all: skip noisy/faulty benchmarks + add b.ReportAllocs for every benchmark (#8856)
* Skips very noisy benchmarks that end up running only for b.N=1 because their entire time is spent in setup, and varying parameters doesn't change much given that the number of stores is what dominates the expense. To ensure we can provide reliable benchmarks, progressively for the project, skip these until there is a proper re-work of what the benchmarks need to do * Previously sub-benchmarks: b.Run(...) did not b.ReportAllocs() due to a faulty assumption that invoking b.ReportAllocs() at the top would be inherited by all sub-benchmarks. This change fixes that Fixes #8779 Fixes #8855 Co-authored-by: Alessio Treglia <alessio@tendermint.com> Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Alessio Treglia
mergify[bot]
parent
3954c244b6
commit
b9f3db1be8
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ func BenchmarkCoinsAdditionIntersect(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
b.ReportAllocs()
|
||||
benchmarkingFunc := func(numCoinsA int, numCoinsB int) func(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
return func(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
b.ReportAllocs()
|
||||
coinsA := Coins(make([]Coin, numCoinsA))
|
||||
coinsB := Coins(make([]Coin, numCoinsB))
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ func BenchmarkCoinsAdditionNoIntersect(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
b.ReportAllocs()
|
||||
benchmarkingFunc := func(numCoinsA int, numCoinsB int) func(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
return func(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
b.ReportAllocs()
|
||||
coinsA := Coins(make([]Coin, numCoinsA))
|
||||
coinsB := Coins(make([]Coin, numCoinsB))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user