
## Issue Addressed

Attempts to fix #2701 but I doubt this is the reason behind that.

## Proposed Changes

maintain a waker in the rpc handler and call it if an event is received
2021-10-21 06:14:36 +00:00
Age Manning
df40700ddd Rename eth2_libp2p to lighthouse_network (#2702)
## Description

The `eth2_libp2p` crate was originally named and designed to incorporate a simple libp2p integration into lighthouse. Since its origins the crates purpose has expanded dramatically. It now houses a lot more sophistication that is specific to lighthouse and no longer just a libp2p integration. 

As of this writing it currently houses the following high-level lighthouse-specific logic:
- Lighthouse's implementation of the eth2 RPC protocol and specific encodings/decodings
- Integration and handling of ENRs with respect to libp2p and eth2
- Lighthouse's discovery logic, its integration with discv5 and logic about searching and handling peers. 
- Lighthouse's peer manager - This is a large module handling various aspects of Lighthouse's network, such as peer scoring, handling pings and metadata, connection maintenance and recording, etc.
- Lighthouse's peer database - This is a collection of information stored for each individual peer which is specific to lighthouse. We store connection state, sync state, last seen ips and scores etc. The data stored for each peer is designed for various elements of the lighthouse code base such as syncing and the http api.
- Gossipsub scoring - This stores a collection of gossipsub 1.1 scoring mechanisms that are continuously analyssed and updated based on the ethereum 2 networks and how Lighthouse performs on these networks.
- Lighthouse specific types for managing gossipsub topics, sync status and ENR fields
- Lighthouse's network HTTP API metrics - A collection of metrics for lighthouse network monitoring
- Lighthouse's custom configuration of all networking protocols, RPC, gossipsub, discovery, identify and libp2p. 

Therefore it makes sense to rename the crate to be more akin to its current purposes, simply that it manages the majority of Lighthouse's network stack. This PR renames this crate to `lighthouse_network`

Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
2021-10-19 00:30:39 +00:00