Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Sproul
a290a3c537 Add configurable block replayer (#2863)
## Issue Addressed

Successor to #2431

## Proposed Changes

* Add a `BlockReplayer` struct to abstract over the intricacies of calling `per_slot_processing` and `per_block_processing` while avoiding unnecessary tree hashing.
* Add a variant of the forwards state root iterator that does not require an `end_state`.
* Use the `BlockReplayer` when reconstructing states in the database. Use the efficient forwards iterator for frozen states.
* Refactor the iterators to remove `Arc<HotColdDB>` (this seems to be neater than making _everything_ an `Arc<HotColdDB>` as I did in #2431).

Supplying the state roots allow us to avoid building a tree hash cache at all when reconstructing historic states, which saves around 1 second flat (regardless of `slots-per-restore-point`). This is a small percentage of worst-case state load times with 200K validators and SPRP=2048 (~15s vs ~16s) but a significant speed-up for more frequent restore points: state loads with SPRP=32 should be now consistently <500ms instead of 1.5s (a ~3x speedup).

## Additional Info

Required by https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/2628
2021-12-21 06:30:52 +00:00
realbigsean
b22ac95d7f v1.1.6 Fork Choice changes (#2822)
## Issue Addressed

Resolves: https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/2741
Includes: https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/2853 so that we can get ssz static tests passing here on v1.1.6. If we want to merge that first, we can make this diff slightly smaller

## Proposed Changes

- Changes the `justified_epoch` and `finalized_epoch` in the `ProtoArrayNode` each to an `Option<Checkpoint>`. The `Option` is necessary only for the migration, so not ideal. But does allow us to add a default logic to `None` on these fields during the database migration.
- Adds a database migration from a legacy fork choice struct to the new one, search for all necessary block roots in fork choice by iterating through blocks in the db.
- updates related to https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2727
  -  We will have to update the persisted forkchoice to make sure the justified checkpoint stored is correct according to the updated fork choice logic. This boils down to setting the forkchoice store's justified checkpoint to the justified checkpoint of the block that advanced the finalized checkpoint to the current one. 
  - AFAICT there's no migration steps necessary for the update to allow applying attestations from prior blocks, but would appreciate confirmation on that
- I updated the consensus spec tests to v1.1.6 here, but they will fail until we also implement the proposer score boost updates. I confirmed that the previously failing scenario `new_finalized_slot_is_justified_checkpoint_ancestor` will now pass after the boost updates, but haven't confirmed _all_ tests will pass because I just quickly stubbed out the proposer boost test scenario formatting.
- This PR now also includes proposer boosting https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2730

## Additional Info
I realized checking justified and finalized roots in fork choice makes it more likely that we trigger this bug: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2727

It's possible the combination of justified checkpoint and finalized checkpoint in the forkchoice store is different from in any block in fork choice. So when trying to startup our store's justified checkpoint seems invalid to the rest of fork choice (but it should be valid). When this happens we get an `InvalidBestNode` error and fail to start up. So I'm including that bugfix in this branch.

Todo:

- [x] Fix fork choice tests
- [x] Self review
- [x] Add fix for https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2727
- [x] Rebase onto Kintusgi 
- [x] Fix `num_active_validators` calculation as @michaelsproul pointed out
- [x] Clean up db migrations

Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
2021-12-13 20:43:22 +00:00
Paul Hauner
cbd2201164
Fixes after rebasing Kintsugi onto unstable (#2799)
* Fix fork choice after rebase

* Remove paulhauner warp dep

* Fix fork choice test compile errors

* Assume fork choice payloads are valid

* Add comment

* Ignore new tests

* Fix error in test skipping
2021-12-02 14:26:55 +11:00
Paul Hauner
6dde12f311
[Merge] Optimistic Sync: Stage 1 (#2686)
* Add payload verification status to fork choice

* Pass payload verification status to import_block

* Add valid back-propagation

* Add head safety status latch to API

* Remove ExecutionLayerStatus

* Add execution info to client notifier

* Update notifier logs

* Change use of "hash" to refer to beacon block

* Shutdown on invalid finalized block

* Tidy, add comments

* Fix failing FC tests

* Allow blocks with unsafe head

* Fix forkchoiceUpdate call on startup
2021-12-02 14:26:54 +11:00
Paul Hauner
d8623cfc4f
[Merge] Implement execution_layer (#2635)
* Checkout serde_utils from rayonism

* Make eth1::http functions pub

* Add bones of execution_layer

* Modify decoding

* Expose Transaction, cargo fmt

* Add executePayload

* Add all minimal spec endpoints

* Start adding json rpc wrapper

* Finish custom JSON response handler

* Switch to new rpc sending method

* Add first test

* Fix camelCase

* Finish adding tests

* Begin threading execution layer into BeaconChain

* Fix clippy lints

* Fix clippy lints

* Thread execution layer into ClientBuilder

* Add CLI flags

* Add block processing methods to ExecutionLayer

* Add block_on to execution_layer

* Integrate execute_payload

* Add extra_data field

* Begin implementing payload handle

* Send consensus valid/invalid messages

* Fix minor type in task_executor

* Call forkchoiceUpdated

* Add search for TTD block

* Thread TTD into execution layer

* Allow producing block with execution payload

* Add LRU cache for execution blocks

* Remove duplicate 0x on ssz_types serialization

* Add tests for block getter methods

* Add basic block generator impl

* Add is_valid_terminal_block to EL

* Verify merge block in block_verification

* Partially implement --terminal-block-hash-override

* Add terminal_block_hash to ChainSpec

* Remove Option from terminal_block_hash in EL

* Revert merge changes to consensus/fork_choice

* Remove commented-out code

* Add bones for handling RPC methods on test server

* Add first ExecutionLayer tests

* Add testing for finding terminal block

* Prevent infinite loops

* Add insert_merge_block to block gen

* Add block gen test for pos blocks

* Start adding payloads to block gen

* Fix clippy lints

* Add execution payload to block gen

* Add execute_payload to block_gen

* Refactor block gen

* Add all routes to mock server

* Use Uint256 for base_fee_per_gas

* Add working execution chain build

* Remove unused var

* Revert "Use Uint256 for base_fee_per_gas"

This reverts commit 6c88f19ac45db834dd4dbf7a3c6e7242c1c0f735.

* Fix base_fee_for_gas Uint256

* Update execute payload handle

* Improve testing, fix bugs

* Fix default fee-recipient

* Fix fee-recipient address (again)

* Add check for terminal block, add comments, tidy

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@GMAIL.com>

* Fix is_none on handle Drop

* Remove commented-out tests

Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@GMAIL.com>
2021-12-02 14:26:51 +11:00
Paul Hauner
931daa40d7 Add fork choice EF tests (#2737)
## Issue Addressed

Resolves #2545

## Proposed Changes

Adds the long-overdue EF tests for fork choice. Although we had pretty good coverage via other implementations that closely followed our approach, it is nonetheless important for us to implement these tests too.

During testing I found that we were using a hard-coded `SAFE_SLOTS_TO_UPDATE_JUSTIFIED` value rather than one from the `ChainSpec`. This caused a failure during a minimal preset test. This doesn't represent a risk to mainnet or testnets, since the hard-coded value matched the mainnet preset.

## Failing Cases

There is one failing case which is presently marked as `SkippedKnownFailure`:

```
case 4 ("new_finalized_slot_is_justified_checkpoint_ancestor") from /home/paul/development/lighthouse/testing/ef_tests/consensus-spec-tests/tests/minimal/phase0/fork_choice/on_block/pyspec_tests/new_finalized_slot_is_justified_checkpoint_ancestor failed with NotEqual:
head check failed: Got Head { slot: Slot(40), root: 0x9183dbaed4191a862bd307d476e687277fc08469fc38618699863333487703e7 } | Expected Head { slot: Slot(24), root: 0x105b49b51bf7103c182aa58860b039550a89c05a4675992e2af703bd02c84570 }
```

This failure is due to #2741. It's not a particularly high priority issue at the moment, so we fix it after merging this PR.
2021-11-08 07:29:04 +00:00
Michael Sproul
10945e0619 Revert bad blocks on missed fork (#2529)
## Issue Addressed

Closes #2526

## Proposed Changes

If the head block fails to decode on start up, do two things:

1. Revert all blocks between the head and the most recent hard fork (to `fork_slot - 1`).
2. Reset fork choice so that it contains the new head, and all blocks back to the new head's finalized checkpoint.

## Additional Info

I tweaked some of the beacon chain test harness stuff in order to make it generic enough to test with a non-zero slot clock on start-up. In the process I consolidated all the various `new_` methods into a single generic one which will hopefully serve all future uses 🤞
2021-08-30 06:41:31 +00:00