Remove strict fee recipient (#3552)
## Issue Addressed Resolves: #3550 Remove the `--strict-fee-recipient` flag. It will cause missed proposals prior to the bellatrix transition. Co-authored-by: realbigsean <sean@sigmaprime.io>
This commit is contained in:
parent
81d078bfc7
commit
a9f075c3c0
@ -430,20 +430,6 @@ fn builder_registration_timestamp_override_flag() {
|
||||
assert_eq!(config.builder_registration_timestamp_override, Some(100))
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn strict_fee_recipient_flag() {
|
||||
CommandLineTest::new()
|
||||
.flag("strict-fee-recipient", None)
|
||||
.run()
|
||||
.with_config(|config| assert!(config.strict_fee_recipient));
|
||||
}
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn no_strict_fee_recipient_flag() {
|
||||
CommandLineTest::new()
|
||||
.run()
|
||||
.with_config(|config| assert!(!config.strict_fee_recipient));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn monitoring_endpoint() {
|
||||
CommandLineTest::new()
|
||||
|
@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ pub struct BlockServiceBuilder<T, E: EthSpec> {
|
||||
context: Option<RuntimeContext<E>>,
|
||||
graffiti: Option<Graffiti>,
|
||||
graffiti_file: Option<GraffitiFile>,
|
||||
strict_fee_recipient: bool,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<T: SlotClock + 'static, E: EthSpec> BlockServiceBuilder<T, E> {
|
||||
@ -55,7 +54,6 @@ impl<T: SlotClock + 'static, E: EthSpec> BlockServiceBuilder<T, E> {
|
||||
context: None,
|
||||
graffiti: None,
|
||||
graffiti_file: None,
|
||||
strict_fee_recipient: false,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -89,11 +87,6 @@ impl<T: SlotClock + 'static, E: EthSpec> BlockServiceBuilder<T, E> {
|
||||
self
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn strict_fee_recipient(mut self, strict_fee_recipient: bool) -> Self {
|
||||
self.strict_fee_recipient = strict_fee_recipient;
|
||||
self
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn build(self) -> Result<BlockService<T, E>, String> {
|
||||
Ok(BlockService {
|
||||
inner: Arc::new(Inner {
|
||||
@ -111,7 +104,6 @@ impl<T: SlotClock + 'static, E: EthSpec> BlockServiceBuilder<T, E> {
|
||||
.ok_or("Cannot build BlockService without runtime_context")?,
|
||||
graffiti: self.graffiti,
|
||||
graffiti_file: self.graffiti_file,
|
||||
strict_fee_recipient: self.strict_fee_recipient,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -125,7 +117,6 @@ pub struct Inner<T, E: EthSpec> {
|
||||
context: RuntimeContext<E>,
|
||||
graffiti: Option<Graffiti>,
|
||||
graffiti_file: Option<GraffitiFile>,
|
||||
strict_fee_recipient: bool,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Attempts to produce attestations for any block producer(s) at the start of the epoch.
|
||||
@ -324,9 +315,7 @@ impl<T: SlotClock + 'static, E: EthSpec> BlockService<T, E> {
|
||||
let self_ref = &self;
|
||||
let proposer_index = self.validator_store.validator_index(&validator_pubkey);
|
||||
let validator_pubkey_ref = &validator_pubkey;
|
||||
let fee_recipient = self.validator_store.get_fee_recipient(&validator_pubkey);
|
||||
|
||||
let strict_fee_recipient = self.strict_fee_recipient;
|
||||
// Request block from first responsive beacon node.
|
||||
let block = self
|
||||
.beacon_nodes
|
||||
@ -377,17 +366,6 @@ impl<T: SlotClock + 'static, E: EthSpec> BlockService<T, E> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure the correctness of the execution payload's fee recipient.
|
||||
if strict_fee_recipient {
|
||||
if let Ok(execution_payload) = block.body().execution_payload() {
|
||||
if Some(execution_payload.fee_recipient()) != fee_recipient {
|
||||
return Err(BlockError::Recoverable(
|
||||
"Incorrect fee recipient used by builder".to_string(),
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if proposer_index != Some(block.proposer_index()) {
|
||||
return Err(BlockError::Recoverable(
|
||||
"Proposer index does not match block proposer. Beacon chain re-orged"
|
||||
|
@ -268,18 +268,17 @@ pub fn cli_app<'a, 'b>() -> App<'a, 'b> {
|
||||
headers during proposals and will sign over headers. Useful for outsourcing \
|
||||
execution payload construction during proposals.")
|
||||
.takes_value(false),
|
||||
)
|
||||
.arg(
|
||||
).arg(
|
||||
Arg::with_name("strict-fee-recipient")
|
||||
.long("strict-fee-recipient")
|
||||
.help("If this flag is set, Lighthouse will refuse to sign any block whose \
|
||||
`fee_recipient` does not match the `suggested_fee_recipient` sent by this validator. \
|
||||
This applies to both the normal block proposal flow, as well as block proposals \
|
||||
through the builder API. Proposals through the builder API are more likely to have a \
|
||||
discrepancy in `fee_recipient` so you should be aware of how your connected relay \
|
||||
sends proposer payments before using this flag. If this flag is used, a fee recipient \
|
||||
mismatch in the builder API flow will result in a fallback to the local execution engine \
|
||||
for payload construction, where a strict fee recipient check will still be applied.")
|
||||
.help("[DEPRECATED] If this flag is set, Lighthouse will refuse to sign any block whose \
|
||||
`fee_recipient` does not match the `suggested_fee_recipient` sent by this validator. \
|
||||
This applies to both the normal block proposal flow, as well as block proposals \
|
||||
through the builder API. Proposals through the builder API are more likely to have a \
|
||||
discrepancy in `fee_recipient` so you should be aware of how your connected relay \
|
||||
sends proposer payments before using this flag. If this flag is used, a fee recipient \
|
||||
mismatch in the builder API flow will result in a fallback to the local execution engine \
|
||||
for payload construction, where a strict fee recipient check will still be applied.")
|
||||
.takes_value(false),
|
||||
)
|
||||
.arg(
|
||||
|
@ -61,9 +61,6 @@ pub struct Config {
|
||||
/// A list of custom certificates that the validator client will additionally use when
|
||||
/// connecting to a beacon node over SSL/TLS.
|
||||
pub beacon_nodes_tls_certs: Option<Vec<PathBuf>>,
|
||||
/// Enabling this will make sure the validator client never signs a block whose `fee_recipient`
|
||||
/// does not match the `suggested_fee_recipient`.
|
||||
pub strict_fee_recipient: bool,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl Default for Config {
|
||||
@ -99,7 +96,6 @@ impl Default for Config {
|
||||
builder_proposals: false,
|
||||
builder_registration_timestamp_override: None,
|
||||
gas_limit: None,
|
||||
strict_fee_recipient: false,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -334,7 +330,11 @@ impl Config {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if cli_args.is_present("strict-fee-recipient") {
|
||||
config.strict_fee_recipient = true;
|
||||
warn!(
|
||||
log,
|
||||
"The flag `--strict-fee-recipient` has been deprecated due to a bug causing \
|
||||
missed proposals. The flag will be ignored."
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(config)
|
||||
|
@ -420,7 +420,6 @@ impl<T: EthSpec> ProductionValidatorClient<T> {
|
||||
.runtime_context(context.service_context("block".into()))
|
||||
.graffiti(config.graffiti)
|
||||
.graffiti_file(config.graffiti_file.clone())
|
||||
.strict_fee_recipient(config.strict_fee_recipient)
|
||||
.build()?;
|
||||
|
||||
let attestation_service = AttestationServiceBuilder::new()
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user