Commit Graph

20 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mark Mackey
8a04c3428e Merged with unstable 2022-11-30 17:29:10 -06:00
Michael Sproul
3be41006a6 Add --light-client-server flag and state cache utils (#3714)
## Issue Addressed

Part of https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3651.

## Proposed Changes

Add a flag for enabling the light client server, which should be checked before gossip/RPC traffic is processed (e.g. https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3693, https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3711). The flag is available at runtime from `beacon_chain.config.enable_light_client_server`.

Additionally, a new method `BeaconChain::with_mutable_state_for_block` is added which I envisage being used for computing light client updates. Unfortunately its performance will be quite poor on average because it will only run quickly with access to the tree hash cache. Each slot the tree hash cache is only available for a brief window of time between the head block being processed and the state advance at 9s in the slot. When the state advance happens the cache is moved and mutated to get ready for the next slot, which makes it no longer useful for merkle proofs related to the head block. Rather than spend more time trying to optimise this I think we should continue prototyping with this code, and I'll make sure `tree-states` is ready to ship before we enable the light client server in prod (cf. https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3206).

## Additional Info

I also fixed a bug in the implementation of `BeaconState::compute_merkle_proof` whereby the tree hash cache was moved with `.take()` but never put back with `.restore()`.
2022-11-11 11:03:18 +00:00
realbigsean
8656d23327
merge with unstable 2022-11-01 13:18:00 -04:00
will
9f242137b0 Add a new bls test (#3235)
## Issue Addressed

Which issue # does this PR address?
#2629 

## Proposed Changes

Please list or describe the changes introduced by this PR.

1. ci would dowload the bls test cases from https://github.com/ethereum/bls12-381-tests/
2. all the bls test cases(except eth ones) would use cases in the archive from step one
3. The bls test cases from https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-spec-tests would stay there and no use . For the future , these bls test cases would be remove suggested from https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-spec-tests/issues/25 . So it would do no harm and compatible for future cases.

## Additional Info

Please provide any additional information. For example, future considerations
or information useful for reviewers.


Question: 

I am not sure if I should implement tests about `deserialization_G1`, `deserialization_G2` and `hash_to_G2` for the issue.
2022-10-12 23:40:42 +00:00
realbigsean
88006735c4
compile 2022-10-03 10:06:04 -04:00
Paul Hauner
a0605c4ee6 Bump EF tests to v1.2.0 rc.3 (#3483)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

Bumps test vectors and ignores another weird MacOS file.

## Additional Info

NA
2022-08-19 04:27:21 +00:00
Paul Hauner
d9d1288156 Add mainnet merge values 🐼 (#3462)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

Adds **tentative** values for the merge TTD and Bellatrix as per https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2969

## Additional Info

- ~~Blocked on https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2969~~
2022-08-17 02:36:38 +00:00
Michael Sproul
d04fde3ba9 Remove equivocating validators from fork choice (#3371)
## Issue Addressed

Closes https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3241
Closes https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3242

## Proposed Changes

* [x] Implement logic to remove equivocating validators from fork choice per https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2845
* [x] Update tests to v1.2.0-rc.1. The new test which exercises `equivocating_indices` is passing.
* [x] Pull in some SSZ abstractions from the `tree-states` branch that make implementing Vec-compatible encoding for types like `BTreeSet` and `BTreeMap`.
* [x] Implement schema upgrades and downgrades for the database (new schema version is V11).
* [x] Apply attester slashings from blocks to fork choice

## Additional Info

* This PR doesn't need the `BTreeMap` impl, but `tree-states` does, and I don't think there's any harm in keeping it. But I could also be convinced to drop it.

Blocked on #3322.
2022-07-28 09:43:41 +00:00
Michael Sproul
ef7351ddfe Update to spec v1.1.8 (#2893)
## Proposed Changes

Change the canonical fork name for the merge to Bellatrix. Keep other merge naming the same to avoid churn.

I've also fixed and enabled the `fork` and `transition` tests for Bellatrix, and the v1.1.7 fork choice tests.

Additionally, the `BellatrixPreset` has been added with tests. It gets served via the `/config/spec` API endpoint along with the other presets.
2022-01-19 00:24:19 +00:00
realbigsean
b22ac95d7f v1.1.6 Fork Choice changes (#2822)
## Issue Addressed

Resolves: https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/2741
Includes: https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/2853 so that we can get ssz static tests passing here on v1.1.6. If we want to merge that first, we can make this diff slightly smaller

## Proposed Changes

- Changes the `justified_epoch` and `finalized_epoch` in the `ProtoArrayNode` each to an `Option<Checkpoint>`. The `Option` is necessary only for the migration, so not ideal. But does allow us to add a default logic to `None` on these fields during the database migration.
- Adds a database migration from a legacy fork choice struct to the new one, search for all necessary block roots in fork choice by iterating through blocks in the db.
- updates related to https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2727
  -  We will have to update the persisted forkchoice to make sure the justified checkpoint stored is correct according to the updated fork choice logic. This boils down to setting the forkchoice store's justified checkpoint to the justified checkpoint of the block that advanced the finalized checkpoint to the current one. 
  - AFAICT there's no migration steps necessary for the update to allow applying attestations from prior blocks, but would appreciate confirmation on that
- I updated the consensus spec tests to v1.1.6 here, but they will fail until we also implement the proposer score boost updates. I confirmed that the previously failing scenario `new_finalized_slot_is_justified_checkpoint_ancestor` will now pass after the boost updates, but haven't confirmed _all_ tests will pass because I just quickly stubbed out the proposer boost test scenario formatting.
- This PR now also includes proposer boosting https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2730

## Additional Info
I realized checking justified and finalized roots in fork choice makes it more likely that we trigger this bug: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2727

It's possible the combination of justified checkpoint and finalized checkpoint in the forkchoice store is different from in any block in fork choice. So when trying to startup our store's justified checkpoint seems invalid to the rest of fork choice (but it should be valid). When this happens we get an `InvalidBestNode` error and fail to start up. So I'm including that bugfix in this branch.

Todo:

- [x] Fix fork choice tests
- [x] Self review
- [x] Add fix for https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2727
- [x] Rebase onto Kintusgi 
- [x] Fix `num_active_validators` calculation as @michaelsproul pointed out
- [x] Clean up db migrations

Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
2021-12-13 20:43:22 +00:00
Pawan Dhananjay
e391b32858 Merge devnet 3 (#2859)
## Issue Addressed

N/A

## Proposed Changes

Changes required for the `merge-devnet-3`. Added some more non substantive renames on top of @realbigsean 's commit. 
Note: this doesn't include the proposer boosting changes in kintsugi v3.

This devnet isn't running with the proposer boosting fork choice changes so if we are looking to merge https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/2822 into `unstable`, then I think we should just maintain this branch for the devnet temporarily. 


Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
2021-12-12 09:04:21 +00:00
Paul Hauner
5f0fef2d1e
Kintsugi on_merge_block tests (#2811)
* Start v1.1.5 updates

* Implement new payload creation logic

* Tidy, add comments

* Remove unused error enums

* Add validate payload for gossip

* Refactor validate_merge_block

* Split payload verification in per block processing

* Add execute_payload

* Tidy

* Tidy

* Start working on new fork choice tests

* Fix failing merge block test

* Skip block_lookup_failed test

* Fix failing terminal block test

* Fixes from self-review

* Address review comments
2021-12-02 14:29:20 +11:00
Paul Hauner
cbd2201164
Fixes after rebasing Kintsugi onto unstable (#2799)
* Fix fork choice after rebase

* Remove paulhauner warp dep

* Fix fork choice test compile errors

* Assume fork choice payloads are valid

* Add comment

* Ignore new tests

* Fix error in test skipping
2021-12-02 14:26:55 +11:00
Michael Sproul
fd828199f5
Update test vectors to v1.1.0 (#2642) 2021-12-02 14:26:51 +11:00
Michael Sproul
cce855f9ea
Fix consensus, SSZ, tree hash & run merge EF tests (#2622)
* Update to v1.1.0-beta.4 (squash of #2548)

* SSZ, cached tree hash, EF tests
2021-12-02 14:26:50 +11:00
Paul Hauner
931daa40d7 Add fork choice EF tests (#2737)
## Issue Addressed

Resolves #2545

## Proposed Changes

Adds the long-overdue EF tests for fork choice. Although we had pretty good coverage via other implementations that closely followed our approach, it is nonetheless important for us to implement these tests too.

During testing I found that we were using a hard-coded `SAFE_SLOTS_TO_UPDATE_JUSTIFIED` value rather than one from the `ChainSpec`. This caused a failure during a minimal preset test. This doesn't represent a risk to mainnet or testnets, since the hard-coded value matched the mainnet preset.

## Failing Cases

There is one failing case which is presently marked as `SkippedKnownFailure`:

```
case 4 ("new_finalized_slot_is_justified_checkpoint_ancestor") from /home/paul/development/lighthouse/testing/ef_tests/consensus-spec-tests/tests/minimal/phase0/fork_choice/on_block/pyspec_tests/new_finalized_slot_is_justified_checkpoint_ancestor failed with NotEqual:
head check failed: Got Head { slot: Slot(40), root: 0x9183dbaed4191a862bd307d476e687277fc08469fc38618699863333487703e7 } | Expected Head { slot: Slot(24), root: 0x105b49b51bf7103c182aa58860b039550a89c05a4675992e2af703bd02c84570 }
```

This failure is due to #2741. It's not a particularly high priority issue at the moment, so we fix it after merging this PR.
2021-11-08 07:29:04 +00:00
Paul Hauner
cfafe7ba3a Update to consensus-spec-tests v1.1.3 (#2722)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

Updates to `testing/ef_tests` to use https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-spec-tests/releases/tag/v1.1.3.

Also updates `initialize_beacon_state_from_eth1` to set the `state.fork.previous_version` to the Altair fork version when starting a new Altair chain from genesis. This will not have an effect on mainnet or any long-lived testnets. This was introduced in https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/releases/tag/v1.1.1.

## Additional Info

NA
2021-10-16 05:07:21 +00:00
Michael Sproul
a844ce5ba9 Update spec tests to v1.1.0-beta.4 (#2548)
## Proposed Changes

Bump the spec tests to beta.4, including the new randomised tests (which all pass 🎉)
2021-09-25 05:58:35 +00:00
realbigsean
a3a7f39b0d [Altair] Sync committee pools (#2321)
Add pools supporting sync committees:
- naive sync aggregation pool
- observed sync contributions pool
- observed sync contributors pool
- observed sync aggregators pool

Add SSZ types and tests related to sync committee signatures.

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
2021-07-15 00:52:02 +00:00
Michael Sproul
b4689e20c6 Altair consensus changes and refactors (#2279)
## Proposed Changes

Implement the consensus changes necessary for the upcoming Altair hard fork.

## Additional Info

This is quite a heavy refactor, with pivotal types like the `BeaconState` and `BeaconBlock` changing from structs to enums. This ripples through the whole codebase with field accesses changing to methods, e.g. `state.slot` => `state.slot()`.


Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
2021-07-09 06:15:32 +00:00