Commit Graph

142 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
zhiqiangxu
501ce62d7c minor optimize process_active_validator: avoid a call to state.get_validator (#4608) 2023-08-14 00:29:45 +00:00
Jimmy Chen
fc7f1ba6b9 Phase 0 attestation rewards via Beacon API (#4474)
## Issue Addressed

Addresses #4026.

Beacon-API spec [here](https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Beacon/getAttestationsRewards).

Endpoint: `POST /eth/v1/beacon/rewards/attestations/{epoch}`

This endpoint already supports post-Altair epochs. This PR adds support for phase 0 rewards calculation.

## Proposed Changes

- [x] Attestation rewards API to support phase 0 rewards calculation, re-using logic from `state_processing`. Refactored `get_attestation_deltas` slightly to support computing deltas for a subset of validators.
- [x] Add `inclusion_delay` to `ideal_rewards` (`beacon-API` spec update to follow)
- [x] Add `inactivity` penalties to both `ideal_rewards` and `total_rewards` (`beacon-API` spec update to follow)
- [x] Add tests to compute attestation rewards and compare results with beacon states 

## Additional Notes

- The extra penalty for missing attestations or being slashed during an inactivity leak is currently not included in the API response (for both phase 0 and Altair) in the spec. 
- I went with adding `inactivity` as a separate component rather than combining them with the 4 rewards, because this is how it was grouped in [the phase 0 spec](https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/dev/specs/phase0/beacon-chain.md#get_attestation_deltas). During inactivity leak, all rewards include the optimal reward, and inactivity penalties are calculated separately (see below code snippet from the spec), so it would be quite confusing if we merge them. This would also work better with Altair, because there's no "cancelling" of rewards and inactivity penalties are more separate.
- Altair calculation logic (to include inactivity penalties) to be updated in a follow-up PR.

```python
def get_attestation_deltas(state: BeaconState) -> Tuple[Sequence[Gwei], Sequence[Gwei]]:
    """
    Return attestation reward/penalty deltas for each validator.
    """
    source_rewards, source_penalties = get_source_deltas(state)
    target_rewards, target_penalties = get_target_deltas(state)
    head_rewards, head_penalties = get_head_deltas(state)
    inclusion_delay_rewards, _ = get_inclusion_delay_deltas(state)
    _, inactivity_penalties = get_inactivity_penalty_deltas(state)

    rewards = [
        source_rewards[i] + target_rewards[i] + head_rewards[i] + inclusion_delay_rewards[i]
        for i in range(len(state.validators))
    ]

    penalties = [
        source_penalties[i] + target_penalties[i] + head_penalties[i] + inactivity_penalties[i]
        for i in range(len(state.validators))
    ]

    return rewards, penalties
```

## Example API Response

<details>
  <summary>Click me</summary>
  
```json
{
  "ideal_rewards": [
    {
      "effective_balance": "1000000000",
      "head": "6638",
      "target": "6638",
      "source": "6638",
      "inclusion_delay": "9783",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "2000000000",
      "head": "13276",
      "target": "13276",
      "source": "13276",
      "inclusion_delay": "19565",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "3000000000",
      "head": "19914",
      "target": "19914",
      "source": "19914",
      "inclusion_delay": "29349",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "4000000000",
      "head": "26553",
      "target": "26553",
      "source": "26553",
      "inclusion_delay": "39131",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "5000000000",
      "head": "33191",
      "target": "33191",
      "source": "33191",
      "inclusion_delay": "48914",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "6000000000",
      "head": "39829",
      "target": "39829",
      "source": "39829",
      "inclusion_delay": "58697",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "7000000000",
      "head": "46468",
      "target": "46468",
      "source": "46468",
      "inclusion_delay": "68480",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "8000000000",
      "head": "53106",
      "target": "53106",
      "source": "53106",
      "inclusion_delay": "78262",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "9000000000",
      "head": "59744",
      "target": "59744",
      "source": "59744",
      "inclusion_delay": "88046",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "10000000000",
      "head": "66383",
      "target": "66383",
      "source": "66383",
      "inclusion_delay": "97828",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "11000000000",
      "head": "73021",
      "target": "73021",
      "source": "73021",
      "inclusion_delay": "107611",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "12000000000",
      "head": "79659",
      "target": "79659",
      "source": "79659",
      "inclusion_delay": "117394",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "13000000000",
      "head": "86298",
      "target": "86298",
      "source": "86298",
      "inclusion_delay": "127176",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "14000000000",
      "head": "92936",
      "target": "92936",
      "source": "92936",
      "inclusion_delay": "136959",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "15000000000",
      "head": "99574",
      "target": "99574",
      "source": "99574",
      "inclusion_delay": "146742",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "16000000000",
      "head": "106212",
      "target": "106212",
      "source": "106212",
      "inclusion_delay": "156525",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "17000000000",
      "head": "112851",
      "target": "112851",
      "source": "112851",
      "inclusion_delay": "166307",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "18000000000",
      "head": "119489",
      "target": "119489",
      "source": "119489",
      "inclusion_delay": "176091",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "19000000000",
      "head": "126127",
      "target": "126127",
      "source": "126127",
      "inclusion_delay": "185873",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "20000000000",
      "head": "132766",
      "target": "132766",
      "source": "132766",
      "inclusion_delay": "195656",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "21000000000",
      "head": "139404",
      "target": "139404",
      "source": "139404",
      "inclusion_delay": "205439",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "22000000000",
      "head": "146042",
      "target": "146042",
      "source": "146042",
      "inclusion_delay": "215222",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "23000000000",
      "head": "152681",
      "target": "152681",
      "source": "152681",
      "inclusion_delay": "225004",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "24000000000",
      "head": "159319",
      "target": "159319",
      "source": "159319",
      "inclusion_delay": "234787",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "25000000000",
      "head": "165957",
      "target": "165957",
      "source": "165957",
      "inclusion_delay": "244570",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "26000000000",
      "head": "172596",
      "target": "172596",
      "source": "172596",
      "inclusion_delay": "254352",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "27000000000",
      "head": "179234",
      "target": "179234",
      "source": "179234",
      "inclusion_delay": "264136",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "28000000000",
      "head": "185872",
      "target": "185872",
      "source": "185872",
      "inclusion_delay": "273918",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "29000000000",
      "head": "192510",
      "target": "192510",
      "source": "192510",
      "inclusion_delay": "283701",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "30000000000",
      "head": "199149",
      "target": "199149",
      "source": "199149",
      "inclusion_delay": "293484",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "31000000000",
      "head": "205787",
      "target": "205787",
      "source": "205787",
      "inclusion_delay": "303267",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "32000000000",
      "head": "212426",
      "target": "212426",
      "source": "212426",
      "inclusion_delay": "313050",
      "inactivity": "0"
    }
  ],
  "total_rewards": [
    {
      "validator_index": "0",
      "head": "212426",
      "target": "212426",
      "source": "212426",
      "inclusion_delay": "313050",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "validator_index": "32",
      "head": "212426",
      "target": "212426",
      "source": "212426",
      "inclusion_delay": "313050",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "validator_index": "63",
      "head": "-357771",
      "target": "-357771",
      "source": "-357771",
      "inclusion_delay": "0",
      "inactivity": "0"
    }
  ]
}
```
</details>
2023-07-18 01:48:40 +00:00
Pawan Dhananjay
f2223feb21 Rust 1.71 lints (#4503)
## Issue Addressed

N/A

## Proposed Changes

Add lints for rust 1.71

[3789134](3789134ae2) is probably the one that needs most attention as it changes beacon state code. I changed the `is_in_inactivity_leak ` function to return a `ArithError` as not all consumers of that function work well with a `BeaconState::Error`.
2023-07-17 00:14:19 +00:00
Jimmy Chen
46be05f728 Cache target attester balances for unrealized FFG progression calculation (#4362)
## Issue Addressed

#4118 

## Proposed Changes

This PR introduces a "progressive balances" cache on the `BeaconState`, which keeps track of the accumulated target attestation balance for the current & previous epochs. The cached values are utilised by fork choice to calculate unrealized justification and finalization (instead of converting epoch participation arrays to balances for each block we receive).

This optimization will be rolled out gradually to allow for more testing. A new `--progressive-balances disabled|checked|strict|fast` flag is introduced to support this:
- `checked`: enabled with checks against participation cache, and falls back to the existing epoch processing calculation if there is a total target attester balance mismatch. There is no performance gain from this as the participation cache still needs to be computed. **This is the default mode for now.**
- `strict`: enabled with checks against participation cache, returns error if there is a mismatch. **Used for testing only**.
- `fast`: enabled with no comparative checks and without computing the participation cache. This mode gives us the performance gains from the optimization. This is still experimental and not currently recommended for production usage, but will become the default mode in a future release.
- `disabled`: disable the usage of progressive cache, and use the existing method for FFG progression calculation. This mode may be useful if we find a bug and want to stop the frequent error logs.

### Tasks

- [x] Initial cache implementation in `BeaconState`
- [x] Perform checks in fork choice to compare the progressive balances cache against results from `ParticipationCache`
- [x] Add CLI flag, and disable the optimization by default
- [x] Testing on Goerli & Benchmarking
- [x]  Move caching logic from state processing to the `ProgressiveBalancesCache` (see [this comment](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/4362#discussion_r1230877001))
- [x] Add attesting balance metrics



Co-authored-by: Jimmy Chen <jimmy@sigmaprime.io>
2023-06-30 01:13:06 +00:00
Pawan Dhananjay
448d3ec9b3 Aggregate subsets (#3493)
## Issue Addressed

Resolves #3238 

## Proposed Changes

Please list or describe the changes introduced by this PR.

## Additional Info

Please provide any additional information. For example, future considerations
or information useful for reviewers.
2023-06-27 01:06:49 +00:00
Jimmy Chen
8d9c748025 Fix attestation withdrawals root mismatch (#4249)
## Issue Addressed

Addresses #4234 

## Proposed Changes

- Skip withdrawals processing in an inconsistent state replay. 
- Repurpose `StateRootStrategy`: rename to `StateProcessingStrategy` and always skip withdrawals if using `StateProcessingStrategy::Inconsistent`
- Add a test to reproduce the scenario


Co-authored-by: Jimmy Chen <jimmy@sigmaprime.io>
2023-05-09 10:48:15 +00:00
Michael Sproul
c11638c36c Split common crates out into their own repos (#3890)
## Proposed Changes

Split out several crates which now exist in separate repos under `sigp`.

- [`ssz` and `ssz_derive`](https://github.com/sigp/ethereum_ssz)
- [`tree_hash` and `tree_hash_derive`](https://github.com/sigp/tree_hash)
- [`ethereum_hashing`](https://github.com/sigp/ethereum_hashing)
- [`ethereum_serde_utils`](https://github.com/sigp/ethereum_serde_utils)
- [`ssz_types`](https://github.com/sigp/ssz_types)

For the published crates see: https://crates.io/teams/github:sigp:crates-io?sort=recent-updates.

## Additional Info

- [x] Need to work out how to handle versioning. I was hoping to do 1.0 versions of several crates, but if they depend on `ethereum-types 0.x` that is not going to work. EDIT: decided to go with 0.5.x versions.
- [x] Need to port several changes from `tree-states`, `capella`, `eip4844` branches to the external repos.
2023-04-28 01:15:40 +00:00
Paul Hauner
2b3084f578 Use head state for exit verification (#4183)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

Similar to #4181 but without the version bump and a more nuanced fix.

Patches the high CPU usage seen after the Capella fork which was caused by processing exits when there are skip slots.

## Additional Info

~~This is an imperfect solution that will cause us to drop some exits at the fork boundary. This is tracked at #4184.~~
2023-04-14 01:11:46 +00:00
Divma
047c7544e3 Clean capella (#4019)
## Issue Addressed

Cleans up all the remnants of 4844 in capella. This makes sure when 4844 is reviewed there is nothing we are missing because it got included here 

## Proposed Changes

drop a bomb on every 4844 thing 

## Additional Info

Merge process I did (locally) is as follows:
- squash merge to produce one commit
- in new branch off unstable with the squashed commit create a `git revert HEAD` commit
- merge that new branch onto 4844 with `--strategy ours`
- compare local 4844 to remote 4844 and make sure the diff is empty
- enjoy

Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
2023-03-01 03:19:02 +00:00
Paul Hauner
40669da486
Modify some Capella comments (#4015)
* Modify comment to only include 4844

Capella only modifies per epoch processing by adding
`process_historical_summaries_update`, which does not change the realization of
justification or finality.

Whilst 4844 does not currently modify realization, the spec is not yet final
enough to say that it never will.

* Clarify address change verification comment

The verification of the address change doesn't really have anything to do with
the current epoch. I think this was just a copy-paste from a function like
`verify_exit`.
2023-02-21 18:03:42 +11:00
Paul Hauner
b72f273e47
Capella consensus review (#4012)
* Add extra encoding/decoding tests

* Remove TODO

The method LGTM

* Remove `FreeAttestation`

This is an ancient relic, I'm surprised it still existed!

* Add paranoid check for eip4844 code

This is not technically necessary, but I think it's nice to be explicit about
EIP4844 consensus code for the time being.

* Reduce big-O complexity of address change pruning

I'm not sure this is *actually* useful, but it might come in handy if we see a
ton of address changes at the fork boundary. I know the devops team have been
testing with ~100k changes, so maybe this will help in that case.

* Revert "Reduce big-O complexity of address change pruning"

This reverts commit e7d93e6cc7cf1b92dd5a9e1966ce47d4078121eb.
2023-02-21 15:33:27 +11:00
Michael Sproul
918b688f72
Simplify payload traits and reduce cloning (#3976)
* Simplify payload traits and reduce cloning

* Fix self limiter
2023-02-15 14:17:56 +11:00
Mark Mackey
d842215a44
Merge branch 'upstream/unstable' into capella 2023-01-31 12:16:26 -06:00
Michael Sproul
0866b739d0 Clippy 1.67 (#3916)
## Proposed Changes

Clippy 1.67.0 put us on blast for the size of some of our errors, most of them written by me ( 👀 ). This PR shrinks the size of `BeaconChainError` by dropping some extraneous info and boxing an inner error which should only occur infrequently anyway.

For the `AttestationSlashInfo` and `BlockSlashInfo` I opted to ignore the lint as they are always used in a `Result<A, Info>` where `A` is a similar size. This means they don't bloat the size of the `Result`, so it's a bit annoying for Clippy to report this as an issue.

I also chose to ignore `clippy::uninlined-format-args` because I think the benefit-to-churn ratio is too low. E.g. sometimes we have long identifiers in `format!` args and IMO the non-inlined form is easier to read:

```rust
// I prefer this...
format!(
    "{} did {} to {}",
    REALLY_LONG_CONSTANT_NAME,
    ANOTHER_REALLY_LONG_CONSTANT_NAME,
    regular_long_identifier_name
);
  
// To this
format!("{REALLY_LONG_CONSTANT_NAME} did {ANOTHER_REALLY_LONG_CONSTANT_NAME} to {regular_long_identifier_name}");
```

I tried generating an automatic diff with `cargo clippy --fix` but it came out at:

```
250 files changed, 1209 insertions(+), 1469 deletions(-)
```

Which seems like a bad idea when we'd have to back-merge it to `capella` and `eip4844` 😱
2023-01-27 09:48:42 +00:00
Michael Sproul
d8abf2fc41
Import BLS to execution changes before Capella (#3892)
* Import BLS to execution changes before Capella

* Test for BLS to execution change HTTP API

* Pack BLS to execution changes in LIFO order

* Remove unused var

* Clippy
2023-01-21 10:39:59 +11:00
Mark Mackey
d9dd9b43ee Sign BlsToExecutionChange w/ GENESIS_FORK_VERSION 2023-01-13 10:47:19 -06:00
ethDreamer
52c1055fdc
Remove withdrawals-processing feature (#3864)
* Use spec to Determine Supported Engine APIs

* Remove `withdrawals-processing` feature

* Fixed Tests

* Missed Some Spots

* Fixed Another Test

* Stupid Clippy
2023-01-12 15:15:08 +11:00
realbigsean
98b11bbd3f
add historical summaries (#3865)
* add historical summaries

* fix tree hash caching, disable the sanity slots test with fake crypto

* add ssz static HistoricalSummary

* only store historical summaries after capella

* Teach `UpdatePattern` about Capella

* Tidy EF tests

* Clippy

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
2023-01-11 12:40:21 +11:00
ethDreamer
cb94f639b0
Isolate withdrawals-processing Feature (#3854) 2023-01-09 11:05:28 +11:00
Mark Mackey
986ae4360a
Fix clippy complaints 2022-12-28 14:47:16 -06:00
Mark Mackey
c188cde034
merge upstream/unstable 2022-12-28 14:43:25 -06:00
ethDreamer
b224ed8151
Update consensus/state_processing/src/upgrade/eip4844.rs
Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@GMAIL.com>
2022-12-19 19:35:17 -06:00
ethDreamer
0c22d69e15
Update consensus/state_processing/src/upgrade/eip4844.rs
Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@GMAIL.com>
2022-12-19 19:35:08 -06:00
Mark Mackey
b75ca74222 Removed withdrawals feature flag 2022-12-19 15:38:46 -06:00
Divma
ffbf70e2d9 Clippy lints for rust 1.66 (#3810)
## Issue Addressed
Fixes the new clippy lints for rust 1.66

## Proposed Changes

Most of the changes come from:
- [unnecessary_cast](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#unnecessary_cast)
- [iter_kv_map](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#iter_kv_map)
- [needless_borrow](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#needless_borrow)

## Additional Info

na
2022-12-16 04:04:00 +00:00
Michael Sproul
558367ab8c
Bounded withdrawals and spec v1.3.0-alpha.2 (#3802) 2022-12-16 09:20:45 +11:00
Justin Traglia
f7a54afde5
Fix some capella nits (#3782) 2022-12-12 11:40:44 +11:00
ethDreamer
1a39976715
Fixed Compiler Warnings & Failing Tests (#3771) 2022-12-03 10:42:12 +11:00
Mark Mackey
8a04c3428e Merged with unstable 2022-11-30 17:29:10 -06:00
Michael Sproul
22115049ee Prioritise important parts of block processing (#3696)
## Issue Addressed

Closes https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/2327

## Proposed Changes

This is an extension of some ideas I implemented while working on `tree-states`:

- Cache the indexed attestations from blocks in the `ConsensusContext`. Previously we were re-computing them 3-4 times over.
- Clean up `import_block` by splitting each part into `import_block_XXX`.
- Move some stuff off hot paths, specifically:
  - Relocate non-essential tasks that were running between receiving the payload verification status and priming the early attester cache. These tasks are moved after the cache priming:
    - Attestation observation
    - Validator monitor updates
    - Slasher updates
    - Updating the shuffling cache
  - Fork choice attestation observation now happens at the end of block verification in parallel with payload verification (this seems to save 5-10ms).
  - Payload verification now happens _before_ advancing the pre-state and writing it to disk! States were previously being written eagerly and adding ~20-30ms in front of verifying the execution payload. State catchup also sometimes takes ~500ms if we get a cache miss and need to rebuild the tree hash cache.

The remaining task that's taking substantial time (~20ms) is importing the block to fork choice. I _think_ this is because of pull-tips, and we should be able to optimise it out with a clever total active balance cache in the state (which would be computed in parallel with payload verification). I've decided to leave that for future work though. For now it can be observed via the new `beacon_block_processing_post_exec_pre_attestable_seconds` metric.


Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
2022-11-30 05:22:58 +00:00
Michael Sproul
788b337951
Op pool and gossip for BLS to execution changes (#3726) 2022-11-25 07:09:26 +11:00
Michael Sproul
e3ccd8fd4a
Two Capella bugfixes (#3749)
* Two Capella bugfixes

* fix payload default check in fork choice

* Revert "fix payload default check in fork choice"

This reverts commit e56fefbd05.

Co-authored-by: realbigsean <sean@sigmaprime.io>
2022-11-24 15:14:06 +11:00
ethDreamer
24e5252a55
Massive Update to Engine API (#3740)
* Massive Update to Engine API

* Update beacon_node/execution_layer/src/engine_api/json_structures.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/execution_layer/src/engine_api/json_structures.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/execution_payload.rs

Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@GMAIL.com>

* Update beacon_node/execution_layer/src/engine_api.rs

Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@GMAIL.com>

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@GMAIL.com>
2022-11-22 13:27:48 -05:00
Michael Sproul
0cdd049da9
Fixes to make EF Capella tests pass (#3719)
* Fixes to make EF Capella tests pass

* Clippy for state_processing
2022-11-14 13:14:31 -06:00
Mark Mackey
276e1845fd Added process_withdrawals 2022-11-13 18:20:27 -06:00
Mark Mackey
756e48f5dc BeaconState field renamed 2022-11-10 11:49:55 -06:00
Mark Mackey
2d01ae6036 Fixed compiling with withdrawals enabled 2022-11-09 19:34:19 -06:00
Mark Mackey
ab13f95db5 Updated for queueless withdrawals spec 2022-11-09 18:09:34 -06:00
Jimmy Chen
cb393f5b7d
Fix compilation error (#3692) 2022-11-06 11:46:48 -05:00
realbigsean
fc0b06a039
Feature gate withdrawals (#3684)
* start feature gating

* feature gate withdrawals
2022-11-04 16:50:26 -04:00
realbigsean
c45b809b76
Cleanup payload types (#3675)
* Add transparent support

* Add `Config` struct

* Deprecate `enum_behaviour`

* Partially remove enum_behaviour from project

* Revert "Partially remove enum_behaviour from project"

This reverts commit 46ffb7fe77622cf420f7ba2fccf432c0050535d6.

* Revert "Deprecate `enum_behaviour`"

This reverts commit 89b64a6f53d0f68685be88d5b60d39799d9933b5.

* Add `struct_behaviour`

* Tidy

* Move tests into `ssz_derive`

* Bump ssz derive

* Fix comment

* newtype transaparent ssz

* use ssz transparent and create macros for  per fork implementations

* use superstruct map macros

Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
2022-11-02 10:30:41 -04:00
realbigsean
d8a49aad2b
merge with unstable fixes 2022-11-01 13:26:56 -04:00
realbigsean
8656d23327
merge with unstable 2022-11-01 13:18:00 -04:00
realbigsean
5ad834280b
Block processing eip4844 (#3673)
* add eip4844 block processing

* fix blob processing code

* consensus logic fixes and cleanup

* use safe arith
2022-11-01 13:15:11 -04:00
ethDreamer
e8604757a2 Deposit Cache Finalization & Fast WS Sync (#2915)
## Summary

The deposit cache now has the ability to finalize deposits. This will cause it to drop unneeded deposit logs and hashes in the deposit Merkle tree that are no longer required to construct deposit proofs. The cache is finalized whenever the latest finalized checkpoint has a new `Eth1Data` with all deposits imported.

This has three benefits:

1. Improves the speed of constructing Merkle proofs for deposits as we can just replay deposits since the last finalized checkpoint instead of all historical deposits when re-constructing the Merkle tree.
2. Significantly faster weak subjectivity sync as the deposit cache can be transferred to the newly syncing node in compressed form. The Merkle tree that stores `N` finalized deposits requires a maximum of `log2(N)` hashes. The newly syncing node then only needs to download deposits since the last finalized checkpoint to have a full tree.
3. Future proofing in preparation for [EIP-4444](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4444) as execution nodes will no longer be required to store logs permanently so we won't always have all historical logs available to us.

## More Details

Image to illustrate how the deposit contract merkle tree evolves and finalizes along with the resulting `DepositTreeSnapshot`
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/37123614/151465302-5fc56284-8a69-4998-b20e-45db3934ac70.png)

## Other Considerations

I've changed the structure of the `SszDepositCache` so once you load & save your database from this version of lighthouse, you will no longer be able to load it from older versions.

Co-authored-by: ethDreamer <37123614+ethDreamer@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-10-30 04:04:24 +00:00
ethDreamer
f1a3b3b01c
Added Capella Epoch Processing Logic (#3666) 2022-10-27 17:41:39 -04:00
realbigsean
137f230344
Capella eip 4844 cleanup (#3652)
* add capella gossip boiler plate

* get everything compiling

Co-authored-by: realbigsean <sean@sigmaprime.io
Co-authored-by: Mark Mackey <mark@sigmaprime.io>

* small cleanup

* small cleanup

* cargo fix + some test cleanup

* improve block production

* add fixme for potential panic

Co-authored-by: Mark Mackey <mark@sigmaprime.io>
2022-10-26 15:15:26 -04:00
Michael Sproul
59ec6b71b8 Consensus context with proposer index caching (#3604)
## Issue Addressed

Closes https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/2371

## Proposed Changes

Backport some changes from `tree-states` that remove duplicated calculations of the `proposer_index`.

With this change the proposer index should be calculated only once for each block, and then plumbed through to every place it is required.

## Additional Info

In future I hope to add more data to the consensus context that is cached on a per-epoch basis, like the effective balances of validators and the base rewards.

There are some other changes to remove indexing in tests that were also useful for `tree-states` (the `tree-states` types don't implement `Index`).
2022-10-15 22:25:54 +00:00
Michael Sproul
ca9dc8e094 Optimise HTTP validator lookups (#3559)
## Issue Addressed

While digging around in some logs I noticed that queries for validators by pubkey were taking 10ms+, which seemed too long. This was due to a loop through the entire validator registry for each lookup.

## Proposed Changes

Rather than using a loop through the register, this PR utilises the pubkey cache which is usually initialised at the head*. In case the cache isn't built, we fall back to the previous loop logic. In the vast majority of cases I expect the cache will be built, as the validator client queries at the `head` where all caches should be built.

## Additional Info

*I had to modify the cache build that runs after fork choice to build the pubkey cache. I think it had been optimised out, perhaps accidentally. I think it's preferable to have the exit cache and the pubkey cache built on the head state, as they are required for verifying deposits and exits respectively, and we may as well build them off the hot path of block processing. Previously they'd get built the first time a deposit or exit needed to be verified.

I've deleted the unused `map_state` function which was obsoleted by `map_state_and_execution_optimistic`.
2022-10-15 22:25:51 +00:00
ethDreamer
221c433d62
Fixed a ton of state_processing stuff (#3642)
FIXME's:
 * consensus/fork_choice/src/fork_choice.rs
 * consensus/state_processing/src/per_epoch_processing/capella.rs
 * consensus/types/src/execution_payload_header.rs
 
TODO's:
 * consensus/state_processing/src/per_epoch_processing/capella/partial_withdrawals.rs
 * consensus/state_processing/src/per_epoch_processing/capella/full_withdrawals.rs
2022-10-14 17:35:10 -05:00