lighthouse/beacon_node/http_api/tests/common.rs

217 lines
7.0 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

use beacon_chain::{
2023-02-06 13:34:28 +00:00
test_utils::{BeaconChainHarness, BoxedMutator, EphemeralTestingSlotClockHarnessType},
BeaconChain, BeaconChainTypes,
};
use directory::DEFAULT_ROOT_DIR;
use eth2::{BeaconNodeHttpClient, Timeouts};
Rename eth2_libp2p to lighthouse_network (#2702) ## Description The `eth2_libp2p` crate was originally named and designed to incorporate a simple libp2p integration into lighthouse. Since its origins the crates purpose has expanded dramatically. It now houses a lot more sophistication that is specific to lighthouse and no longer just a libp2p integration. As of this writing it currently houses the following high-level lighthouse-specific logic: - Lighthouse's implementation of the eth2 RPC protocol and specific encodings/decodings - Integration and handling of ENRs with respect to libp2p and eth2 - Lighthouse's discovery logic, its integration with discv5 and logic about searching and handling peers. - Lighthouse's peer manager - This is a large module handling various aspects of Lighthouse's network, such as peer scoring, handling pings and metadata, connection maintenance and recording, etc. - Lighthouse's peer database - This is a collection of information stored for each individual peer which is specific to lighthouse. We store connection state, sync state, last seen ips and scores etc. The data stored for each peer is designed for various elements of the lighthouse code base such as syncing and the http api. - Gossipsub scoring - This stores a collection of gossipsub 1.1 scoring mechanisms that are continuously analyssed and updated based on the ethereum 2 networks and how Lighthouse performs on these networks. - Lighthouse specific types for managing gossipsub topics, sync status and ENR fields - Lighthouse's network HTTP API metrics - A collection of metrics for lighthouse network monitoring - Lighthouse's custom configuration of all networking protocols, RPC, gossipsub, discovery, identify and libp2p. Therefore it makes sense to rename the crate to be more akin to its current purposes, simply that it manages the majority of Lighthouse's network stack. This PR renames this crate to `lighthouse_network` Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
2021-10-19 00:30:39 +00:00
use http_api::{Config, Context};
use lighthouse_network::{
discv5::enr::{CombinedKey, EnrBuilder},
libp2p::{
core::connection::ConnectionId,
swarm::{
behaviour::{ConnectionEstablished, FromSwarm},
NetworkBehaviour,
},
},
rpc::methods::{MetaData, MetaDataV2},
types::{EnrAttestationBitfield, EnrSyncCommitteeBitfield, SyncState},
ConnectedPoint, Enr, NetworkGlobals, PeerId, PeerManager,
};
Enable proposer boost re-orging (#2860) ## Proposed Changes With proposer boosting implemented (#2822) we have an opportunity to re-org out late blocks. This PR adds three flags to the BN to control this behaviour: * `--disable-proposer-reorgs`: turn aggressive re-orging off (it's on by default). * `--proposer-reorg-threshold N`: attempt to orphan blocks with less than N% of the committee vote. If this parameter isn't set then N defaults to 20% when the feature is enabled. * `--proposer-reorg-epochs-since-finalization N`: only attempt to re-org late blocks when the number of epochs since finalization is less than or equal to N. The default is 2 epochs, meaning re-orgs will only be attempted when the chain is finalizing optimally. For safety Lighthouse will only attempt a re-org under very specific conditions: 1. The block being proposed is 1 slot after the canonical head, and the canonical head is 1 slot after its parent. i.e. at slot `n + 1` rather than building on the block from slot `n` we build on the block from slot `n - 1`. 2. The current canonical head received less than N% of the committee vote. N should be set depending on the proposer boost fraction itself, the fraction of the network that is believed to be applying it, and the size of the largest entity that could be hoarding votes. 3. The current canonical head arrived after the attestation deadline from our perspective. This condition was only added to support suppression of forkchoiceUpdated messages, but makes intuitive sense. 4. The block is being proposed in the first 2 seconds of the slot. This gives it time to propagate and receive the proposer boost. ## Additional Info For the initial idea and background, see: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2353#issuecomment-950238004 There is also a specification for this feature here: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/3034 Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: pawan <pawandhananjay@gmail.com>
2022-12-13 09:57:26 +00:00
use logging::test_logger;
use network::{NetworkReceivers, NetworkSenders};
use sensitive_url::SensitiveUrl;
use slog::Logger;
use std::future::Future;
use std::net::{IpAddr, Ipv4Addr, SocketAddr};
use std::sync::Arc;
use std::time::Duration;
Enable proposer boost re-orging (#2860) ## Proposed Changes With proposer boosting implemented (#2822) we have an opportunity to re-org out late blocks. This PR adds three flags to the BN to control this behaviour: * `--disable-proposer-reorgs`: turn aggressive re-orging off (it's on by default). * `--proposer-reorg-threshold N`: attempt to orphan blocks with less than N% of the committee vote. If this parameter isn't set then N defaults to 20% when the feature is enabled. * `--proposer-reorg-epochs-since-finalization N`: only attempt to re-org late blocks when the number of epochs since finalization is less than or equal to N. The default is 2 epochs, meaning re-orgs will only be attempted when the chain is finalizing optimally. For safety Lighthouse will only attempt a re-org under very specific conditions: 1. The block being proposed is 1 slot after the canonical head, and the canonical head is 1 slot after its parent. i.e. at slot `n + 1` rather than building on the block from slot `n` we build on the block from slot `n - 1`. 2. The current canonical head received less than N% of the committee vote. N should be set depending on the proposer boost fraction itself, the fraction of the network that is believed to be applying it, and the size of the largest entity that could be hoarding votes. 3. The current canonical head arrived after the attestation deadline from our perspective. This condition was only added to support suppression of forkchoiceUpdated messages, but makes intuitive sense. 4. The block is being proposed in the first 2 seconds of the slot. This gives it time to propagate and receive the proposer boost. ## Additional Info For the initial idea and background, see: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2353#issuecomment-950238004 There is also a specification for this feature here: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/3034 Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: pawan <pawandhananjay@gmail.com>
2022-12-13 09:57:26 +00:00
use store::MemoryStore;
use tokio::sync::oneshot;
use types::{ChainSpec, EthSpec};
pub const TCP_PORT: u16 = 42;
pub const UDP_PORT: u16 = 42;
pub const SEQ_NUMBER: u64 = 0;
pub const EXTERNAL_ADDR: &str = "/ip4/0.0.0.0/tcp/9000";
/// HTTP API tester that allows interaction with the underlying beacon chain harness.
pub struct InteractiveTester<E: EthSpec> {
2023-02-06 13:34:28 +00:00
pub harness: BeaconChainHarness<EphemeralTestingSlotClockHarnessType<E>>,
pub client: BeaconNodeHttpClient,
pub network_rx: NetworkReceivers<E>,
_server_shutdown: oneshot::Sender<()>,
}
/// The result of calling `create_api_server`.
///
/// Glue-type between `tests::ApiTester` and `InteractiveTester`.
pub struct ApiServer<E: EthSpec, SFut: Future<Output = ()>> {
pub server: SFut,
pub listening_socket: SocketAddr,
pub shutdown_tx: oneshot::Sender<()>,
pub network_rx: NetworkReceivers<E>,
pub local_enr: Enr,
pub external_peer_id: PeerId,
}
type Initializer<E> = Box<
dyn FnOnce(HarnessBuilder<EphemeralHarnessType<E>>) -> HarnessBuilder<EphemeralHarnessType<E>>,
>;
Enable proposer boost re-orging (#2860) ## Proposed Changes With proposer boosting implemented (#2822) we have an opportunity to re-org out late blocks. This PR adds three flags to the BN to control this behaviour: * `--disable-proposer-reorgs`: turn aggressive re-orging off (it's on by default). * `--proposer-reorg-threshold N`: attempt to orphan blocks with less than N% of the committee vote. If this parameter isn't set then N defaults to 20% when the feature is enabled. * `--proposer-reorg-epochs-since-finalization N`: only attempt to re-org late blocks when the number of epochs since finalization is less than or equal to N. The default is 2 epochs, meaning re-orgs will only be attempted when the chain is finalizing optimally. For safety Lighthouse will only attempt a re-org under very specific conditions: 1. The block being proposed is 1 slot after the canonical head, and the canonical head is 1 slot after its parent. i.e. at slot `n + 1` rather than building on the block from slot `n` we build on the block from slot `n - 1`. 2. The current canonical head received less than N% of the committee vote. N should be set depending on the proposer boost fraction itself, the fraction of the network that is believed to be applying it, and the size of the largest entity that could be hoarding votes. 3. The current canonical head arrived after the attestation deadline from our perspective. This condition was only added to support suppression of forkchoiceUpdated messages, but makes intuitive sense. 4. The block is being proposed in the first 2 seconds of the slot. This gives it time to propagate and receive the proposer boost. ## Additional Info For the initial idea and background, see: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2353#issuecomment-950238004 There is also a specification for this feature here: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/3034 Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: pawan <pawandhananjay@gmail.com>
2022-12-13 09:57:26 +00:00
type Mutator<E> = BoxedMutator<E, MemoryStore<E>, MemoryStore<E>>;
impl<E: EthSpec> InteractiveTester<E> {
pub async fn new(spec: Option<ChainSpec>, validator_count: usize) -> Self {
Self::new_with_initializer_and_mutator(spec, validator_count, None, None).await
Enable proposer boost re-orging (#2860) ## Proposed Changes With proposer boosting implemented (#2822) we have an opportunity to re-org out late blocks. This PR adds three flags to the BN to control this behaviour: * `--disable-proposer-reorgs`: turn aggressive re-orging off (it's on by default). * `--proposer-reorg-threshold N`: attempt to orphan blocks with less than N% of the committee vote. If this parameter isn't set then N defaults to 20% when the feature is enabled. * `--proposer-reorg-epochs-since-finalization N`: only attempt to re-org late blocks when the number of epochs since finalization is less than or equal to N. The default is 2 epochs, meaning re-orgs will only be attempted when the chain is finalizing optimally. For safety Lighthouse will only attempt a re-org under very specific conditions: 1. The block being proposed is 1 slot after the canonical head, and the canonical head is 1 slot after its parent. i.e. at slot `n + 1` rather than building on the block from slot `n` we build on the block from slot `n - 1`. 2. The current canonical head received less than N% of the committee vote. N should be set depending on the proposer boost fraction itself, the fraction of the network that is believed to be applying it, and the size of the largest entity that could be hoarding votes. 3. The current canonical head arrived after the attestation deadline from our perspective. This condition was only added to support suppression of forkchoiceUpdated messages, but makes intuitive sense. 4. The block is being proposed in the first 2 seconds of the slot. This gives it time to propagate and receive the proposer boost. ## Additional Info For the initial idea and background, see: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2353#issuecomment-950238004 There is also a specification for this feature here: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/3034 Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: pawan <pawandhananjay@gmail.com>
2022-12-13 09:57:26 +00:00
}
pub async fn new_with_initializer_and_mutator(
Enable proposer boost re-orging (#2860) ## Proposed Changes With proposer boosting implemented (#2822) we have an opportunity to re-org out late blocks. This PR adds three flags to the BN to control this behaviour: * `--disable-proposer-reorgs`: turn aggressive re-orging off (it's on by default). * `--proposer-reorg-threshold N`: attempt to orphan blocks with less than N% of the committee vote. If this parameter isn't set then N defaults to 20% when the feature is enabled. * `--proposer-reorg-epochs-since-finalization N`: only attempt to re-org late blocks when the number of epochs since finalization is less than or equal to N. The default is 2 epochs, meaning re-orgs will only be attempted when the chain is finalizing optimally. For safety Lighthouse will only attempt a re-org under very specific conditions: 1. The block being proposed is 1 slot after the canonical head, and the canonical head is 1 slot after its parent. i.e. at slot `n + 1` rather than building on the block from slot `n` we build on the block from slot `n - 1`. 2. The current canonical head received less than N% of the committee vote. N should be set depending on the proposer boost fraction itself, the fraction of the network that is believed to be applying it, and the size of the largest entity that could be hoarding votes. 3. The current canonical head arrived after the attestation deadline from our perspective. This condition was only added to support suppression of forkchoiceUpdated messages, but makes intuitive sense. 4. The block is being proposed in the first 2 seconds of the slot. This gives it time to propagate and receive the proposer boost. ## Additional Info For the initial idea and background, see: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2353#issuecomment-950238004 There is also a specification for this feature here: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/3034 Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: pawan <pawandhananjay@gmail.com>
2022-12-13 09:57:26 +00:00
spec: Option<ChainSpec>,
validator_count: usize,
initializer: Option<Initializer<E>>,
Enable proposer boost re-orging (#2860) ## Proposed Changes With proposer boosting implemented (#2822) we have an opportunity to re-org out late blocks. This PR adds three flags to the BN to control this behaviour: * `--disable-proposer-reorgs`: turn aggressive re-orging off (it's on by default). * `--proposer-reorg-threshold N`: attempt to orphan blocks with less than N% of the committee vote. If this parameter isn't set then N defaults to 20% when the feature is enabled. * `--proposer-reorg-epochs-since-finalization N`: only attempt to re-org late blocks when the number of epochs since finalization is less than or equal to N. The default is 2 epochs, meaning re-orgs will only be attempted when the chain is finalizing optimally. For safety Lighthouse will only attempt a re-org under very specific conditions: 1. The block being proposed is 1 slot after the canonical head, and the canonical head is 1 slot after its parent. i.e. at slot `n + 1` rather than building on the block from slot `n` we build on the block from slot `n - 1`. 2. The current canonical head received less than N% of the committee vote. N should be set depending on the proposer boost fraction itself, the fraction of the network that is believed to be applying it, and the size of the largest entity that could be hoarding votes. 3. The current canonical head arrived after the attestation deadline from our perspective. This condition was only added to support suppression of forkchoiceUpdated messages, but makes intuitive sense. 4. The block is being proposed in the first 2 seconds of the slot. This gives it time to propagate and receive the proposer boost. ## Additional Info For the initial idea and background, see: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2353#issuecomment-950238004 There is also a specification for this feature here: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/3034 Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: pawan <pawandhananjay@gmail.com>
2022-12-13 09:57:26 +00:00
mutator: Option<Mutator<E>>,
) -> Self {
let mut harness_builder = BeaconChainHarness::builder(E::default())
.spec_or_default(spec)
Enable proposer boost re-orging (#2860) ## Proposed Changes With proposer boosting implemented (#2822) we have an opportunity to re-org out late blocks. This PR adds three flags to the BN to control this behaviour: * `--disable-proposer-reorgs`: turn aggressive re-orging off (it's on by default). * `--proposer-reorg-threshold N`: attempt to orphan blocks with less than N% of the committee vote. If this parameter isn't set then N defaults to 20% when the feature is enabled. * `--proposer-reorg-epochs-since-finalization N`: only attempt to re-org late blocks when the number of epochs since finalization is less than or equal to N. The default is 2 epochs, meaning re-orgs will only be attempted when the chain is finalizing optimally. For safety Lighthouse will only attempt a re-org under very specific conditions: 1. The block being proposed is 1 slot after the canonical head, and the canonical head is 1 slot after its parent. i.e. at slot `n + 1` rather than building on the block from slot `n` we build on the block from slot `n - 1`. 2. The current canonical head received less than N% of the committee vote. N should be set depending on the proposer boost fraction itself, the fraction of the network that is believed to be applying it, and the size of the largest entity that could be hoarding votes. 3. The current canonical head arrived after the attestation deadline from our perspective. This condition was only added to support suppression of forkchoiceUpdated messages, but makes intuitive sense. 4. The block is being proposed in the first 2 seconds of the slot. This gives it time to propagate and receive the proposer boost. ## Additional Info For the initial idea and background, see: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2353#issuecomment-950238004 There is also a specification for this feature here: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/3034 Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: pawan <pawandhananjay@gmail.com>
2022-12-13 09:57:26 +00:00
.logger(test_logger())
.mock_execution_layer();
harness_builder = if let Some(initializer) = initializer {
// Apply custom initialization provided by the caller.
initializer(harness_builder)
} else {
// Apply default initial configuration.
harness_builder
.deterministic_keypairs(validator_count)
.fresh_ephemeral_store()
};
Enable proposer boost re-orging (#2860) ## Proposed Changes With proposer boosting implemented (#2822) we have an opportunity to re-org out late blocks. This PR adds three flags to the BN to control this behaviour: * `--disable-proposer-reorgs`: turn aggressive re-orging off (it's on by default). * `--proposer-reorg-threshold N`: attempt to orphan blocks with less than N% of the committee vote. If this parameter isn't set then N defaults to 20% when the feature is enabled. * `--proposer-reorg-epochs-since-finalization N`: only attempt to re-org late blocks when the number of epochs since finalization is less than or equal to N. The default is 2 epochs, meaning re-orgs will only be attempted when the chain is finalizing optimally. For safety Lighthouse will only attempt a re-org under very specific conditions: 1. The block being proposed is 1 slot after the canonical head, and the canonical head is 1 slot after its parent. i.e. at slot `n + 1` rather than building on the block from slot `n` we build on the block from slot `n - 1`. 2. The current canonical head received less than N% of the committee vote. N should be set depending on the proposer boost fraction itself, the fraction of the network that is believed to be applying it, and the size of the largest entity that could be hoarding votes. 3. The current canonical head arrived after the attestation deadline from our perspective. This condition was only added to support suppression of forkchoiceUpdated messages, but makes intuitive sense. 4. The block is being proposed in the first 2 seconds of the slot. This gives it time to propagate and receive the proposer boost. ## Additional Info For the initial idea and background, see: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2353#issuecomment-950238004 There is also a specification for this feature here: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/3034 Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: pawan <pawandhananjay@gmail.com>
2022-12-13 09:57:26 +00:00
// Add a mutator for the beacon chain builder which will be called in
// `HarnessBuilder::build`.
Enable proposer boost re-orging (#2860) ## Proposed Changes With proposer boosting implemented (#2822) we have an opportunity to re-org out late blocks. This PR adds three flags to the BN to control this behaviour: * `--disable-proposer-reorgs`: turn aggressive re-orging off (it's on by default). * `--proposer-reorg-threshold N`: attempt to orphan blocks with less than N% of the committee vote. If this parameter isn't set then N defaults to 20% when the feature is enabled. * `--proposer-reorg-epochs-since-finalization N`: only attempt to re-org late blocks when the number of epochs since finalization is less than or equal to N. The default is 2 epochs, meaning re-orgs will only be attempted when the chain is finalizing optimally. For safety Lighthouse will only attempt a re-org under very specific conditions: 1. The block being proposed is 1 slot after the canonical head, and the canonical head is 1 slot after its parent. i.e. at slot `n + 1` rather than building on the block from slot `n` we build on the block from slot `n - 1`. 2. The current canonical head received less than N% of the committee vote. N should be set depending on the proposer boost fraction itself, the fraction of the network that is believed to be applying it, and the size of the largest entity that could be hoarding votes. 3. The current canonical head arrived after the attestation deadline from our perspective. This condition was only added to support suppression of forkchoiceUpdated messages, but makes intuitive sense. 4. The block is being proposed in the first 2 seconds of the slot. This gives it time to propagate and receive the proposer boost. ## Additional Info For the initial idea and background, see: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/2353#issuecomment-950238004 There is also a specification for this feature here: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/3034 Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: pawan <pawandhananjay@gmail.com>
2022-12-13 09:57:26 +00:00
if let Some(mutator) = mutator {
harness_builder = harness_builder.initial_mutator(mutator);
}
let harness = harness_builder.build();
let ApiServer {
server,
listening_socket,
shutdown_tx: _server_shutdown,
network_rx,
..
} = create_api_server(harness.chain.clone(), harness.logger().clone()).await;
tokio::spawn(server);
let client = BeaconNodeHttpClient::new(
SensitiveUrl::parse(&format!(
"http://{}:{}",
listening_socket.ip(),
listening_socket.port()
))
.unwrap(),
Timeouts::set_all(Duration::from_secs(1)),
);
Self {
harness,
client,
network_rx,
_server_shutdown,
}
}
}
pub async fn create_api_server<T: BeaconChainTypes>(
chain: Arc<BeaconChain<T>>,
log: Logger,
) -> ApiServer<T::EthSpec, impl Future<Output = ()>> {
// Get a random unused port.
let port = unused_port::unused_tcp_port().unwrap();
create_api_server_on_port(chain, log, port).await
}
pub async fn create_api_server_on_port<T: BeaconChainTypes>(
chain: Arc<BeaconChain<T>>,
log: Logger,
port: u16,
) -> ApiServer<T::EthSpec, impl Future<Output = ()>> {
let (network_senders, network_receivers) = NetworkSenders::new();
// Default metadata
let meta_data = MetaData::V2(MetaDataV2 {
seq_number: SEQ_NUMBER,
attnets: EnrAttestationBitfield::<T::EthSpec>::default(),
syncnets: EnrSyncCommitteeBitfield::<T::EthSpec>::default(),
});
let enr_key = CombinedKey::generate_secp256k1();
let enr = EnrBuilder::new("v4").build(&enr_key).unwrap();
let network_globals = Arc::new(NetworkGlobals::new(
enr.clone(),
TCP_PORT,
UDP_PORT,
meta_data,
vec![],
&log,
));
// Only a peer manager can add peers, so we create a dummy manager.
let config = lighthouse_network::peer_manager::config::Config::default();
let mut pm = PeerManager::new(config, network_globals.clone(), &log).unwrap();
// add a peer
let peer_id = PeerId::random();
let endpoint = &ConnectedPoint::Listener {
local_addr: EXTERNAL_ADDR.parse().unwrap(),
send_back_addr: EXTERNAL_ADDR.parse().unwrap(),
};
let connection_id = ConnectionId::new(1);
pm.on_swarm_event(FromSwarm::ConnectionEstablished(ConnectionEstablished {
peer_id,
connection_id,
endpoint,
failed_addresses: &[],
other_established: 0,
}));
*network_globals.sync_state.write() = SyncState::Synced;
let eth1_service =
eth1::Service::new(eth1::Config::default(), log.clone(), chain.spec.clone()).unwrap();
let context = Arc::new(Context {
config: Config {
enabled: true,
listen_addr: IpAddr::V4(Ipv4Addr::new(127, 0, 0, 1)),
listen_port: port,
allow_origin: None,
Add TLS capability to the beacon node HTTP API (#2668) Currently, the beacon node has no ability to serve the HTTP API over TLS. Adding this functionality would be helpful for certain use cases, such as when you need a validator client to connect to a backup beacon node which is outside your local network, and the use of an SSH tunnel or reverse proxy would be inappropriate. ## Proposed Changes - Add three new CLI flags to the beacon node - `--http-enable-tls`: enables TLS - `--http-tls-cert`: to specify the path to the certificate file - `--http-tls-key`: to specify the path to the key file - Update the HTTP API to optionally use `warp`'s [`TlsServer`](https://docs.rs/warp/0.3.1/warp/struct.TlsServer.html) depending on the presence of the `--http-enable-tls` flag - Update tests and docs - Use a custom branch for `warp` to ensure proper error handling ## Additional Info Serving the API over TLS should currently be considered experimental. The reason for this is that it uses code from an [unmerged PR](https://github.com/seanmonstar/warp/pull/717). This commit provides the `try_bind_with_graceful_shutdown` method to `warp`, which is helpful for controlling error flow when the TLS configuration is invalid (cert/key files don't exist, incorrect permissions, etc). I've implemented the same code in my [branch here](https://github.com/macladson/warp/tree/tls). Once the code has been reviewed and merged upstream into `warp`, we can remove the dependency on my branch and the feature can be considered more stable. Currently, the private key file must not be password-protected in order to be read into Lighthouse.
2021-10-12 03:35:49 +00:00
tls_config: None,
allow_sync_stalled: false,
data_dir: std::path::PathBuf::from(DEFAULT_ROOT_DIR),
spec_fork_name: None,
},
chain: Some(chain.clone()),
network_senders: Some(network_senders),
network_globals: Some(network_globals),
eth1_service: Some(eth1_service),
log,
});
let ctx = context.clone();
let (shutdown_tx, shutdown_rx) = oneshot::channel();
let server_shutdown = async {
// It's not really interesting why this triggered, just that it happened.
let _ = shutdown_rx.await;
};
let (listening_socket, server) = http_api::serve(ctx, server_shutdown).unwrap();
ApiServer {
server,
listening_socket,
shutdown_tx,
network_rx: network_receivers,
local_enr: enr,
external_peer_id: peer_id,
}
}