2020-06-18 11:06:34 +00:00
|
|
|
//! Tests for gossip verification of voluntary exits, propser slashings and attester slashings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#![cfg(not(debug_assertions))]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[macro_use]
|
|
|
|
extern crate lazy_static;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use beacon_chain::observed_operations::ObservationOutcome;
|
|
|
|
use beacon_chain::test_utils::{
|
2020-08-26 09:24:55 +00:00
|
|
|
AttestationStrategy, BeaconChainHarness, BlockStrategy, BlockingMigratorDiskHarnessType,
|
2020-06-18 11:06:34 +00:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
use sloggers::{null::NullLoggerBuilder, Build};
|
|
|
|
use std::sync::Arc;
|
|
|
|
use store::{LevelDB, StoreConfig};
|
|
|
|
use tempfile::{tempdir, TempDir};
|
|
|
|
use types::test_utils::{
|
|
|
|
AttesterSlashingTestTask, ProposerSlashingTestTask, TestingAttesterSlashingBuilder,
|
|
|
|
TestingProposerSlashingBuilder, TestingVoluntaryExitBuilder,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
use types::*;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pub const VALIDATOR_COUNT: usize = 24;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lazy_static! {
|
|
|
|
/// A cached set of keys.
|
|
|
|
static ref KEYPAIRS: Vec<Keypair> =
|
|
|
|
types::test_utils::generate_deterministic_keypairs(VALIDATOR_COUNT);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type E = MinimalEthSpec;
|
2020-08-26 09:24:55 +00:00
|
|
|
type TestHarness = BeaconChainHarness<BlockingMigratorDiskHarnessType<E>>;
|
2020-06-18 11:06:34 +00:00
|
|
|
type HotColdDB = store::HotColdDB<E, LevelDB<E>, LevelDB<E>>;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn get_store(db_path: &TempDir) -> Arc<HotColdDB> {
|
|
|
|
let spec = E::default_spec();
|
|
|
|
let hot_path = db_path.path().join("hot_db");
|
|
|
|
let cold_path = db_path.path().join("cold_db");
|
|
|
|
let config = StoreConfig::default();
|
|
|
|
let log = NullLoggerBuilder.build().expect("logger should build");
|
|
|
|
Arc::new(
|
|
|
|
HotColdDB::open(&hot_path, &cold_path, config, spec, log)
|
|
|
|
.expect("disk store should initialize"),
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn get_harness(store: Arc<HotColdDB>, validator_count: usize) -> TestHarness {
|
|
|
|
let harness = BeaconChainHarness::new_with_disk_store(
|
|
|
|
MinimalEthSpec,
|
|
|
|
store,
|
|
|
|
KEYPAIRS[0..validator_count].to_vec(),
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
harness.advance_slot();
|
|
|
|
harness
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn voluntary_exit() {
|
|
|
|
let db_path = tempdir().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let store = get_store(&db_path);
|
2020-08-26 09:24:55 +00:00
|
|
|
let mut harness = get_harness(store.clone(), VALIDATOR_COUNT);
|
|
|
|
let spec = &harness.chain.spec.clone();
|
2020-06-18 11:06:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
harness.extend_chain(
|
|
|
|
(E::slots_per_epoch() * (spec.shard_committee_period + 1)) as usize,
|
|
|
|
BlockStrategy::OnCanonicalHead,
|
|
|
|
AttestationStrategy::AllValidators,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let head_info = harness.chain.head_info().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let make_exit = |validator_index: usize, exit_epoch: u64| {
|
|
|
|
TestingVoluntaryExitBuilder::new(Epoch::new(exit_epoch), validator_index as u64).build(
|
|
|
|
&KEYPAIRS[validator_index].sk,
|
|
|
|
&head_info.fork,
|
|
|
|
head_info.genesis_validators_root,
|
|
|
|
spec,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let validator_index1 = VALIDATOR_COUNT - 1;
|
|
|
|
let validator_index2 = VALIDATOR_COUNT - 2;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let exit1 = make_exit(validator_index1, spec.shard_committee_period);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First verification should show it to be fresh.
|
|
|
|
assert!(matches!(
|
|
|
|
harness
|
|
|
|
.chain
|
|
|
|
.verify_voluntary_exit_for_gossip(exit1.clone())
|
|
|
|
.unwrap(),
|
|
|
|
ObservationOutcome::New(_)
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Second should not.
|
|
|
|
assert!(matches!(
|
|
|
|
harness
|
|
|
|
.chain
|
|
|
|
.verify_voluntary_exit_for_gossip(exit1.clone()),
|
|
|
|
Ok(ObservationOutcome::AlreadyKnown)
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// A different exit for the same validator should also be detected as a duplicate.
|
|
|
|
let exit2 = make_exit(validator_index1, spec.shard_committee_period + 1);
|
|
|
|
assert!(matches!(
|
|
|
|
harness.chain.verify_voluntary_exit_for_gossip(exit2),
|
|
|
|
Ok(ObservationOutcome::AlreadyKnown)
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Exit for a different validator should be fine.
|
|
|
|
let exit3 = make_exit(validator_index2, spec.shard_committee_period);
|
|
|
|
assert!(matches!(
|
|
|
|
harness
|
|
|
|
.chain
|
|
|
|
.verify_voluntary_exit_for_gossip(exit3)
|
|
|
|
.unwrap(),
|
|
|
|
ObservationOutcome::New(_)
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn proposer_slashing() {
|
|
|
|
let db_path = tempdir().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let store = get_store(&db_path);
|
|
|
|
let harness = get_harness(store.clone(), VALIDATOR_COUNT);
|
|
|
|
let spec = &harness.chain.spec;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let head_info = harness.chain.head_info().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let validator_index1 = VALIDATOR_COUNT - 1;
|
|
|
|
let validator_index2 = VALIDATOR_COUNT - 2;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let make_slashing = |validator_index: usize| {
|
|
|
|
TestingProposerSlashingBuilder::double_vote::<E>(
|
|
|
|
ProposerSlashingTestTask::Valid,
|
|
|
|
validator_index as u64,
|
|
|
|
&KEYPAIRS[validator_index].sk,
|
|
|
|
&head_info.fork,
|
|
|
|
head_info.genesis_validators_root,
|
|
|
|
spec,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let slashing1 = make_slashing(validator_index1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First slashing for this proposer should be allowed.
|
|
|
|
assert!(matches!(
|
|
|
|
harness
|
|
|
|
.chain
|
|
|
|
.verify_proposer_slashing_for_gossip(slashing1.clone())
|
|
|
|
.unwrap(),
|
|
|
|
ObservationOutcome::New(_)
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// Duplicate slashing should be detected.
|
|
|
|
assert!(matches!(
|
|
|
|
harness
|
|
|
|
.chain
|
|
|
|
.verify_proposer_slashing_for_gossip(slashing1.clone())
|
|
|
|
.unwrap(),
|
|
|
|
ObservationOutcome::AlreadyKnown
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Different slashing for the same index should be rejected
|
|
|
|
let slashing2 = ProposerSlashing {
|
|
|
|
signed_header_1: slashing1.signed_header_2,
|
|
|
|
signed_header_2: slashing1.signed_header_1,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
assert!(matches!(
|
|
|
|
harness
|
|
|
|
.chain
|
|
|
|
.verify_proposer_slashing_for_gossip(slashing2)
|
|
|
|
.unwrap(),
|
|
|
|
ObservationOutcome::AlreadyKnown
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Proposer slashing for a different index should be accepted
|
|
|
|
let slashing3 = make_slashing(validator_index2);
|
|
|
|
assert!(matches!(
|
|
|
|
harness
|
|
|
|
.chain
|
|
|
|
.verify_proposer_slashing_for_gossip(slashing3)
|
|
|
|
.unwrap(),
|
|
|
|
ObservationOutcome::New(_)
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn attester_slashing() {
|
|
|
|
let db_path = tempdir().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let store = get_store(&db_path);
|
|
|
|
let harness = get_harness(store.clone(), VALIDATOR_COUNT);
|
|
|
|
let spec = &harness.chain.spec;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let head_info = harness.chain.head_info().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First third of the validators
|
|
|
|
let first_third = (0..VALIDATOR_COUNT as u64 / 3).collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
|
|
|
// First half of the validators
|
|
|
|
let first_half = (0..VALIDATOR_COUNT as u64 / 2).collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
|
|
|
// Last third of the validators
|
|
|
|
let last_third = (2 * VALIDATOR_COUNT as u64 / 3..VALIDATOR_COUNT as u64).collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
|
|
|
// Last half of the validators
|
|
|
|
let second_half = (VALIDATOR_COUNT as u64 / 2..VALIDATOR_COUNT as u64).collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-25 02:03:18 +00:00
|
|
|
let signer = |idx: u64, message: &[u8]| {
|
|
|
|
KEYPAIRS[idx as usize]
|
|
|
|
.sk
|
|
|
|
.sign(Hash256::from_slice(&message))
|
|
|
|
};
|
2020-06-18 11:06:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let make_slashing = |validators| {
|
|
|
|
TestingAttesterSlashingBuilder::double_vote::<_, E>(
|
|
|
|
AttesterSlashingTestTask::Valid,
|
|
|
|
validators,
|
|
|
|
signer,
|
|
|
|
&head_info.fork,
|
|
|
|
head_info.genesis_validators_root,
|
|
|
|
spec,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Slashing for first third of validators should be accepted.
|
|
|
|
let slashing1 = make_slashing(&first_third);
|
|
|
|
assert!(matches!(
|
|
|
|
harness
|
|
|
|
.chain
|
|
|
|
.verify_attester_slashing_for_gossip(slashing1.clone())
|
|
|
|
.unwrap(),
|
|
|
|
ObservationOutcome::New(_)
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Overlapping slashing for first half of validators should also be accepted.
|
|
|
|
let slashing2 = make_slashing(&first_half);
|
|
|
|
assert!(matches!(
|
|
|
|
harness
|
|
|
|
.chain
|
|
|
|
.verify_attester_slashing_for_gossip(slashing2.clone())
|
|
|
|
.unwrap(),
|
|
|
|
ObservationOutcome::New(_)
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Repeating slashing1 or slashing2 should be rejected
|
|
|
|
assert!(matches!(
|
|
|
|
harness
|
|
|
|
.chain
|
|
|
|
.verify_attester_slashing_for_gossip(slashing1.clone())
|
|
|
|
.unwrap(),
|
|
|
|
ObservationOutcome::AlreadyKnown
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
assert!(matches!(
|
|
|
|
harness
|
|
|
|
.chain
|
|
|
|
.verify_attester_slashing_for_gossip(slashing2.clone())
|
|
|
|
.unwrap(),
|
|
|
|
ObservationOutcome::AlreadyKnown
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Slashing for last half of validators should be accepted (distinct from all existing)
|
|
|
|
let slashing3 = make_slashing(&second_half);
|
|
|
|
assert!(matches!(
|
|
|
|
harness
|
|
|
|
.chain
|
|
|
|
.verify_attester_slashing_for_gossip(slashing3)
|
|
|
|
.unwrap(),
|
|
|
|
ObservationOutcome::New(_)
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
// Slashing for last third (contained in last half) should be rejected.
|
|
|
|
let slashing4 = make_slashing(&last_third);
|
|
|
|
assert!(matches!(
|
|
|
|
harness
|
|
|
|
.chain
|
|
|
|
.verify_attester_slashing_for_gossip(slashing4)
|
|
|
|
.unwrap(),
|
|
|
|
ObservationOutcome::AlreadyKnown
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
}
|