* Set priority for eth transactions
Set the tx priority to the lowest priority in the messages.
fix unit tests
code cleanup and spec
update spec
fix go lint
add priority integration test
add python linter job
add access list tx type
fix gas limit
remove ledger tag, so no need to replace hid dependency
fix earlier check
ibc-go v5.0.0-beta1
* fix pruned node integration test
* Update x/feemarket/spec/09_antehandlers.md
Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <31522760+fedekunze@users.noreply.github.com>
* bug(feemarket): set lower bound of base fee to min gas price param)
* fix
* bug(feemarket): flag necessary improvement to integration tests, as the baseFee changes for every test
* bug(feemarket): add unit tests for CalculateBaseFee
* bug(feemarket): move integration test setup out of Describe block
* wip fix tests
* bug(feemarket): fix integration tests
* bug(feemarket): wip improve specs
* bug(feemarket): add spec concepts
* bug(feemarket): remove todo
* bug(feemarket): remove changes used for debugging in params
* bug(feemarket): remove todo in integration test
* add changelog
* address PR comments
Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <31522760+fedekunze@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add min_gas_price to feemarket params
* Add MinGasPriceDecorators
* feemarket integration tests for MinGasPrice
* Restructure integration tests
* Simplify integration tests context
We use DeliverTx context to set up the app, otherwise not all settings are initialized.
We test CheckTx with `s.app.BaseApp.CheckTx(req)`, which uses the `CheckTx` mode and context.
* Update MinGasPrice spec in feemarket module
* reorder ethermint module order for initializing genesis
* feemarket migrations for adding MinGasPrice param
* update changelog
* Additional unit tests for MinGasPrice = 0, tx gas price > 0 (PR review)
https://github.com/tharsis/ethermint/pull/1104#discussion_r884991661
* Use 0 MinGasPrice for transaction simulations
* Fix duplicate registration of feemarket GenesisState and Params (PR review)
https://github.com/tharsis/ethermint/pull/1104#issuecomment-1141893712
