Fix attestation withdrawals root mismatch (#4249)

## Issue Addressed

Addresses #4234 

## Proposed Changes

- Skip withdrawals processing in an inconsistent state replay. 
- Repurpose `StateRootStrategy`: rename to `StateProcessingStrategy` and always skip withdrawals if using `StateProcessingStrategy::Inconsistent`
- Add a test to reproduce the scenario


Co-authored-by: Jimmy Chen <jimmy@sigmaprime.io>
This commit is contained in:
Jimmy Chen 2023-05-09 10:48:15 +00:00
parent c7c51062ab
commit 8d9c748025
16 changed files with 230 additions and 41 deletions

View File

@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ use state_processing::{
},
per_slot_processing,
state_advance::{complete_state_advance, partial_state_advance},
BlockSignatureStrategy, ConsensusContext, SigVerifiedOp, VerifyBlockRoot, VerifyOperation,
BlockSignatureStrategy, ConsensusContext, SigVerifiedOp, StateProcessingStrategy,
VerifyBlockRoot, VerifyOperation,
};
use std::borrow::Cow;
use std::cmp::Ordering;
@ -4651,6 +4652,7 @@ impl<T: BeaconChainTypes> BeaconChain<T> {
&mut state,
&block,
signature_strategy,
StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
VerifyBlockRoot::True,
&mut ctxt,
&self.spec,

View File

@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ use state_processing::{
per_block_processing, per_slot_processing,
state_advance::partial_state_advance,
BlockProcessingError, BlockSignatureStrategy, ConsensusContext, SlotProcessingError,
VerifyBlockRoot,
StateProcessingStrategy, VerifyBlockRoot,
};
use std::borrow::Cow;
use std::fs;
@ -1400,6 +1400,7 @@ impl<T: BeaconChainTypes> ExecutionPendingBlock<T> {
&block,
// Signatures were verified earlier in this function.
BlockSignatureStrategy::NoVerification,
StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
VerifyBlockRoot::True,
&mut consensus_context,
&chain.spec,

View File

@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ use slog::{info, warn, Logger};
use state_processing::state_advance::complete_state_advance;
use state_processing::{
per_block_processing, per_block_processing::BlockSignatureStrategy, ConsensusContext,
VerifyBlockRoot,
StateProcessingStrategy, VerifyBlockRoot,
};
use std::sync::Arc;
use std::time::Duration;
@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ pub fn reset_fork_choice_to_finalization<E: EthSpec, Hot: ItemStore<E>, Cold: It
&mut state,
&block,
BlockSignatureStrategy::NoVerification,
StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
VerifyBlockRoot::True,
&mut ctxt,
spec,

View File

@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
use crate::observed_operations::ObservationOutcome;
pub use crate::persisted_beacon_chain::PersistedBeaconChain;
pub use crate::{
beacon_chain::{BEACON_CHAIN_DB_KEY, ETH1_CACHE_DB_KEY, FORK_CHOICE_DB_KEY, OP_POOL_DB_KEY},
@ -26,6 +27,7 @@ use futures::channel::mpsc::Receiver;
pub use genesis::{interop_genesis_state_with_eth1, DEFAULT_ETH1_BLOCK_HASH};
use int_to_bytes::int_to_bytes32;
use merkle_proof::MerkleTree;
use operation_pool::ReceivedPreCapella;
use parking_lot::Mutex;
use parking_lot::RwLockWriteGuard;
use rand::rngs::StdRng;
@ -38,7 +40,7 @@ use slot_clock::{SlotClock, TestingSlotClock};
use state_processing::per_block_processing::compute_timestamp_at_slot;
use state_processing::{
state_advance::{complete_state_advance, partial_state_advance},
StateRootStrategy,
StateProcessingStrategy,
};
use std::borrow::Cow;
use std::collections::{HashMap, HashSet};
@ -709,7 +711,7 @@ where
pub fn get_hot_state(&self, state_hash: BeaconStateHash) -> Option<BeaconState<E>> {
self.chain
.store
.load_hot_state(&state_hash.into(), StateRootStrategy::Accurate)
.load_hot_state(&state_hash.into(), StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate)
.unwrap()
}
@ -1494,6 +1496,26 @@ where
.sign(sk, &fork, genesis_validators_root, &self.chain.spec)
}
pub fn add_bls_to_execution_change(
&self,
validator_index: u64,
address: Address,
) -> Result<(), String> {
let signed_bls_change = self.make_bls_to_execution_change(validator_index, address);
if let ObservationOutcome::New(verified_bls_change) = self
.chain
.verify_bls_to_execution_change_for_gossip(signed_bls_change)
.expect("should verify BLS to execution change for gossip")
{
self.chain
.import_bls_to_execution_change(verified_bls_change, ReceivedPreCapella::No)
.then_some(())
.ok_or("should import BLS to execution change to the op pool".to_string())
} else {
Err("should observe new BLS to execution change".to_string())
}
}
pub fn make_bls_to_execution_change(
&self,
validator_index: u64,

View File

@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
#![cfg(not(debug_assertions))]
use beacon_chain::test_utils::HARNESS_GENESIS_TIME;
use beacon_chain::{
attestation_verification::Error as AttnError,
test_utils::{
@ -7,6 +8,7 @@ use beacon_chain::{
},
BeaconChain, BeaconChainError, BeaconChainTypes, WhenSlotSkipped,
};
use genesis::{interop_genesis_state, DEFAULT_ETH1_BLOCK_HASH};
use int_to_bytes::int_to_bytes32;
use lazy_static::lazy_static;
use state_processing::{
@ -14,9 +16,9 @@ use state_processing::{
};
use tree_hash::TreeHash;
use types::{
test_utils::generate_deterministic_keypair, AggregateSignature, Attestation, BeaconStateError,
BitList, Epoch, EthSpec, Hash256, Keypair, MainnetEthSpec, SecretKey, SelectionProof,
SignedAggregateAndProof, Slot, SubnetId, Unsigned,
test_utils::generate_deterministic_keypair, Address, AggregateSignature, Attestation,
BeaconStateError, BitList, Epoch, EthSpec, Hash256, Keypair, MainnetEthSpec, SecretKey,
SelectionProof, SignedAggregateAndProof, Slot, SubnetId, Unsigned,
};
pub type E = MainnetEthSpec;
@ -50,6 +52,48 @@ fn get_harness(validator_count: usize) -> BeaconChainHarness<EphemeralHarnessTyp
harness
}
/// Returns a beacon chain harness with Capella fork enabled at epoch 1, and
/// all genesis validators start with BLS withdrawal credentials.
fn get_harness_capella_spec(validator_count: usize) -> BeaconChainHarness<EphemeralHarnessType<E>> {
let mut spec = E::default_spec();
spec.altair_fork_epoch = Some(Epoch::new(0));
spec.bellatrix_fork_epoch = Some(Epoch::new(0));
spec.capella_fork_epoch = Some(Epoch::new(1));
let validator_keypairs = KEYPAIRS[0..validator_count].to_vec();
let genesis_state = interop_genesis_state(
&validator_keypairs,
HARNESS_GENESIS_TIME,
Hash256::from_slice(DEFAULT_ETH1_BLOCK_HASH),
None,
&spec,
)
.unwrap();
let harness = BeaconChainHarness::builder(MainnetEthSpec)
.spec(spec)
.keypairs(validator_keypairs)
.withdrawal_keypairs(
KEYPAIRS[0..validator_count]
.iter()
.cloned()
.map(Some)
.collect(),
)
.genesis_state_ephemeral_store(genesis_state)
.mock_execution_layer()
.build();
harness
.execution_block_generator()
.move_to_terminal_block()
.unwrap();
harness.advance_slot();
harness
}
/// Returns an attestation that is valid for some slot in the given `chain`.
///
/// Also returns some info about who created it.
@ -998,6 +1042,100 @@ async fn attestation_that_skips_epochs() {
.expect("should gossip verify attestation that skips slots");
}
/// Ensures that an attestation can be processed when a validator receives proposer reward
/// in an epoch _and_ is scheduled for a withdrawal. This is a regression test for a scenario where
/// inconsistent state lookup could cause withdrawal root mismatch.
#[tokio::test]
async fn attestation_validator_receive_proposer_reward_and_withdrawals() {
let harness = get_harness_capella_spec(VALIDATOR_COUNT);
// Advance to a Capella block. Make sure the blocks have attestations.
let two_thirds = (VALIDATOR_COUNT / 3) * 2;
let attesters = (0..two_thirds).collect();
harness
.extend_chain(
// To trigger the bug we need the proposer attestation reward to be signed at a block
// that isn't the first in the epoch.
MainnetEthSpec::slots_per_epoch() as usize + 1,
BlockStrategy::OnCanonicalHead,
AttestationStrategy::SomeValidators(attesters),
)
.await;
// Add BLS change for the block proposer at slot 33. This sets up a withdrawal for the block proposer.
let proposer_index = harness
.chain
.block_at_slot(harness.get_current_slot(), WhenSlotSkipped::None)
.expect("should not error getting block at slot")
.expect("should find block at slot")
.message()
.proposer_index();
harness
.add_bls_to_execution_change(proposer_index, Address::from_low_u64_be(proposer_index))
.unwrap();
// Apply two blocks: one to process the BLS change, and another to process the withdrawal.
harness.advance_slot();
harness
.extend_chain(
2,
BlockStrategy::OnCanonicalHead,
AttestationStrategy::SomeValidators(vec![]),
)
.await;
let earlier_slot = harness.get_current_slot();
let earlier_block = harness
.chain
.block_at_slot(earlier_slot, WhenSlotSkipped::None)
.expect("should not error getting block at slot")
.expect("should find block at slot");
// Extend the chain out a few epochs so we have some chain depth to play with.
harness.advance_slot();
harness
.extend_chain(
MainnetEthSpec::slots_per_epoch() as usize * 2,
BlockStrategy::OnCanonicalHead,
AttestationStrategy::SomeValidators(vec![]),
)
.await;
let current_slot = harness.get_current_slot();
let mut state = harness
.chain
.get_state(&earlier_block.state_root(), Some(earlier_slot))
.expect("should not error getting state")
.expect("should find state");
while state.slot() < current_slot {
per_slot_processing(&mut state, None, &harness.spec).expect("should process slot");
}
let state_root = state.update_tree_hash_cache().unwrap();
// Get an attestation pointed to an old block (where we do not have its shuffling cached).
// Verifying the attestation triggers an inconsistent state replay.
let remaining_attesters = (two_thirds..VALIDATOR_COUNT).collect();
let (attestation, subnet_id) = harness
.get_unaggregated_attestations(
&AttestationStrategy::SomeValidators(remaining_attesters),
&state,
state_root,
earlier_block.canonical_root(),
current_slot,
)
.first()
.expect("should have at least one committee")
.first()
.cloned()
.expect("should have at least one attestation in committee");
harness
.chain
.verify_unaggregated_attestation_for_gossip(&attestation, Some(subnet_id))
.expect("should gossip verify attestation without checking withdrawals root");
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn attestation_to_finalized_block() {
let harness = get_harness(VALIDATOR_COUNT);

View File

@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ use slasher::{Config as SlasherConfig, Slasher};
use state_processing::{
common::get_indexed_attestation,
per_block_processing::{per_block_processing, BlockSignatureStrategy},
per_slot_processing, BlockProcessingError, ConsensusContext, VerifyBlockRoot,
per_slot_processing, BlockProcessingError, ConsensusContext, StateProcessingStrategy,
VerifyBlockRoot,
};
use std::marker::PhantomData;
use std::sync::Arc;
@ -1167,6 +1168,7 @@ async fn add_base_block_to_altair_chain() {
&mut state,
&base_block,
BlockSignatureStrategy::NoVerification,
StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
VerifyBlockRoot::True,
&mut ctxt,
&harness.chain.spec,
@ -1305,6 +1307,7 @@ async fn add_altair_block_to_base_chain() {
&mut state,
&altair_block,
BlockSignatureStrategy::NoVerification,
StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
VerifyBlockRoot::True,
&mut ctxt,
&harness.chain.spec,

View File

@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ use slog::{debug, error, info, trace, warn, Logger};
use ssz::{Decode, Encode};
use ssz_derive::{Decode, Encode};
use state_processing::{
BlockProcessingError, BlockReplayer, SlotProcessingError, StateRootStrategy,
BlockProcessingError, BlockReplayer, SlotProcessingError, StateProcessingStrategy,
};
use std::cmp::min;
use std::convert::TryInto;
@ -531,10 +531,10 @@ impl<E: EthSpec, Hot: ItemStore<E>, Cold: ItemStore<E>> HotColdDB<E, Hot, Cold>
// chain. This way we avoid returning a state that doesn't match `state_root`.
self.load_cold_state(state_root)
} else {
self.load_hot_state(state_root, StateRootStrategy::Accurate)
self.load_hot_state(state_root, StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate)
}
} else {
match self.load_hot_state(state_root, StateRootStrategy::Accurate)? {
match self.load_hot_state(state_root, StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate)? {
Some(state) => Ok(Some(state)),
None => self.load_cold_state(state_root),
}
@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ impl<E: EthSpec, Hot: ItemStore<E>, Cold: ItemStore<E>> HotColdDB<E, Hot, Cold>
}
.into())
} else {
self.load_hot_state(state_root, StateRootStrategy::Inconsistent)
self.load_hot_state(state_root, StateProcessingStrategy::Inconsistent)
}
}
@ -662,10 +662,13 @@ impl<E: EthSpec, Hot: ItemStore<E>, Cold: ItemStore<E>> HotColdDB<E, Hot, Cold>
{
// NOTE: minor inefficiency here because we load an unnecessary hot state summary
//
// `StateRootStrategy` should be irrelevant here since we never replay blocks for an epoch
// `StateProcessingStrategy` should be irrelevant here since we never replay blocks for an epoch
// boundary state in the hot DB.
let state = self
.load_hot_state(&epoch_boundary_state_root, StateRootStrategy::Accurate)?
.load_hot_state(
&epoch_boundary_state_root,
StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
)?
.ok_or(HotColdDBError::MissingEpochBoundaryState(
epoch_boundary_state_root,
))?;
@ -834,7 +837,7 @@ impl<E: EthSpec, Hot: ItemStore<E>, Cold: ItemStore<E>> HotColdDB<E, Hot, Cold>
pub fn load_hot_state(
&self,
state_root: &Hash256,
state_root_strategy: StateRootStrategy,
state_processing_strategy: StateProcessingStrategy,
) -> Result<Option<BeaconState<E>>, Error> {
metrics::inc_counter(&metrics::BEACON_STATE_HOT_GET_COUNT);
@ -867,7 +870,7 @@ impl<E: EthSpec, Hot: ItemStore<E>, Cold: ItemStore<E>> HotColdDB<E, Hot, Cold>
blocks,
slot,
no_state_root_iter(),
state_root_strategy,
state_processing_strategy,
)?
};
@ -1038,7 +1041,7 @@ impl<E: EthSpec, Hot: ItemStore<E>, Cold: ItemStore<E>> HotColdDB<E, Hot, Cold>
blocks,
slot,
Some(state_root_iter),
StateRootStrategy::Accurate,
StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
)?;
// If state is not error, put it in the cache.
@ -1130,10 +1133,10 @@ impl<E: EthSpec, Hot: ItemStore<E>, Cold: ItemStore<E>> HotColdDB<E, Hot, Cold>
blocks: Vec<SignedBeaconBlock<E, BlindedPayload<E>>>,
target_slot: Slot,
state_root_iter: Option<impl Iterator<Item = Result<(Hash256, Slot), Error>>>,
state_root_strategy: StateRootStrategy,
state_processing_strategy: StateProcessingStrategy,
) -> Result<BeaconState<E>, Error> {
let mut block_replayer = BlockReplayer::new(state, &self.spec)
.state_root_strategy(state_root_strategy)
.state_processing_strategy(state_processing_strategy)
.no_signature_verification()
.minimal_block_root_verification();

View File

@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ use itertools::{process_results, Itertools};
use slog::info;
use state_processing::{
per_block_processing, per_slot_processing, BlockSignatureStrategy, ConsensusContext,
VerifyBlockRoot,
StateProcessingStrategy, VerifyBlockRoot,
};
use std::sync::Arc;
use types::{EthSpec, Hash256};
@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ where
&mut state,
&block,
BlockSignatureStrategy::NoVerification,
StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
VerifyBlockRoot::True,
&mut ctxt,
&self.spec,

View File

@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ pub struct BlockReplayer<
> {
state: BeaconState<Spec>,
spec: &'a ChainSpec,
state_root_strategy: StateRootStrategy,
state_processing_strategy: StateProcessingStrategy,
block_sig_strategy: BlockSignatureStrategy,
verify_block_root: Option<VerifyBlockRoot>,
pre_block_hook: Option<PreBlockHook<'a, Spec, Error>>,
@ -60,13 +60,13 @@ impl From<BlockProcessingError> for BlockReplayError {
}
}
/// Defines how state roots should be computed during block replay.
#[derive(PartialEq)]
pub enum StateRootStrategy {
/// Defines how state roots should be computed and whether to perform all state transitions during block replay.
#[derive(PartialEq, Clone, Copy)]
pub enum StateProcessingStrategy {
/// Perform all transitions faithfully to the specification.
Accurate,
/// Don't compute state roots, eventually computing an invalid beacon state that can only be
/// used for obtaining shuffling.
/// Don't compute state roots and process withdrawals, eventually computing an invalid beacon
/// state that can only be used for obtaining shuffling.
Inconsistent,
}
@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ where
Self {
state,
spec,
state_root_strategy: StateRootStrategy::Accurate,
state_processing_strategy: StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
block_sig_strategy: BlockSignatureStrategy::VerifyBulk,
verify_block_root: Some(VerifyBlockRoot::True),
pre_block_hook: None,
@ -100,12 +100,15 @@ where
}
}
/// Set the replayer's state root strategy different from the default.
pub fn state_root_strategy(mut self, state_root_strategy: StateRootStrategy) -> Self {
if state_root_strategy == StateRootStrategy::Inconsistent {
/// Set the replayer's state processing strategy different from the default.
pub fn state_processing_strategy(
mut self,
state_processing_strategy: StateProcessingStrategy,
) -> Self {
if state_processing_strategy == StateProcessingStrategy::Inconsistent {
self.verify_block_root = None;
}
self.state_root_strategy = state_root_strategy;
self.state_processing_strategy = state_processing_strategy;
self
}
@ -182,7 +185,7 @@ where
i: usize,
) -> Result<Option<Hash256>, Error> {
// If we don't care about state roots then return immediately.
if self.state_root_strategy == StateRootStrategy::Inconsistent {
if self.state_processing_strategy == StateProcessingStrategy::Inconsistent {
return Ok(Some(Hash256::zero()));
}
@ -249,7 +252,7 @@ where
// If no explicit policy is set, verify only the first 1 or 2 block roots if using
// accurate state roots. Inaccurate state roots require block root verification to
// be off.
if i <= 1 && self.state_root_strategy == StateRootStrategy::Accurate {
if i <= 1 && self.state_processing_strategy == StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate {
VerifyBlockRoot::True
} else {
VerifyBlockRoot::False
@ -263,6 +266,7 @@ where
&mut self.state,
block,
self.block_sig_strategy,
self.state_processing_strategy,
verify_block_root,
&mut ctxt,
self.spec,

View File

@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ pub mod state_advance;
pub mod upgrade;
pub mod verify_operation;
pub use block_replayer::{BlockReplayError, BlockReplayer, StateRootStrategy};
pub use block_replayer::{BlockReplayError, BlockReplayer, StateProcessingStrategy};
pub use consensus_context::{ConsensusContext, ContextError};
pub use genesis::{
eth2_genesis_time, initialize_beacon_state_from_eth1, is_valid_genesis_state,

View File

@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ mod verify_exit;
mod verify_proposer_slashing;
use crate::common::decrease_balance;
use crate::StateProcessingStrategy;
#[cfg(feature = "arbitrary-fuzz")]
use arbitrary::Arbitrary;
@ -96,6 +97,7 @@ pub fn per_block_processing<T: EthSpec, Payload: AbstractExecPayload<T>>(
state: &mut BeaconState<T>,
signed_block: &SignedBeaconBlock<T, Payload>,
block_signature_strategy: BlockSignatureStrategy,
state_processing_strategy: StateProcessingStrategy,
verify_block_root: VerifyBlockRoot,
ctxt: &mut ConsensusContext<T>,
spec: &ChainSpec,
@ -160,7 +162,9 @@ pub fn per_block_processing<T: EthSpec, Payload: AbstractExecPayload<T>>(
// previous block.
if is_execution_enabled(state, block.body()) {
let payload = block.body().execution_payload()?;
process_withdrawals::<T, Payload>(state, payload, spec)?;
if state_processing_strategy == StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate {
process_withdrawals::<T, Payload>(state, payload, spec)?;
}
process_execution_payload::<T, Payload>(state, payload, spec)?;
}

View File

@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
#![cfg(all(test, not(feature = "fake_crypto")))]
use crate::per_block_processing;
use crate::per_block_processing::errors::{
AttestationInvalid, AttesterSlashingInvalid, BlockOperationError, BlockProcessingError,
DepositInvalid, HeaderInvalid, IndexedAttestationInvalid, IntoWithIndex,
ProposerSlashingInvalid,
};
use crate::{per_block_processing, StateProcessingStrategy};
use crate::{
per_block_processing::{process_operations, verify_exit::verify_exit},
BlockSignatureStrategy, ConsensusContext, VerifyBlockRoot, VerifySignatures,
@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ async fn valid_block_ok() {
&mut state,
&block,
BlockSignatureStrategy::VerifyIndividual,
StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
VerifyBlockRoot::True,
&mut ctxt,
&spec,
@ -97,6 +98,7 @@ async fn invalid_block_header_state_slot() {
&mut state,
&SignedBeaconBlock::from_block(block, signature),
BlockSignatureStrategy::VerifyIndividual,
StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
VerifyBlockRoot::True,
&mut ctxt,
&spec,
@ -129,6 +131,7 @@ async fn invalid_parent_block_root() {
&mut state,
&SignedBeaconBlock::from_block(block, signature),
BlockSignatureStrategy::VerifyIndividual,
StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
VerifyBlockRoot::True,
&mut ctxt,
&spec,
@ -162,6 +165,7 @@ async fn invalid_block_signature() {
&mut state,
&SignedBeaconBlock::from_block(block, Signature::empty()),
BlockSignatureStrategy::VerifyIndividual,
StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
VerifyBlockRoot::True,
&mut ctxt,
&spec,
@ -195,6 +199,7 @@ async fn invalid_randao_reveal_signature() {
&mut state,
&signed_block,
BlockSignatureStrategy::VerifyIndividual,
StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
VerifyBlockRoot::True,
&mut ctxt,
&spec,

View File

@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ use eth2::{
use ssz::Encode;
use state_processing::{
block_signature_verifier::BlockSignatureVerifier, per_block_processing, per_slot_processing,
BlockSignatureStrategy, ConsensusContext, VerifyBlockRoot,
BlockSignatureStrategy, ConsensusContext, StateProcessingStrategy, VerifyBlockRoot,
};
use std::borrow::Cow;
use std::fs::File;
@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ fn do_transition<T: EthSpec>(
&mut pre_state,
&block,
BlockSignatureStrategy::NoVerification,
StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
VerifyBlockRoot::True,
&mut ctxt,
spec,

View File

@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ use crate::decode::{ssz_decode_file_with, ssz_decode_state, yaml_decode_file};
use serde_derive::Deserialize;
use state_processing::{
per_block_processing, per_slot_processing, BlockProcessingError, BlockSignatureStrategy,
ConsensusContext, VerifyBlockRoot,
ConsensusContext, StateProcessingStrategy, VerifyBlockRoot,
};
use types::{BeaconState, EthSpec, ForkName, RelativeEpoch, SignedBeaconBlock};
@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ impl<E: EthSpec> Case for SanityBlocks<E> {
&mut indiv_state,
signed_block,
BlockSignatureStrategy::VerifyIndividual,
StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
VerifyBlockRoot::True,
&mut ctxt,
spec,
@ -106,6 +107,7 @@ impl<E: EthSpec> Case for SanityBlocks<E> {
&mut bulk_state,
signed_block,
BlockSignatureStrategy::VerifyBulk,
StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
VerifyBlockRoot::True,
&mut ctxt,
spec,

View File

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ use crate::decode::{ssz_decode_file_with, ssz_decode_state, yaml_decode_file};
use serde_derive::Deserialize;
use state_processing::{
per_block_processing, state_advance::complete_state_advance, BlockSignatureStrategy,
ConsensusContext, VerifyBlockRoot,
ConsensusContext, StateProcessingStrategy, VerifyBlockRoot,
};
use std::str::FromStr;
use types::{BeaconState, Epoch, ForkName, SignedBeaconBlock};
@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ impl<E: EthSpec> Case for TransitionTest<E> {
&mut state,
block,
BlockSignatureStrategy::VerifyBulk,
StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
VerifyBlockRoot::True,
&mut ctxt,
spec,

View File

@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ use super::*;
use beacon_chain::test_utils::{BeaconChainHarness, EphemeralHarnessType};
use state_processing::{
per_block_processing, per_block_processing::errors::ExitInvalid, BlockProcessingError,
BlockSignatureStrategy, ConsensusContext, VerifyBlockRoot,
BlockSignatureStrategy, ConsensusContext, StateProcessingStrategy, VerifyBlockRoot,
};
use types::{BeaconBlock, BeaconState, Epoch, EthSpec, SignedBeaconBlock};
@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ impl ExitTest {
state,
block,
BlockSignatureStrategy::VerifyIndividual,
StateProcessingStrategy::Accurate,
VerifyBlockRoot::True,
&mut ctxt,
&E::default_spec(),