From b81f385cc58140026a93564641e8e49e899c8c45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julien Robert Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 15:04:20 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] docs: improve voting wording (#14340) --- x/gov/README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/x/gov/README.md b/x/gov/README.md index 15ea845bcc..b1a313d5d4 100644 --- a/x/gov/README.md +++ b/x/gov/README.md @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ If a delegator does not vote, it will inherit its validator vote. * If the delegator votes after its validator, it will override its validator vote with its own. If the proposal is urgent, it is possible that the vote will close before delegators have a chance to react and - override their validator's vote. This is not a problem, as proposals require more than 2/3rd of the total voting power to pass before the end of the voting period. Because as little as 1/3 + 1 validation power could collude to censor transactions, non-collusion is already assumed for ranges exceeding this threshold. + override their validator's vote. This is not a problem, as proposals require more than 2/3rd of the total voting power to pass, when tallied at the end of the voting period. Because as little as 1/3 + 1 validation power could collude to censor transactions, non-collusion is already assumed for ranges exceeding this threshold. #### Validator’s punishment for non-voting