347 lines
10 KiB
Rust
347 lines
10 KiB
Rust
|
use super::*;
|
||
|
use state_processing::{
|
||
|
per_block_processing, per_block_processing::errors::ExitInvalid,
|
||
|
test_utils::BlockProcessingBuilder, BlockProcessingError, BlockSignatureStrategy,
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
use types::{BeaconBlock, BeaconState, Epoch, EthSpec, SignedBeaconBlock};
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Default validator index to exit.
|
||
|
pub const VALIDATOR_INDEX: u64 = 0;
|
||
|
// Epoch that the state will be transitioned to by default, equal to PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_PERIOD.
|
||
|
pub const STATE_EPOCH: Epoch = Epoch::new(2048);
|
||
|
|
||
|
struct ExitTest {
|
||
|
validator_index: u64,
|
||
|
exit_epoch: Epoch,
|
||
|
state_epoch: Epoch,
|
||
|
block_modifier: Box<dyn FnOnce(&mut BeaconBlock<E>)>,
|
||
|
builder_modifier: Box<dyn FnOnce(BlockProcessingBuilder<E>) -> BlockProcessingBuilder<E>>,
|
||
|
#[allow(dead_code)]
|
||
|
expected: Result<(), BlockProcessingError>,
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
impl Default for ExitTest {
|
||
|
fn default() -> Self {
|
||
|
Self {
|
||
|
validator_index: VALIDATOR_INDEX,
|
||
|
exit_epoch: STATE_EPOCH,
|
||
|
state_epoch: STATE_EPOCH,
|
||
|
block_modifier: Box::new(|_| ()),
|
||
|
builder_modifier: Box::new(|x| x),
|
||
|
expected: Ok(()),
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
impl ExitTest {
|
||
|
fn block_and_pre_state(self) -> (SignedBeaconBlock<E>, BeaconState<E>) {
|
||
|
let spec = &E::default_spec();
|
||
|
|
||
|
(self.builder_modifier)(
|
||
|
get_builder(spec, self.state_epoch.as_u64(), VALIDATOR_COUNT)
|
||
|
.insert_exit(self.validator_index, self.exit_epoch)
|
||
|
.modify(self.block_modifier),
|
||
|
)
|
||
|
.build(None, None)
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
fn process(
|
||
|
block: &SignedBeaconBlock<E>,
|
||
|
state: &mut BeaconState<E>,
|
||
|
) -> Result<(), BlockProcessingError> {
|
||
|
per_block_processing(
|
||
|
state,
|
||
|
block,
|
||
|
None,
|
||
|
BlockSignatureStrategy::VerifyIndividual,
|
||
|
&E::default_spec(),
|
||
|
)
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
#[cfg(test)]
|
||
|
fn run(self) -> BeaconState<E> {
|
||
|
let spec = &E::default_spec();
|
||
|
let expected = self.expected.clone();
|
||
|
assert_eq!(STATE_EPOCH, spec.persistent_committee_period);
|
||
|
|
||
|
let (block, mut state) = self.block_and_pre_state();
|
||
|
|
||
|
let result = Self::process(&block, &mut state);
|
||
|
|
||
|
assert_eq!(result, expected);
|
||
|
|
||
|
state
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
fn test_vector(self, title: String) -> TestVector {
|
||
|
let (block, pre_state) = self.block_and_pre_state();
|
||
|
let mut post_state = pre_state.clone();
|
||
|
let (post_state, error) = match Self::process(&block, &mut post_state) {
|
||
|
Ok(_) => (Some(post_state), None),
|
||
|
Err(e) => (None, Some(format!("{:?}", e))),
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
|
||
|
TestVector {
|
||
|
title,
|
||
|
block,
|
||
|
pre_state,
|
||
|
post_state,
|
||
|
error,
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
vectors_and_tests!(
|
||
|
// Ensures we can process a valid exit,
|
||
|
valid_single_exit,
|
||
|
ExitTest::default(),
|
||
|
// Tests three exists in the same block.
|
||
|
valid_three_exits,
|
||
|
ExitTest {
|
||
|
builder_modifier: Box::new(|builder| {
|
||
|
builder
|
||
|
.insert_exit(1, STATE_EPOCH)
|
||
|
.insert_exit(2, STATE_EPOCH)
|
||
|
}),
|
||
|
..ExitTest::default()
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
// Ensures that a validator cannot be exited twice in the same block.
|
||
|
invalid_duplicate,
|
||
|
ExitTest {
|
||
|
block_modifier: Box::new(|block| {
|
||
|
// Duplicate the exit
|
||
|
let exit = block.body.voluntary_exits[0].clone();
|
||
|
block.body.voluntary_exits.push(exit).unwrap();
|
||
|
}),
|
||
|
expected: Err(BlockProcessingError::ExitInvalid {
|
||
|
index: 1,
|
||
|
reason: ExitInvalid::AlreadyExited(0),
|
||
|
}),
|
||
|
..ExitTest::default()
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
// Tests the following line of the spec:
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// v0.11.2
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// ```ignore
|
||
|
// validator = state.validators[voluntary_exit.validator_index]
|
||
|
// ```
|
||
|
invalid_validator_unknown,
|
||
|
ExitTest {
|
||
|
block_modifier: Box::new(|block| {
|
||
|
block.body.voluntary_exits[0].message.validator_index = VALIDATOR_COUNT as u64;
|
||
|
}),
|
||
|
expected: Err(BlockProcessingError::ExitInvalid {
|
||
|
index: 0,
|
||
|
reason: ExitInvalid::ValidatorUnknown(VALIDATOR_COUNT as u64),
|
||
|
}),
|
||
|
..ExitTest::default()
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
// Tests the following line of the spec:
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// v0.11.2
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// ```ignore
|
||
|
// # Verify exit has not been initiated
|
||
|
// assert validator.exit_epoch == FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH
|
||
|
// ```
|
||
|
invalid_exit_already_initiated,
|
||
|
ExitTest {
|
||
|
builder_modifier: Box::new(|mut builder| {
|
||
|
builder.state.validators[0].exit_epoch = STATE_EPOCH + 1;
|
||
|
builder
|
||
|
}),
|
||
|
expected: Err(BlockProcessingError::ExitInvalid {
|
||
|
index: 0,
|
||
|
reason: ExitInvalid::AlreadyExited(0),
|
||
|
}),
|
||
|
..ExitTest::default()
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
// Tests the following line of the spec:
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// v0.11.2
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// ```ignore
|
||
|
// # Verify the validator is active
|
||
|
// assert is_active_validator(validator, get_current_epoch(state))
|
||
|
// ```
|
||
|
invalid_not_active_before_activation_epoch,
|
||
|
ExitTest {
|
||
|
builder_modifier: Box::new(|mut builder| {
|
||
|
builder.state.validators[0].activation_epoch = builder.spec.far_future_epoch;
|
||
|
builder
|
||
|
}),
|
||
|
expected: Err(BlockProcessingError::ExitInvalid {
|
||
|
index: 0,
|
||
|
reason: ExitInvalid::NotActive(0),
|
||
|
}),
|
||
|
..ExitTest::default()
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
// Also tests the following line of the spec:
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// v0.11.2
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// ```ignore
|
||
|
// # Verify the validator is active
|
||
|
// assert is_active_validator(validator, get_current_epoch(state))
|
||
|
// ```
|
||
|
invalid_not_active_after_exit_epoch,
|
||
|
ExitTest {
|
||
|
builder_modifier: Box::new(|mut builder| {
|
||
|
builder.state.validators[0].exit_epoch = STATE_EPOCH;
|
||
|
builder
|
||
|
}),
|
||
|
expected: Err(BlockProcessingError::ExitInvalid {
|
||
|
index: 0,
|
||
|
reason: ExitInvalid::NotActive(0),
|
||
|
}),
|
||
|
..ExitTest::default()
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
// Ensures we can process an exit from genesis.
|
||
|
valid_genesis_epoch,
|
||
|
ExitTest {
|
||
|
exit_epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
||
|
..ExitTest::default()
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
// Ensures we can process an exit from the previous epoch.
|
||
|
valid_previous_epoch,
|
||
|
ExitTest {
|
||
|
exit_epoch: STATE_EPOCH - 1,
|
||
|
..ExitTest::default()
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
// Tests the following line of the spec:
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// v0.11.2
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// ```ignore
|
||
|
// # Exits must specify an epoch when they become valid; they are not
|
||
|
// # valid before then
|
||
|
// assert get_current_epoch(state) >= voluntary_exit.epoch
|
||
|
// ```
|
||
|
invalid_future_exit_epoch,
|
||
|
ExitTest {
|
||
|
exit_epoch: STATE_EPOCH + 1,
|
||
|
expected: Err(BlockProcessingError::ExitInvalid {
|
||
|
index: 0,
|
||
|
reason: ExitInvalid::FutureEpoch {
|
||
|
state: STATE_EPOCH,
|
||
|
exit: STATE_EPOCH + 1,
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
}),
|
||
|
..ExitTest::default()
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
// Tests the following line of the spec:
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// v0.11.2
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// ```ignore
|
||
|
// # Verify the validator has been active long enough
|
||
|
// assert get_current_epoch(state) >= validator.activation_epoch + PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_PERIOD
|
||
|
// ```
|
||
|
invalid_too_young_by_one_epoch,
|
||
|
ExitTest {
|
||
|
state_epoch: STATE_EPOCH - 1,
|
||
|
exit_epoch: STATE_EPOCH - 1,
|
||
|
expected: Err(BlockProcessingError::ExitInvalid {
|
||
|
index: 0,
|
||
|
reason: ExitInvalid::TooYoungToExit {
|
||
|
current_epoch: STATE_EPOCH - 1,
|
||
|
earliest_exit_epoch: STATE_EPOCH,
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
}),
|
||
|
..ExitTest::default()
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
// Also tests the following line of the spec:
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// v0.11.2
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// ```ignore
|
||
|
// # Verify the validator has been active long enough
|
||
|
// assert get_current_epoch(state) >= validator.activation_epoch + PERSISTENT_COMMITTEE_PERIOD
|
||
|
// ```
|
||
|
invalid_too_young_by_a_lot,
|
||
|
ExitTest {
|
||
|
state_epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
||
|
exit_epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
||
|
expected: Err(BlockProcessingError::ExitInvalid {
|
||
|
index: 0,
|
||
|
reason: ExitInvalid::TooYoungToExit {
|
||
|
current_epoch: Epoch::new(0),
|
||
|
earliest_exit_epoch: STATE_EPOCH,
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
}),
|
||
|
..ExitTest::default()
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
// Tests the following line of the spec:
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// v0.11.2
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// ```ignore
|
||
|
// # Verify signature
|
||
|
// domain = get_domain(state, DOMAIN_VOLUNTARY_EXIT,
|
||
|
// voluntary_exit.epoch)
|
||
|
// signing_root = compute_signing_root(voluntary_exit, domain)
|
||
|
// assert bls.Verify(validator.pubkey, signing_root,
|
||
|
// signed_voluntary_exit.signature)
|
||
|
// ```
|
||
|
invalid_bad_signature,
|
||
|
ExitTest {
|
||
|
block_modifier: Box::new(|block| {
|
||
|
// Shift the validator index by 1 so that it's mismatched from the key that was
|
||
|
// used to sign.
|
||
|
block.body.voluntary_exits[0].message.validator_index = VALIDATOR_INDEX + 1;
|
||
|
}),
|
||
|
expected: Err(BlockProcessingError::ExitInvalid {
|
||
|
index: 0,
|
||
|
reason: ExitInvalid::BadSignature,
|
||
|
}),
|
||
|
..ExitTest::default()
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
);
|
||
|
|
||
|
#[cfg(test)]
|
||
|
mod custom_tests {
|
||
|
use super::*;
|
||
|
|
||
|
fn assert_exited(state: &BeaconState<E>, validator_index: usize) {
|
||
|
let spec = E::default_spec();
|
||
|
|
||
|
let validator = &state.validators[validator_index];
|
||
|
assert_eq!(
|
||
|
validator.exit_epoch,
|
||
|
// This is correct until we exceed the churn limit. If that happens, we
|
||
|
// need to introduce more complex logic.
|
||
|
state.current_epoch() + 1 + spec.max_seed_lookahead,
|
||
|
"exit epoch"
|
||
|
);
|
||
|
assert_eq!(
|
||
|
validator.withdrawable_epoch,
|
||
|
validator.exit_epoch + E::default_spec().min_validator_withdrawability_delay,
|
||
|
"withdrawable epoch"
|
||
|
);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
#[test]
|
||
|
fn valid() {
|
||
|
let state = ExitTest::default().run();
|
||
|
assert_exited(&state, VALIDATOR_INDEX as usize);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
#[test]
|
||
|
fn valid_three() {
|
||
|
let state = ExitTest {
|
||
|
builder_modifier: Box::new(|builder| {
|
||
|
builder
|
||
|
.insert_exit(1, STATE_EPOCH)
|
||
|
.insert_exit(2, STATE_EPOCH)
|
||
|
}),
|
||
|
..ExitTest::default()
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
.run();
|
||
|
|
||
|
for i in &[VALIDATOR_INDEX, 1, 2] {
|
||
|
assert_exited(&state, *i as usize);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|