## Issue Addressed
Closes#3014
## Proposed Changes
- Rename `receipt_root` to `receipts_root`
- Rename `execute_payload` to `notify_new_payload`
- This is slightly weird since we modify everything except the actual HTTP call to the engine API. That change is expected to be implemented in #2985 (cc @ethDreamer)
- Enable "random" tests for Bellatrix.
## Notes
This will break *partially* compatibility with Kintusgi testnets in order to gain compatibility with [Kiln](https://hackmd.io/@n0ble/kiln-spec) testnets. I think it will only break the BN APIs due to the `receipts_root` change, however it might have some other effects too.
Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
## Issue Addressed
Lighthouse gossiping late messages
## Proposed Changes
Point LH to our fork using tokio interval, which 1) works as expected 2) is more performant than the previous version that actually worked as expected
Upgrade libp2p
## Additional Info
https://github.com/libp2p/rust-libp2p/issues/2497
## Issue Addressed
#2883
## Proposed Changes
* Added `suggested-fee-recipient` & `suggested-fee-recipient-file` flags to validator client (similar to graffiti / graffiti-file implementation).
* Added proposer preparation service to VC, which sends the fee-recipient of all known validators to the BN via [/eth/v1/validator/prepare_beacon_proposer](https://github.com/ethereum/beacon-APIs/pull/178) api once per slot
* Added [/eth/v1/validator/prepare_beacon_proposer](https://github.com/ethereum/beacon-APIs/pull/178) api endpoint and preparation data caching
* Added cleanup routine to remove cached proposer preparations when not updated for 2 epochs
## Additional Info
Changed the Implementation following the discussion in #2883.
Co-authored-by: pk910 <philipp@pk910.de>
Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
Co-authored-by: Philipp K <philipp@pk910.de>
## Issue Addressed
On a network with few nodes, it is possible that the same node can be found from a subnet discovery and a normal peer discovery at the same time.
The network behaviour loads these peers into events and processes them when it has the chance. It can happen that the same peer can enter the event queue more than once and then attempt to be dialed twice.
This PR shifts the registration of nodes in the peerdb as being dialed before they enter the NetworkBehaviour queue, preventing multiple attempts of the same peer being entered into the queue and avoiding the race condition.
## Issue Addressed
#2947
## Proposed Changes
Store messages that fail to be published due to insufficient peers for retry later. Messages expire after half an epoch and are retried if gossipsub informs us that an useful peer has connected. Currently running in Atlanta
## Additional Info
If on retry sending the messages fails they will not be tried again
## Issue Addressed
NA
## Proposed Changes
Checks to see if attestations or sync messages are still valid before "accepting" them for propagation.
## Additional Info
NA
## Issue Addressed
NA
## Proposed Changes
Adds `STRICT_LATE_MESSAGE_PENALTIES: bool` which allows for toggling penalties for late sync/attn messages.
`STRICT_LATE_MESSAGE_PENALTIES` is set to `false`, since we're seeing a lot of late messages on the network which are causing peer drops. We can toggle the bool during testing to try and figure out what/who is the cause of these late messages.
In effect, this PR *relaxes* peer downscoring for late attns and sync committee messages.
## Additional Info
- ~~Blocked on #2974~~
The gossipsub history was increased to a good portion of a slot from 2.1 seconds in the last release.
Although it shouldn't cause too much issue, it could be related to recieving later messages than usual and interacting with our scoring system penalizing peers. For consistency, this PR reduces the time we gossip messages back to the same values of the previous release.
It also adjusts the gossipsub heartbeat time for testing purposes with a developer flag but this should not effect end users.
## Issue Addressed
This PR fixes the unnecessary `WARN Single block lookup failed` messages described here:
https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/2866#issuecomment-1008442640
## Proposed Changes
Add a new cache to the `BeaconChain` that tracks the block roots of blocks from before finalization. These could be blocks from the canonical chain (which might need to be read from disk), or old pre-finalization blocks that have been forked out.
The cache also stores a set of block roots for in-progress single block lookups, which duplicates some of the information from sync's `single_block_lookups` hashmap:
a836e180f9/beacon_node/network/src/sync/manager.rs (L192-L196)
On a live node you can confirm that the cache is working by grepping logs for the message: `Rejected attestation to finalized block`.
## Issue Addressed
N/A
## Proposed Changes
Add a HTTP API which can be used to compute the attestation performances of a validator (or all validators) over a discrete range of epochs.
Performances can be computed for a single validator, or for the global validator set.
## Usage
### Request
The API can be used as follows:
```
curl "http://localhost:5052/lighthouse/analysis/attestation_performance/{validator_index}?start_epoch=57730&end_epoch=57732"
```
Alternatively, to compute performances for the global validator set:
```
curl "http://localhost:5052/lighthouse/analysis/attestation_performance/global?start_epoch=57730&end_epoch=57732"
```
### Response
The response is JSON formatted as follows:
```
[
{
"index": 72,
"epochs": {
"57730": {
"active": true,
"head": false,
"target": false,
"source": false
},
"57731": {
"active": true,
"head": true,
"target": true,
"source": true,
"delay": 1
},
"57732": {
"active": true,
"head": true,
"target": true,
"source": true,
"delay": 1
},
}
}
]
```
> Note that the `"epochs"` are not guaranteed to be in ascending order.
## Additional Info
- This API is intended to be used in our upcoming validator analysis tooling (#2873) and will likely not be very useful for regular users. Some advanced users or block explorers may find this API useful however.
- The request range is limited to 100 epochs (since the range is inclusive and it also computes the `end_epoch` it's actually 101 epochs) to prevent Lighthouse using exceptionally large amounts of memory.
Checking how to priorize the polling of the network I moved most of the service code to functions. This change I think it's worth on it's own for code quality since inside the `tokio::select` many tools don't work (cargo fmt, sometimes clippy, and sometimes even the compiler's errors get wack). This is functionally equivalent to the previous code, just better organized
## Proposed Changes
Initially the idea was to remove hashing of blocks in backfill sync. After considering it more, we conclude that we need to do it in both (forward and backfill) anyway. But since we forgot why we were doing it in the first place, this PR documents this logic.
Future us should find it useful
Co-authored-by: Divma <26765164+divagant-martian@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue Addressed
NA
## Proposed Changes
- Bump Lighthouse version to v2.1.1
- Update `thread_local` from v1.1.3 to v1.1.4 to address https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2022-0006
## Additional Info
- ~~Blocked on #2950~~
- ~~Blocked on #2952~~
In the latest release we decreased the target number of subnet peers.
It appears this could be causing issues in some cases and so reverting it back to the previous number it wise. A larger PR that follows this will address some other related discovery issues and peer management around subnet peer discovery.
#2923
Which issue # does this PR address?
There's a redundant field on the BeaconChain called disabled_forks that was once part of our fork-aware networking (#953) but which is no longer used and could be deleted. so Removed all references to disabled_forks so that the code compiles and git grep disabled_forks returns no results.
## Proposed Changes
Please list or describe the changes introduced by this PR.
Removed all references of disabled_forks
Co-authored-by: Divma <26765164+divagant-martian@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue Addressed
We emit a warning to verify that all peer connection state information is consistent. A warning is given under one edge case;
We try to dial a peer with peer-id X and multiaddr Y. The peer responds to multiaddr Y with a different peer-id, Z. The dialing to the peer fails, but libp2p injects the failed attempt as peer-id Z.
In this instance, our PeerDB tries to add a new peer in the disconnected state under a previously unknown peer-id. This is harmless and so this PR permits this behaviour without logging a warning.
## Issues Addressed
Closes#2739Closes#2812
## Proposed Changes
Support the deserialization of query strings containing duplicate keys into their corresponding types.
As `warp` does not support this feature natively (as discussed in #2739), it relies on the external library [`serde_array_query`](https://github.com/sigp/serde_array_query) (written by @michaelsproul)
This is backwards compatible meaning that both of the following requests will produce the same output:
```
curl "http://localhost:5052/eth/v1/events?topics=head,block"
```
```
curl "http://localhost:5052/eth/v1/events?topics=head&topics=block"
```
## Additional Info
Certain error messages have changed slightly. This only affects endpoints which accept multiple values.
For example:
```
{"code":400,"message":"BAD_REQUEST: invalid query: Invalid query string","stacktraces":[]}
```
is now
```
{"code":400,"message":"BAD_REQUEST: unable to parse query","stacktraces":[]}
```
The serve order of the endpoints `get_beacon_state_validators` and `get_beacon_state_validators_id` have flipped:
```rust
.or(get_beacon_state_validators_id.boxed())
.or(get_beacon_state_validators.boxed())
```
This is to ensure proper error messages when filter fallback occurs due to the use of the `and_then` filter.
## Future Work
- Cleanup / remove filter fallback behaviour by substituting `and_then` with `then` where appropriate.
- Add regression tests for HTTP API error messages.
## Credits
- @mooori for doing the ground work of investigating possible solutions within the existing Rust ecosystem.
- @michaelsproul for writing [`serde_array_query`](https://github.com/sigp/serde_array_query) and for helping debug the behaviour of the `warp` filter fallback leading to incorrect error messages.
## Proposed Changes
Change the canonical fork name for the merge to Bellatrix. Keep other merge naming the same to avoid churn.
I've also fixed and enabled the `fork` and `transition` tests for Bellatrix, and the v1.1.7 fork choice tests.
Additionally, the `BellatrixPreset` has been added with tests. It gets served via the `/config/spec` API endpoint along with the other presets.
## Issue Addressed
NA
## Proposed Changes
In https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/2832 we made some changes to the `SnapshotCache` to help deal with the one-block reorgs seen on mainnet (and testnets).
I believe the change in #2832 is good and we should keep it, but I think that in its present form it is causing the `SnapshotCache` to hold onto states that it doesn't need anymore. For example, a skip slot will result in one more `BeaconSnapshot` being stored in the cache.
This PR adds a new type of pruning that happens after a block is inserted to the cache. We will remove any snapshot from the cache that is a *grandparent* of the block being imported. Since we know the grandparent has two valid blocks built atop it, it is not at risk from a one-block re-org.
## Additional Info
NA
## Proposed Changes
Allocate less memory in sync by hashing the `SignedBeaconBlock`s in a batch directly, rather than going via SSZ bytes.
Credit to @paulhauner for finding this source of temporary allocations.
## Issue Addressed
The PeerDB was getting out of sync with the number of disconnected peers compared to the actual count. As this value determines how many we store in our cache, over time the cache was depleting and we were removing peers immediately resulting in errors that manifest as unknown peers for some operations.
The error occurs when dialing a peer fails, we were not correctly updating the peerdb counter because the increment to the counter was placed in the wrong order and was therefore not incrementing the count.
This PR corrects this.
There is a pretty significant tradeoff between bandwidth and speed of gossipsub messages.
We can reduce our bandwidth usage considerably at the cost of minimally delaying gossipsub messages. The impact of delaying messages has not been analyzed thoroughly yet, however this PR in conjunction with some gossipsub updates show considerable bandwidth reduction.
This PR allows the user to set a CLI value (`network-load`) which is an integer in the range of 1 of 5 depending on their bandwidth appetite. 1 represents the least bandwidth but slowest message recieving and 5 represents the most bandwidth and fastest received message time.
For low-bandwidth users it is likely to be more efficient to use a lower value. The default is set to 3, which currently represents a reduced bandwidth usage compared to previous version of this PR. The previous lighthouse versions are equivalent to setting the `network-load` CLI to 4.
This PR is awaiting a few gossipsub updates before we can get it into lighthouse.
## Issue Addressed
- Resolves https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/2902
## Proposed Changes
As documented in https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/2902, there are some cases where we will score peers very harshly for sending attestations to an unknown head.
This PR removes the penalty when an attestation for an unknown head is received, queued for block look-up, then popped from the queue without the head block being known. This prevents peers from being penalized for an unknown block when that peer was never actually asked for the block.
Peer penalties should still be applied to the peers who *do* get the request for the block and fail to respond with a valid block. As such, peers who send us attestations to non-existent heads should eventually be booted.
## Additional Info
- [ ] Need to confirm that a timeout for a bbroot request will incur a penalty.
## Issue Addressed
NA
## Proposed Changes
We have observed occasions were under-resourced nodes will receive messages that were valid *at the time*, but later become invalidated due to long waits for a `BeaconProcessor` worker.
In this PR, we will check to see if the message was valid *at the time of receipt*. If it was initially valid but invalid now, we just ignore the message without penalizing the peer.
## Additional Info
NA
## Issue Addressed
NA
## Proposed Changes
I've observed some Prater nodes (and potentially some mainnet nodes) banning peers due to validator pubkey cache lock timeouts. For the `BeaconChainError`-type of errors, they're caused by internal faults and we can't necessarily tell if the peer is bad or not. I think this is causing us to ban peers unnecessarily when running on under-resourced machines.
## Additional Info
NA
## Issue Addressed
NA
## Proposed Changes
Introduces a cache to attestation to produce atop blocks which will become the head, but are not fully imported (e.g., not inserted into the database).
Whilst attesting to a block before it's imported is rather easy, if we're going to produce that attestation then we also need to be able to:
1. Verify that attestation.
1. Respond to RPC requests for the `beacon_block_root`.
Attestation verification (1) is *partially* covered. Since we prime the shuffling cache before we insert the block into the early attester cache, we should be fine for all typical use-cases. However, it is possible that the cache is washed out before we've managed to insert the state into the database and then attestation verification will fail with a "missing beacon state"-type error.
Providing the block via RPC (2) is also partially covered, since we'll check the database *and* the early attester cache when responding a blocks-by-root request. However, we'll still omit the block from blocks-by-range requests (until the block lands in the DB). I *think* this is fine, since there's no guarantee that we return all blocks for those responses.
Another important consideration is whether or not the *parent* of the early attester block is available in the databse. If it were not, we might fail to respond to blocks-by-root request that are iterating backwards to collect a chain of blocks. I argue that *we will always have the parent of the early attester block in the database.* This is because we are holding the fork-choice write-lock when inserting the block into the early attester cache and we do not drop that until the block is in the database.
## Issue Addressed
The fee-recipient argument of the beacon node does not allow a value to be specified:
> $ lighthouse beacon_node --merge --fee-recipient "0x332E43696A505EF45b9319973785F837ce5267b9"
> error: Found argument '0x332E43696A505EF45b9319973785F837ce5267b9' which wasn't expected, or isn't valid in this context
>
> USAGE:
> lighthouse beacon_node --fee-recipient --merge
>
> For more information try --help
## Proposed Changes
Allow specifying a value for the fee-recipient argument in beacon_node/src/cli.rs
## Additional Info
I've added .takes_value(true) and successfully proposed a block in the kintsugi testnet with my own fee-recipient address instead of the hardcoded default. I think that was just missed as the argument does not make sense without a value :)
Co-authored-by: pk910 <philipp@pk910.de>
Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
## Issue Addressed
NA
## Proposed Changes
Ensures full roots are printed, rather than shortened versions like `0x935b…d376`.
For example, it would be nice if we could do API queries based upon the roots shown in the `Beacon chain re-org` event:
```
Jan 05 12:36:52.224 WARN Beacon chain re-org reorg_distance: 2, new_slot: 2073184, new_head: 0x8a97…2dec, new_head_parent: 0xa985…7688, previous_slot: 2073183, previous_head: 0x935b…d376, service: beacon
Jan 05 13:35:05.832 WARN Beacon chain re-org reorg_distance: 1, new_slot: 2073475, new_head: 0x9207…c6b9, new_head_parent: 0xb2ce…839b, previous_slot: 2073474, previous_head: 0x8066…92f7, service: beacon
```
## Additional Info
We should eventually fix this project-wide, however this is a short-term patch.
## Proposed Changes
Update `superstruct` to bring in @realbigsean's fixes necessary for MEV-compatible private beacon block types (a la #2795).
The refactoring is due to another change in superstruct that allows partial getters to be auto-generated.
## Issue Addressed
N/A
## Proposed Changes
We are currently treating errors from the EL on `engine_executePayload` as `PayloadVerificationStatus::NotVerified`. This adds the block as a candidate head block in fork choice even if the EL explicitly rejected the block as invalid.
`PayloadVerificationStatus::NotVerified` should be only returned when the EL explicitly returns "syncing" imo. This PR propagates an error instead of returning `NotVerified` on EL all EL errors.
## Issue Addressed
Closes#2286Closes#2538Closes#2342
## Proposed Changes
Part II of major slasher optimisations after #2767
These changes will be backwards-incompatible due to the move to MDBX (and the schema change) 😱
* [x] Shrink attester keys from 16 bytes to 7 bytes.
* [x] Shrink attester records from 64 bytes to 6 bytes.
* [x] Separate `DiskConfig` from regular `Config`.
* [x] Add configuration for the LRU cache size.
* [x] Add a "migration" that deletes any legacy LMDB database.
## Issue Addressed
Successor to #2431
## Proposed Changes
* Add a `BlockReplayer` struct to abstract over the intricacies of calling `per_slot_processing` and `per_block_processing` while avoiding unnecessary tree hashing.
* Add a variant of the forwards state root iterator that does not require an `end_state`.
* Use the `BlockReplayer` when reconstructing states in the database. Use the efficient forwards iterator for frozen states.
* Refactor the iterators to remove `Arc<HotColdDB>` (this seems to be neater than making _everything_ an `Arc<HotColdDB>` as I did in #2431).
Supplying the state roots allow us to avoid building a tree hash cache at all when reconstructing historic states, which saves around 1 second flat (regardless of `slots-per-restore-point`). This is a small percentage of worst-case state load times with 200K validators and SPRP=2048 (~15s vs ~16s) but a significant speed-up for more frequent restore points: state loads with SPRP=32 should be now consistently <500ms instead of 1.5s (a ~3x speedup).
## Additional Info
Required by https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/2628
## Issue Addressed
#2834
## Proposed Changes
Change log message severity from error to debug in attestation verification when attestation state is finalized.
## Issue Addressed
#2841
## Proposed Changes
Not counting dialing peers while deciding if we have reached the target peers in case of outbound peers.
## Additional Info
Checked this running in nodes and bandwidth looks normal, peer count looks normal too
## Proposed Changes
Remove the `is_first_block_in_epoch` logic from the balances cache update logic, as it was incorrect in the case of skipped slots. The updated code is simpler because regardless of whether the block is the first in the epoch we can check if an entry for the epoch boundary root already exists in the cache, and update the cache accordingly.
Additionally, to assist with flip-flopping justified epochs, move to cloning the balance cache rather than moving it. This should still be very fast in practice because the balances cache is a ~1.6MB `Vec`, and this operation is expected to only occur infrequently.
## Issue Addressed
Resolves: https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/2741
Includes: https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/2853 so that we can get ssz static tests passing here on v1.1.6. If we want to merge that first, we can make this diff slightly smaller
## Proposed Changes
- Changes the `justified_epoch` and `finalized_epoch` in the `ProtoArrayNode` each to an `Option<Checkpoint>`. The `Option` is necessary only for the migration, so not ideal. But does allow us to add a default logic to `None` on these fields during the database migration.
- Adds a database migration from a legacy fork choice struct to the new one, search for all necessary block roots in fork choice by iterating through blocks in the db.
- updates related to https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2727
- We will have to update the persisted forkchoice to make sure the justified checkpoint stored is correct according to the updated fork choice logic. This boils down to setting the forkchoice store's justified checkpoint to the justified checkpoint of the block that advanced the finalized checkpoint to the current one.
- AFAICT there's no migration steps necessary for the update to allow applying attestations from prior blocks, but would appreciate confirmation on that
- I updated the consensus spec tests to v1.1.6 here, but they will fail until we also implement the proposer score boost updates. I confirmed that the previously failing scenario `new_finalized_slot_is_justified_checkpoint_ancestor` will now pass after the boost updates, but haven't confirmed _all_ tests will pass because I just quickly stubbed out the proposer boost test scenario formatting.
- This PR now also includes proposer boosting https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2730
## Additional Info
I realized checking justified and finalized roots in fork choice makes it more likely that we trigger this bug: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2727
It's possible the combination of justified checkpoint and finalized checkpoint in the forkchoice store is different from in any block in fork choice. So when trying to startup our store's justified checkpoint seems invalid to the rest of fork choice (but it should be valid). When this happens we get an `InvalidBestNode` error and fail to start up. So I'm including that bugfix in this branch.
Todo:
- [x] Fix fork choice tests
- [x] Self review
- [x] Add fix for https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2727
- [x] Rebase onto Kintusgi
- [x] Fix `num_active_validators` calculation as @michaelsproul pointed out
- [x] Clean up db migrations
Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
## Issue Addressed
N/A
## Proposed Changes
Changes required for the `merge-devnet-3`. Added some more non substantive renames on top of @realbigsean 's commit.
Note: this doesn't include the proposer boosting changes in kintsugi v3.
This devnet isn't running with the proposer boosting fork choice changes so if we are looking to merge https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/2822 into `unstable`, then I think we should just maintain this branch for the devnet temporarily.
Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
