Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Divma
047c7544e3 Clean capella (#4019)
## Issue Addressed

Cleans up all the remnants of 4844 in capella. This makes sure when 4844 is reviewed there is nothing we are missing because it got included here 

## Proposed Changes

drop a bomb on every 4844 thing 

## Additional Info

Merge process I did (locally) is as follows:
- squash merge to produce one commit
- in new branch off unstable with the squashed commit create a `git revert HEAD` commit
- merge that new branch onto 4844 with `--strategy ours`
- compare local 4844 to remote 4844 and make sure the diff is empty
- enjoy

Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
2023-03-01 03:19:02 +00:00
Michael Sproul
18c8cab4da
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/unstable' into capella-merge 2023-02-14 12:07:27 +11:00
Divma
ceb986549d Self rate limiting dev flag (#3928)
## Issue Addressed
Adds self rate limiting options, mainly with the idea to comply with peer's rate limits in small testnets

## Proposed Changes
Add a hidden flag `self-limiter` this can take no value, or customs values to configure quotas per protocol

## Additional Info
### How to use
`--self-limiter` will turn on the self rate limiter applying the same params we apply to inbound requests (requests from other peers)
`--self-limiter "beacon_blocks_by_range:64/1"` will turn on the self rate limiter for ALL protocols, but change the quota for bbrange to 64 requested blocks per 1 second.
`--self-limiter "beacon_blocks_by_range:64/1;ping:1/10"` same as previous one, changing the quota for ping as well.

### Caveats
- The rate limiter is either on or off for all protocols. I added the custom values to be able to change the quotas per protocol so that some protocols can be given extremely loose or tight quotas. I think this should satisfy every need even if we can't technically turn off rate limits per protocol.
- This reuses the rate limiter struct for the inbound requests so there is this ugly part of the code in which we need to deal with the inbound only protocols (light client stuff) if this becomes too ugly as we add lc protocols, we might want to split the rate limiters. I've checked this and looks doable with const generics to avoid so much code duplication

### Knowing if this is on
```
Feb 06 21:12:05.493 DEBG Using self rate limiting params         config: OutboundRateLimiterConfig { ping: 2/10s, metadata: 1/15s, status: 5/15s, goodbye: 1/10s, blocks_by_range: 1024/10s, blocks_by_root: 128/10s }, service: libp2p_rpc, service: libp2p
```
2023-02-08 02:18:53 +00:00
Mark Mackey
8a04c3428e Merged with unstable 2022-11-30 17:29:10 -06:00
Giulio rebuffo
d5a2de759b Added LightClientBootstrap V1 (#3711)
## Issue Addressed

Partially addresses #3651

## Proposed Changes

Adds server-side support for light_client_bootstrap_v1 topic

## Additional Info

This PR, creates each time a bootstrap without using cache, I do not know how necessary a cache is in this case as this topic is not supposed to be called frequently and IMHO we can just prevent abuse by using the limiter, but let me know what you think or if there is any caveat to this, or if it is necessary only for the sake of good practice.


Co-authored-by: Pawan Dhananjay <pawandhananjay@gmail.com>
2022-11-25 05:19:00 +00:00
realbigsean
ba16a037a3
cleanup 2022-10-04 09:34:05 -04:00
realbigsean
e81dbbfea4
compile 2022-10-03 21:48:02 -04:00
Marius van der Wijden
36a0add0cd network stuff 2022-09-17 15:23:28 +02:00
Divma
7af5742081 Deprecate step param in BlocksByRange RPC request (#3275)
## Issue Addressed

Deprecates the step parameter in the blocks by range request

## Proposed Changes

- Modifies the BlocksByRangeRequest type to remove the step parameter and everywhere we took it into account before
- Adds a new type to still handle coding and decoding of requests that use the parameter

## Additional Info
I went with a deprecation over the type itself so that requests received outside `lighthouse_network` don't even need to deal with this parameter. After the deprecation period just removing the Old blocks by range request should be straightforward
2022-06-22 16:23:34 +00:00
Age Manning
df40700ddd Rename eth2_libp2p to lighthouse_network (#2702)
## Description

The `eth2_libp2p` crate was originally named and designed to incorporate a simple libp2p integration into lighthouse. Since its origins the crates purpose has expanded dramatically. It now houses a lot more sophistication that is specific to lighthouse and no longer just a libp2p integration. 

As of this writing it currently houses the following high-level lighthouse-specific logic:
- Lighthouse's implementation of the eth2 RPC protocol and specific encodings/decodings
- Integration and handling of ENRs with respect to libp2p and eth2
- Lighthouse's discovery logic, its integration with discv5 and logic about searching and handling peers. 
- Lighthouse's peer manager - This is a large module handling various aspects of Lighthouse's network, such as peer scoring, handling pings and metadata, connection maintenance and recording, etc.
- Lighthouse's peer database - This is a collection of information stored for each individual peer which is specific to lighthouse. We store connection state, sync state, last seen ips and scores etc. The data stored for each peer is designed for various elements of the lighthouse code base such as syncing and the http api.
- Gossipsub scoring - This stores a collection of gossipsub 1.1 scoring mechanisms that are continuously analyssed and updated based on the ethereum 2 networks and how Lighthouse performs on these networks.
- Lighthouse specific types for managing gossipsub topics, sync status and ENR fields
- Lighthouse's network HTTP API metrics - A collection of metrics for lighthouse network monitoring
- Lighthouse's custom configuration of all networking protocols, RPC, gossipsub, discovery, identify and libp2p. 

Therefore it makes sense to rename the crate to be more akin to its current purposes, simply that it manages the majority of Lighthouse's network stack. This PR renames this crate to `lighthouse_network`

Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
2021-10-19 00:30:39 +00:00