Allow state processing to compile under v0.5.0
This commit is contained in:
parent
3b8c1df5da
commit
3a384d93f8
@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ fn per_block_processing_signature_optional(
|
||||
process_block_header(state, block, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure the current and previous epoch cache is built.
|
||||
state.build_epoch_cache(RelativeEpoch::Current, spec)?;
|
||||
state.build_epoch_cache(RelativeEpoch::Previous, spec)?;
|
||||
state.build_epoch_cache(RelativeEpoch::Current, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
if should_verify_block_signature {
|
||||
verify_block_signature(&state, &block, &spec)?;
|
||||
@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ fn per_block_processing_signature_optional(
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn process_block_header(
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
state: &mut BeaconState,
|
||||
block: &BeaconBlock,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
||||
|
@ -142,10 +142,8 @@ fn validate_attestation_signature_optional(
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Get the committee for the specific shard that this attestation is for.
|
||||
let relative_epoch = RelativeEpoch::from_slot(state.slot, attestation.data.slot, spec)
|
||||
.map_err(|_| BeaconStateError::EpochOutOfBounds)?; // Should not fail due to previous checks.
|
||||
let crosslink_committee = state
|
||||
.get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(attestation.data.slot, relative_epoch, spec)?
|
||||
.get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(attestation.data.slot, spec)?
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.find(|c| c.shard == attestation.data.shard)
|
||||
.ok_or_else(|| {
|
||||
|
@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
|
||||
use errors::EpochProcessingError as Error;
|
||||
use integer_sqrt::IntegerSquareRoot;
|
||||
use process_validator_registry::process_validator_registry;
|
||||
use rayon::prelude::*;
|
||||
use ssz::TreeHash;
|
||||
use std::collections::HashMap;
|
||||
@ -8,7 +9,9 @@ use validator_statuses::{TotalBalances, ValidatorStatuses};
|
||||
use winning_root::{winning_root, WinningRoot};
|
||||
|
||||
pub mod errors;
|
||||
pub mod get_attestation_participants;
|
||||
pub mod inclusion_distance;
|
||||
pub mod process_validator_registry;
|
||||
pub mod tests;
|
||||
pub mod validator_statuses;
|
||||
pub mod winning_root;
|
||||
@ -25,10 +28,9 @@ pub type WinningRootHashSet = HashMap<u64, WinningRoot>;
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
pub fn per_epoch_processing(state: &mut BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
||||
// Ensure all of the caches are built.
|
||||
// Ensure the previous and next epoch caches are built.
|
||||
state.build_epoch_cache(RelativeEpoch::Previous, spec)?;
|
||||
state.build_epoch_cache(RelativeEpoch::Current, spec)?;
|
||||
state.build_epoch_cache(RelativeEpoch::Next, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
let mut statuses = initialize_validator_statuses(&state, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -61,7 +63,7 @@ pub fn per_epoch_processing(state: &mut BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec) -> Result
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns a list of active validator indices for the state's current epoch.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn calculate_active_validator_indices(state: &BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec) -> Vec<usize> {
|
||||
get_active_validator_indices(
|
||||
&state.validator_registry,
|
||||
@ -76,26 +78,28 @@ pub fn calculate_active_validator_indices(state: &BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec)
|
||||
/// - previous epoch attesters
|
||||
/// - etc.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn initialize_validator_statuses(
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<ValidatorStatuses, BeaconStateError> {
|
||||
let mut statuses = ValidatorStatuses::new(state, spec);
|
||||
let mut statuses = ValidatorStatuses::new(state, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
statuses.process_attestations(&state, &state.latest_attestations, spec)?;
|
||||
statuses.process_attestations(&state, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(statuses)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
/// Maybe resets the eth1 period.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn process_eth1_data(state: &mut BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec) {
|
||||
let next_epoch = state.next_epoch(spec);
|
||||
let voting_period = spec.epochs_per_eth1_voting_period;
|
||||
|
||||
if next_epoch % voting_period == 0 {
|
||||
for eth1_data_vote in &state.eth1_data_votes {
|
||||
if eth1_data_vote.vote_count * 2 > voting_period {
|
||||
if eth1_data_vote.vote_count * 2 > voting_period * spec.slots_per_epoch {
|
||||
state.latest_eth1_data = eth1_data_vote.eth1_data.clone();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -119,7 +123,7 @@ pub fn process_justification(
|
||||
let previous_epoch = state.previous_epoch(spec);
|
||||
let current_epoch = state.current_epoch(spec);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut new_justified_epoch = state.justified_epoch;
|
||||
let mut new_justified_epoch = state.current_justified_epoch;
|
||||
state.justification_bitfield <<= 1;
|
||||
|
||||
// If > 2/3 of the total balance attested to the previous epoch boundary
|
||||
@ -168,8 +172,10 @@ pub fn process_justification(
|
||||
// - The presently justified epoch was two epochs ago.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Then, set the finalized epoch to two epochs ago.
|
||||
if (state.justification_bitfield % 8 == 0b111) & (state.justified_epoch == previous_epoch - 1) {
|
||||
state.finalized_epoch = state.justified_epoch;
|
||||
if (state.justification_bitfield % 8 == 0b111)
|
||||
& (state.current_justified_epoch == previous_epoch - 1)
|
||||
{
|
||||
state.finalized_epoch = state.current_justified_epoch;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// If:
|
||||
//
|
||||
@ -177,12 +183,14 @@ pub fn process_justification(
|
||||
// - Set the previous epoch to be justified.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Then, set the finalized epoch to be the previous epoch.
|
||||
if (state.justification_bitfield % 4 == 0b11) & (state.justified_epoch == previous_epoch) {
|
||||
state.finalized_epoch = state.justified_epoch;
|
||||
if (state.justification_bitfield % 4 == 0b11)
|
||||
& (state.current_justified_epoch == previous_epoch)
|
||||
{
|
||||
state.finalized_epoch = state.current_justified_epoch;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
state.previous_justified_epoch = state.justified_epoch;
|
||||
state.justified_epoch = new_justified_epoch;
|
||||
state.previous_justified_epoch = state.current_justified_epoch;
|
||||
state.current_justified_epoch = new_justified_epoch;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Updates the following fields on the `BeaconState`:
|
||||
@ -191,23 +199,11 @@ pub fn process_justification(
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Also returns a `WinningRootHashSet` for later use during epoch processing.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn process_crosslinks(
|
||||
state: &mut BeaconState,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<WinningRootHashSet, Error> {
|
||||
let current_epoch_attestations: Vec<&PendingAttestation> = state
|
||||
.latest_attestations
|
||||
.par_iter()
|
||||
.filter(|a| a.data.slot.epoch(spec.slots_per_epoch) == state.current_epoch(spec))
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
|
||||
let previous_epoch_attestations: Vec<&PendingAttestation> = state
|
||||
.latest_attestations
|
||||
.par_iter()
|
||||
.filter(|a| a.data.slot.epoch(spec.slots_per_epoch) == state.previous_epoch(spec))
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
|
||||
let mut winning_root_for_shards: WinningRootHashSet = HashMap::new();
|
||||
|
||||
let previous_and_current_epoch_slots: Vec<Slot> = state
|
||||
@ -221,24 +217,18 @@ pub fn process_crosslinks(
|
||||
let crosslink_committees_at_slot =
|
||||
state.get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(slot, spec)?.clone();
|
||||
|
||||
for (crosslink_committee, shard) in crosslink_committees_at_slot {
|
||||
let shard = shard as u64;
|
||||
for c in crosslink_committees_at_slot {
|
||||
let shard = c.shard as u64;
|
||||
|
||||
let winning_root = winning_root(
|
||||
state,
|
||||
shard,
|
||||
¤t_epoch_attestations[..],
|
||||
&previous_epoch_attestations[..],
|
||||
spec,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
let winning_root = winning_root(state, shard, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some(winning_root) = winning_root {
|
||||
let total_committee_balance = state.get_total_balance(&crosslink_committee, spec);
|
||||
let total_committee_balance = state.get_total_balance(&c.committee, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: I think this has a bug.
|
||||
if (3 * winning_root.total_attesting_balance) >= (2 * total_committee_balance) {
|
||||
state.latest_crosslinks[shard as usize] = Crosslink {
|
||||
epoch: state.current_epoch(spec),
|
||||
epoch: slot.epoch(spec.slots_per_epoch),
|
||||
crosslink_data_root: winning_root.crosslink_data_root,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -294,7 +284,10 @@ pub fn process_rewards_and_penalities(
|
||||
.map(|(index, &balance)| {
|
||||
let mut balance = balance;
|
||||
let status = &statuses.statuses[index];
|
||||
let base_reward = state.base_reward(index, base_reward_quotient, spec);
|
||||
let base_reward = get_base_reward(state, index, total_balances.previous_epoch, spec)
|
||||
.expect(
|
||||
"Cannot fail to access a validator balance when iterating validator balances.",
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if epochs_since_finality <= 4 {
|
||||
// Expected FFG source
|
||||
@ -330,11 +323,15 @@ pub fn process_rewards_and_penalities(
|
||||
safe_sub_assign!(balance, base_reward);
|
||||
};
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
let inactivity_penalty = state.inactivity_penalty(
|
||||
let inactivity_penalty = get_inactivity_penalty(
|
||||
state,
|
||||
index,
|
||||
epochs_since_finality,
|
||||
base_reward_quotient,
|
||||
epochs_since_finality.as_u64(),
|
||||
total_balances.previous_epoch,
|
||||
spec,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.expect(
|
||||
"Cannot fail to access a validator balance when iterating validator balances.",
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if status.is_active_in_previous_epoch {
|
||||
@ -349,7 +346,10 @@ pub fn process_rewards_and_penalities(
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if state.validator_registry[index].slashed {
|
||||
let base_reward = state.base_reward(index, base_reward_quotient, spec);
|
||||
let base_reward =
|
||||
get_base_reward(state, index, total_balances.previous_epoch, spec).expect(
|
||||
"Cannot fail to access a validator balance when iterating validator balances.",
|
||||
);
|
||||
safe_sub_assign!(balance, 2 * inactivity_penalty + base_reward);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -384,7 +384,10 @@ pub fn process_rewards_and_penalities(
|
||||
let proposer_index = status.inclusion_info.proposer_index;
|
||||
let inclusion_distance = status.inclusion_info.distance;
|
||||
|
||||
let base_reward = state.base_reward(proposer_index, base_reward_quotient, spec);
|
||||
let base_reward =
|
||||
get_base_reward(state, proposer_index, total_balances.previous_epoch, spec).expect(
|
||||
"Cannot fail to access a validator balance when iterating validator balances.",
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if inclusion_distance > 0 && inclusion_distance < Slot::max_value() {
|
||||
safe_add_assign!(
|
||||
@ -399,53 +402,37 @@ pub fn process_rewards_and_penalities(
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Peforms a validator registry update, if required.
|
||||
/// Returns the base reward for some validator.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
pub fn process_validator_registry(state: &mut BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
||||
let current_epoch = state.current_epoch(spec);
|
||||
let next_epoch = state.next_epoch(spec);
|
||||
|
||||
state.previous_shuffling_epoch = state.current_shuffling_epoch;
|
||||
state.previous_shuffling_start_shard = state.current_shuffling_start_shard;
|
||||
|
||||
state.previous_shuffling_seed = state.current_shuffling_seed;
|
||||
|
||||
let should_update_validator_registy = if state.finalized_epoch
|
||||
> state.validator_registry_update_epoch
|
||||
{
|
||||
(0..state.get_current_epoch_committee_count(spec)).all(|i| {
|
||||
let shard = (state.current_shuffling_start_shard + i as u64) % spec.shard_count;
|
||||
state.latest_crosslinks[shard as usize].epoch > state.validator_registry_update_epoch
|
||||
})
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn get_base_reward(
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
index: usize,
|
||||
previous_total_balance: u64,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<u64, BeaconStateError> {
|
||||
if previous_total_balance == 0 {
|
||||
Ok(0)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
false
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if should_update_validator_registy {
|
||||
state.update_validator_registry(spec);
|
||||
|
||||
state.current_shuffling_epoch = next_epoch;
|
||||
state.current_shuffling_start_shard = (state.current_shuffling_start_shard
|
||||
+ state.get_current_epoch_committee_count(spec) as u64)
|
||||
% spec.shard_count;
|
||||
state.current_shuffling_seed = state.generate_seed(state.current_shuffling_epoch, spec)?
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
let epochs_since_last_registry_update =
|
||||
current_epoch - state.validator_registry_update_epoch;
|
||||
if (epochs_since_last_registry_update > 1)
|
||||
& epochs_since_last_registry_update.is_power_of_two()
|
||||
{
|
||||
state.current_shuffling_epoch = next_epoch;
|
||||
state.current_shuffling_seed =
|
||||
state.generate_seed(state.current_shuffling_epoch, spec)?
|
||||
}
|
||||
let adjusted_quotient = previous_total_balance.integer_sqrt() / spec.base_reward_quotient;
|
||||
Ok(state.get_effective_balance(index, spec)? / adjusted_quotient / 5)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
state.process_slashings(spec);
|
||||
state.process_exit_queue(spec);
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
/// Returns the inactivity penalty for some validator.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn get_inactivity_penalty(
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
index: usize,
|
||||
epochs_since_finality: u64,
|
||||
previous_total_balance: u64,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<u64, BeaconStateError> {
|
||||
Ok(get_base_reward(state, index, previous_total_balance, spec)?
|
||||
+ state.get_effective_balance(index, spec)? * epochs_since_finality
|
||||
/ spec.inactivity_penalty_quotient
|
||||
/ 2)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Updates the state's `latest_active_index_roots` field with a tree hash the active validator
|
||||
@ -486,12 +473,5 @@ pub fn update_latest_slashed_balances(state: &mut BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec)
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
pub fn clean_attestations(state: &mut BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec) {
|
||||
let current_epoch = state.current_epoch(spec);
|
||||
|
||||
state.latest_attestations = state
|
||||
.latest_attestations
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.filter(|a| a.data.slot.epoch(spec.slots_per_epoch) >= current_epoch)
|
||||
.cloned()
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
state.previous_epoch_attestations = vec![];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
||||
use types::{beacon_state::helpers::verify_bitfield_length, *};
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns validator indices which participated in the attestation.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn get_attestation_participants(
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
attestation_data: &AttestationData,
|
||||
bitfield: &Bitfield,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<Vec<usize>, BeaconStateError> {
|
||||
let epoch = attestation_data.slot.epoch(spec.slots_per_epoch);
|
||||
|
||||
let crosslink_committee =
|
||||
state.get_crosslink_committee_for_shard(epoch, attestation_data.shard, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
if crosslink_committee.slot != attestation_data.slot {
|
||||
return Err(BeaconStateError::NoCommitteeForShard);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let committee = &crosslink_committee.committee;
|
||||
|
||||
if !verify_bitfield_length(&bitfield, committee.len()) {
|
||||
return Err(BeaconStateError::InvalidBitfield);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let mut participants = Vec::with_capacity(committee.len());
|
||||
for (i, validator_index) in committee.iter().enumerate() {
|
||||
match bitfield.get(i) {
|
||||
Ok(bit) if bit == true => participants.push(*validator_index),
|
||||
_ => {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
participants.shrink_to_fit();
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(participants)
|
||||
}
|
@ -1,12 +1,11 @@
|
||||
use super::errors::InclusionError;
|
||||
use super::get_attestation_participants::get_attestation_participants;
|
||||
use types::*;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns the distance between the first included attestation for some validator and this
|
||||
/// slot.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note: In the spec this is defined "inline", not as a helper function.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn inclusion_distance(
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
attestations: &[&PendingAttestation],
|
||||
@ -19,9 +18,7 @@ pub fn inclusion_distance(
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns the slot of the earliest included attestation for some validator.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note: In the spec this is defined "inline", not as a helper function.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn inclusion_slot(
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
attestations: &[&PendingAttestation],
|
||||
@ -34,9 +31,7 @@ pub fn inclusion_slot(
|
||||
|
||||
/// Finds the earliest included attestation for some validator.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note: In the spec this is defined "inline", not as a helper function.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
fn earliest_included_attestation(
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
attestations: &[&PendingAttestation],
|
||||
@ -47,7 +42,7 @@ fn earliest_included_attestation(
|
||||
|
||||
for (i, a) in attestations.iter().enumerate() {
|
||||
let participants =
|
||||
state.get_attestation_participants(&a.data, &a.aggregation_bitfield, spec)?;
|
||||
get_attestation_participants(state, &a.data, &a.aggregation_bitfield, spec)?;
|
||||
if participants.iter().any(|i| *i == validator_index) {
|
||||
included_attestations.push(i);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
|
||||
use super::Error;
|
||||
use types::*;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Peforms a validator registry update, if required.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
pub fn process_validator_registry(state: &mut BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
||||
let current_epoch = state.current_epoch(spec);
|
||||
let next_epoch = state.next_epoch(spec);
|
||||
|
||||
state.previous_shuffling_epoch = state.current_shuffling_epoch;
|
||||
state.previous_shuffling_start_shard = state.current_shuffling_start_shard;
|
||||
|
||||
state.previous_shuffling_seed = state.current_shuffling_seed;
|
||||
|
||||
if should_update_validator_registry(state, spec)? {
|
||||
state.update_validator_registry(spec);
|
||||
|
||||
state.current_shuffling_epoch = next_epoch;
|
||||
state.current_shuffling_start_shard = (state.current_shuffling_start_shard
|
||||
+ spec.get_epoch_committee_count(
|
||||
state
|
||||
.get_active_validator_indices(current_epoch, spec)?
|
||||
.len(),
|
||||
) as u64)
|
||||
% spec.shard_count;
|
||||
state.current_shuffling_seed = state.generate_seed(state.current_shuffling_epoch, spec)?
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
let epochs_since_last_registry_update =
|
||||
current_epoch - state.validator_registry_update_epoch;
|
||||
if (epochs_since_last_registry_update > 1)
|
||||
& epochs_since_last_registry_update.is_power_of_two()
|
||||
{
|
||||
state.current_shuffling_epoch = next_epoch;
|
||||
state.current_shuffling_seed =
|
||||
state.generate_seed(state.current_shuffling_epoch, spec)?
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
state.process_slashings(spec);
|
||||
state.process_exit_queue(spec);
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns `true` if the validator registry should be updated during an epoch processing.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn should_update_validator_registry(
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<bool, BeaconStateError> {
|
||||
if state.finalized_epoch <= state.validator_registry_update_epoch {
|
||||
return Ok(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let num_active_validators = state
|
||||
.get_active_validator_indices(state.current_epoch(spec), spec)?
|
||||
.len();
|
||||
let current_epoch_committee_count = spec.get_epoch_committee_count(num_active_validators);
|
||||
|
||||
for shard in (0..current_epoch_committee_count)
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.map(|i| (state.current_shuffling_start_shard + i as u64) % spec.shard_count)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if state.latest_crosslinks[shard as usize].epoch <= state.validator_registry_update_epoch {
|
||||
return Ok(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(true)
|
||||
}
|
@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
|
||||
use super::get_attestation_participants::get_attestation_participants;
|
||||
use super::WinningRootHashSet;
|
||||
use types::*;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -147,8 +148,8 @@ impl ValidatorStatuses {
|
||||
/// - Active validators
|
||||
/// - Total balances for the current and previous epochs.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
pub fn new(state: &BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec) -> Self {
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn new(state: &BeaconState, spec: &ChainSpec) -> Result<Self, BeaconStateError> {
|
||||
let mut statuses = Vec::with_capacity(state.validator_registry.len());
|
||||
let mut total_balances = TotalBalances::default();
|
||||
|
||||
@ -157,37 +158,40 @@ impl ValidatorStatuses {
|
||||
|
||||
if validator.is_active_at(state.current_epoch(spec)) {
|
||||
status.is_active_in_current_epoch = true;
|
||||
total_balances.current_epoch += state.get_effective_balance(i, spec);
|
||||
total_balances.current_epoch += state.get_effective_balance(i, spec)?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if validator.is_active_at(state.previous_epoch(spec)) {
|
||||
status.is_active_in_previous_epoch = true;
|
||||
total_balances.previous_epoch += state.get_effective_balance(i, spec);
|
||||
total_balances.previous_epoch += state.get_effective_balance(i, spec)?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
statuses.push(status);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Self {
|
||||
Ok(Self {
|
||||
statuses,
|
||||
total_balances,
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Process some attestations from the given `state` updating the `statuses` and
|
||||
/// `total_balances` fields.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn process_attestations(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
attestations: &[PendingAttestation],
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<(), BeaconStateError> {
|
||||
for a in attestations {
|
||||
for a in state
|
||||
.previous_epoch_attestations
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.chain(state.current_epoch_attestations.iter())
|
||||
{
|
||||
let attesting_indices =
|
||||
state.get_attestation_participants(&a.data, &a.aggregation_bitfield, spec)?;
|
||||
let attesting_balance = state.get_total_balance(&attesting_indices, spec);
|
||||
get_attestation_participants(state, &a.data, &a.aggregation_bitfield, spec)?;
|
||||
let attesting_balance = state.get_total_balance(&attesting_indices, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
let mut status = AttesterStatus::default();
|
||||
|
||||
@ -206,10 +210,15 @@ impl ValidatorStatuses {
|
||||
status.is_previous_epoch_attester = true;
|
||||
|
||||
// The inclusion slot and distance are only required for previous epoch attesters.
|
||||
let relative_epoch = RelativeEpoch::from_slot(state.slot, a.data.slot, spec)?;
|
||||
status.inclusion_info = InclusionInfo {
|
||||
slot: a.inclusion_slot,
|
||||
distance: inclusion_distance(a),
|
||||
proposer_index: state.get_beacon_proposer_index(a.inclusion_slot, spec)?,
|
||||
proposer_index: state.get_beacon_proposer_index(
|
||||
a.inclusion_slot,
|
||||
relative_epoch,
|
||||
spec,
|
||||
)?,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if has_common_epoch_boundary_root(a, state, state.previous_epoch(spec), spec)? {
|
||||
@ -235,7 +244,7 @@ impl ValidatorStatuses {
|
||||
/// Update the `statuses` for each validator based upon whether or not they attested to the
|
||||
/// "winning" shard block root for the previous epoch.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn process_winning_roots(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
@ -248,11 +257,10 @@ impl ValidatorStatuses {
|
||||
state.get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(slot, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
// Loop through each committee in the slot.
|
||||
for (crosslink_committee, shard) in crosslink_committees_at_slot {
|
||||
for c in crosslink_committees_at_slot {
|
||||
// If there was some winning crosslink root for the committee's shard.
|
||||
if let Some(winning_root) = winning_roots.get(&shard) {
|
||||
let total_committee_balance =
|
||||
state.get_total_balance(&crosslink_committee, spec);
|
||||
if let Some(winning_root) = winning_roots.get(&c.shard) {
|
||||
let total_committee_balance = state.get_total_balance(&c.committee, spec)?;
|
||||
for &validator_index in &winning_root.attesting_validator_indices {
|
||||
// Take note of the balance information for the winning root, it will be
|
||||
// used later to calculate rewards for that validator.
|
||||
@ -272,14 +280,14 @@ impl ValidatorStatuses {
|
||||
/// Returns the distance between when the attestation was created and when it was included in a
|
||||
/// block.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
fn inclusion_distance(a: &PendingAttestation) -> Slot {
|
||||
a.inclusion_slot - a.data.slot
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns `true` if some `PendingAttestation` is from the supplied `epoch`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
fn is_from_epoch(a: &PendingAttestation, epoch: Epoch, spec: &ChainSpec) -> bool {
|
||||
a.data.slot.epoch(spec.slots_per_epoch) == epoch
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -287,7 +295,7 @@ fn is_from_epoch(a: &PendingAttestation, epoch: Epoch, spec: &ChainSpec) -> bool
|
||||
/// Returns `true` if a `PendingAttestation` and `BeaconState` share the same beacon block hash for
|
||||
/// the first slot of the given epoch.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
fn has_common_epoch_boundary_root(
|
||||
a: &PendingAttestation,
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
@ -295,25 +303,21 @@ fn has_common_epoch_boundary_root(
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<bool, BeaconStateError> {
|
||||
let slot = epoch.start_slot(spec.slots_per_epoch);
|
||||
let state_boundary_root = *state
|
||||
.get_block_root(slot, spec)
|
||||
.ok_or_else(|| BeaconStateError::InsufficientBlockRoots)?;
|
||||
let state_boundary_root = *state.get_block_root(slot, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(a.data.epoch_boundary_root == state_boundary_root)
|
||||
Ok(a.data.target_root == state_boundary_root)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns `true` if a `PendingAttestation` and `BeaconState` share the same beacon block hash for
|
||||
/// the current slot of the `PendingAttestation`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
fn has_common_beacon_block_root(
|
||||
a: &PendingAttestation,
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<bool, BeaconStateError> {
|
||||
let state_block_root = *state
|
||||
.get_block_root(a.data.slot, spec)
|
||||
.ok_or_else(|| BeaconStateError::InsufficientBlockRoots)?;
|
||||
let state_block_root = *state.get_block_root(a.data.slot, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(a.data.beacon_block_root == state_block_root)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
|
||||
use super::get_attestation_participants::get_attestation_participants;
|
||||
use std::collections::HashSet;
|
||||
use std::iter::FromIterator;
|
||||
use types::*;
|
||||
@ -13,14 +14,14 @@ impl WinningRoot {
|
||||
/// Returns `true` if `self` is a "better" candidate than `other`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// A winning root is "better" than another if it has a higher `total_attesting_balance`. Ties
|
||||
/// are broken by favouring the lower `crosslink_data_root` value.
|
||||
/// are broken by favouring the higher `crosslink_data_root` value.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn is_better_than(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
|
||||
if self.total_attesting_balance > other.total_attesting_balance {
|
||||
true
|
||||
} else if self.total_attesting_balance == other.total_attesting_balance {
|
||||
self.crosslink_data_root < other.crosslink_data_root
|
||||
self.crosslink_data_root > other.crosslink_data_root
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
false
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -33,22 +34,21 @@ impl WinningRoot {
|
||||
/// The `WinningRoot` object also contains additional fields that are useful in later stages of
|
||||
/// per-epoch processing.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn winning_root(
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
shard: u64,
|
||||
current_epoch_attestations: &[&PendingAttestation],
|
||||
previous_epoch_attestations: &[&PendingAttestation],
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<Option<WinningRoot>, BeaconStateError> {
|
||||
let mut winning_root: Option<WinningRoot> = None;
|
||||
|
||||
let crosslink_data_roots: HashSet<Hash256> = HashSet::from_iter(
|
||||
previous_epoch_attestations
|
||||
state
|
||||
.previous_epoch_attestations
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.chain(current_epoch_attestations.iter())
|
||||
.chain(state.current_epoch_attestations.iter())
|
||||
.filter_map(|a| {
|
||||
if a.data.shard == shard {
|
||||
if is_eligible_for_winning_root(state, a, shard) {
|
||||
Some(a.data.crosslink_data_root)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
None
|
||||
@ -57,18 +57,17 @@ pub fn winning_root(
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
for crosslink_data_root in crosslink_data_roots {
|
||||
let attesting_validator_indices = get_attesting_validator_indices(
|
||||
state,
|
||||
shard,
|
||||
current_epoch_attestations,
|
||||
previous_epoch_attestations,
|
||||
&crosslink_data_root,
|
||||
spec,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
let attesting_validator_indices =
|
||||
get_attesting_validator_indices(state, shard, &crosslink_data_root, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
let total_attesting_balance: u64 = attesting_validator_indices
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.fold(0, |acc, i| acc + state.get_effective_balance(*i, spec));
|
||||
let total_attesting_balance: u64 =
|
||||
attesting_validator_indices
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.try_fold(0_u64, |acc, i| {
|
||||
state
|
||||
.get_effective_balance(*i, spec)
|
||||
.and_then(|bal| Ok(acc + bal))
|
||||
})?;
|
||||
|
||||
let candidate = WinningRoot {
|
||||
crosslink_data_root,
|
||||
@ -88,25 +87,36 @@ pub fn winning_root(
|
||||
Ok(winning_root)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns all indices which voted for a given crosslink. May contain duplicates.
|
||||
/// Returns `true` if pending attestation `a` is eligible to become a winning root.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
fn is_eligible_for_winning_root(state: &BeaconState, a: &PendingAttestation, shard: Shard) -> bool {
|
||||
if shard >= state.latest_crosslinks.len() as u64 {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
a.data.previous_crosslink == state.latest_crosslinks[shard as usize]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns all indices which voted for a given crosslink. Does not contain duplicates.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
fn get_attesting_validator_indices(
|
||||
state: &BeaconState,
|
||||
shard: u64,
|
||||
current_epoch_attestations: &[&PendingAttestation],
|
||||
previous_epoch_attestations: &[&PendingAttestation],
|
||||
crosslink_data_root: &Hash256,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<Vec<usize>, BeaconStateError> {
|
||||
let mut indices = vec![];
|
||||
|
||||
for a in current_epoch_attestations
|
||||
for a in state
|
||||
.current_epoch_attestations
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.chain(previous_epoch_attestations.iter())
|
||||
.chain(state.previous_epoch_attestations.iter())
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (a.data.shard == shard) && (a.data.crosslink_data_root == *crosslink_data_root) {
|
||||
indices.append(&mut state.get_attestation_participants(
|
||||
indices.append(&mut get_attestation_participants(
|
||||
state,
|
||||
&a.data,
|
||||
&a.aggregation_bitfield,
|
||||
spec,
|
||||
@ -114,5 +124,41 @@ fn get_attesting_validator_indices(
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Sort the list (required for dedup). "Unstable" means the sort may re-order equal elements,
|
||||
// this causes no issue here.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// These sort + dedup ops are potentially good CPU time optimisation targets.
|
||||
indices.sort_unstable();
|
||||
// Remove all duplicate indices (requires a sorted list).
|
||||
indices.dedup();
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(indices)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
mod tests {
|
||||
use super::*;
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn is_better_than() {
|
||||
let worse = WinningRoot {
|
||||
crosslink_data_root: Hash256::from_slice(&[1; 32]),
|
||||
attesting_validator_indices: vec![],
|
||||
total_attesting_balance: 42,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let better = WinningRoot {
|
||||
crosslink_data_root: Hash256::from_slice(&[2; 32]),
|
||||
..worse.clone()
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(better.is_better_than(&worse));
|
||||
|
||||
let better = WinningRoot {
|
||||
total_attesting_balance: worse.total_attesting_balance + 1,
|
||||
..worse.clone()
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(better.is_better_than(&worse));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
|
||||
use self::epoch_cache::EpochCache;
|
||||
use crate::test_utils::TestRandom;
|
||||
use crate::{validator_registry::get_active_validator_indices, *};
|
||||
use crate::*;
|
||||
use int_to_bytes::int_to_bytes32;
|
||||
use log::trace;
|
||||
use pubkey_cache::PubkeyCache;
|
||||
use rand::RngCore;
|
||||
use serde_derive::{Deserialize, Serialize};
|
||||
@ -39,6 +38,7 @@ pub enum Error {
|
||||
InsufficientAttestations,
|
||||
InsufficientCommittees,
|
||||
InsufficientSlashedBalances,
|
||||
NoCommitteeForShard,
|
||||
EpochCacheUninitialized(RelativeEpoch),
|
||||
PubkeyCacheInconsistent,
|
||||
PubkeyCacheIncomplete {
|
||||
@ -349,17 +349,49 @@ impl BeaconState {
|
||||
self.current_epoch(spec) + 1
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns the active validator indices for the given epoch, assuming there is no validator
|
||||
/// registry update in the next epoch.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note: Utilizes the cache and will fail if the appropriate cache is not initialized.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn get_active_validator_indices(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
epoch: Epoch,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<&[usize], Error> {
|
||||
// If the slot is in the next epoch, assume there was no validator registry update.
|
||||
let relative_epoch =
|
||||
match RelativeEpoch::from_epoch(self.slot.epoch(spec.slots_per_epoch), epoch) {
|
||||
Err(RelativeEpochError::AmbiguiousNextEpoch) => {
|
||||
Ok(RelativeEpoch::NextWithoutRegistryChange)
|
||||
}
|
||||
e => e,
|
||||
}?;
|
||||
|
||||
let cache = self.cache(relative_epoch, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(&cache.active_validator_indices)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns the crosslink committees for some slot.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note: Utilizes the cache and will fail if the appropriate cache is not initialized.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
slot: Slot,
|
||||
relative_epoch: RelativeEpoch,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<&Vec<CrosslinkCommittee>, Error> {
|
||||
// If the slot is in the next epoch, assume there was no validator registry update.
|
||||
let relative_epoch = match RelativeEpoch::from_slot(self.slot, slot, spec) {
|
||||
Err(RelativeEpochError::AmbiguiousNextEpoch) => {
|
||||
Ok(RelativeEpoch::NextWithoutRegistryChange)
|
||||
}
|
||||
e => e,
|
||||
}?;
|
||||
|
||||
let cache = self.cache(relative_epoch, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(cache
|
||||
@ -367,15 +399,46 @@ impl BeaconState {
|
||||
.ok_or_else(|| Error::SlotOutOfBounds)?)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns the crosslink committees for some shard in an epoch.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note: Utilizes the cache and will fail if the appropriate cache is not initialized.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
pub fn get_crosslink_committee_for_shard(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
epoch: Epoch,
|
||||
shard: Shard,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<&CrosslinkCommittee, Error> {
|
||||
// If the slot is in the next epoch, assume there was no validator registry update.
|
||||
let relative_epoch = match RelativeEpoch::from_epoch(self.current_epoch(spec), epoch) {
|
||||
Err(RelativeEpochError::AmbiguiousNextEpoch) => {
|
||||
Ok(RelativeEpoch::NextWithoutRegistryChange)
|
||||
}
|
||||
e => e,
|
||||
}?;
|
||||
|
||||
let cache = self.cache(relative_epoch, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(cache
|
||||
.get_crosslink_committee_for_shard(shard, spec)
|
||||
.ok_or_else(|| Error::NoCommitteeForShard)?)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Return the block root at a recent `slot`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn get_block_root(&self, slot: Slot, spec: &ChainSpec) -> Option<&Hash256> {
|
||||
pub fn get_block_root(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
slot: Slot,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<&Hash256, BeaconStateError> {
|
||||
if (self.slot <= slot + spec.slots_per_historical_root as u64) && (slot < self.slot) {
|
||||
self.latest_block_roots
|
||||
.get(slot.as_usize() % spec.slots_per_historical_root)
|
||||
.ok_or_else(|| Error::InsufficientBlockRoots)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
None
|
||||
Err(Error::EpochOutOfBounds)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -476,12 +539,12 @@ impl BeaconState {
|
||||
relative_epoch: RelativeEpoch,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<usize, Error> {
|
||||
let committees = self.get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(slot, relative_epoch, spec)?;
|
||||
trace!(
|
||||
"get_beacon_proposer_index: slot: {}, committees_count: {}",
|
||||
slot,
|
||||
committees.len()
|
||||
);
|
||||
let cache = self.cache(relative_epoch, spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
let committees = cache
|
||||
.get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(slot, spec)
|
||||
.ok_or_else(|| Error::SlotOutOfBounds)?;
|
||||
|
||||
committees
|
||||
.first()
|
||||
.ok_or(Error::InsufficientValidators)
|
||||
@ -751,13 +814,14 @@ impl BeaconState {
|
||||
.ok_or_else(|| Error::UnknownValidator)?)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Process the slashings.
|
||||
/// Process slashings.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note: Utilizes the cache and will fail if the appropriate cache is not initialized.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
pub fn process_slashings(&mut self, spec: &ChainSpec) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
||||
let current_epoch = self.current_epoch(spec);
|
||||
let active_validator_indices =
|
||||
get_active_validator_indices(&self.validator_registry, current_epoch);
|
||||
let active_validator_indices = self.get_active_validator_indices(current_epoch, spec)?;
|
||||
let total_balance = self.get_total_balance(&active_validator_indices[..], spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
for (index, validator) in self.validator_registry.iter().enumerate() {
|
||||
@ -818,11 +882,12 @@ impl BeaconState {
|
||||
|
||||
/// Update validator registry, activating/exiting validators if possible.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note: Utilizes the cache and will fail if the appropriate cache is not initialized.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
pub fn update_validator_registry(&mut self, spec: &ChainSpec) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
||||
let current_epoch = self.current_epoch(spec);
|
||||
let active_validator_indices =
|
||||
get_active_validator_indices(&self.validator_registry, current_epoch);
|
||||
let active_validator_indices = self.get_active_validator_indices(current_epoch, spec)?;
|
||||
let total_balance = self.get_total_balance(&active_validator_indices[..], spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
let max_balance_churn = std::cmp::max(
|
||||
@ -867,54 +932,32 @@ impl BeaconState {
|
||||
/// Iterate through the validator registry and eject active validators with balance below
|
||||
/// ``EJECTION_BALANCE``.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
pub fn process_ejections(&mut self, spec: &ChainSpec) {
|
||||
for validator_index in
|
||||
get_active_validator_indices(&self.validator_registry, self.current_epoch(spec))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if self.validator_balances[validator_index] < spec.ejection_balance {
|
||||
self.exit_validator(validator_index, spec)
|
||||
}
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn process_ejections(&mut self, spec: &ChainSpec) -> Result<(), Error> {
|
||||
// There is an awkward double (triple?) loop here because we can't loop across the borrowed
|
||||
// active validator indices and mutate state in the one loop.
|
||||
let exitable: Vec<usize> = self
|
||||
.get_active_validator_indices(self.current_epoch(spec), spec)?
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.filter_map(|&i| {
|
||||
if self.validator_balances[i as usize] < spec.ejection_balance {
|
||||
Some(i)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
None
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
|
||||
for validator_index in exitable {
|
||||
self.exit_validator(validator_index, spec)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns the penality that should be applied to some validator for inactivity.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note: this is defined "inline" in the spec, not as a helper function.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
pub fn inactivity_penalty(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
validator_index: usize,
|
||||
epochs_since_finality: Epoch,
|
||||
base_reward_quotient: u64,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<u64, Error> {
|
||||
let effective_balance = self.get_effective_balance(validator_index, spec)?;
|
||||
let base_reward = self.base_reward(validator_index, base_reward_quotient, spec)?;
|
||||
Ok(base_reward
|
||||
+ effective_balance * epochs_since_finality.as_u64()
|
||||
/ spec.inactivity_penalty_quotient
|
||||
/ 2)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns the base reward for some validator.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note: In the spec this is defined "inline", not as a helper function.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
pub fn base_reward(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
validator_index: usize,
|
||||
base_reward_quotient: u64,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Result<u64, Error> {
|
||||
Ok(self.get_effective_balance(validator_index, spec)? / base_reward_quotient / 5)
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Return the combined effective balance of an array of validators.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Spec v0.4.0
|
||||
/// Spec v0.5.0
|
||||
pub fn get_total_balance(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
validator_indices: &[usize],
|
||||
|
@ -13,7 +13,9 @@ pub struct EpochCache {
|
||||
/// Maps validator index to a slot, shard and committee index for attestation.
|
||||
pub attestation_duties: Vec<Option<AttestationDuty>>,
|
||||
/// Maps a shard to an index of `self.committees`.
|
||||
pub shard_committee_indices: Vec<(Slot, usize)>,
|
||||
pub shard_committee_indices: Vec<Option<(Slot, usize)>>,
|
||||
/// Indices of all active validators in the epoch
|
||||
pub active_validator_indices: Vec<usize>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl EpochCache {
|
||||
@ -31,18 +33,18 @@ impl EpochCache {
|
||||
let builder = match relative_epoch {
|
||||
RelativeEpoch::Previous => EpochCrosslinkCommitteesBuilder::for_previous_epoch(
|
||||
state,
|
||||
active_validator_indices,
|
||||
active_validator_indices.clone(),
|
||||
spec,
|
||||
),
|
||||
RelativeEpoch::Current => EpochCrosslinkCommitteesBuilder::for_current_epoch(
|
||||
state,
|
||||
active_validator_indices,
|
||||
active_validator_indices.clone(),
|
||||
spec,
|
||||
),
|
||||
RelativeEpoch::NextWithRegistryChange => {
|
||||
EpochCrosslinkCommitteesBuilder::for_next_epoch(
|
||||
state,
|
||||
active_validator_indices,
|
||||
active_validator_indices.clone(),
|
||||
true,
|
||||
spec,
|
||||
)?
|
||||
@ -50,7 +52,7 @@ impl EpochCache {
|
||||
RelativeEpoch::NextWithoutRegistryChange => {
|
||||
EpochCrosslinkCommitteesBuilder::for_next_epoch(
|
||||
state,
|
||||
active_validator_indices,
|
||||
active_validator_indices.clone(),
|
||||
false,
|
||||
spec,
|
||||
)?
|
||||
@ -64,7 +66,7 @@ impl EpochCache {
|
||||
// 2. `shard_committee_indices`: maps `Shard` into a `CrosslinkCommittee` in
|
||||
// `EpochCrosslinkCommittees`.
|
||||
let mut attestation_duties = vec![None; state.validator_registry.len()];
|
||||
let mut shard_committee_indices = vec![(Slot::default(), 0); spec.shard_count as usize];
|
||||
let mut shard_committee_indices = vec![None; spec.shard_count as usize];
|
||||
for (i, slot_committees) in epoch_crosslink_committees
|
||||
.crosslink_committees
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
@ -75,7 +77,7 @@ impl EpochCache {
|
||||
for (j, crosslink_committee) in slot_committees.iter().enumerate() {
|
||||
let shard = crosslink_committee.shard;
|
||||
|
||||
shard_committee_indices[shard as usize] = (slot, j);
|
||||
shard_committee_indices[shard as usize] = Some((slot, j));
|
||||
|
||||
for (k, validator_index) in crosslink_committee.committee.iter().enumerate() {
|
||||
let attestation_duty = AttestationDuty {
|
||||
@ -93,6 +95,7 @@ impl EpochCache {
|
||||
epoch_crosslink_committees,
|
||||
attestation_duties,
|
||||
shard_committee_indices,
|
||||
active_validator_indices,
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -110,9 +113,13 @@ impl EpochCache {
|
||||
shard: Shard,
|
||||
spec: &ChainSpec,
|
||||
) -> Option<&CrosslinkCommittee> {
|
||||
let (slot, committee) = self.shard_committee_indices.get(shard as usize)?;
|
||||
let slot_committees = self.get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(*slot, spec)?;
|
||||
slot_committees.get(*committee)
|
||||
if shard > self.shard_committee_indices.len() as u64 {
|
||||
None
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
let (slot, committee) = self.shard_committee_indices[shard as usize]?;
|
||||
let slot_committees = self.get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(slot, spec)?;
|
||||
slot_committees.get(committee)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -261,13 +268,14 @@ impl EpochCrosslinkCommitteesBuilder {
|
||||
|
||||
let committees_per_slot = (self.committees_per_epoch / spec.slots_per_epoch) as usize;
|
||||
|
||||
for i in 0..spec.slots_per_epoch as usize {
|
||||
for (i, slot) in self.epoch.slot_iter(spec.slots_per_epoch).enumerate() {
|
||||
for j in (0..committees.len())
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.skip(i * committees_per_slot)
|
||||
.take(committees_per_slot)
|
||||
{
|
||||
let crosslink_committee = CrosslinkCommittee {
|
||||
slot,
|
||||
shard,
|
||||
committee: committees.remove(j),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ use ssz_derive::{Decode, Encode, TreeHash};
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Default, Clone, Debug, PartialEq, Serialize, Deserialize, Decode, Encode, TreeHash)]
|
||||
pub struct CrosslinkCommittee {
|
||||
pub slot: Slot,
|
||||
pub shard: Shard,
|
||||
pub committee: Vec<usize>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -109,10 +109,7 @@ impl TestingBeaconBlockBuilder {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let relative_epoch = RelativeEpoch::from_slot(state.slot, slot, spec).unwrap();
|
||||
for crosslink_committee in
|
||||
state.get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(slot, relative_epoch, spec)?
|
||||
{
|
||||
for crosslink_committee in state.get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(slot, spec)? {
|
||||
if attestations_added >= num_attestations {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -223,9 +223,8 @@ impl TestingBeaconStateBuilder {
|
||||
for slot in first_slot..last_slot + 1 {
|
||||
let slot = Slot::from(slot);
|
||||
|
||||
let relative_epoch = RelativeEpoch::from_slot(state.slot, slot, spec).unwrap();
|
||||
let committees = state
|
||||
.get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(slot, relative_epoch, spec)
|
||||
.get_crosslink_committees_at_slot(slot, spec)
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.clone();
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user