refactor(orm)!: rename table interfaces from Store -> Table in codegen (#11176)

## Description

I realize it's more intuitive to name the interfaces in codegen `FooTable` rather than `FooStore` for the type `Foo`.

Since we (and possibly others) are starting to build off of this, better to change now rather than later.

How does this change look?



---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed 
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

orm/internal/codegen/singleton.go

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ func (s singletonGen) gen() {
 
 func (s singletonGen) genInterface() {
 	s.P("// singleton store")
-	s.P("type ", s.messageStoreInterfaceName(s.msg), " interface {")
+	s.P("type ", s.messageTableInterfaceName(s.msg), " interface {")
 	s.P("Get(ctx ", contextPkg.Ident("Context"), ") (*", s.msg.GoIdent.GoName, ", error)")
 	s.P("Save(ctx ", contextPkg.Ident("Context"), ", ", s.param(s.msg.GoIdent.GoName), "*", s.msg.GoIdent.GoName, ") error")
 	s.P("}")
@@ -45,18 +45,18 @@ func (s singletonGen) genInterface() {
 }
 
 func (s singletonGen) genStruct() {
-	s.P("type ", s.messageStoreReceiverName(s.msg), " struct {")
+	s.P("type ", s.messageTableReceiverName(s.msg), " struct {")
 	s.P("table ", ormTablePkg.Ident("Table"))
 	s.P("}")
 	s.P()
 }
 
 func (s singletonGen) genInterfaceGuard() {
-	s.P("var _ ", s.messageStoreInterfaceName(s.msg), " = ", s.messageStoreReceiverName(s.msg), "{}")
+	s.P("var _ ", s.messageTableInterfaceName(s.msg), " = ", s.messageTableReceiverName(s.msg), "{}")
 }
 
 func (s singletonGen) genMethods() {
-	receiver := fmt.Sprintf("func (x %s) ", s.messageStoreReceiverName(s.msg))
+	receiver := fmt.Sprintf("func (x %s) ", s.messageTableReceiverName(s.msg))
 	varName := s.param(s.msg.GoIdent.GoName)
 	// Get
 	s.P(receiver, "Get(ctx ", contextPkg.Ident("Context"), ") (*", s.msg.GoIdent.GoName, ", error) {")
@@ -74,12 +74,12 @@ func (s singletonGen) genMethods() {
 }
 
 func (s singletonGen) genConstructor() {
-	iface := s.messageStoreInterfaceName(s.msg)
+	iface := s.messageTableInterfaceName(s.msg)
 	s.P("func New", iface, "(db ", ormTablePkg.Ident("Schema"), ") (", iface, ", error) {")
 	s.P("table := db.GetTable(&", s.msg.GoIdent.GoName, "{})")
 	s.P("if table == nil {")
 	s.P("return nil, ", ormErrPkg.Ident("TableNotFound.Wrap"), "(string((&", s.msg.GoIdent.GoName, "{}).ProtoReflect().Descriptor().FullName()))")
 	s.P("}")
-	s.P("return &", s.messageStoreReceiverName(s.msg), "{table}, nil")
+	s.P("return &", s.messageTableReceiverName(s.msg), "{table}, nil")
 	s.P("}")
 }