Merge branch 'faster-rewards' into sane-case
This commit is contained in:
commit
ed49023b87
@ -4,14 +4,13 @@ use ssz::TreeHash;
|
|||||||
use state_processing::{
|
use state_processing::{
|
||||||
per_epoch_processing,
|
per_epoch_processing,
|
||||||
per_epoch_processing::{
|
per_epoch_processing::{
|
||||||
calculate_active_validator_indices, calculate_attester_sets, clean_attestations,
|
clean_attestations, initialize_validator_statuses, process_crosslinks, process_eth1_data,
|
||||||
process_crosslinks, process_eth1_data, process_justification,
|
process_justification, process_rewards_and_penalities, process_validator_registry,
|
||||||
process_rewards_and_penalities, process_validator_registry, update_active_tree_index_roots,
|
update_active_tree_index_roots, update_latest_slashed_balances,
|
||||||
update_latest_slashed_balances,
|
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
use types::test_utils::TestingBeaconStateBuilder;
|
use types::test_utils::TestingBeaconStateBuilder;
|
||||||
use types::{validator_registry::get_active_validator_indices, *};
|
use types::*;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
pub const BENCHING_SAMPLE_SIZE: usize = 10;
|
pub const BENCHING_SAMPLE_SIZE: usize = 10;
|
||||||
pub const SMALL_BENCHING_SAMPLE_SIZE: usize = 10;
|
pub const SMALL_BENCHING_SAMPLE_SIZE: usize = 10;
|
||||||
@ -73,64 +72,6 @@ pub fn bench_epoch_processing_n_validators(c: &mut Criterion, validator_count: u
|
|||||||
///
|
///
|
||||||
/// `desc` will be added to the title of each bench.
|
/// `desc` will be added to the title of each bench.
|
||||||
fn bench_epoch_processing(c: &mut Criterion, state: &BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec, desc: &str) {
|
fn bench_epoch_processing(c: &mut Criterion, state: &BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec, desc: &str) {
|
||||||
let state_clone = state.clone();
|
|
||||||
let spec_clone = spec.clone();
|
|
||||||
c.bench(
|
|
||||||
&format!("{}/epoch_processing", desc),
|
|
||||||
Benchmark::new("calculate_active_validator_indices", move |b| {
|
|
||||||
b.iter_batched(
|
|
||||||
|| state_clone.clone(),
|
|
||||||
|mut state| {
|
|
||||||
calculate_active_validator_indices(&mut state, &spec_clone);
|
|
||||||
state
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
criterion::BatchSize::SmallInput,
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
})
|
|
||||||
.sample_size(BENCHING_SAMPLE_SIZE),
|
|
||||||
);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let state_clone = state.clone();
|
|
||||||
let spec_clone = spec.clone();
|
|
||||||
let active_validator_indices = calculate_active_validator_indices(&state, &spec);
|
|
||||||
c.bench(
|
|
||||||
&format!("{}/epoch_processing", desc),
|
|
||||||
Benchmark::new("calculate_current_total_balance", move |b| {
|
|
||||||
b.iter_batched(
|
|
||||||
|| state_clone.clone(),
|
|
||||||
|state| {
|
|
||||||
state.get_total_balance(&active_validator_indices[..], &spec_clone);
|
|
||||||
state
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
criterion::BatchSize::SmallInput,
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
})
|
|
||||||
.sample_size(BENCHING_SAMPLE_SIZE),
|
|
||||||
);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let state_clone = state.clone();
|
|
||||||
let spec_clone = spec.clone();
|
|
||||||
c.bench(
|
|
||||||
&format!("{}/epoch_processing", desc),
|
|
||||||
Benchmark::new("calculate_previous_total_balance", move |b| {
|
|
||||||
b.iter_batched(
|
|
||||||
|| state_clone.clone(),
|
|
||||||
|state| {
|
|
||||||
state.get_total_balance(
|
|
||||||
&get_active_validator_indices(
|
|
||||||
&state.validator_registry,
|
|
||||||
state.previous_epoch(&spec_clone),
|
|
||||||
)[..],
|
|
||||||
&spec_clone,
|
|
||||||
);
|
|
||||||
state
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
criterion::BatchSize::SmallInput,
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
})
|
|
||||||
.sample_size(BENCHING_SAMPLE_SIZE),
|
|
||||||
);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let state_clone = state.clone();
|
let state_clone = state.clone();
|
||||||
let spec_clone = spec.clone();
|
let spec_clone = spec.clone();
|
||||||
c.bench(
|
c.bench(
|
||||||
@ -152,11 +93,11 @@ fn bench_epoch_processing(c: &mut Criterion, state: &BeaconState, spec: &ChainSp
|
|||||||
let spec_clone = spec.clone();
|
let spec_clone = spec.clone();
|
||||||
c.bench(
|
c.bench(
|
||||||
&format!("{}/epoch_processing", desc),
|
&format!("{}/epoch_processing", desc),
|
||||||
Benchmark::new("calculate_attester_sets", move |b| {
|
Benchmark::new("initialize_validator_statuses", move |b| {
|
||||||
b.iter_batched(
|
b.iter_batched(
|
||||||
|| state_clone.clone(),
|
|| state_clone.clone(),
|
||||||
|mut state| {
|
|mut state| {
|
||||||
calculate_attester_sets(&mut state, &spec_clone).unwrap();
|
initialize_validator_statuses(&mut state, &spec_clone).unwrap();
|
||||||
state
|
state
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
criterion::BatchSize::SmallInput,
|
criterion::BatchSize::SmallInput,
|
||||||
@ -167,28 +108,14 @@ fn bench_epoch_processing(c: &mut Criterion, state: &BeaconState, spec: &ChainSp
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
let state_clone = state.clone();
|
let state_clone = state.clone();
|
||||||
let spec_clone = spec.clone();
|
let spec_clone = spec.clone();
|
||||||
let previous_epoch = state.previous_epoch(&spec);
|
let attesters = initialize_validator_statuses(&state, &spec).unwrap();
|
||||||
let attesters = calculate_attester_sets(&state, &spec).unwrap();
|
|
||||||
let active_validator_indices = calculate_active_validator_indices(&state, &spec);
|
|
||||||
let current_total_balance = state.get_total_balance(&active_validator_indices[..], &spec);
|
|
||||||
let previous_total_balance = state.get_total_balance(
|
|
||||||
&get_active_validator_indices(&state.validator_registry, previous_epoch)[..],
|
|
||||||
&spec,
|
|
||||||
);
|
|
||||||
c.bench(
|
c.bench(
|
||||||
&format!("{}/epoch_processing", desc),
|
&format!("{}/epoch_processing", desc),
|
||||||
Benchmark::new("process_justification", move |b| {
|
Benchmark::new("process_justification", move |b| {
|
||||||
b.iter_batched(
|
b.iter_batched(
|
||||||
|| state_clone.clone(),
|
|| state_clone.clone(),
|
||||||
|mut state| {
|
|mut state| {
|
||||||
process_justification(
|
process_justification(&mut state, &attesters.total_balances, &spec_clone);
|
||||||
&mut state,
|
|
||||||
current_total_balance,
|
|
||||||
previous_total_balance,
|
|
||||||
attesters.previous_epoch_boundary.balance,
|
|
||||||
attesters.current_epoch_boundary.balance,
|
|
||||||
&spec_clone,
|
|
||||||
);
|
|
||||||
state
|
state
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
criterion::BatchSize::SmallInput,
|
criterion::BatchSize::SmallInput,
|
||||||
@ -213,25 +140,17 @@ fn bench_epoch_processing(c: &mut Criterion, state: &BeaconState, spec: &ChainSp
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
let mut state_clone = state.clone();
|
let mut state_clone = state.clone();
|
||||||
let spec_clone = spec.clone();
|
let spec_clone = spec.clone();
|
||||||
let previous_epoch = state.previous_epoch(&spec);
|
let attesters = initialize_validator_statuses(&state, &spec).unwrap();
|
||||||
let attesters = calculate_attester_sets(&state, &spec).unwrap();
|
|
||||||
let active_validator_indices = calculate_active_validator_indices(&state, &spec);
|
|
||||||
let previous_total_balance = state.get_total_balance(
|
|
||||||
&get_active_validator_indices(&state.validator_registry, previous_epoch)[..],
|
|
||||||
&spec,
|
|
||||||
);
|
|
||||||
let winning_root_for_shards = process_crosslinks(&mut state_clone, &spec).unwrap();
|
let winning_root_for_shards = process_crosslinks(&mut state_clone, &spec).unwrap();
|
||||||
c.bench(
|
c.bench(
|
||||||
&format!("{}/epoch_processing", desc),
|
&format!("{}/epoch_processing", desc),
|
||||||
Benchmark::new("process_rewards_and_penalties", move |b| {
|
Benchmark::new("process_rewards_and_penalties", move |b| {
|
||||||
b.iter_batched(
|
b.iter_batched(
|
||||||
|| state_clone.clone(),
|
|| (state_clone.clone(), attesters.clone()),
|
||||||
|mut state| {
|
|(mut state, mut attesters)| {
|
||||||
process_rewards_and_penalities(
|
process_rewards_and_penalities(
|
||||||
&mut state,
|
&mut state,
|
||||||
&active_validator_indices,
|
&mut attesters,
|
||||||
&attesters,
|
|
||||||
previous_total_balance,
|
|
||||||
&winning_root_for_shards,
|
&winning_root_for_shards,
|
||||||
&spec_clone,
|
&spec_clone,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
@ -261,32 +180,8 @@ fn bench_epoch_processing(c: &mut Criterion, state: &BeaconState, spec: &ChainSp
|
|||||||
.sample_size(BENCHING_SAMPLE_SIZE),
|
.sample_size(BENCHING_SAMPLE_SIZE),
|
||||||
);
|
);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let mut state_clone = state.clone();
|
let state_clone = state.clone();
|
||||||
let spec_clone = spec.clone();
|
let spec_clone = spec.clone();
|
||||||
let previous_epoch = state.previous_epoch(&spec);
|
|
||||||
let attesters = calculate_attester_sets(&state, &spec).unwrap();
|
|
||||||
let active_validator_indices = calculate_active_validator_indices(&state, &spec);
|
|
||||||
let current_total_balance = state.get_total_balance(&active_validator_indices[..], spec);
|
|
||||||
let previous_total_balance = state.get_total_balance(
|
|
||||||
&get_active_validator_indices(&state.validator_registry, previous_epoch)[..],
|
|
||||||
&spec,
|
|
||||||
);
|
|
||||||
assert_eq!(
|
|
||||||
state_clone.finalized_epoch, state_clone.validator_registry_update_epoch,
|
|
||||||
"The last registry update should be at the last finalized epoch."
|
|
||||||
);
|
|
||||||
process_justification(
|
|
||||||
&mut state_clone,
|
|
||||||
current_total_balance,
|
|
||||||
previous_total_balance,
|
|
||||||
attesters.previous_epoch_boundary.balance,
|
|
||||||
attesters.current_epoch_boundary.balance,
|
|
||||||
spec,
|
|
||||||
);
|
|
||||||
assert!(
|
|
||||||
state_clone.finalized_epoch > state_clone.validator_registry_update_epoch,
|
|
||||||
"The state should have been finalized."
|
|
||||||
);
|
|
||||||
c.bench(
|
c.bench(
|
||||||
&format!("{}/epoch_processing", desc),
|
&format!("{}/epoch_processing", desc),
|
||||||
Benchmark::new("process_validator_registry", move |b| {
|
Benchmark::new("process_validator_registry", move |b| {
|
||||||
|
@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ pub fn state_processing(c: &mut Criterion) {
|
|||||||
Builder::from_env(Env::default().default_filter_or(LOG_LEVEL)).init();
|
Builder::from_env(Env::default().default_filter_or(LOG_LEVEL)).init();
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
bench_block_processing::bench_block_processing_n_validators(c, VALIDATOR_COUNT);
|
|
||||||
bench_epoch_processing::bench_epoch_processing_n_validators(c, VALIDATOR_COUNT);
|
bench_epoch_processing::bench_epoch_processing_n_validators(c, VALIDATOR_COUNT);
|
||||||
|
bench_block_processing::bench_block_processing_n_validators(c, VALIDATOR_COUNT);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
criterion_group!(benches, state_processing);
|
criterion_group!(benches, state_processing);
|
||||||
|
@ -1,19 +1,16 @@
|
|||||||
use attester_sets::AttesterSets;
|
|
||||||
use errors::EpochProcessingError as Error;
|
use errors::EpochProcessingError as Error;
|
||||||
use fnv::FnvHashMap;
|
|
||||||
use fnv::FnvHashSet;
|
|
||||||
use integer_sqrt::IntegerSquareRoot;
|
use integer_sqrt::IntegerSquareRoot;
|
||||||
use rayon::prelude::*;
|
use rayon::prelude::*;
|
||||||
use ssz::TreeHash;
|
use ssz::TreeHash;
|
||||||
use std::collections::HashMap;
|
use std::collections::HashMap;
|
||||||
use std::iter::FromIterator;
|
|
||||||
use types::{validator_registry::get_active_validator_indices, *};
|
use types::{validator_registry::get_active_validator_indices, *};
|
||||||
|
use validator_statuses::{TotalBalances, ValidatorStatuses};
|
||||||
use winning_root::{winning_root, WinningRoot};
|
use winning_root::{winning_root, WinningRoot};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
pub mod attester_sets;
|
|
||||||
pub mod errors;
|
pub mod errors;
|
||||||
pub mod inclusion_distance;
|
pub mod inclusion_distance;
|
||||||
pub mod tests;
|
pub mod tests;
|
||||||
|
pub mod validator_statuses;
|
||||||
pub mod winning_root;
|
pub mod winning_root;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/// Maps a shard to a winning root.
|
/// Maps a shard to a winning root.
|
||||||
@ -28,47 +25,22 @@ pub type WinningRootHashSet = HashMap<u64, WinningRoot>;
|
|||||||
///
|
///
|
||||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||||
pub fn per_epoch_processing(state: &mut BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
pub fn per_epoch_processing(state: &mut BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
||||||
let previous_epoch = state.previous_epoch(spec);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Ensure all of the caches are built.
|
// Ensure all of the caches are built.
|
||||||
state.build_epoch_cache(RelativeEpoch::Previous, spec)?;
|
state.build_epoch_cache(RelativeEpoch::Previous, spec)?;
|
||||||
state.build_epoch_cache(RelativeEpoch::Current, spec)?;
|
state.build_epoch_cache(RelativeEpoch::Current, spec)?;
|
||||||
state.build_epoch_cache(RelativeEpoch::Next, spec)?;
|
state.build_epoch_cache(RelativeEpoch::Next, spec)?;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let attesters = calculate_attester_sets(&state, spec)?;
|
let mut statuses = initialize_validator_statuses(&state, spec)?;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let active_validator_indices = calculate_active_validator_indices(&state, spec);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let current_total_balance = state.get_total_balance(&active_validator_indices[..], spec);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let previous_total_balance = state.get_total_balance(
|
|
||||||
&get_active_validator_indices(&state.validator_registry, previous_epoch)[..],
|
|
||||||
spec,
|
|
||||||
);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
process_eth1_data(state, spec);
|
process_eth1_data(state, spec);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
process_justification(
|
process_justification(state, &statuses.total_balances, spec);
|
||||||
state,
|
|
||||||
current_total_balance,
|
|
||||||
previous_total_balance,
|
|
||||||
attesters.previous_epoch_boundary.balance,
|
|
||||||
attesters.current_epoch_boundary.balance,
|
|
||||||
spec,
|
|
||||||
);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Crosslinks
|
// Crosslinks
|
||||||
let winning_root_for_shards = process_crosslinks(state, spec)?;
|
let winning_root_for_shards = process_crosslinks(state, spec)?;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Rewards and Penalities
|
// Rewards and Penalities
|
||||||
process_rewards_and_penalities(
|
process_rewards_and_penalities(state, &mut statuses, &winning_root_for_shards, spec)?;
|
||||||
state,
|
|
||||||
&active_validator_indices,
|
|
||||||
&attesters,
|
|
||||||
previous_total_balance,
|
|
||||||
&winning_root_for_shards,
|
|
||||||
spec,
|
|
||||||
)?;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Ejections
|
// Ejections
|
||||||
state.process_ejections(spec);
|
state.process_ejections(spec);
|
||||||
@ -105,11 +77,15 @@ pub fn calculate_active_validator_indices(state: &BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec)
|
|||||||
/// - etc.
|
/// - etc.
|
||||||
///
|
///
|
||||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||||
pub fn calculate_attester_sets(
|
pub fn initialize_validator_statuses(
|
||||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||||
) -> Result<AttesterSets, BeaconStateError> {
|
) -> Result<ValidatorStatuses, BeaconStateError> {
|
||||||
AttesterSets::new(&state, spec)
|
let mut statuses = ValidatorStatuses::new(state, spec);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
statuses.process_attestations(&state, &state.latest_attestations, spec)?;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Ok(statuses)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||||
@ -137,10 +113,7 @@ pub fn process_eth1_data(state: &mut BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec) {
|
|||||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||||
pub fn process_justification(
|
pub fn process_justification(
|
||||||
state: &mut BeaconState,
|
state: &mut BeaconState,
|
||||||
current_total_balance: u64,
|
total_balances: &TotalBalances,
|
||||||
previous_total_balance: u64,
|
|
||||||
previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance: u64,
|
|
||||||
current_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance: u64,
|
|
||||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||||
) {
|
) {
|
||||||
let previous_epoch = state.previous_epoch(spec);
|
let previous_epoch = state.previous_epoch(spec);
|
||||||
@ -153,7 +126,8 @@ pub fn process_justification(
|
|||||||
//
|
//
|
||||||
// - Set the 2nd bit of the bitfield.
|
// - Set the 2nd bit of the bitfield.
|
||||||
// - Set the previous epoch to be justified.
|
// - Set the previous epoch to be justified.
|
||||||
if (3 * previous_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance) >= (2 * previous_total_balance) {
|
if (3 * total_balances.previous_epoch_boundary_attesters) >= (2 * total_balances.previous_epoch)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
state.justification_bitfield |= 2;
|
state.justification_bitfield |= 2;
|
||||||
new_justified_epoch = previous_epoch;
|
new_justified_epoch = previous_epoch;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
@ -161,7 +135,7 @@ pub fn process_justification(
|
|||||||
//
|
//
|
||||||
// - Set the 1st bit of the bitfield.
|
// - Set the 1st bit of the bitfield.
|
||||||
// - Set the current epoch to be justified.
|
// - Set the current epoch to be justified.
|
||||||
if (3 * current_epoch_boundary_attesting_balance) >= (2 * current_total_balance) {
|
if (3 * total_balances.current_epoch_boundary_attesters) >= (2 * total_balances.current_epoch) {
|
||||||
state.justification_bitfield |= 1;
|
state.justification_bitfield |= 1;
|
||||||
new_justified_epoch = current_epoch;
|
new_justified_epoch = current_epoch;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
@ -283,126 +257,79 @@ pub fn process_crosslinks(
|
|||||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||||
pub fn process_rewards_and_penalities(
|
pub fn process_rewards_and_penalities(
|
||||||
state: &mut BeaconState,
|
state: &mut BeaconState,
|
||||||
active_validator_indices: &[usize],
|
statuses: &mut ValidatorStatuses,
|
||||||
attesters: &AttesterSets,
|
|
||||||
previous_total_balance: u64,
|
|
||||||
winning_root_for_shards: &WinningRootHashSet,
|
winning_root_for_shards: &WinningRootHashSet,
|
||||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||||
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
||||||
let next_epoch = state.next_epoch(spec);
|
let next_epoch = state.next_epoch(spec);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let active_validator_indices: FnvHashSet<usize> =
|
statuses.process_winning_roots(state, winning_root_for_shards, spec)?;
|
||||||
FnvHashSet::from_iter(active_validator_indices.iter().cloned());
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let previous_epoch_attestations: Vec<&PendingAttestation> = state
|
let total_balances = &statuses.total_balances;
|
||||||
.latest_attestations
|
|
||||||
.par_iter()
|
|
||||||
.filter(|a| a.data.slot.epoch(spec.slots_per_epoch) == state.previous_epoch(spec))
|
|
||||||
.collect();
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let base_reward_quotient = previous_total_balance.integer_sqrt() / spec.base_reward_quotient;
|
let base_reward_quotient =
|
||||||
|
total_balances.previous_epoch.integer_sqrt() / spec.base_reward_quotient;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Guard against a divide-by-zero during the validator balance update.
|
||||||
if base_reward_quotient == 0 {
|
if base_reward_quotient == 0 {
|
||||||
return Err(Error::BaseRewardQuotientIsZero);
|
return Err(Error::BaseRewardQuotientIsZero);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if previous_total_balance == 0 {
|
// Guard against a divide-by-zero during the validator balance update.
|
||||||
|
if total_balances.previous_epoch == 0 {
|
||||||
return Err(Error::PreviousTotalBalanceIsZero);
|
return Err(Error::PreviousTotalBalanceIsZero);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
// Guard against an out-of-bounds during the validator balance update.
|
||||||
// Map is ValidatorIndex -> ProposerIndex
|
if statuses.statuses.len() != state.validator_balances.len() {
|
||||||
let mut inclusion_slots: FnvHashMap<usize, (Slot, usize)> = FnvHashMap::default();
|
return Err(Error::ValidatorStatusesInconsistent);
|
||||||
for a in &previous_epoch_attestations {
|
|
||||||
let participants =
|
|
||||||
state.get_attestation_participants(&a.data, &a.aggregation_bitfield, spec)?;
|
|
||||||
let inclusion_distance = (a.inclusion_slot - a.data.slot).as_u64();
|
|
||||||
for participant in participants {
|
|
||||||
if let Some((existing_distance, _)) = inclusion_slots.get(&participant) {
|
|
||||||
if *existing_distance <= inclusion_distance {
|
|
||||||
continue;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
let proposer_index = state
|
|
||||||
.get_beacon_proposer_index(a.data.slot, spec)
|
|
||||||
.map_err(|_| Error::UnableToDetermineProducer)?;
|
|
||||||
inclusion_slots.insert(
|
|
||||||
participant,
|
|
||||||
(Slot::from(inclusion_distance), proposer_index),
|
|
||||||
);
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Justification and finalization
|
// Justification and finalization
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let epochs_since_finality = next_epoch - state.finalized_epoch;
|
let epochs_since_finality = next_epoch - state.finalized_epoch;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if epochs_since_finality <= 4 {
|
state.validator_balances = state
|
||||||
state.validator_balances = state
|
.validator_balances
|
||||||
.validator_balances
|
.par_iter()
|
||||||
.par_iter()
|
.enumerate()
|
||||||
.enumerate()
|
.map(|(index, &balance)| {
|
||||||
.map(|(index, &balance)| {
|
let mut balance = balance;
|
||||||
let mut balance = balance;
|
let status = &statuses.statuses[index];
|
||||||
let base_reward = state.base_reward(index, base_reward_quotient, spec);
|
let base_reward = state.base_reward(index, base_reward_quotient, spec);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if epochs_since_finality <= 4 {
|
||||||
// Expected FFG source
|
// Expected FFG source
|
||||||
if attesters.previous_epoch.indices.contains(&index) {
|
if status.is_previous_epoch_attester {
|
||||||
safe_add_assign!(
|
safe_add_assign!(
|
||||||
balance,
|
balance,
|
||||||
base_reward * attesters.previous_epoch.balance / previous_total_balance
|
base_reward * total_balances.previous_epoch_attesters
|
||||||
|
/ total_balances.previous_epoch
|
||||||
);
|
);
|
||||||
} else if active_validator_indices.contains(&index) {
|
} else if status.is_active_in_previous_epoch {
|
||||||
safe_sub_assign!(balance, base_reward);
|
safe_sub_assign!(balance, base_reward);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Expected FFG target
|
// Expected FFG target
|
||||||
if attesters.previous_epoch_boundary.indices.contains(&index) {
|
if status.is_previous_epoch_boundary_attester {
|
||||||
safe_add_assign!(
|
safe_add_assign!(
|
||||||
balance,
|
balance,
|
||||||
base_reward * attesters.previous_epoch_boundary.balance
|
base_reward * total_balances.previous_epoch_boundary_attesters
|
||||||
/ previous_total_balance
|
/ total_balances.previous_epoch
|
||||||
);
|
);
|
||||||
} else if active_validator_indices.contains(&index) {
|
} else if status.is_active_in_previous_epoch {
|
||||||
safe_sub_assign!(balance, base_reward);
|
safe_sub_assign!(balance, base_reward);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Expected beacon chain head
|
// Expected beacon chain head
|
||||||
if attesters.previous_epoch_head.indices.contains(&index) {
|
if status.is_previous_epoch_head_attester {
|
||||||
safe_add_assign!(
|
safe_add_assign!(
|
||||||
balance,
|
balance,
|
||||||
base_reward * attesters.previous_epoch_head.balance
|
base_reward * total_balances.previous_epoch_head_attesters
|
||||||
/ previous_total_balance
|
/ total_balances.previous_epoch
|
||||||
);
|
);
|
||||||
} else if active_validator_indices.contains(&index) {
|
} else if status.is_active_in_previous_epoch {
|
||||||
safe_sub_assign!(balance, base_reward);
|
safe_sub_assign!(balance, base_reward);
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
} else {
|
||||||
if attesters.previous_epoch.indices.contains(&index) {
|
|
||||||
let base_reward = state.base_reward(index, base_reward_quotient, spec);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let (inclusion_distance, _) = inclusion_slots
|
|
||||||
.get(&index)
|
|
||||||
.expect("Inconsistent inclusion_slots.");
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if *inclusion_distance > 0 {
|
|
||||||
safe_add_assign!(
|
|
||||||
balance,
|
|
||||||
base_reward * spec.min_attestation_inclusion_delay
|
|
||||||
/ inclusion_distance.as_u64()
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
balance
|
|
||||||
})
|
|
||||||
.collect();
|
|
||||||
} else {
|
|
||||||
state.validator_balances = state
|
|
||||||
.validator_balances
|
|
||||||
.par_iter()
|
|
||||||
.enumerate()
|
|
||||||
.map(|(index, &balance)| {
|
|
||||||
let mut balance = balance;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let inactivity_penalty = state.inactivity_penalty(
|
let inactivity_penalty = state.inactivity_penalty(
|
||||||
index,
|
index,
|
||||||
epochs_since_finality,
|
epochs_since_finality,
|
||||||
@ -410,14 +337,14 @@ pub fn process_rewards_and_penalities(
|
|||||||
spec,
|
spec,
|
||||||
);
|
);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if active_validator_indices.contains(&index) {
|
if status.is_active_in_previous_epoch {
|
||||||
if !attesters.previous_epoch.indices.contains(&index) {
|
if !status.is_previous_epoch_attester {
|
||||||
safe_sub_assign!(balance, inactivity_penalty);
|
safe_sub_assign!(balance, inactivity_penalty);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if !attesters.previous_epoch_boundary.indices.contains(&index) {
|
if !status.is_previous_epoch_boundary_attester {
|
||||||
safe_sub_assign!(balance, inactivity_penalty);
|
safe_sub_assign!(balance, inactivity_penalty);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if !attesters.previous_epoch_head.indices.contains(&index) {
|
if !status.is_previous_epoch_head_attester {
|
||||||
safe_sub_assign!(balance, inactivity_penalty);
|
safe_sub_assign!(balance, inactivity_penalty);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -426,91 +353,45 @@ pub fn process_rewards_and_penalities(
|
|||||||
safe_sub_assign!(balance, 2 * inactivity_penalty + base_reward);
|
safe_sub_assign!(balance, 2 * inactivity_penalty + base_reward);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if attesters.previous_epoch.indices.contains(&index) {
|
// Crosslinks
|
||||||
let base_reward = state.base_reward(index, base_reward_quotient, spec);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let (inclusion_distance, _) = inclusion_slots
|
if let Some(ref info) = status.winning_root_info {
|
||||||
.get(&index)
|
safe_add_assign!(
|
||||||
.expect("Inconsistent inclusion_slots.");
|
balance,
|
||||||
|
base_reward * info.total_attesting_balance / info.total_committee_balance
|
||||||
|
);
|
||||||
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
safe_sub_assign!(balance, base_reward);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if *inclusion_distance > 0 {
|
balance
|
||||||
safe_add_assign!(
|
})
|
||||||
balance,
|
.collect();
|
||||||
base_reward * spec.min_attestation_inclusion_delay
|
|
||||||
/ inclusion_distance.as_u64()
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
balance
|
|
||||||
})
|
|
||||||
.collect();
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Attestation inclusion
|
// Attestation inclusion
|
||||||
//
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for &index in &attesters.previous_epoch.indices {
|
// Guard against an out-of-bounds during the attester inclusion balance update.
|
||||||
let (_, proposer_index) = inclusion_slots
|
if statuses.statuses.len() != state.validator_registry.len() {
|
||||||
.get(&index)
|
return Err(Error::ValidatorStatusesInconsistent);
|
||||||
.ok_or_else(|| Error::InclusionSlotsInconsistent(index))?;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let base_reward = state.base_reward(*proposer_index, base_reward_quotient, spec);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
safe_add_assign!(
|
|
||||||
state.validator_balances[*proposer_index],
|
|
||||||
base_reward / spec.attestation_inclusion_reward_quotient
|
|
||||||
);
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
//Crosslinks
|
for (index, _validator) in state.validator_registry.iter().enumerate() {
|
||||||
|
let status = &statuses.statuses[index];
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for slot in state.previous_epoch(spec).slot_iter(spec.slots_per_epoch) {
|
if status.is_previous_epoch_attester {
|
||||||
// Clone removes the borrow which becomes an issue when mutating `state.balances`.
|
let proposer_index = status.inclusion_info.proposer_index;
|
||||||
let crosslink_committees_at_slot =
|
let inclusion_distance = status.inclusion_info.distance;
|
||||||
state.get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(slot, spec)?.clone();
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for (crosslink_committee, shard) in crosslink_committees_at_slot {
|
let base_reward = state.base_reward(proposer_index, base_reward_quotient, spec);
|
||||||
let shard = shard as u64;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Note: I'm a little uncertain of the logic here -- I am waiting for spec v0.5.0 to
|
if inclusion_distance > 0 && inclusion_distance < Slot::max_value() {
|
||||||
// clear it up.
|
safe_add_assign!(
|
||||||
//
|
state.validator_balances[proposer_index],
|
||||||
// What happens here is:
|
base_reward * spec.min_attestation_inclusion_delay
|
||||||
//
|
/ inclusion_distance.as_u64()
|
||||||
// - If there was some crosslink root elected by the super-majority of this committee,
|
)
|
||||||
// then we reward all who voted for that root and penalize all that did not.
|
|
||||||
// - However, if there _was not_ some super-majority-voted crosslink root, then penalize
|
|
||||||
// all the validators.
|
|
||||||
//
|
|
||||||
// I'm not quite sure that the second case (no super-majority crosslink) is correct.
|
|
||||||
if let Some(winning_root) = winning_root_for_shards.get(&shard) {
|
|
||||||
// Hash set de-dedups and (hopefully) offers a speed improvement from faster
|
|
||||||
// lookups.
|
|
||||||
let attesting_validator_indices: FnvHashSet<usize> =
|
|
||||||
FnvHashSet::from_iter(winning_root.attesting_validator_indices.iter().cloned());
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for &index in &crosslink_committee {
|
|
||||||
let base_reward = state.base_reward(index, base_reward_quotient, spec);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let total_balance = state.get_total_balance(&crosslink_committee, spec);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if attesting_validator_indices.contains(&index) {
|
|
||||||
safe_add_assign!(
|
|
||||||
state.validator_balances[index],
|
|
||||||
base_reward * winning_root.total_attesting_balance / total_balance
|
|
||||||
);
|
|
||||||
} else {
|
|
||||||
safe_sub_assign!(state.validator_balances[index], base_reward);
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
} else {
|
|
||||||
for &index in &crosslink_committee {
|
|
||||||
let base_reward = state.base_reward(index, base_reward_quotient, spec);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
safe_sub_assign!(state.validator_balances[index], base_reward);
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -1,133 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
use fnv::FnvHashSet;
|
|
||||||
use types::*;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/// A set of validator indices, along with the total balance of all those attesters.
|
|
||||||
#[derive(Default)]
|
|
||||||
pub struct Attesters {
|
|
||||||
/// A set of validator indices.
|
|
||||||
pub indices: FnvHashSet<usize>,
|
|
||||||
/// The total balance of all validators in `self.indices`.
|
|
||||||
pub balance: u64,
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
impl Attesters {
|
|
||||||
/// Add the given indices to the set, incrementing the sets balance by the provided balance.
|
|
||||||
fn add(&mut self, additional_indices: &[usize], additional_balance: u64) {
|
|
||||||
self.indices.reserve(additional_indices.len());
|
|
||||||
for i in additional_indices {
|
|
||||||
self.indices.insert(*i);
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
self.balance = self.balance.saturating_add(additional_balance);
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/// A collection of `Attester` objects, representing set of attesters that are rewarded/penalized
|
|
||||||
/// during an epoch transition.
|
|
||||||
pub struct AttesterSets {
|
|
||||||
/// All validators who attested during the state's current epoch.
|
|
||||||
pub current_epoch: Attesters,
|
|
||||||
/// All validators who attested that the beacon block root of the first slot of the state's
|
|
||||||
/// current epoch is the same as the one stored in this state.
|
|
||||||
///
|
|
||||||
/// In short validators who agreed with the state about the first slot of the current epoch.
|
|
||||||
pub current_epoch_boundary: Attesters,
|
|
||||||
/// All validators who attested during the state's previous epoch.
|
|
||||||
pub previous_epoch: Attesters,
|
|
||||||
/// All validators who attested that the beacon block root of the first slot of the state's
|
|
||||||
/// previous epoch is the same as the one stored in this state.
|
|
||||||
///
|
|
||||||
/// In short, validators who agreed with the state about the first slot of the previous epoch.
|
|
||||||
pub previous_epoch_boundary: Attesters,
|
|
||||||
/// All validators who attested that the beacon block root at the pending attestation's slot is
|
|
||||||
/// the same as the one stored in this state.
|
|
||||||
///
|
|
||||||
/// In short, validators who agreed with the state about the current beacon block root when
|
|
||||||
/// they attested.
|
|
||||||
pub previous_epoch_head: Attesters,
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
impl AttesterSets {
|
|
||||||
/// Loop through all attestations in the state and instantiate a complete `AttesterSets` struct.
|
|
||||||
///
|
|
||||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
|
||||||
pub fn new(state: &BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec) -> Result<Self, BeaconStateError> {
|
|
||||||
let mut current_epoch = Attesters::default();
|
|
||||||
let mut current_epoch_boundary = Attesters::default();
|
|
||||||
let mut previous_epoch = Attesters::default();
|
|
||||||
let mut previous_epoch_boundary = Attesters::default();
|
|
||||||
let mut previous_epoch_head = Attesters::default();
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for a in &state.latest_attestations {
|
|
||||||
let attesting_indices =
|
|
||||||
state.get_attestation_participants(&a.data, &a.aggregation_bitfield, spec)?;
|
|
||||||
let attesting_balance = state.get_total_balance(&attesting_indices, spec);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if is_from_epoch(a, state.current_epoch(spec), spec) {
|
|
||||||
current_epoch.add(&attesting_indices, attesting_balance);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if has_common_epoch_boundary_root(a, state, state.current_epoch(spec), spec)? {
|
|
||||||
current_epoch_boundary.add(&attesting_indices, attesting_balance);
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
} else if is_from_epoch(a, state.previous_epoch(spec), spec) {
|
|
||||||
previous_epoch.add(&attesting_indices, attesting_balance);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if has_common_epoch_boundary_root(a, state, state.previous_epoch(spec), spec)? {
|
|
||||||
previous_epoch_boundary.add(&attesting_indices, attesting_balance);
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if has_common_beacon_block_root(a, state, spec)? {
|
|
||||||
previous_epoch_head.add(&attesting_indices, attesting_balance);
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Ok(Self {
|
|
||||||
current_epoch,
|
|
||||||
current_epoch_boundary,
|
|
||||||
previous_epoch,
|
|
||||||
previous_epoch_boundary,
|
|
||||||
previous_epoch_head,
|
|
||||||
})
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/// Returns `true` if some `PendingAttestation` is from the supplied `epoch`.
|
|
||||||
///
|
|
||||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
|
||||||
fn is_from_epoch(a: &PendingAttestation, epoch: Epoch, spec: &ChainSpec) -> bool {
|
|
||||||
a.data.slot.epoch(spec.slots_per_epoch) == epoch
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/// Returns `true` if a `PendingAttestation` and `BeaconState` share the same beacon block hash for
|
|
||||||
/// the first slot of the given epoch.
|
|
||||||
///
|
|
||||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
|
||||||
fn has_common_epoch_boundary_root(
|
|
||||||
a: &PendingAttestation,
|
|
||||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
|
||||||
epoch: Epoch,
|
|
||||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
||||||
) -> Result<bool, BeaconStateError> {
|
|
||||||
let slot = epoch.start_slot(spec.slots_per_epoch);
|
|
||||||
let state_boundary_root = *state
|
|
||||||
.get_block_root(slot, spec)
|
|
||||||
.ok_or_else(|| BeaconStateError::InsufficientBlockRoots)?;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Ok(a.data.epoch_boundary_root == state_boundary_root)
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/// Returns `true` if a `PendingAttestation` and `BeaconState` share the same beacon block hash for
|
|
||||||
/// the current slot of the `PendingAttestation`.
|
|
||||||
///
|
|
||||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
|
||||||
fn has_common_beacon_block_root(
|
|
||||||
a: &PendingAttestation,
|
|
||||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
|
||||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
|
||||||
) -> Result<bool, BeaconStateError> {
|
|
||||||
let state_block_root = *state
|
|
||||||
.get_block_root(a.data.slot, spec)
|
|
||||||
.ok_or_else(|| BeaconStateError::InsufficientBlockRoots)?;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Ok(a.data.beacon_block_root == state_block_root)
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ pub enum EpochProcessingError {
|
|||||||
NoRandaoSeed,
|
NoRandaoSeed,
|
||||||
PreviousTotalBalanceIsZero,
|
PreviousTotalBalanceIsZero,
|
||||||
InclusionDistanceZero,
|
InclusionDistanceZero,
|
||||||
|
ValidatorStatusesInconsistent,
|
||||||
/// Unable to get the inclusion distance for a validator that should have an inclusion
|
/// Unable to get the inclusion distance for a validator that should have an inclusion
|
||||||
/// distance. This indicates an internal inconsistency.
|
/// distance. This indicates an internal inconsistency.
|
||||||
///
|
///
|
||||||
|
@ -0,0 +1,319 @@
|
|||||||
|
use super::WinningRootHashSet;
|
||||||
|
use types::*;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/// Sets the boolean `var` on `self` to be true if it is true on `other`. Otherwise leaves `self`
|
||||||
|
/// as is.
|
||||||
|
macro_rules! set_self_if_other_is_true {
|
||||||
|
($self_: ident, $other: ident, $var: ident) => {
|
||||||
|
if $other.$var {
|
||||||
|
$self_.$var = true;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
};
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/// The information required to reward some validator for their participation in a "winning"
|
||||||
|
/// crosslink root.
|
||||||
|
#[derive(Default, Clone)]
|
||||||
|
pub struct WinningRootInfo {
|
||||||
|
/// The total balance of the crosslink committee.
|
||||||
|
pub total_committee_balance: u64,
|
||||||
|
/// The total balance of the crosslink committee that attested for the "winning" root.
|
||||||
|
pub total_attesting_balance: u64,
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/// The information required to reward a block producer for including an attestation in a block.
|
||||||
|
#[derive(Clone)]
|
||||||
|
pub struct InclusionInfo {
|
||||||
|
/// The earliest slot a validator had an attestation included in the previous epoch.
|
||||||
|
pub slot: Slot,
|
||||||
|
/// The distance between the attestation slot and the slot that attestation was included in a
|
||||||
|
/// block.
|
||||||
|
pub distance: Slot,
|
||||||
|
/// The index of the proposer at the slot where the attestation was included.
|
||||||
|
pub proposer_index: usize,
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
impl Default for InclusionInfo {
|
||||||
|
/// Defaults to `slot` and `distance` at their maximum values and `proposer_index` at zero.
|
||||||
|
fn default() -> Self {
|
||||||
|
Self {
|
||||||
|
slot: Slot::max_value(),
|
||||||
|
distance: Slot::max_value(),
|
||||||
|
proposer_index: 0,
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
impl InclusionInfo {
|
||||||
|
/// Tests if some `other` `InclusionInfo` has a lower inclusion slot than `self`. If so,
|
||||||
|
/// replaces `self` with `other`.
|
||||||
|
pub fn update(&mut self, other: &Self) {
|
||||||
|
if other.slot < self.slot {
|
||||||
|
self.slot = other.slot;
|
||||||
|
self.distance = other.distance;
|
||||||
|
self.proposer_index = other.proposer_index;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/// Information required to reward some validator during the current and previous epoch.
|
||||||
|
#[derive(Default, Clone)]
|
||||||
|
pub struct AttesterStatus {
|
||||||
|
/// True if the validator was active in the state's _current_ epoch.
|
||||||
|
pub is_active_in_current_epoch: bool,
|
||||||
|
/// True if the validator was active in the state's _previous_ epoch.
|
||||||
|
pub is_active_in_previous_epoch: bool,
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/// True if the validator had an attestation included in the _current_ epoch.
|
||||||
|
pub is_current_epoch_attester: bool,
|
||||||
|
/// True if the validator's beacon block root attestation for the first slot of the _current_
|
||||||
|
/// epoch matches the block root known to the state.
|
||||||
|
pub is_current_epoch_boundary_attester: bool,
|
||||||
|
/// True if the validator had an attestation included in the _previous_ epoch.
|
||||||
|
pub is_previous_epoch_attester: bool,
|
||||||
|
/// True if the validator's beacon block root attestation for the first slot of the _previous_
|
||||||
|
/// epoch matches the block root known to the state.
|
||||||
|
pub is_previous_epoch_boundary_attester: bool,
|
||||||
|
/// True if the validator's beacon block root attestation in the _previous_ epoch at the
|
||||||
|
/// attestation's slot (`attestation_data.slot`) matches the block root known to the state.
|
||||||
|
pub is_previous_epoch_head_attester: bool,
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/// Information used to reward the block producer of this validators earliest-included
|
||||||
|
/// attestation.
|
||||||
|
pub inclusion_info: InclusionInfo,
|
||||||
|
/// Information used to reward/penalize the validator if they voted in the super-majority for
|
||||||
|
/// some shard block.
|
||||||
|
pub winning_root_info: Option<WinningRootInfo>,
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
impl AttesterStatus {
|
||||||
|
/// Accepts some `other` `AttesterStatus` and updates `self` if required.
|
||||||
|
///
|
||||||
|
/// Will never set one of the `bool` fields to `false`, it will only set it to `true` if other
|
||||||
|
/// contains a `true` field.
|
||||||
|
///
|
||||||
|
/// Note: does not update the winning root info, this is done manually.
|
||||||
|
pub fn update(&mut self, other: &Self) {
|
||||||
|
// Update all the bool fields, only updating `self` if `other` is true (never setting
|
||||||
|
// `self` to false).
|
||||||
|
set_self_if_other_is_true!(self, other, is_active_in_current_epoch);
|
||||||
|
set_self_if_other_is_true!(self, other, is_active_in_previous_epoch);
|
||||||
|
set_self_if_other_is_true!(self, other, is_current_epoch_attester);
|
||||||
|
set_self_if_other_is_true!(self, other, is_current_epoch_boundary_attester);
|
||||||
|
set_self_if_other_is_true!(self, other, is_previous_epoch_attester);
|
||||||
|
set_self_if_other_is_true!(self, other, is_previous_epoch_boundary_attester);
|
||||||
|
set_self_if_other_is_true!(self, other, is_previous_epoch_head_attester);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
self.inclusion_info.update(&other.inclusion_info);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/// The total effective balances for different sets of validators during the previous and current
|
||||||
|
/// epochs.
|
||||||
|
#[derive(Default, Clone)]
|
||||||
|
pub struct TotalBalances {
|
||||||
|
/// The total effective balance of all active validators during the _current_ epoch.
|
||||||
|
pub current_epoch: u64,
|
||||||
|
/// The total effective balance of all active validators during the _previous_ epoch.
|
||||||
|
pub previous_epoch: u64,
|
||||||
|
/// The total effective balance of all validators who attested during the _current_ epoch.
|
||||||
|
pub current_epoch_attesters: u64,
|
||||||
|
/// The total effective balance of all validators who attested during the _current_ epoch and
|
||||||
|
/// agreed with the state about the beacon block at the first slot of the _current_ epoch.
|
||||||
|
pub current_epoch_boundary_attesters: u64,
|
||||||
|
/// The total effective balance of all validators who attested during the _previous_ epoch.
|
||||||
|
pub previous_epoch_attesters: u64,
|
||||||
|
/// The total effective balance of all validators who attested during the _previous_ epoch and
|
||||||
|
/// agreed with the state about the beacon block at the first slot of the _previous_ epoch.
|
||||||
|
pub previous_epoch_boundary_attesters: u64,
|
||||||
|
/// The total effective balance of all validators who attested during the _previous_ epoch and
|
||||||
|
/// agreed with the state about the beacon block at the time of attestation.
|
||||||
|
pub previous_epoch_head_attesters: u64,
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/// Summarised information about validator participation in the _previous and _current_ epochs of
|
||||||
|
/// some `BeaconState`.
|
||||||
|
#[derive(Clone)]
|
||||||
|
pub struct ValidatorStatuses {
|
||||||
|
/// Information about each individual validator from the state's validator registy.
|
||||||
|
pub statuses: Vec<AttesterStatus>,
|
||||||
|
/// Summed balances for various sets of validators.
|
||||||
|
pub total_balances: TotalBalances,
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
impl ValidatorStatuses {
|
||||||
|
/// Initializes a new instance, determining:
|
||||||
|
///
|
||||||
|
/// - Active validators
|
||||||
|
/// - Total balances for the current and previous epochs.
|
||||||
|
///
|
||||||
|
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||||
|
pub fn new(state: &BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec) -> Self {
|
||||||
|
let mut statuses = Vec::with_capacity(state.validator_registry.len());
|
||||||
|
let mut total_balances = TotalBalances::default();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
for (i, validator) in state.validator_registry.iter().enumerate() {
|
||||||
|
let mut status = AttesterStatus::default();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if validator.is_active_at(state.current_epoch(spec)) {
|
||||||
|
status.is_active_in_current_epoch = true;
|
||||||
|
total_balances.current_epoch += state.get_effective_balance(i, spec);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if validator.is_active_at(state.previous_epoch(spec)) {
|
||||||
|
status.is_active_in_previous_epoch = true;
|
||||||
|
total_balances.previous_epoch += state.get_effective_balance(i, spec);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
statuses.push(status);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Self {
|
||||||
|
statuses,
|
||||||
|
total_balances,
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/// Process some attestations from the given `state` updating the `statuses` and
|
||||||
|
/// `total_balances` fields.
|
||||||
|
///
|
||||||
|
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||||
|
pub fn process_attestations(
|
||||||
|
&mut self,
|
||||||
|
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||||
|
attestations: &[PendingAttestation],
|
||||||
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||||
|
) -> Result<(), BeaconStateError> {
|
||||||
|
for a in attestations {
|
||||||
|
let attesting_indices =
|
||||||
|
state.get_attestation_participants(&a.data, &a.aggregation_bitfield, spec)?;
|
||||||
|
let attesting_balance = state.get_total_balance(&attesting_indices, spec);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
let mut status = AttesterStatus::default();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Profile this attestation, updating the total balances and generating an
|
||||||
|
// `AttesterStatus` object that applies to all participants in the attestation.
|
||||||
|
if is_from_epoch(a, state.current_epoch(spec), spec) {
|
||||||
|
self.total_balances.current_epoch_attesters += attesting_balance;
|
||||||
|
status.is_current_epoch_attester = true;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if has_common_epoch_boundary_root(a, state, state.current_epoch(spec), spec)? {
|
||||||
|
self.total_balances.current_epoch_boundary_attesters += attesting_balance;
|
||||||
|
status.is_current_epoch_boundary_attester = true;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
} else if is_from_epoch(a, state.previous_epoch(spec), spec) {
|
||||||
|
self.total_balances.previous_epoch_attesters += attesting_balance;
|
||||||
|
status.is_previous_epoch_attester = true;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// The inclusion slot and distance are only required for previous epoch attesters.
|
||||||
|
status.inclusion_info = InclusionInfo {
|
||||||
|
slot: a.inclusion_slot,
|
||||||
|
distance: inclusion_distance(a),
|
||||||
|
proposer_index: state.get_beacon_proposer_index(a.inclusion_slot, spec)?,
|
||||||
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if has_common_epoch_boundary_root(a, state, state.previous_epoch(spec), spec)? {
|
||||||
|
self.total_balances.previous_epoch_boundary_attesters += attesting_balance;
|
||||||
|
status.is_previous_epoch_boundary_attester = true;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if has_common_beacon_block_root(a, state, spec)? {
|
||||||
|
self.total_balances.previous_epoch_head_attesters += attesting_balance;
|
||||||
|
status.is_previous_epoch_head_attester = true;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Loop through the participating validator indices and update the status vec.
|
||||||
|
for validator_index in attesting_indices {
|
||||||
|
self.statuses[validator_index].update(&status);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Ok(())
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/// Update the `statuses` for each validator based upon whether or not they attested to the
|
||||||
|
/// "winning" shard block root for the previous epoch.
|
||||||
|
///
|
||||||
|
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||||
|
pub fn process_winning_roots(
|
||||||
|
&mut self,
|
||||||
|
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||||
|
winning_roots: &WinningRootHashSet,
|
||||||
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||||
|
) -> Result<(), BeaconStateError> {
|
||||||
|
// Loop through each slot in the previous epoch.
|
||||||
|
for slot in state.previous_epoch(spec).slot_iter(spec.slots_per_epoch) {
|
||||||
|
let crosslink_committees_at_slot =
|
||||||
|
state.get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(slot, spec)?;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Loop through each committee in the slot.
|
||||||
|
for (crosslink_committee, shard) in crosslink_committees_at_slot {
|
||||||
|
// If there was some winning crosslink root for the committee's shard.
|
||||||
|
if let Some(winning_root) = winning_roots.get(&shard) {
|
||||||
|
let total_committee_balance =
|
||||||
|
state.get_total_balance(&crosslink_committee, spec);
|
||||||
|
for &validator_index in &winning_root.attesting_validator_indices {
|
||||||
|
// Take note of the balance information for the winning root, it will be
|
||||||
|
// used later to calculate rewards for that validator.
|
||||||
|
self.statuses[validator_index].winning_root_info = Some(WinningRootInfo {
|
||||||
|
total_committee_balance,
|
||||||
|
total_attesting_balance: winning_root.total_attesting_balance,
|
||||||
|
})
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Ok(())
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/// Returns the distance between when the attestation was created and when it was included in a
|
||||||
|
/// block.
|
||||||
|
///
|
||||||
|
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||||
|
fn inclusion_distance(a: &PendingAttestation) -> Slot {
|
||||||
|
a.inclusion_slot - a.data.slot
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/// Returns `true` if some `PendingAttestation` is from the supplied `epoch`.
|
||||||
|
///
|
||||||
|
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||||
|
fn is_from_epoch(a: &PendingAttestation, epoch: Epoch, spec: &ChainSpec) -> bool {
|
||||||
|
a.data.slot.epoch(spec.slots_per_epoch) == epoch
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/// Returns `true` if a `PendingAttestation` and `BeaconState` share the same beacon block hash for
|
||||||
|
/// the first slot of the given epoch.
|
||||||
|
///
|
||||||
|
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||||
|
fn has_common_epoch_boundary_root(
|
||||||
|
a: &PendingAttestation,
|
||||||
|
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||||
|
epoch: Epoch,
|
||||||
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||||
|
) -> Result<bool, BeaconStateError> {
|
||||||
|
let slot = epoch.start_slot(spec.slots_per_epoch);
|
||||||
|
let state_boundary_root = *state
|
||||||
|
.get_block_root(slot, spec)
|
||||||
|
.ok_or_else(|| BeaconStateError::InsufficientBlockRoots)?;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Ok(a.data.epoch_boundary_root == state_boundary_root)
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/// Returns `true` if a `PendingAttestation` and `BeaconState` share the same beacon block hash for
|
||||||
|
/// the current slot of the `PendingAttestation`.
|
||||||
|
///
|
||||||
|
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||||
|
fn has_common_beacon_block_root(
|
||||||
|
a: &PendingAttestation,
|
||||||
|
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||||
|
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||||
|
) -> Result<bool, BeaconStateError> {
|
||||||
|
let state_block_root = *state
|
||||||
|
.get_block_root(a.data.slot, spec)
|
||||||
|
.ok_or_else(|| BeaconStateError::InsufficientBlockRoots)?;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Ok(a.data.beacon_block_root == state_block_root)
|
||||||
|
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user