## Issue Addressed
The lcli and antithesis docker builds are failing in unstable so bumping all the versions here
Co-authored-by: realbigsean <sean@sigmaprime.io>
## Issue Addressed
N/A
## Proposed Changes
Use stable version of ubuntu base image in dockerfile instead of using latest. This will help in narrowing down issues with docker images.
## Issue Addressed
Closes#2938
## Proposed Changes
* Build and publish images with a `-modern` suffix which enable CPU optimizations for modern hardware.
* Add docs for the plethora of available images!
* Unify all the Docker workflows in `docker.yml` (including for tagged releases).
## Additional Info
The `Dockerfile` is no longer used by our Docker Hub builds, as we use `cross` and a generic approach for ARM and x86. There's a new CI job `docker-build-from-source` which tests the `Dockerfile` without publishing anything.
## Issue Addressed
- Resolves#2778
## Proposed Changes
Updates docker images from Buster (10) to Bullseye (11), since Bullseye is [listed](https://www.debian.org/releases/) as the "current stable release".
## Additional Info
NA
## Issue Addressed
Resolves: #2087
## Proposed Changes
- Add a `Dockerfile` to the `lcli` directory
- Add a github actions job to build and push and `lcli` docker image on pushes to `unstable` and `stable`
## Additional Info
It's a little awkward but `lcli` requires the full project scope so must be built:
- from the `lighthouse` dir with: `docker build -f ./lcli/Dockerflie .`
- from the `lcli` dir with: `docker build -f ./Dockerfile ../`
Didn't include `libssl-dev` or `ca-certificates`, `lcli` doesn't need these right?
Co-authored-by: realbigsean <seananderson33@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
