Support EIP-2930 #64

New Issue

i-norden · 2021-04-15T17:47:51Z

i-norden commented

2021-04-15 17:47:51 +00:00

Firstly just assert we can index EIP-2930 txs as normal, without the additional fields/rows and with no issues in storing them as IPLDs.

Secondly, adjust the code and database schemas to decode and index the new access list.

Firstly just assert we can index EIP-2930 txs as normal, without the additional fields/rows and with no issues in storing them as IPLDs. Secondly, adjust the code and database schemas to decode and index the new access list.

i-norden commented

2021-04-27 18:32:12 +00:00

We are running into error like this until we support it: statediff.Service.WriteLoop: processing error block height=12323727 error="error creating IPLD nodes from block and receipts: wrong transaction hash computed" worker=8

This is because for 2930 txs it is not just the RLP encoded tx that is stored in the trie, but rather 0x01 || RLP(tx) so the EncodeRLP() method does not work any more and we need to use MarshalBinary().

The same is true for receipts, except we need to add the MarshalBinary() method first.

We are running into error like this until we support it: `statediff.Service.WriteLoop: processing error block height=12323727 error="error creating IPLD nodes from block and receipts: wrong transaction hash computed" worker=8` This is because for 2930 txs it is not just the RLP encoded tx that is stored in the trie, but rather `0x01 || RLP(tx)` so the `EncodeRLP()` method does not work any more and we need to use `MarshalBinary()`. The same is true for receipts, except we need to add the `MarshalBinary()` method first.

i-norden commented

2021-05-03 18:19:08 +00:00

Addressed in #68