state_processing: winning_root v0.6.1
This commit is contained in:
parent
ca73fb72da
commit
fd56c8fa04
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
use super::get_attestation_participants::get_attestation_participants;
|
||||
use super::get_attesting_indices::get_attesting_indices_unsorted;
|
||||
use super::WinningRootHashSet;
|
||||
use types::*;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ pub struct InclusionInfo {
|
||||
pub slot: Slot,
|
||||
/// The distance between the attestation slot and the slot that attestation was included in a
|
||||
/// block.
|
||||
pub distance: Slot,
|
||||
pub distance: u64,
|
||||
/// The index of the proposer at the slot where the attestation was included.
|
||||
pub proposer_index: usize,
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ impl Default for InclusionInfo {
|
||||
fn default() -> Self {
|
||||
Self {
|
||||
slot: Slot::max_value(),
|
||||
distance: Slot::max_value(),
|
||||
distance: u64::max_value(),
|
||||
proposer_index: 0,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ impl ValidatorStatuses {
|
||||
/// Process some attestations from the given `state` updating the `statuses` and
|
||||
/// `total_balances` fields.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.1
|
||||
/// Spec v0.6.1
|
||||
pub fn process_attestations(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
@ -211,28 +211,30 @@ impl ValidatorStatuses {
|
||||
.chain(state.current_epoch_attestations.iter())
|
||||
{
|
||||
let attesting_indices =
|
||||
get_attestation_participants(state, &a.data, &a.aggregation_bitfield, spec)?;
|
||||
get_attesting_indices_unsorted(state, &a.data, &a.aggregation_bitfield, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
let mut status = ValidatorStatus::default();
|
||||
|
||||
// Profile this attestation, updating the total balances and generating an
|
||||
// `ValidatorStatus` object that applies to all participants in the attestation.
|
||||
if is_from_epoch(a, state.current_epoch(spec), spec) {
|
||||
if is_from_epoch(a, state.current_epoch(spec)) {
|
||||
status.is_current_epoch_attester = true;
|
||||
|
||||
if target_matches_epoch_start_block(a, state, state.current_epoch(spec), spec)? {
|
||||
status.is_current_epoch_target_attester = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if is_from_epoch(a, state.previous_epoch(spec), spec) {
|
||||
} else if is_from_epoch(a, state.previous_epoch(spec)) {
|
||||
status.is_previous_epoch_attester = true;
|
||||
|
||||
// The inclusion slot and distance are only required for previous epoch attesters.
|
||||
let relative_epoch = RelativeEpoch::from_slot(state.slot, a.inclusion_slot, spec)?;
|
||||
let attestation_slot = state.get_attestation_slot(&a.data, spec)?;
|
||||
let inclusion_slot = attestation_slot + a.inclusion_delay;
|
||||
let relative_epoch = RelativeEpoch::from_slot(state.slot, inclusion_slot, spec)?;
|
||||
status.inclusion_info = Some(InclusionInfo {
|
||||
slot: a.inclusion_slot,
|
||||
distance: inclusion_distance(a),
|
||||
slot: inclusion_slot,
|
||||
distance: a.inclusion_delay,
|
||||
proposer_index: state.get_beacon_proposer_index(
|
||||
a.inclusion_slot,
|
||||
attestation_slot,
|
||||
relative_epoch,
|
||||
spec,
|
||||
)?,
|
||||
@ -316,25 +318,17 @@ impl ValidatorStatuses {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns the distance between when the attestation was created and when it was included in a
|
||||
/// block.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.1
|
||||
fn inclusion_distance(a: &PendingAttestation) -> Slot {
|
||||
a.inclusion_slot - a.data.slot
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns `true` if some `PendingAttestation` is from the supplied `epoch`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.1
|
||||
fn is_from_epoch(a: &PendingAttestation, epoch: Epoch, spec: &ChainSpec) -> bool {
|
||||
a.data.slot.epoch(spec.slots_per_epoch) == epoch
|
||||
/// Spec v0.6.1
|
||||
fn is_from_epoch(a: &PendingAttestation, epoch: Epoch) -> bool {
|
||||
a.data.target_epoch == epoch
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns `true` if the attestation's FFG target is equal to the hash of the `state`'s first
|
||||
/// beacon block in the given `epoch`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.6.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.6.1
|
||||
fn target_matches_epoch_start_block(
|
||||
a: &PendingAttestation,
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
@ -350,13 +344,14 @@ fn target_matches_epoch_start_block(
|
||||
/// Returns `true` if a `PendingAttestation` and `BeaconState` share the same beacon block hash for
|
||||
/// the current slot of the `PendingAttestation`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.6.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.6.1
|
||||
fn has_common_beacon_block_root(
|
||||
a: &PendingAttestation,
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<bool, BeaconStateError> {
|
||||
let state_block_root = *state.get_block_root(a.data.slot, spec)?;
|
||||
let attestation_slot = state.get_attestation_slot(&a.data, spec)?;
|
||||
let state_block_root = *state.get_block_root(attestation_slot, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(a.data.beacon_block_root == state_block_root)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
|
||||
use super::get_attestation_participants::get_attestation_participants;
|
||||
use std::collections::HashSet;
|
||||
use std::iter::FromIterator;
|
||||
use super::get_attesting_indices::get_attesting_indices_unsorted;
|
||||
use std::collections::{HashMap, HashSet};
|
||||
use tree_hash::TreeHash;
|
||||
use types::*;
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone)]
|
||||
pub struct WinningRoot {
|
||||
pub crosslink_data_root: Hash256,
|
||||
pub crosslink: Crosslink,
|
||||
pub attesting_validator_indices: Vec<usize>,
|
||||
pub total_attesting_balance: u64,
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -16,15 +16,15 @@ impl WinningRoot {
|
||||
/// A winning root is "better" than another if it has a higher `total_attesting_balance`. Ties
|
||||
/// are broken by favouring the higher `crosslink_data_root` value.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.1
|
||||
/// Spec v0.6.1
|
||||
pub fn is_better_than(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
|
||||
if self.total_attesting_balance > other.total_attesting_balance {
|
||||
true
|
||||
} else if self.total_attesting_balance == other.total_attesting_balance {
|
||||
self.crosslink_data_root > other.crosslink_data_root
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
false
|
||||
}
|
||||
(
|
||||
self.total_attesting_balance,
|
||||
self.crosslink.crosslink_data_root,
|
||||
) > (
|
||||
other.total_attesting_balance,
|
||||
other.crosslink.crosslink_data_root,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -34,43 +34,55 @@ impl WinningRoot {
|
||||
/// The `WinningRoot` object also contains additional fields that are useful in later stages of
|
||||
/// per-epoch processing.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.1
|
||||
/// Spec v0.6.1
|
||||
pub fn winning_root(
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
shard: u64,
|
||||
epoch: Epoch,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<Option<WinningRoot>, BeaconStateError> {
|
||||
let mut winning_root: Option<WinningRoot> = None;
|
||||
let shard_attestations: Vec<&PendingAttestation> = state
|
||||
.get_matching_source_attestations(epoch, spec)?
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.filter(|a| a.data.shard == shard)
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
|
||||
let crosslink_data_roots: HashSet<Hash256> = HashSet::from_iter(
|
||||
state
|
||||
.previous_epoch_attestations
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.chain(state.current_epoch_attestations.iter())
|
||||
.filter_map(|a| {
|
||||
if is_eligible_for_winning_root(state, a, shard) {
|
||||
Some(a.data.crosslink_data_root)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
None
|
||||
}
|
||||
}),
|
||||
);
|
||||
let shard_crosslinks = shard_attestations.iter().map(|att| {
|
||||
(
|
||||
att,
|
||||
state.get_crosslink_from_attestation_data(&att.data, spec),
|
||||
)
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
for crosslink_data_root in crosslink_data_roots {
|
||||
let current_shard_crosslink_root = state.current_crosslinks[shard as usize].tree_hash_root();
|
||||
let candidate_crosslinks = shard_crosslinks.filter(|(_, c)| {
|
||||
c.previous_crosslink_root.as_bytes() == ¤t_shard_crosslink_root[..]
|
||||
|| c.tree_hash_root() == current_shard_crosslink_root
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Build a map from candidate crosslink to attestations that support that crosslink.
|
||||
let mut candidate_crosslink_map: HashMap<Crosslink, Vec<&PendingAttestation>> = HashMap::new();
|
||||
|
||||
for (&attestation, crosslink) in candidate_crosslinks {
|
||||
let supporting_attestations = candidate_crosslink_map
|
||||
.entry(crosslink)
|
||||
.or_insert_with(Vec::new);
|
||||
supporting_attestations.push(attestation);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if candidate_crosslink_map.is_empty() {
|
||||
return Ok(None);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let mut winning_root = None;
|
||||
for (crosslink, attestations) in candidate_crosslink_map {
|
||||
let attesting_validator_indices =
|
||||
get_attesting_validator_indices(state, shard, &crosslink_data_root, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
let total_attesting_balance: u64 =
|
||||
attesting_validator_indices
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.try_fold(0_u64, |acc, i| {
|
||||
state
|
||||
.get_effective_balance(*i, spec)
|
||||
.and_then(|bal| Ok(acc + bal))
|
||||
})?;
|
||||
get_unslashed_attesting_indices_unsorted(state, &attestations, spec)?;
|
||||
let total_attesting_balance =
|
||||
state.get_total_balance(&attesting_validator_indices, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
let candidate = WinningRoot {
|
||||
crosslink_data_root,
|
||||
crosslink,
|
||||
attesting_validator_indices,
|
||||
total_attesting_balance,
|
||||
};
|
||||
@ -87,52 +99,29 @@ pub fn winning_root(
|
||||
Ok(winning_root)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns `true` if pending attestation `a` is eligible to become a winning root.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.1
|
||||
fn is_eligible_for_winning_root(state: &BeaconState, a: &PendingAttestation, shard: Shard) -> bool {
|
||||
if shard >= state.latest_crosslinks.len() as u64 {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
a.data.previous_crosslink == state.latest_crosslinks[shard as usize]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns all indices which voted for a given crosslink. Does not contain duplicates.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.1
|
||||
fn get_attesting_validator_indices(
|
||||
pub fn get_unslashed_attesting_indices_unsorted(
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
shard: u64,
|
||||
crosslink_data_root: &Hash256,
|
||||
attestations: &[&PendingAttestation],
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<Vec<usize>, BeaconStateError> {
|
||||
let mut indices = vec![];
|
||||
|
||||
for a in state
|
||||
.current_epoch_attestations
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.chain(state.previous_epoch_attestations.iter())
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (a.data.shard == shard) && (a.data.crosslink_data_root == *crosslink_data_root) {
|
||||
indices.append(&mut get_attestation_participants(
|
||||
state,
|
||||
&a.data,
|
||||
&a.aggregation_bitfield,
|
||||
spec,
|
||||
)?);
|
||||
}
|
||||
let mut output = HashSet::new();
|
||||
for a in attestations {
|
||||
output.extend(get_attesting_indices_unsorted(
|
||||
state,
|
||||
&a.data,
|
||||
&a.aggregation_bitfield,
|
||||
spec,
|
||||
)?);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Sort the list (required for dedup). "Unstable" means the sort may re-order equal elements,
|
||||
// this causes no issue here.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// These sort + dedup ops are potentially good CPU time optimisation targets.
|
||||
indices.sort_unstable();
|
||||
// Remove all duplicate indices (requires a sorted list).
|
||||
indices.dedup();
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(indices)
|
||||
Ok(output
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.filter(|index| {
|
||||
state
|
||||
.validator_registry
|
||||
.get(*index)
|
||||
.map_or(false, |v| !v.slashed)
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
@ -142,15 +131,17 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn is_better_than() {
|
||||
let worse = WinningRoot {
|
||||
crosslink_data_root: Hash256::from_slice(&[1; 32]),
|
||||
crosslink: Crosslink {
|
||||
epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
||||
previous_crosslink_root: Hash256::from_slice(&[0; 32]),
|
||||
crosslink_data_root: Hash256::from_slice(&[1; 32]),
|
||||
},
|
||||
attesting_validator_indices: vec![],
|
||||
total_attesting_balance: 42,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let better = WinningRoot {
|
||||
crosslink_data_root: Hash256::from_slice(&[2; 32]),
|
||||
..worse.clone()
|
||||
};
|
||||
let mut better = worse.clone();
|
||||
better.crosslink.crosslink_data_root = Hash256::from_slice(&[2; 32]);
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(better.is_better_than(&worse));
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user