Correct table formatting in Lighthouse book (#4407)
This is only a minor correction to the table not properly showing up in Lighthouse book. The changes solves the formatting issue. Another change is on the link to do port-forwarding.
This commit is contained in:
parent
affea585f4
commit
2bb62b7f7d
@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ For these reasons, we recommend that you make your node publicly accessible.
|
||||
|
||||
Lighthouse supports UPnP. If you are behind a NAT with a router that supports
|
||||
UPnP, you can simply ensure UPnP is enabled (Lighthouse will inform you in its
|
||||
initial logs if a route has been established). You can also manually [set up port mappings](./advanced_networking.md) in your router to your local Lighthouse instance. By default,
|
||||
initial logs if a route has been established). You can also manually [set up port mappings/port forwarding](./advanced_networking.md/#how-to-open-ports) in your router to your local Lighthouse instance. By default,
|
||||
Lighthouse uses port 9000 for both TCP and UDP. Opening both these ports will
|
||||
make your Lighthouse node maximally contactable.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ There are two types of withdrawal credentials, `0x00` and `0x01`. To check which
|
||||
<div align="center">
|
||||
|
||||
| Number of eligible validators | Ideal scenario *n* | Practical scenario *n* |
|
||||
|-------------------------------|--------------------| ---------------------- |
|
||||
|:----------------:|:---------------------:|:----:|
|
||||
| 300000 | 2.60 | 2.63 |
|
||||
| 400000 | 3.47 | 3.51 |
|
||||
| 500000 | 4.34 | 4.38 |
|
||||
@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ There are two types of withdrawal credentials, `0x00` and `0x01`. To check which
|
||||
| 800000 | 6.94 | 7.01 |
|
||||
| 900000 | 7.81 | 7.89 |
|
||||
| 1000000 | 8.68 | 8.77 |
|
||||
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
> Note: Ideal scenario assumes no block proposals are missed. This means a total of withdrawals of 7200 blocks/day * 16 withdrawals/block = 115200 withdrawals/day. Practical scenario assumes 1% of blocks are missed per day. As an example, if there are 700000 eligible validators, one would expect a waiting time of slightly more than 6 days.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user