LaconicNetwork/cosmos-sdk
10
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases 2 Wiki Activity

docs: fix typos (#23152)

Browse Source 
Signed-off-by: oliveredget <188809800+oliveredget@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
oliveredget 2025-01-02 23:02:09 +08:00 committed by GitHub
parent 57a1437fdf
commit 87c7e5e98a
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
x/accounts/defaults/lockup/README.md
View File

@ -118,15 +118,15 @@ The spendable amount is calculated as:
`spendableAmount` = `balance` - `notBondedLockedAmount`
where `notBondedLockedAmount` = `lockedAmount` - `Min(lockedAmount, delegatedLockedAmount)`
As seen in the formula `notBondedLockedAmout` can only be 0 or a positive value when `DelegatedLockedAmount` < `LockedAmount`. Let call `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` is the `delegatedLockedAmount` when applying N slash
As seen in the formula `notBondedLockedAmount` can only be 0 or a positive value when `DelegatedLockedAmount` < `LockedAmount`. Let call `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` is the `delegatedLockedAmount` when applying N slash
1. Case 1: Originally `DelegatedLockedAmount` > `lockedAmount` but when applying the slash amount the `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` < `lockedAmount` then
* When not applying slash `notBondedLockedAmout` will be 0
* When apply slash `notBondedLockedAmout` will be `lockedAmount` - `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` = a positive amount
* When not applying slash `notBondedLockedAmount` will be 0
* When apply slash `notBondedLockedAmount` will be `lockedAmount` - `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` = a positive amount
2. Case 2: where originally `DelegatedLockedAmount` < `lockedAmount` when applying the slash amount the `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` < `lockedAmount` then
* When not applying slash `lockedAmount` - `DelegatedLockedAmount`
* When apply slash `notBondedLockedAmout` will be `lockedAmount` - `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` = `lockedAmount` - `(DelegatedLockedAmount - N)` = `lockedAmount` - `DelegatedLockedAmount` + N
3. Case 3: where originally `DelegatedLockedAmount` > `lockedAmount` when applying the slash amount still the `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` > `lockedAmount` then `notBondedLockedAmout` will be 0 applying slash or not
* When apply slash `notBondedLockedAmount` will be `lockedAmount` - `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` = `lockedAmount` - `(DelegatedLockedAmount - N)` = `lockedAmount` - `DelegatedLockedAmount` + N
3. Case 3: where originally `DelegatedLockedAmount` > `lockedAmount` when applying the slash amount still the `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` > `lockedAmount` then `notBondedLockedAmount` will be 0 applying slash or not
In cases 1 and 2, `notBondedLockedAmount` decreases when not applying the slash, resulting in a higher `spendableAmount`.